Take Control Of Your Data. Join our Data Science Briefing newsletter for the best in #DataScience and #MachineLearning

Manhattan, NY
Joined February 2015
Data For Science retweeted
I'm teaching this one live on Saturday. If you're shipping LLM systems to production, come spend 3.5 hands-on hours with me.
Prototypes are easy. Production is where LLM systems go to die. This Saturday: a live 3.5-hour masterclass on production evals, RAG, agents & LLMOps — hands-on, notebooks included. Sep 12, 9:30 AM ET. Code BRUNO40 = 40% off, auto-applied: luma.com/jt8q8cpr?coupon=BRU…
2
1
186
Data For Science retweeted
Replying to @data4sci
Yes — single numbers lie. Bootstrap the difference to get a CI, and only call it real if that CI excludes zero (and you’ve checked effect size/sample size).
1
2
26
Data For Science retweeted
Replying to @data4sci
@data4sci calls LLM-as-judge without human calibration what it is. Opinion laundering. If you never checked the judge against human labels, you did not measure anything. You bought a more expensive shrug. Most internal dashboards have the same problem.
1
45
Data For Science retweeted
[2605.06394] Lecture Notes on Statistical Physics and Neural Networks — Clear lecture-style notes connecting statistical physics tools to neural network theory—useful as a structured refresher if you want the big ideas and standard derivations… arxiv.org/abs/2605.06394
23
1
168
7,306
Data For Science retweeted
Personal update: I've joined Anthropic. I think the next few years at the frontier of LLMs will be especially formative. I am very excited to join the team here and get back to R&D. I remain deeply passionate about education and plan to resume my work on it in time.
7,876
10,921
7,548
149,087
28,075,232
Data For Science retweeted
ClaudeDevs
@ClaudeDevsApr 23
Over the past month, some of you reported Claude Code's quality had slipped. We investigated, and published a post-mortem on the three issues we found. All are fixed in v2.1.116+ and we’ve reset usage limits for all subscribers.
1,848
2,534
1,549
39,263
6,499,617
Data For Science retweeted
found the original 4k+ resolution artemis ii moon photos rather than the compressed 1080p ones official government accounts have been posting and the details are absolutely spectacular images.nasa.gov
45
3,288
111
20,495
446,991
Data For Science retweeted
This watershed map of Spain shows whether a drop of water ends up in the Atlantic or in the Mediterranean. Beautiful visualization by @joewdavies.
49
958
49
5,089
386,101
Data For Science retweeted
LLM Knowledge Bases Something I'm finding very useful recently: using LLMs to build personal knowledge bases for various topics of research interest. In this way, a large fraction of my recent token throughput is going less into manipulating code, and more into manipulating knowledge (stored as markdown and images). The latest LLMs are quite good at it. So: Data ingest: I index source documents (articles, papers, repos, datasets, images, etc.) into a raw/ directory, then I use an LLM to incrementally "compile" a wiki, which is just a collection of .md files in a directory structure. The wiki includes summaries of all the data in raw/, backlinks, and then it categorizes data into concepts, writes articles for them, and links them all. To convert web articles into .md files I like to use the Obsidian Web Clipper extension, and then I also use a hotkey to download all the related images to local so that my LLM can easily reference them. IDE: I use Obsidian as the IDE "frontend" where I can view the raw data, the the compiled wiki, and the derived visualizations. Important to note that the LLM writes and maintains all of the data of the wiki, I rarely touch it directly. I've played with a few Obsidian plugins to render and view data in other ways (e.g. Marp for slides). Q&A: Where things get interesting is that once your wiki is big enough (e.g. mine on some recent research is ~100 articles and ~400K words), you can ask your LLM agent all kinds of complex questions against the wiki, and it will go off, research the answers, etc. I thought I had to reach for fancy RAG, but the LLM has been pretty good about auto-maintaining index files and brief summaries of all the documents and it reads all the important related data fairly easily at this ~small scale. Output: Instead of getting answers in text/terminal, I like to have it render markdown files for me, or slide shows (Marp format), or matplotlib images, all of which I then view again in Obsidian. You can imagine many other visual output formats depending on the query. Often, I end up "filing" the outputs back into the wiki to enhance it for further queries. So my own explorations and queries always "add up" in the knowledge base. Linting: I've run some LLM "health checks" over the wiki to e.g. find inconsistent data, impute missing data (with web searchers), find interesting connections for new article candidates, etc., to incrementally clean up the wiki and enhance its overall data integrity. The LLMs are quite good at suggesting further questions to ask and look into. Extra tools: I find myself developing additional tools to process the data, e.g. I vibe coded a small and naive search engine over the wiki, which I both use directly (in a web ui), but more often I want to hand it off to an LLM via CLI as a tool for larger queries. Further explorations: As the repo grows, the natural desire is to also think about synthetic data generation + finetuning to have your LLM "know" the data in its weights instead of just context windows. TLDR: raw data from a given number of sources is collected, then compiled by an LLM into a .md wiki, then operated on by various CLIs by the LLM to do Q&A and to incrementally enhance the wiki, and all of it viewable in Obsidian. You rarely ever write or edit the wiki manually, it's the domain of the LLM. I think there is room here for an incredible new product instead of a hacky collection of scripts.
2,938
7,389
2,213
61,015
21,982,036
Data For Science retweeted
God Speed Artemis II I’ve waited 57 years to see this again. It was a Saturn V last time. Good Luck Integrity and her crew.
1
3
234
Data For Science retweeted
When I got interested in computer programming in the 90s, there were no programming books in my country. I had to wait for our yearly family vacation. We'd connect through London and I'd rush to Oxford Street to buy whatever books I could. A few minutes, once a year, to decide what I'd study for the next 12 months. And they had to fit in my 20kg luggage. Now education is free and accessible to everyone. Anyone with motivation can learn whatever they want. What a revolution!
I’m going to tell you how much worse it was at the start of the PC Revolution for white collar workers trying to adapt, vs today with AI Today, presumably every white collar worker has access to a smart phone and/or a PC/laptop. Back then, a PC cost $4,995 , an off brand was $3,995. 5k in 1984 is about $16k today. It was really expensive. The only reason I could learn how to code and support software is because my job let me take home a PC to learn. By reading the software manual. Literally. RTFM. Or pay to go to training. Classes that started at hundreds of dollars then. It was expensive. It absolutely limited who could get ahead. Today, ANYONE can go to their browser, to the AI LLM website of their choice, and type in the words “I’m a novice with zero computer background, teach me how to create an agent that reads my email and …” That concept applies to LEARNING ANYTHING Think about what this means. Any employee of any company can say “ I need to learn how to xyz for my job , which is to do the following: Tell me what more information do you need to help me be more efficient, productive and promotable”. Or “ what new skills can you teach me that will help me reduce my chances of getting laid off “. Or “what suggestions do you have for me to communicate to my boss, who I barely know, to help my chances of staying employed “ These aren’t great prompts. But they are a start that anyone can take. Think about how incredible that is. Back in the day was so much harder for white collar workers. It was harder for new grads because unless they took comp sci, they probably had never used a PC. Big Companies are going to cut jobs. No question about it. Small companies is are going to need more and more AI literate thinkers who can help them compete or get an edge What I tell every entrepreneur, and it’s more crucial today. “ when you run with the elephants there are the quick and the dead. Adopt tech quickly , you can out maneuver big companies. “
37
13
4
336
38,437
Data For Science retweeted
This seems interesting
Google's Gemini is powerful — but getting it into production? That's where Vertex AI comes in. March 18: API basics → multimodal apps → production deployment on GCP. 👉 learning.oreilly.com/live-ev…
1
1
1
301
Data For Science retweeted
This week @TheLancet cover and link to their accompanying editorial thelancet.com/journals/lance…
109
1,894
100
3,870
203,639
Replying to @sahilkapur
A reckoning for what, a$$hole? For the best post-Covid economy in the world? For the quick reduction in the Covid-induced inflation & unemployment? For the amazing bills that got passed despite the razor thin majority? For the restored int’l respect? FOR WHAT???
1
5
37
425
Data For Science retweeted
Claude = Tensorflow Clawd = PyTorch
2
12
2,905
Data For Science retweeted
Boris Cherny
@bchernyJan 27
Replying to @karpathy
As always, a very thoughtful and well reasoned take. I read till the end. I think the Claude Code team itself might be an indicator of where things are headed. We have directional answers for some (not all) of the prompts: 1. We hire mostly generalists. We have a mix of senior engineers and less senior since not all of the things people learned in the past translate to coding with LLMs. As you said, the model can fill in the details. 10x engineers definitely exist, and they often span across multiple areas — product and design, product and business, product and infra (@jarredsumner is a great example of the latter. Yes, he’s blushing). 2. Pretty much 100% of our code is written by Claude Code + Opus 4.5. For me personally it has been 100% for two+ months now, I don’t even make small edits by hand. I shipped 22 PRs yesterday and 27 the day before, each one 100% written by Claude. Some were written from a CLI, some from the iOS app; others on the team code largely with the Claude Code app Slack or with the Desktop app. I think most of the industry will see similar stats in the coming months — it will take more time for some vs others. We will then start seeing similar stats for non-coding computer work also. 3. The code quality problems you listed are real: the model over-complicates things, it leaves dead code around, it doesn’t like to refactor when it should. These will continue improve as the model improves, and our code quality bar will go up even more as a result. My bet is that there will be no slopcopolypse because the model will become better at writing less sloppy code and at fixing existing code issues; I think 4.5 is already quite good at these and it will continue to get better. In the meantime, what helps is also having the model code review its code using a fresh context window; at Anthropic we use claude -p for this on every PR and it catches and fixes many issues. Overall your ideas very much resonate. Thanks again for sharing. ✌️
161
424
106
7,011
1,335,589
Data For Science retweeted
There's an AI coding approach that lets you run seriously long-running AI agents (hours, days) that ship code while you sleep. I've tried it, and I'm not going back. It's the Ralph Wiggum approach. Here it is in a nutshell: Run a coding agent with a clean slate, again and again until a stop condition is met. The Bash Script Running ralph involves a single bash script. 1. Set up a bash for loop that runs a set number of times, let's say 10. You choose a finite number to prevent the agent running infinitely. 2. Inside the loop, you get the coding agent (Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex etc) to work on a single feature in the repo until that single feature is done. You prompt it to say "if, after implementing, there is no further work to be done, reply with COMPLETE. 3. Check for COMPLETE inside the loop and exit early if it exists. The Stop Condition How does the LLM know when to emit COMPLETE? There are multiple approaches: - Raw Prompting: Just pass a very clear stop condition to the prompt inside the bash loop. "The job is complete when X conditions are met" - TODO list: Give the agent a TODO list to complete - PRD: My preferred approach, explained below Progress Reports In your prompt, you MUST tell the agent to commit its work, and append its progress to a local progress.txt file. Committing its work allows future agents to navigate what was done via the git history. The progress.txt is a standard long-running agent practice. Feed it in to the agent via the prompt, and use the verb 'append' to make sure it doesn't update previous entries. Keep CI Green Each commit MUST pass all tests and types. This means you have to prompt the agent to run typechecks and tests on each commit. If you don't do this, you're hamstringing future agent runs with bad code, and they'll need to bisect to find bugs. Super nasty. This means that building really healthy feedback loops is CRITICAL to Ralph's success. The PRD Two problems immediately emerge with Ralph. The first is that the agent picks tasks which are too large. They don't scope the amount of work correctly and they try things which are too ambitious. This means they run out of context window and just end up failing. The second is that the agent doesn't know when to stop. To solve this, I use a PRD-based approach that formalizes the work I want Ralph to complete in a list of user stories. It's a mix of a PRD and a TODO-list, where the PRD is a JSON file of user stories with 'passes: false'. I then prompt the agent to pick the highest priority feature, and ONLY work on that feature. It then updates the passing status of the relevant PRD item at the end. This scopes it down extremely effectively, meaning it utilizes only a small part of its context window, and thus isn't swamped by context rot. Summary - Bash script - JSON-based PRD - progress.txt - Keep CI green - Feedback loops You'll have an AI coding setup that can ship while you kip.
130
143
32
2,470
207,019
Being a college instructor makes you woke, but not for the reasons people think. It's because students come in all kinds. Some are trans, some are gay, some are Black, some are Jewish, some are foreign, some are rural. Some have disabilities, housing insecurity, mental health challenges. And yes, some are Christian and some are Republican. Over the weeks and months of class time, things happen. Parents die. Grandparents die. Students fall pregnant mid-semester. You aren't their parent, and they aren't your kids. But you're sort of their parent, and they're sort of your kids. They're young people figuring things out. Your job is to nurture their intellectual development. But they're young and human, which means they can't cleanly separate the intellectual from the emotional. So neither can you. An encouraging word, a moment of sympathy for loss or struggle. That's part of the job too. The assessments must and should be objective, but to be a truly effective educator, everything before that can't be. Each person needs something different to be fully their best. So you end up a little woke. You realize that frameworks and procedures can't be one-size-fits-all. They need to accommodate the full spectrum of humanity, because humanity isn't all one thing.
254
531
52
3,889
157,254
The great sin of our age is incuriosity. People are not motivated to learn, they are not motivated to pursue knowledge. We need a generation of students that are hyper-literate, a generation that rejoices in reading. If there's any hope for the future, it begins in the library.
30
480
25
3,879
112,066