It is strikingly different what having a full bias vs slightly more diversity of thought looks like on national television. I just finished watching media coverage of MP Jeneroux’s resignation and here were their key points and takeaway: CTV Power Play (approx 11 min segment): 1️⃣ how good of a man Janeroux is. How many panelists (con and lib) knew him and respect him. 2️⃣ there may be more to the story, but they were hesitant to make comments on it because they don’t know. 3️⃣ discussed his family and wife’s career and how hard it must be to travel back and fourth. 4️⃣ the biggest national conversation right now is this budget—to the point where the host even apologized for bringing up Janeroux’s departure—but obviously it’s the news cycle so she had to talk about it. CBC Power & Politics (approx 36 min segment): 1️⃣ conservatives treated him horribly and were threatening him “that’s no way to treat a colleague”, 2️⃣ He clearly disagrees with Pierre Poilievre’s leadership style. He made no mention of his praise of Poilievre in his statement—so that’s proof he obviously disagrees—“his choice was, I’m not gonna cross the floor because I’m unhappy with the leadership of Poilievre (because I’ve been threatened), and I can’t stay in this caucus because of how I’ve been treated. So I have to resign” 3️⃣ Pierre’s leadership doesn’t work. He lost the election he was supposed to win. He lost his seat in Ottawa which was easy to win. 4️⃣ Poilievre is 20 points behind Carney in terms of popularity “people don’t like Poilievre. He has no allies. People don’t like Poilievre—and he’s not making it easy for people to like him” and then all laughed about the struggles Poilievre is having. Why do our tax dollars pay for this? How is this acceptable?