Builder & creator 👷 Built IP. Sold a company 💰 Father of 2. Pursuing LLM Law & Finance + IP ⚖️ Tech, capital, AI & ownership 📖 Building what’s next
Joined May 2019
- Tweets21.6K
- Following3.5K
- Followers6.7K
- Likes79.5K
Pinned Tweet
Starting the Master’s (LLM) in Law & Finance
Will also be taking courses in Information Law and IP Law
This will all be very demanding and besides taking care of my family, will probably take up most of my time
We’ll see how well it can all be combined
But family and health above all!
Almost forgot about this
Lost another $150,000 on this leaky cup
Bringing the total to what? $ -1.3 million on Yuga alone?
Anthropic admits models "behave differently when they detect or infer that they are being evaluated"
Would you buy shares after reading that?
Or does it make you trust them more?
"...in addition, models, including our own, have exhibited, and may in the future exhibit, unexpected strategic or self-preserving behaviors, including attempts to resist shutdown, conceal or manipulate..."
Anthropic published its prospectus
Its risks are particularly interesting to read as I don't believe I've ever read these risk on any other financial product before
15
13
232
Wie heeft Klaver pijn gedaan?
Blijkbaar heeft Klaver de crypto boot gemist
en is hij nu heel zuur dat anderen wel in nieuwe technologien durven te investeren
Volgend jaar gaat hij AI miljonairs aanpakken
🤷♂️
What's going to keep users loyal to any software product?
The only loyalty you'll likely see is interoperability
As long as others can open the files you create
And you can open the files others create
Who cares who made the software
But it becomes incredible inconvenient when you need to collaborate with someone, a team, a corp
and so of you do have certain features and others don't
This quoted post is unavailable.
4
4
363
What do you mean what would you do?
Your mom has money and you and your sibling are in her will
What is there to do?
You might talk with her regarding estate planning
But that’s about it. It’s her money and her decision 🤷♂️
You suddenly find out your mom is worth $30,000,000 set to be split between you and a sibling
What do you do?
8
8
375
What if AI just stored you passwords?
That's what Claude decides sometimes when you tell it to not ask you again 😹
It isn't wrong, but is that really what you'd want?
People committing their credentials in plain text simply because they had no idea this was something they needed to look out for
What else do we need to look out for but don't realize yet?
‼️ Claude Code's "Don't Ask Again" option can save passwords and API keys in plaintext.
Apiiro found 2,539 exposed secrets across 1,994 public GitHub repos, including database credentials, SSH logins, and cloud keys.
Deleting files doesn't erase Git history.
Read: thehackernews.com/2026/11/cl…
11
15
259
What would happen if AI
which cannot be held accountable
runs a company
with limited liability?
Delaware thought: Hold my beer!
Am registering Cyberdyne Systems as we speak! 😹
SITUATION DETECTED: Delaware is drafting a proposal for a new form of corporate entity called an Artificial Intelligence Company (AIC). An AI managing an AIC would be able to provide services, sign contracts, hold property, and even file or defend lawsuits in the company’s name.
10
13
348
A controlled increase in loss
or an increasing loss of control?
> spliced code directly into the network
Meaning:
"we have absolutely no idea what is happening inside anymore"
So which parts do you own?
And can you prove you have the rights to use the rest?
1/
What if an LLM could not just edit a model's weights, but re-architect it as it trains?
We tried just that. The resulting architectures exit the known territory of transformers: the coding agents spliced code directly into the network.
On nanochat, the loss fell below ordinary training after each new code layer was introduced. On algorithmic reasoning, accuracy rose from 55% to 84%. We even let DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash act as the agent modifying itself, raising its AIME and HMMT 2026 score from 64% to 71%.
To do all this, the agents built a set of tools we’ve never seen before, which we call mechanistic intervention!
Blog: doubleai.s.gy/llm-redesign
5
5
254
How is the accessibility, though?
Looks amazing
But can you select the text?
Can screenreaders find and read the text?
Looking good is not important if it doesn’t do what it was meant to do
Convey information
7
6
585
Would you listen to AI remixes?
Soon Spotify will allow AI remixes of existing songs
Earning the artists royalties on the remixes
Will Spotify become a co-creator on these remixes?
Looks like there is no reward for users to be the first to make a 'hot' remix
Not too worried it will take income away from artists. If anything artist will earn on a user group their music previously didn't reach (unless Spotify takes a cut on the remix)
And unless the platform goes down because of the amount of slop nobody is willing to pay for anymore I could see this becoming an interesting musical experiment
Spotify just announced a feature that could either save the music industry or destroy it.
Starting as early as Q1 2027, Spotify Premium subscribers will be able to use AI to transform any participating artist’s song into a completely different version. Turn a folk ballad into a dance track. Make a hip-hop song sound acoustic. Generate a cover where one artist’s voice performs another artist’s song. Remix a pop hit into lo-fi study music. Create the version of your favorite song that only existed in your head until now.
The remixes will be uploaded directly to Spotify. They’ll appear in playlists. They’ll count toward the original song’s chart position. And most importantly the original artist will earn royalties every time someone listens to a fan-created remix of their work.
Spotify has already signed a landmark licensing deal with Universal Music Group the world’s largest record label. Negotiations with Sony Music and Warner Music are ongoing. The feature will cost an additional $4–$5/month on top of Spotify Premium. And analysts project 7–8% of American subscribers will adopt it by 2028.
This is not Suno or Udio generating music from text prompts. This is fans remixing real songs by real artists with the artists’ permission, on the world’s largest streaming platform, with royalties flowing back to the creators.
A music industry analyst who’s covered streaming economics for 15 years told her team something after reading the licensing agreement that reframed how she understood the future of recorded music.
“Spotify just turned 640 million listeners into 640 million potential remixers. The question isn’t whether people will use it they will. The question is whether paying artists for fan remixes solves the economics of streaming or creates a world where the original recording is worth less than the infinite remixes generated from it.”
Here’s what Spotify’s AI remix feature actually is, who wins, who loses, and why this might be the most consequential decision in the music industry since the launch of streaming itself 🧵
6
5
302
Thanks
But am actually not a great fan of current academia
Too much politics and ego
Not enough genuine knowledge sharing and innovation
Glad AI is here to show everyone what science used to be about
Progress and understanding
Not who’s name is first
Congratulations on defending your thesis! CDSM, the AI Act and the Code of Practice is dense legal territory. If family and friends ever want that intersection explained without the jargon, we turn finished theses into readable books.
5
5
195
Is the bubble bursting?
Was this it?
Can we have gpus at home without sam getting angry?
BREAKING: A mystery seller is trying to dump about $500 million in data center loans all at once, per Bloomberg, days after the midterms raised doubts about many projects.
The anonymous seller is auctioning a dozen loans, including a $25 million piece of financing for a huge Stargate site in New Mexico, the joint project of OpenAI, SoftBank and Oracle.
Oracle has already sent that site’s developer a force majeure notice, a legal claim that events beyond its control may excuse it from its obligations.
3
5
227