Pinned Tweet
Some observations on the Ode from twitter... a thread. @Bose_Memorial @FureyAndrew @JimDinn @PaulLaneMHA @BarryPetten
Yes, yes, and yes.
It is with great concern for some of my fellow countrymen, inching precariously toward the edge of utter lunacy, that I write this post.
Prime Minister Mark Carney this week, in an interview with the New York Times, went on record saying it would be “irresponsible” not to plan for the possible contingency of a military invasion of Canada by the United States. Unfortunately, Mr. Carney didn’t misspeak or fall victim to a cherry-picked quote taken out of context. His concern was later reiterated by Defence Minister David McGuinty and Artificial Intelligence Minister Evan Soloman.
We all know that Donald Trump has a colourful history of spouting off some truly outrageous whoppers from time to time, but even he has never disseminated something as fatuous, dangerous or dishonest as this. And while he seldom backs down from his outrageous claims, whenever he pushes the envelope too far, at least his entourage goes on damage control to walk back some of his excesses – Carney’s guys are doubling down.
Despite these idiotic statements, these are intelligent men. The odds that all three of them would simultaneously become afflicted by the same psychotic delusion is infinitesimally small. The only rational conclusion, therefore, is that they believe, or rather their polling data shows, that enough Canadians are so possessed by Trump Derangement that engaging in such asinine demagoguery is politically expedient.
Sadly, they may be right. The vast coalition of useful idiots and true believers after effectively having their intelligences insulted by their dear leader, are coming out of the woodwork to express gratitude online for the Prime Minister’s caution in preparing for all, including the most remote, contingencies. Others are retreating slightly to hold the line at the fall-back position articulated by Minister McGuinty that, this kind of paranoid delusion is perfectly normal and, “all militaries in the world spend time analyzing risk scenarios.”
I assure you, this is not normal.
Back on planet Earth, the situation is tense and acrimonious (and there is plenty of blame to go around for that), but this is not the more than two centuries of peace along the 49th parallel that followed the signing of the Treaty of Ghent in 1815 drawing to an end. Trump has imposed tariffs on $20 billion (or 2% of the $400 billion per year) of Canadian exports to the US. In other words, amid this unnecessary, escalatory, and foolish trade dispute, the United States will still purchase 200% more Canadian goods and services this year than the rest of the world combined. This situation is like a restaurant’s picky regular customer complaining about an overcooked steak to a prideful chef who, fortified in his own mind by the knowledge he cooked the steak perfectly, refuses to comp the entree. This is not the start of World War III. We are so far removed from a military incursion at our southern border that we may as well be strategizing the response to the equally plausible threat of Santa Claus leading an invasion of elves from the north.
If we woke up tomorrow in some parallel reality where the United States actually was contemplating a full-scale military campaign against Canada, with all due respect to our brave men and women in uniform, the only preparations to be made would be negotiating the terms of our unconditional surrender. Some brave and patriotic Canadians may refuse to submit and instead choose to conduct, as a matter of principle, a brutal and bloody guerilla warfare campaign against the strongest conventional and nuclear military force in the history of the world. Unfortunately, they would be in the precarious position of having to rely on our miserly European allies, or countries like Russia or China, whose recent actions have been significantly more hostile and provocative challenges to our sovereignty than the US tariffs, to supply us with weapons, and they would not remotely be adequate. It’s all so desperately preposterous.
But for the sake of argument, let’s suppose that Donald Trump was indeed the terrifying bogeyman haunting the dreams of the most extreme and hopeless sufferers of Trump Derangement Syndrome and its frightful sister affliction, Andrew Coyneism, a rare and especially acute form of tweet-induced psychotic maladjustment. Even in this scenario, why would Trump use the military to annex Canada? All he would have to do is offer Alberta statehood, liberation from transfer payments, excessive regulation and carbon taxes, carte blanche to exploit its natural resources, a generous welcome bonus in the form of a $100,000 tax credit to every adult Albertan and replace their Canadian dollars with equal amounts of US currency. They would effectively be acquiring Alberta for the knock-down bargain price of roughly 1x annual GDP.
Simultaneously, the US (including the newly acquired Alberta) would immediately cut off all trade with the rest of Canada. The net impact to Canada of this manoeuvre would be a cataclysmic economic collapse, while the newly composed United States would take a net GDP hit (loss of all trade with Canada, mostly offset by the acquisition of Alberta) of 0.8%. Next would come a full package of sanctions, a naval blockade, and when the rest of Canada became desperate enough, a Chinese belt-and-road style offtake of all of Canada’s resources at bargain prices, which by then, the Canadians would be desperate for. In the meantime, the US would revamp its immigration policy to recreate the brain-drain of the 1990s on steroids, welcoming the top 20% most productive Canadians to flee what had overnight become the third world. Harvard Alumnus Mark Carney might well be among those at the front of the line seeking this emigration opportunity, rejoining 91 percent of his own investments already located there.
There would, no doubt, be a fearsome contingent of Canadians refusing to bend or break in the face of American tyranny, and elbows would be flying up to vertiginous heights with such vigour that the Canadian healthcare system would be overwhelmed by millions of spontaneous emergency room visits of patriotic patients with dislocated shoulders.
I suspect many of you reading this are thinking to yourself that this is so completely far-fetched and absurd that, if serious, I must have lost my mind. Allow me to reassure you that while this is all bunk, it remains at least ten times more likely than the United States military executing a boots-on-the-ground invasion of Canada. Anyone who spends more than one second worrying about such an outcome should immediately proceed to the nearest sink to splash some cold water in their face and pull themselves together.
David Gill 🇨🇦 retweeted
Esteem and reputation are- or should be- built on demonstrable excellence. The reason this story hits so hard is because a university renowned for its elite academic credentials has publicly mismanaged those credentials. A good name, once lost, is hard to recover. Why aspire to go somewhere that does this? It's a tragedy that needs to be reversed.
Sadly, education faculties are sometimes in the front line of this kind of Ponzi scheme credentialism.
David Gill 🇨🇦 retweeted
Especially a class with challenging students. A huge number of errors are founded on this unfamiliarity. I’m staggered by the confidence some people have in their amateur opinions in this area.
David Gill 🇨🇦 retweeted
And I’m often called an optimist, although I tend to move away from that label because what I see my message is, is not so much we should look on the bright side, but rather just be aware of facts, such as that life expectancy has more than doubled, extreme poverty has been reduced from 90% of humanity to 10% of humanity, and deaths in wars are down. The fact that things have gotten better, though not perfect, does lead to some optimism—namely, if our ancestors did it and it kind of worked, sort of, better than not, then it’s not romantic, it’s not foolish, it’s not utopian to try to make things better still.
(From @singforscience with José González. Link below.)
Oh, I got caught up with him as a new teacher. It sounded so good, but worked so bad. It took me years to shake it off, kept thinking it must be me, I must have been doing it wrong. Hahaha haha 😄
NEW BLOG. Impressively wrong- why Alfie Kohn's advice on behaviour management is not good behaviourguru.blogspot.co.uk…
Look at that @GonzoBennett your mudder must be some proud!
Congratulations to our very own @GonzoBennett on his 2025 President's Award for Outstanding Teaching (Lecturers and Instructional Staff).
As a central part of our #TechEd program, Gonzo has left a lasting mark on countless educators.
Read more: gazette.mun.ca/campus-and-co…
Woohoo!
Check out these future educators getting hands-on experience with ROVs!
Students in our Tech. Ed. Program recently participated in a ROV competition to familiarize themselves with the tech & to discover how they can apply it within their own classrooms.
mun.ca/educ/programs/undergr…
David Gill 🇨🇦 retweeted
Encouraging children to take part in political activism for a cause you believe in- even if you think it’s just- is crossing the line. If we permit this then we open the door for children going to any protest, even ones you disagree with. Our job is *not* to indoctrinate them.
Kids’ school dinner protest leaves a bad taste schoolsweek.co.uk/national-e…
David Gill 🇨🇦 retweeted
You cannot make learning easy and fun or relevant all the time. Thinking is *hard*, and the effort of doing so is part of what learning is (and part of the reward).
Also a large part of what we are trying to do is to bring the unfamiliar galaxy of content to students and make it familiar.
The junk reference here to 'visual learners' is the tell here that this is unevidenced, breathless, reheated futurism that is anything but new.
This is going to revolutionize education 📚
Google just launched "Learn Your Way" that basically takes whatever boring chapter you're supposed to read and rebuilds it around stuff you actually give a damn about.
Like if you're into basketball and have to learn Newton's laws, suddenly all the examples are about dribbling and shooting. Art kid studying economics? Now it's all gallery auctions and art markets.
Here's what got me though. They didn't just find-and-replace examples like most "personalized" learning crap does. The AI actually generates different ways to consume the same information:
- Mind maps if you think visually
- Audio lessons with these weird simulated teacher conversations
- Timelines you can click around
- Quizzes that change based on what you're screwing up
They tested this on 60 high schoolers. Random assignment, proper study design. Kids using their system absolutely destroyed the regular textbook group on both immediate testing and when they came back three days later.
Every single one said it made them more confident.
The part that surprised me? They actually solved the accuracy problem. Most ed-tech either dumbs everything down to nothing or gets basic facts wrong.
These guys had real pedagogical experts evaluate every piece on like eight different measures.
Look, textbooks have sucked for centuries not because publishers are idiots, but because making personalized versions was basically impossible at scale. That just changed.
This isn't some K-12 thing either. Corporate training could work this way. Technical documentation. Professional development.
Imagine if every boring compliance course used examples from your actual job instead of generic office scenarios.
We might have just watched the industrial education model crack for the first time. About damn time.
David Gill 🇨🇦 retweeted
USC President Kim asked me for my thoughts about Charlie Kirk at USC’s Democracy Day celebration.
There’s something more important than my message in this video. It’s what you don’t hear. No heckling. No disrespect. No shouting.
I know that social media shows us the worst of humanity, and a few people celebrating a death will get more attention than hundreds of respectful people.
Don’t let these companies and the rage influencers that profit from them convince you the worst of us are the most of us. They are a tiny minority that gets too much attention because anger makes you post, repost, and like.
This was an audience of almost 500 students, and zero disrespect. That’s how most of the real world outside of the internet is. If you find yourself falling for the anger, go out in the real world and make yourself human again.
Every month, I post what I'm reading on my office door. 16 months worth here. Time to take them down and start filling the board again.
David Gill 🇨🇦 retweeted
Speech is not violence. Violence is not speech.
We must repudiate the idea that "speech can be violence" once and for all. @glukianoff and I wrote about the dangers of promoting this idea on college campuses back in 2017, in @TheAtlantic:
theatlantic.com/education/ar…
David Gill 🇨🇦 retweeted
We don’t yet know what motivated the person who shot and killed Charlie Kirk, but this kind of despicable violence has no place in our democracy. Michelle and I will be praying for Charlie’s family tonight, especially his wife Erika and their two young children.
David Gill 🇨🇦 retweeted
If you believe free speech is for you but not your political opponents, you're illiberal.
If no contrary evidence could change your beliefs, you're a fundamentalist.
If you believe the state should punish those with contrary views, you're a totalitarian.
If you believe political opponents should be punished with violence or death, you're a terrorist.
David Gill 🇨🇦 retweeted
At a time when millions across North America are grappling with the dire state of our political discourse in the wake of the horrific assassination of @charliekirk11 — it is more important than ever that our educators respect for the rule of law and recognize the value of human life. This kind of rhetoric from a @UofT professor is completely unacceptable and deeply irresponsible.
David Gill 🇨🇦 retweeted
"88 percent of the students [at NWU & U Mich) said they pretended to be more progressive than they are in order to succeed academically or socially." Such preference falsification (caused by fear of punishment for honesty) can lead to "pluralistic ignorance" or a "spiral of silence," in which everyone thinks everyone else thinks something but no one actually thinks it. nytimes.com/2025/08/21/opini…




























