filthy crypto junkie

Palagruža
Joined April 2014
I once sold a truck to a guy who called and agreed to pay full price as long as I brought it to the airport within the hour. It was incredibly sus, but my truck had been for sale for months, and I had grown desperate. So I went. It only got weirder. The moment I arrive he hops in the drivers seat for a test drive, and a run to the bank to get the money to buy it. He’s a freakishly large porcine fellow, adorned head to toe in dirty work clothes. He looked like Hagrid if he were an alcoholic with a the world’s most unionized construction job. We get to chatting on the drive. Work, life, conspiratorial ramblings, Donald Trump, Pakis. The usual, if you know this type of guy. I come to learn he needed to buy my truck to get home. He had bought a one way plane ticket to come buy a different one, but had been ghosted by the seller when he landed. He was stranded at an airport on the other side of the country with no other plan. So I thought, “well maybe I know the guy who ghosted him. Let me see if I can help.” I asked to see his phone to read his FB Marketplace message with the seller. He had been talking to some guy with Broken English and a vaguely middle eastern sounding name for several days now. The guy was selling an incredibly desirable truck for 30% below market. A virtually impossible deal. The vehicular equivalent of a horny singles in your area add on a porn site. He turned to me and said “y’know, his listing says the truck is about an hour from here, maybe I should go look for him.” I said “bro I’m looking at his profile, he has this same truck listed in every city in North America. The plate in the photos isn’t even from our state. This truck is spammed hundreds of times across marketplace.” To which he replied, “yeah I thought that was weird. I think it’s a glitch.” “No it’s not a glitch… you didn’t send him money did you?” I asked, fearing the answer. “Yeah I sent him a money, otherwise he was gonna sell it to another guy.” I winced. “how much?” “Five thousand bucks.” “……okay.” “Well let’s look him up, we have his name.” He replies confidently. “Look him up where?” I ask. “Facebook” “I’m looking at his Facebook. It’s not real.” Just then we arrive at the bank, he parks my 2500HD in the handicap spot at a 45 degree angle. I say maybe we should pick a different spot, he tells me he isn’t picky. We set up the wire transfer, he makes a disparaging remark about brown people to the teller. She frowns, she is brown. The money luckily still gets sent. And he takes off in the truck. Hours later he calls me from the middle of nowhere. He had decided to fuck with the aftermarket tuner while driving and bricked it. He was stranded. I don’t think all you xitter users realize just how difficult the modern world already is for an 85IQ person to navigate. With 53% of youtube shorts views now coming from AI content, these people are about to be thrust into a completely incomprehensible dream realm forever.
Bricklayer, 49, travels 1,200 miles for dream girl - only to discover she's AI-generated trib.al/3CcGOfk
315
2,069
81
49,683
2,760,831
WHO DESTROYED FRANCE? 🇫🇷 Yes. EVERYONE did. 1. Emmanuel Macron, a man who thinks he's Jupiter but governs like a McKinsey intern who accidentally became emperor. He promised a French Renaissance and delivered a complete disaster. His solution to every catastrophe is another speech about the future of Europe. 2. The ENA Elite, Sciences Po, and the Grandes Écoles, the world's most sophisticated factories for producing highly educated incompetence. They can explain the collapse of French industry in seventeen PowerPoint presentations without ever having entered a factory. They invented a system where the same people run the state, destroy it, and then get promoted to investigate what went wrong. 3. François Hollande, the socialist who declared war on finance and then appointed Emmanuel Macron economy minister. His presidency was so spectacularly mediocre that even his own party eventually pretended not to know him. He managed to make political paralysis look like an exhausting full-time occupation. 4. Jacques Chirac, who promised reform, encountered a demonstration, and immediately discovered the virtues of doing absolutely nothing. He spent twelve years as president shaking hands with farmers while the national debt continued its agricultural expansion. His greatest political achievement was making immobility look presidential. 5. François Mitterrand, who tried socialism in 1981, and discovered economic reality in 1983. He nationalized companies, reversed course, and built a pyramid at the Louvre. Appropriate architecture for a president who occasionally treated the French economy like a pharaoh's burial chamber. 6. The Socialist Left, which believes money grows on government decrees. Their economic model consists of taxing the rich, subsidizing the poor, employing the middle class in public administration, and borrowing whatever remains. When the money runs out, they accuse arithmetic of being fascist. 7. The French Trade Unions, which defend public services by making sure nobody can use them. They stop trains to save the railways, close schools to defend education, and block refineries to protect purchasing power. Their greatest contribution to French productivity is ensuring that nobody produces anything without their permission. 8. The French Right, which has spent forty years promising to reduce public expenditure, reform the state, restore authority, and liberate the economy. Then it wins an election, appoints seventeen ministers, creates four administrative agencies, and discovers that cutting public expenditure might upset somebody. French conservatives defend free enterprise in speeches and administrative regulation in practice. They want a smaller state, provided nobody removes their subsidies, pensions, privileges, public contracts, or favorite government department. Their economic program was essentially socialism with better tailoring. 9. The French Boomers, who inherited affordable housing, expanding industries, and economic growth, then converted everything into pensions and real estate. They bought apartments for the price of a used Peugeot and now explain to young people that homeownership requires sacrifice. They spent their youth demanding revolution and their retirement demanding that absolutely nothing change. 10. Pétain and Vichy, who responded to the greatest military humiliation in modern French history by deciding that collaboration with the occupier was an excellent national recovery strategy. France had already lost the war. Pétain somehow found a way to make losing considerably more embarrassing. 11. The French Generals of 1940, who built the Maginot Line and apparently forgot to tell the Germans they were supposed to attack it. They prepared brilliantly for the First World War, only to discover that the enemy had inconveniently arrived in the Second. 12. The Republican Idealists, who believe France isn't a country but a philosophical concept. Other nations build institutions. France proclaims Values. When schools fail, they organize republican ceremonies. When public order collapses, they deliver speeches about citizenship. When reality contradicts their principles, reality is clearly insufficiently republican. 13. Saint-Simon, Fourier, Cabet, and the French Utopian Socialists, who looked at humanity and decided the problem was insufficient central planning. Fourier imagined communities organized around human passions. Saint-Simon dreamed of society directed by enlightened productive elites. Their descendants now occupy French ministries, designing national happiness through administrative circulars. Two centuries later, the happiness is still missing, but the paperwork is magnificent. 14. The French Revolution, which promised Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, then introduced mass executions, revolutionary tribunals, civil war, and political terror. The revolutionaries liberated France from monarchy, discovered that citizens disagreed about liberty, and began executing one another. France has spent two centuries celebrating this as the birth of political enlightenment. Apparently, mass killing becomes progressive when accompanied by the correct slogans. 15. The Enlightenment, Libertinism, and the Marquis de Sade, who began by liberating humanity from superstition and ended by demonstrating that intellectual sophistication is no guarantee against moral insanity. Voltaire mocked religious authority, Rousseau dreamed of remaking society, and Sade turned transgression into an entire literary industry. Their descendants now believe that every inherited institution is oppressive and every new social experiment is automatically progress. 16. The English, who spent centuries sabotaging French ambitions, financing France's enemies, and preventing French domination of Europe. The Hundred Years' War was essentially a prolonged British property dispute conducted on French territory. Every time France attempted to become a continental superpower, England appeared with a navy, a coalition, and a remarkably enthusiastic willingness to pay somebody else to fight. 17. The Habsburgs, who surrounded France with territories acquired through marriage, inheritance, and a family tree resembling a biological experiment conducted without ethical supervision. They conquered half of Europe through weddings while French kings bankrupted themselves trying to escape the encirclement. The Habsburgs invented geopolitical domination through matrimonial administration. 18. The English, Again, because centuries of warfare were apparently insufficient. After defeating Napoleon, they conquered global commerce, international finance, and eventually the English language conquered French business. Today, French executives speak English to other French executives in Paris. England finally conquered France without deploying a single soldier. 19. The Romans, who conquered Gaul, introduced taxation, centralized administration, and the idea that provincial populations should be governed by distant officials convinced of their intellectual superiority. Two thousand years later, Paris continues to administer France like a Roman governor collecting taxes from barbarians. Rome collapsed. French bureaucracy survived. Live like Rome, die like Rome. 20. Darth Vader, the ultimate French technocrat. He believed every problem could be solved through centralization, intimidation, and an enormous publicly funded megaproject. His Death Star was essentially the French Ministry of Finance equipped with a superlaser. It cost a fortune, concentrated all power in one place, and exploded because nobody listened to the engineers. 21. Saruman and Sauron, the spiritual ancestors of French industrial planning and European centralization. Saruman wanted to replace forests with factories. Sauron wanted to unite the continent under one supreme administrative authority. Both believed that enough central planning could overcome reality. Both were eventually defeated by small provincial creatures who refused to follow instructions. 22. Satan, who has reportedly retired from corrupting France because the competition has become unbearable. He spent centuries encouraging pride, vanity, envy, and destructive political passions, only to discover that French politicians could produce the same results without supernatural assistance. He applied for a position at the Ministry of Finance but was rejected for insufficient administrative experience. And the French people? They have spent more than two centuries overthrowing kings, emperors, republics, governments, and presidents, convinced that the next political arrangement would finally solve everything. They have tried absolute monarchy, constitutional monarchy, revolutionary dictatorship, empire, parliamentary republics, presidential republicanism, socialism, liberalism, conservatism, and technocracy. Every generation announces that France needs a revolution. Every revolution promises to put an end to the failures of the previous regime. And every new regime eventually discovers that it has inherited THE FRENCH.
153
384
102
1,656
121,903
The manipulated man by esther collar. It’s a bit long. lol. MEN ARE NOT THE OPPRESSORS. MEN ARE THE ONES BEING EXPLOITED. Esther Vilar exposed this in 1971 and they wanted her dead for it. A woman attacked her on live TV. That's how dangerous the truth was. Here is her thesis, without the sugar coating: A man is born with one purpose — to serve. He is trained from childhood. Be strong. Don't cry. Work hard. Make money. Protect her. Provide for her. Die for her. If you do all of that, you might be called a "real man." If you don't, you are nothing. A failure. A bum. Not a man at all. He spends 40 years breaking his back. In construction, in mines, on oil rigs, in wars. He comes home broken, with a paycheck that is never his. It goes to her house. Her kids. Her lifestyle. Her security. And she has the audacity to call him her oppressor. Think about it. What oppressor works 12 hours a day so the oppressed can stay home? What oppressor is told to go down with the ship while the oppressed gets the lifeboat? What oppressor pays for a house he doesn't own, for kids that will be taken from him, for a lifestyle that will be used as evidence that he was "controlling" her? Vilar said women have 3 weapons and they never fail: *1. PRAISE:* "You're such a good provider, honey." Translation: Keep working, slave. *2. PRESSURE:* Nagging, guilt, tears, silent treatment until he obeys. *3. WITHHOLDING:* Intimacy becomes a transaction. He gets it when he behaves. He loses it when he doesn't. Like training a dog. She doesn't want equality. Equality would mean she carries the bricks. She works the sewers. She dies in the wars. She asks you out. She pays for the date. She splits rent 50/50 without complaint. She doesn't want that. No woman ever wanted that. What she wants is a comfortable master. A man strong enough to provide, dumb enough to believe he is in charge. A man who pays for her freedom while calling himself free. Love? Marriage? Vilar said those were invented by women to lock down a provider for life. He thinks he chose her. No. She chose him. She audited his future income and gave him permission to serve her. The system is rigged. He loses his kids in court and pays her to raise them. He loses his house and pays her to live in it. He loses his health and is told to "man up." And if he complains, he is called toxic, weak, insecure. The most exploited animal on this planet is the man who believes his worth is measured by how much he can provide for a woman who secretly despises him. Vilar's solution was brutal and true: The only free man is the man who no longer seeks female validation. The moment you stop needing her praise, her approval, her body you become ungovernable. You work for yourself. You live for yourself. You keep what is yours. Until then, you are not a man. You are a resource. A utility. A wallet with a pulse. *MEN WERE NEVER THE OPPRESSORS. MEN ARE THE EXPLOITED CLASS.*
what controversial opinion will have you in this position?
86
1,113
70
4,057
78,097
The man standing next to Donald Trump is Mike Caruso, currently on trial for urinating in his 3 year old grandson's mouth.
2,653
20,558
1,434
71,090
2,024,909
Ovo im treba stalno nabijati na nos kad krenu sa svojim "mi se branili" sranjima
Nothing more Serbian than destroying Christian heritage. Serbs are closer to islamists than Orthodox at this point.
1
14
Nothing more Serbian than destroying Christian heritage. Serbs are closer to islamists than Orthodox at this point.
23
45
6
314
12,171
b3n1k retweeted
Replying to @hidings0l0
The more exposure to danger, poverty, death, and injury stokes the human desire to procreate. Look up: -The Universe 25 Experiment -Birth rates in dangerous and impoverished countries -Rates of infidelity for jobs that are exposed to human suffering, violence, death (police, medical, military, etc.)
7
22
1
687
150,852
Prvom Vlada organizira derneke a nad drugima se zgraza. Srbe u Jasenovac i Ubij Srbina normalizirano do krajnjih granica.
4
52
692
Partizanska povijest Hajduka je bolna i nadaleko poznata. Negirati ju znači negirati klub za koji navijaš, a promicati onu suprotnu, ustašku, znači taj klub mrziti. Torcida je klub mrzitelja Hajduka
12
7
2
123
2,140
Žalosti me što Vlada osuđuje stare hrvatske povike i pjesme po Splitu Ne uviđa se dvostruki kontekst. I rekontekstualizacija. Tužno.
1
21
407
I sad zamisli ja ocu nakon 16godina odvest oca na utakmicu i ne mogu jer ti recimo UEFA dode i zabrani gledatelje jer se krezubi retardi uzive u neandretalce i sjebu nesto sto milijun ljudi ceka ne znam vec koliko. Sramota, klub se od ovog mora ograditi!
8
8
299
6,904
Jebo vas raspali čiča Draža i njegovi ordeni. Demistifikacija ovih budalaština počinje povijesnim činjenicama koja pokazuju da ta odlikovanja nisu bila nikakav dokaz antifašizma ili vojne zasluge na terenu, već proizvod puke geografsko-političke obmane, potpune neobavještenosti zapadnih saveznika i kasnijih hladnoratovskih kalkulacija. Prvi orden je francuski Ratni krst dodijeljen 1943.godine je produkt neznanja i De Golove izolacije. Početkom 1943. godine, de Gol i njegov pokret Slobodna Francuska nalazili su se u izbjeglištvu u Londonu i Sjevernoj Africi, bez sopstvene obavještajne mreže na Balkanu. De Gol nije imao nikakve direktne informacije sa terena u Jugoslaviji, već se samo oslanjao na izvještaje sa početka rata i tvrdnje kraljevske vlade u izbjeglištvu. Orden je dodijeljen u momentu kada je zapadna diplomatija još uvek po automatizmu slala priznanja predratnim oficirima država članica anti-hitlerovske koalicije. Onog trenutka kada su britanski oficiri na terenu, poput misije Vilijama Dejkina i Ficroja Maklina, poslali neoborive dokaze da se četnici ne bore protiv Nemaca već s njima sarađuju i ubijaju članove pokreta otpora, sopstveni narod, Hrvate i muslimane, De Golov gest postao je tek beznačajni istorijski anahronizam. Drugi orden je poljski Virtuti Militari također iz 1943.godine je samo simbolički gest izbegličke diplomatije. Poljska vlada u Londonu dala je ovo odlikovanje na osnovu lokalnih kontakata u Homolju, gdje su se nalazili odbjegli poljski zarobljenici. Poljaci, koji su u tom trenutku bili u dubokom sukobu sa SSSRom, u svakom antikomunističkom pokretu vidjeli su potencijalnog saveznika. Ovo odlikovanje nije imalo nikakvu vojnu težinu niti je predstavljalo priznanje za borbu protiv nacizma u globalnom smislu, već je bilo isključivo unutrašnji politički i diplomatski manevar jedne izbjegličke vlade bez realne vlasti. Treći orden je američka Legija zasluga iz 1948.godine je apsolutno pragmatični trofej Hladnog rata i tajni uslužni čin koji nije dodijeljen za borbu protiv fašizma, već za konkretnu tehničku uslugu spašavanja oborenih američkih pilota u operaciji Halijard. Amerikancima je to bila čista transakcija, četnici su spasili pilote kako bi obezbijedili zapadnu podršku i odskočnu dasku za preživljavanje. Pošto od podrške nije bilo ništa, SAD su se odužile ordenom. Najvažnije kod ovog ordena je da je on zbog sramote izdat u strogoj tajnosti i decenijama čuvan u sefu State Departmenta. Da je Truman zaista vjerovao da je Draža bio antifašistički heroj, orden bi bio dodeljen javno. SAD su bile svjesne četničke izdaje i kolaboracije i nisu željele kompromitaciju u javnosti, ali su u osvitu Hladnog rata željele i da pošalju simboličan signal protiv novouspostavljenog komunističkog bloka. Orderi i medalje ne mijenjaju povijesne činjenice sa terena i ne mogu poništiti operativne paktove, snabdijevanje municijom od strane Vermahta i Italijana, te masovna ubistva u operacijama protiv sopstvenog naroda i članova pokreta otpora u sadejstvu sa Ustašama. Ova odlikovanja nisu potvrdila antifašistički karakter četničkog pokreta, ona su samo pokazala koliko su zapadne sile bile spora i proračunata diplomatija koja je odlikovanja dijelila na osnovu poluinformacija, geografske udaljenosti i hladnoratovskih interesa.
Replying to @Svimasamdavala
Francuski Ratni krst 2. februar 1943. (General De Gol)Francuska Poljski orden Virtuti Militari1943. (Dodeljen preko Homolja)Poljska Američka Legija zasluga (Legion of Merit)29. mart 1948. (Predsednik Hari Truman)Sjedinjene Američke Države Dražina odlikovanja za učešće u WWII...
8
4
52
1,603
Si les das testosterona a las mujeres, se comportan de forma más justa y menos conflictiva. Sin embargo, las mujeres que creen que tomaron testosterona —pero que en realidad tomaron placebo— se comportan de forma más injusta y más agresiva. Por otra parte, darles testosterona a los hombres hace que se comporten de forma menos fingida/falsa y que su generosidad no dependa de si alguien los está mirando, mientras que niveles más bajos de testosterona (con placebo) favorecen una generosidad más dependiente de la mirada ajena, más estratégica o fingida. A su vez, un amplio cuerpo de evidencia muestra que la testosterona no es en sí misma causante de agresividad, sino que lo que la promueve es más bien el estradiol (un estrógeno), en el cual la testosterona puede o no convertirse mediante la enzima aromatasa en el cerebro.
92
1,478
152
10,724
253,160
Rad se oporezuje, svaka plaća, honorar. Potrošnja se oporezuje - kruh, gorivo, internet, knjige. Posjedovanje automobila se oporezuje. Dobitak na lutriji. Dobit tvrtke. Zarada na dionicama. ali... porez na treći prazan stan u gradu!? Komunjare :D
18
3
1
68
2,360
Marriages survived because men had the heart to endure women. It lasted for generations because of MEN. Because of our emotional intelligence and our compassion for our wives. Not because women were good partners. Because men learned to overlook a lot of stupid shit women do just to let peace reign. Let's be real, women are NOT easy to live with. They are not romantic. Their whole idea of romance is RECEIVING. What he bought for me, where he took me, what he did for me. Never what they give. They are not funny. They are overly sensitive, they hate accountability, they hate saying sorry, they hate initiating sex with their own husbands, and they are controlling as hell. Stubborn and rebellious. And that domestic violence you hear about in marriages? Most of it is STARTED by the wife. Pushing, slapping, throwing things, talking reckless, provoking until the man reacts. Then she wants to play victim. Look at any relationship that doesn't have a man in it,it doesn't work. Lesbians? Highest divorce rate. Highest abuse rate. Because there is no man there to tolerate their violence and their emotions. Two women together can't handle each other. Female friendships? Even worse. Pure gossip, backbiting, jealousy, cutting each other off over the most childish things. They will have 10 female friends by 2022. By 2026, only 2 are left. She has fought with ALL of them. Every single one is now an enemy. But men are the problem.
what opinion on relationships will have you like this?
2,012
12,218
968
78,726
3,593,272
Parkinson’s Law – Why the State Bureaucracy Grows When the Work Shrinks In 1955, a British naval historian wrote a joke for The Economist. Seventy years later, it remains one of the most accurate descriptions of the modern state ever written. Everyone knows the slogan: work expands to fill the time available. Almost no one knows the mechanism underneath it. That mechanism explains Europe. 1. The evidence. Between 1914 and 1928, the Royal Navy lost two thirds of its largest warships. Over the same years the Admiralty – the office that ran the ships – grew by three quarters. There were fewer ships and more men behind desks. Then there was the Colonial Office, which kept growing while the colonies left one by one. It was hiring while the empire was shrinking. 2. The first mechanism. An official who feels overworked has three choices. He can resign, he can share the work with a colleague, or he can ask for two subordinates. He never chooses the colleague, because a colleague is a rival. Two subordinates are a rank. So one tired man becomes three. Then each of the two subordinates feels tired. 3. The second mechanism. Seven people now do what one did, and they keep each other busy with drafts, approvals, and comments on the approvals. Everyone works hard, and nothing is produced. You have been in this meeting. You have been copied on this email. You have watched three people sign the form that one person filled in. 4. The law of triviality. Parkinson noticed that a committee will approve a nuclear reactor in minutes, because nobody understands it. The same committee will debate the bicycle shed for an hour, because everybody does. Bureaucracy does not avoid the important question by accident. It avoids it by design – the small question carries no risk, and on the big one, someone’s name goes on the decision. 5. The ratchet. A business that fails closes. A department that fails gets a bigger budget, because the problem is now bigger. Failure is the bureaucracy’s best argument for itself. This is why the state never shrinks on its own: every problem it does not solve becomes a new office for solving it. 6. The civilizational lesson. Burnham described the managers taking over. Parkinson showed how they breed. Put the two together and you get Brussels. You get France, where the state spends more than half of everything the country produces and still cannot fix a hospital. This is not because the people inside are wicked. It is because the machine works exactly as Parkinson said it would. 7. The vindication. Parkinson was dismissed as a humorist. Then Milei cut Argentina’s ministries in half – and the country did not collapse. It barely noticed, except on the bill. The lesson is simple: you cannot reform a bureaucracy by asking it what to cut. It will always propose to cut the ships – and hire someone to manage the cut.
134
1,808
262
5,637
272,156
People tear down Christianity to their own demise, never realizing that their very freedom to do some comes from the world made by Christians.
39
214
9
1,358
14,908
Women's biggest blind spot Every time I'm on the apps, I see this. I'd have sex with her, but I'd never seriously date her But how is she supposed to know that? To her, the visible interest doesn't really drop, things w/ guys just seem to keep "fizzling out over & over". She doesn't know the guy she's fucking can do a league better than her. She thinks she's still winning. She never had a chance to keep him, and he knew it the whole time. By the time she does start getting less sexual interest, she's been cooked for decent LTRs for a bit. The main option is the timeless classic... make him wait for sex. If he'll wait 5 dates, he'll probably stay with you. If he won't, he won't. He'll make excuses but its just lies. But women don't like to do that because it costs them guys. "Good guys" peace out, it hurts and sucks. But you never had those guys in the first place, girl. And guys get mad bc 'well you fucked that other guy on the first night, why do I have to wait?'. But really, thats her best way to see thru the wall of fake options to who wants to stay with her. You laugh at girls who get pumped-and-dumped, well thats her best way to avoid it. Don't blame her, blame players. Men's advantage is we get our rejection in 3 seconds. Women don't get their rejection for 3 months, unless she forces him to pick a lane.
159
172
29
3,169
655,228
Suppose that once a week, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to £100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this: The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay £1. The sixth would pay £3. The seventh would pay £7. The eighth would pay £12. The ninth would pay £18. And the tenth man (the richest) would pay £59.  So, that’s what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every week and seemed quite happy with the arrangement until, one day, the owner caused them a little problem. “Since you are all such good customers,” he said, “I’m going to reduce the cost of your weekly beer by £20.” Drinks for the ten men would now cost just £80. The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes. So the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free but what about the other six men? The paying customers? How could they divide the £20 windfall so that everyone would get his fair share? They realized that £20 divided by six is £3.33, but if they subtracted that from everybody’s share then not only would the first four men still be drinking for free but the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.  So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fairer to reduce each man’s bill by a higher percentage. They decided to follow the principle of the tax system they had been using and he proceeded to work out the amounts he suggested that each should now pay. And so, the fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (a 100% saving). The sixth man now paid £2 instead of £3 (a 33% saving). The seventh man now paid £5 instead of £7 (a 28% saving). The eighth man now paid £9 instead of £12 (a 25% saving). The ninth man now paid £14 instead of £18 (a 22% saving). And the tenth man now paid £49 instead of £59 (a 16% saving).  Each of the last six was better off than before with the first four continuing to drink for free.  But, once outside the bar, the men began to compare their savings. “I only got £1 out of the £20 saving,” declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man, “but he got £10!“  “Yeah, that’s right,” exclaimed the fifth man. “I only saved a £1 too. It’s unfair that he got ten times more benefit than me!”  “That’s true!” shouted the seventh man. “Why should he get £10 back, when I only got £2? The wealthy get all the breaks!”  “Wait a minute,” yelled the first four men in unison, “we didn’t get anything at all. This new tax system exploits the poor!” The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.  The next week the tenth man didn’t show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had their beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important – they didn’t have enough money between all of them to pay for even half of the bill!  And that’s how it works. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy and they just might not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas, where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.  For those who understand, no explanation is needed. For those who do not understand, no explanation is possible.
179
1,086
127
4,682
228,353
Never forget. Israel allowed Oct 7th to happen, took 6 hours to respond and then responded by killing their own citizens. They gaslit us for 3 years playing the victim while murdering children.
1,503
10,878
218
57,132
877,415