Every route into your systems will be tested.
The only question is who finds the gaps first.
Most organisations get one week of pentesting a year, on a fixed budget of hours. When the hours run out, the test stops. Attackers don't.
Today, cypen.ai launches: AI-accelerated penetration testing, built by practising hackers.
Pay for coverage, not hours. Every finding is validated by a senior tester with evidence of impact. No scanner noise.
Safety, enforced. A fail-closed egress proxy keeps all traffic within scope and the rules of engagement.
So far:
馃敻 Critical vulnerabilities in a $2B+ AI lab
馃敻 48% of findings critical or high
馃敻 Top 3 on Bugcrowd Australia, 3 months running
Find the gaps before attackers do. Link below 馃憞
cypen.ai retweeted
Strongly agree with this. 猡碉笍
After 8 years in cyber security, the hardest part of building @cypen wasn't getting AI to find things. It was teaching it what's actually exploitable.
1. Which leads are worth chasing?
2. What separates a real vulnerability from noise?
3. How to prove impact before anything gets reported?
All while keeping safety enforced, not just promised.
You can only design for that if you've spent years doing the job yourself.
If you're evaluating offensive AI tools, start where Anthony suggests and look at who built it.
cypen.ai retweeted
Jacob is probably one of the smartest folks I鈥檝e interacted with.
Beyond excited for @cypen and feel incredibly privileged to call them a customer of @opencomputerHQ




