There's no goalpost moving.
Your big gotcha is "Private citizen given proposed ownership in a company that never formed".
Or are you still going with this beauty?
xitter.cf/VVandervan/status/2115…
What is the significance of a private citizen being included in the proposed equity table of a new company?
And the Equity Table contained in the email wasn't produced until after he left office.
He had no involvement with the deal in 2015 while in office.
Keep going. You're doing wonderfully.
But that's not the point. The point is you prominently feature on your profile an asserted act of corruption, where there was no Quid Pro Quo, and Biden wasn't even in office. To you, that's a crime.
But we have real Quid Pro Quo and you try to rationalize it away.
We have a transfer of over $2B from a Emirati sheik to Trump, and an inexplicable act of lifting an embargo that was put in place for reasons of National Security.
Within days.
Quid pro Quo.
Do you think a jury would see it otherwise?
After all, you're the legal genius who developed the novel legal theory that a private citizen can be charged with being a corrupt public official even when he's not a public official.
Wow. You should get Hur on the line. You think he had evidence and Hur doesn't. But what does he know?
Just give him your credentials.
Link to the analysis.
Lesee, where do you go from here. I know! You'll discredit the study (that you only heard about moments ago) as funded by libtards and not valid.
Without ever clicking the link.
ojp.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants…
In fact, if you've risked life and limb to get here, you're far less likely to undo all of that by committing crimes. It's consistent with studies showing immigrants commit fewer crimes.
That's just common sense.
Hur admitted he didn't have the evidence. He couldn't get a conviction.
And Hur was so butthurt from failing to deliver at the pinnacle moment of his professional career, he took a dirty vindictive swing at a respectable man as his ass was being ushered back into ignominy.
"If everything is true" there's nothing wrong.
The headline is: Business offers private citizen a 10% ownership share in a company that eventually never materialized.
In contrast, we have a SITTING president being enriched by billions from a foreign interest (with connections to the CCP) followed briskly by removal of embargo that the sitting president's OWN IC says will compromise National Security.
And you're like, meh.
In summary:
In one instance, you have accused a former president of a crime where a) no money had been exchanged (the company never legally formed), b) had no quid pro quo, and b) couldn't have BECAUSE HE WAS A PRIVATE CITIZEN.
It's not an "accusation without any evidence".
It's an accusation without a crime.
THAT's the "Biden Crime Family" crime you have chosen to prominently feature on your profile.
