⏰ Reminder: Vanar Roundtable Tokenizing Work: Can AI Organisations Make Web3 Useful Again? Web3 has tokenized memes, attention, and speculation. But what happens when tokens connect to something real? Work delivered. Services completed. Reputation earned. Activity verified on-chain. Can AI Organisations finally give Web3 something meaningful to tokenize? We're bringing together builders from across AI, Web3, agentic commerce, and security to discuss exactly that. Joining us: @LLMTUNE_IO: Zakaria Tchikadze, COO, @ZTchikadze @demos_network (Demos Agentic Commerce Standard): Jacob Ortiz, Founder, @iamjacobi @QoreChain : Liviu Epure, Founder and CTO, @epure_liviu @GoPlusSecurity : Izzet Elpeze, Head of Technical Support, @0xelpeze @moonrush_space : Blazz, CMO 📅 Thursday, 15 October 2026 🕐 13:00 pm UTC 📍 X Spaces: xitter.cf/i/spaces/1wGWjlwjNyQKQ

Vanar Roundtables: Season 1, Episode 6🎙️ Tokenizing Work: Can AI Organisations make Web3 useful again? Web3 has tokenized memes, attention, and speculation. Now the question is whether it can tokenize something more meaningful: real activity, reputation, and work. For years, tokens have been connected to hype, communities, narratives, and market cycles. But AI Organisations may change what tokens can represent. What happens when an Organisation can take orders, deliver services, earn reputation, build a public track record, and prove activity on-chain? Can tokens finally connect to work being done, value being delivered, and reputation being earned? On this roundtable, we’ll explore whether AI Organisations can help move Web3 beyond speculation and create a new model where tokens are connected to execution, proof, services, reputation, and real on-chain business activity. Joining us: @LLMTUNE_IO: Zakaria Tchikadze, COO, @ZTchikadze @demos_network (Demos Agentic Commerce Standard): Jacob Ortiz, Senior AI Blockchain Architect Engineer, @iamjacobi @QoreChain : Liviu Epure, Founder and CTO, @epure_liviu @GoPlusSecurity : Izzet Elpeze, Head of Technical Support, @0xelpeze @moonrush_space : Blazz, CMO 📅 Thursday, 15 October 2026 🕐 13:00 pm UTC 📍 X Spaces: xitter.cf/i/spaces/1wGWjlwjNyQKQ

Closed source is dead. REA lets Claude Code or Codex take apart any app, all the way down to the binary, and explain exactly how a feature works. - Native apps, Electron apps, websites, APKs, firmware, even smart contract bytecode - Shows the evidence for every claim - Then builds its own version of the feature 25,000+ GitHub stars in a single day. 100% open-source. github.com/morluto/rea

Today I call upon the blockchain industry to calmly begin planning for "bunker mode". My personal recommendation is to set in motion a controlled mass migration of assets to fresh addresses, i.e. addresses whose pubkeys remain hidden behind a hash. Holders, starting with large and sophisticated ones, should consider moving the bulk of their funds to addresses that have never signed a transaction. And when they do sign one, they should also move remaining funds to a new address (possibly generated from the same seed phrase). Don't rush. While I believe there is cause for action a rushed migration would do more harm than good. Don't panic either. Moving assets to protected addresses is a simple, preventative step which does not require new cryptography or new wallets. IMO it is now reasonable to brace for the possibility that ECDSA breaks before qday, in the worst case in months not years. By "break" I mean fast private key recovery (e.g. in one week) on available hardware (e.g. a large GPU cluster). Recent days have been humbling for human mathematical intuition. Long-held, unquestioned hypotheses have fallen. This includes the n log(n) bound for integer multiplication and the 3SUM conjecture. In hindsight, May's unexpected disproof of the Erdős unit distance conjecture was our warning shot. Yesterday's OpenAI drop made it clear that mathematical superintelligence is upon us. They say there are weeks where decades happen. We are about to live through weeks where centuries of mathematical progress happen. Could our magic 64-byte ECDSA signatures be too good to be true? Was it just security through obscurity all this time? Elliptic curves feel especially vulnerable to superintelligence. Curves carry rich structure, with room for fancy tricks like Schoof, Frobenius, pairings. (By contrast, hashes are designed to minimise algebraic structure.) Separately, as Ewin Tang can attest, an efficient quantum algorithm sometimes foreshadows an efficient classical one. We should be open to the possibility of a classical counterpart to Shor that breaks elliptic curves and RSA at once. Also noteworthy is the striking under-representation of cryptographic breakthroughs among the 722 mathematical results OpenAI published. I've witnessed first-hand the US government censoring academic quantum cryptanalysis results. Backroom interventionism is my base case. I urge large, sophisticated actors to lead by example. Project11's "risq list" (bitcoin-risq-list.projecteleven[.]com) is a great tracker of exposed BTC pubkeys. Binance, Bitbank, Robinhood, Bitfinex, and Tether have an opportunity to harden their cold storage. Next month I'll address institutions in London in a live Q&A (forum.ethereuminstitutional[.]org/london-2026). Again, please do not rush. Wallets holding under 50 BTC enjoy partial cover from "Satoshi's shield", i.e. his 20K exposed addresses that hold 50 BTC each. Load-bearing signers like oracles and L2 security councils should consider rotating ECDSA pubkeys with every signed message and/or multi-signing with a hash-based schemes like SPHINCS. Exiting bunker mode safely will require post-AI cryptography. My inclination is to go all-in on hash-based cryptography and avoid structured mathematical assumptions entirely, whether from curves, lattices, or isogenies. A single battle-tested hash (e.g. from the SHA or BLAKE families) yields plausible post-AI security. The Ethereum roadmap on strawmap[.]org fully embraces hash-based cryptography with end-to-end formal verification as a response to the quantum threat. Those timelines must now be revisited and accelerated in light of mathematical superintelligence. I'll be pushing for maximum defensive acceleration.