
class of 2015. Building @cuddlycapybaras since 2024...
Joined May 2018
- Tweets1.6K
- Following2.4K
- Followers1.5K
- Likes38.6K
Mr. Frank retweeted
Rare footage of two Europeans who waited for the EU vote on Tesla FSD. 💀
xitter.cf/robotaxi/status/211639…
Mr. Frank retweeted
Vibe coders, thank me later
21st.dev
reactbits.dev
magicui.design
uiverse.io
mobbin.com
Your app stops looking AI-generated!
We believe voice is the most natural way to interact with intelligence, so we created Dessa, the most authentic full-duplex speech model ever built. Talking with it feels like talking with a person…full of emotion, nuance, pauses, and a natural cadence.
block.xyz/dessa
Mr. Frank retweeted
If you are new to $PAPER
Here is probably the easiest way to understand what Papertrade is:
The project was created by Jez and Blurr, and it allows users to trade BTC and ETH with up to 1,000x leverage
Yes, 1,000x
But what makes Papertrade different from other perpetual exchanges is how the entire system works:
- there’s no traditional order book
- you don’t have funding payments
- forget about conventional slippage
A liquidity pool acting as your counterparty
$PAPER rewards when you lose money
USDC rewards for PAPER stakers
Let’s start with the trading mechanism.
You deposit 1,000 USDC into Papertrade.
With 1,000x leverage, you could open a position worth $1,000,000.
A 0.1% movement in your favor would generate approximately $1,000 in gross unrealized profit.
But a 0.1% movement against you could wipe out your entire margin.
And unlike traditional perpetual exchanges, you’re not trading against another trader.
You’re trading directly against Papertrade’s liquidity pool.
This pool is called Martingaler LP.
The easiest way to understand it is:
Traders lose money = LP gains money
Traders make money = LP pays their profits
Instead, the system is designed to grow its pool through trading losses.
But what happens if too many traders win?
Their profits can enter a payment queue until the pool has enough capital to cover them.
Now let’s talk about $PAPER.
Papertrade literally rewards you for losing money.
Every time a trader closes a position at a loss or gets liquidated, the protocol can mint PAPER based on the eligible loss.
Instead of distributing tokens to investors, Papertrade distributes them to losing traders.
During the initial emission phase, while the recorded LP is below $2M:
$1 of eligible losses = 100 PAPER
As the pool grows beyond that threshold, the emission rate decreases.
So early losing traders receive more PAPER per dollar lost than later participants.
And this creates a pretty unusual incentive.
You’re effectively farming a token by losing money.
Of course, there’s no guarantee that the PAPER you receive will ever compensate for those losses.
Especially considering that PAPER was initially non-transferable.
But the token has another function.
You can stake PAPER to receive USDC rewards.
Papertrade advertises trading without conventional slippage.
At 1,000x leverage, even a small delay can become a serious problem.
Imagine opening a position and watching your unrealized profit reach $10,000.
You press close.
But the transaction doesn’t execute immediately.
The market reverses while you’re waiting.
And by the time the transaction is processed, your position has already been liquidated.
That $10,000 was never realized.
Papertrade calculates its execution price using Hyperliquid’s best bid and ask:
Execution price = (Best Bid + Best Ask) / 2
This means the protocol depends on Hyperliquid’s order book to determine the value of its synthetic positions.
Personally, I think Papertrade is one of the strangest experiments we’ve seen in DeFi recently.
The entire model depends on trading activity, the solvency of the pool and the economic value of PAPER.
And with 1,000x leverage, the difference between making money and losing everything can be a movement of just 0.1%.
Interesting to see whether this model can survive beyond its initial wave of speculation.
(NFA and DYOR always)
Meet Dexpad, an all-in-one Solana launchpad.
Planned:
• Custom pairs
• Transparent fees
• Revenue-funded buyback & burn
• Post-quantum treasury authorization
Trading fees will fund automatic DEX Screener profile payments once the target is met.
Pre-launch preview:
3
60
I lost thousands backing other people’s launches. Now I’m building Dexpad.
First came @DoxxedPad , where I lost thousands of dollars.
Then @dexxedfun , where I lost another significant part of my money.
I believed in the idea: a launchpad that made creating a token easier and brought useful tools into one place. After those experiences, I still wanted that product to exist.
So I decided to build it.
That’s where Dexpad started.
We’re building an all-in-one Solana launchpad: create your token, choose a supported trading pair, decide how much you want to buy at launch, and follow its progress.
Here’s what we’re working toward:
→ DEX Screener, paid automatically from trading fees. A portion of each token’s trading fees will accumulate in its dedicated DEX Screener fund. Once it covers the cost and a valid checkout is available, Dexpad will automatically pay for the token’s enhanced profile. Creators won’t need to pay separately or manually submit the payment. Every token’s page will show funding progress and payment status.
→ Two separate progress trackers. Bonding shows progress toward graduation. DEX funding shows progress toward paying for the profile. Tokens must generate enough fees to cover that cost; reaching one milestone doesn’t automatically complete the other.
→ Transparent fees and revenue. Published allocations for creators, operations, DEX funding, and buybacks—with transactions people can verify.
→ Revenue-funded buyback and burn. A defined share of available platform revenue will fund buybacks and burns of Dexpad’s token, subject to published operating limits. Completed transactions will be visible.
→ Quantum Hardened treasury protection. We’re developing post-quantum authorization for treasury movements. Each supported launch will show its protection scope and activation status. This does not make a token rug-proof or the entire blockchain quantum-secure.
The first token I plan to launch through Dexpad is Dexpad’s own project token.
Before that launch, I intend to publish the team allocation, vesting terms, treasury addresses, fee distribution, and administrative controls.
Dexpad is still in development. Automatic payments and treasury protection are planned features awaiting production activation and verification.
I know what it feels like to put money and belief into a project and lose both.
That experience is why I started building. What we deliver—and what people can verify—will determine whether Dexpad earns their trust.
Follow the build. Test the product. Hold us to the rules we publish.
63
Mr. Frank retweeted
We see a lot of projects pursuing privacy as a whole.
I see dozens doing the same thing, whilst anyone can just use @theprivacycash / @HusherExchange making these dozen projects obsolete.
We’re not those projects.
Curtain is pursuing privacy for a specific financial reality: tokenized stocks, USDG, and RWA portfolios.
As more financial assets move onchain, users should not have to expose every position, recipient, rebalance, or timing decision to the public.
The market can stay transparent. Your portfolio does not need to be.
Mr. Frank retweeted
Disappointed by the European Central Bank’s (ECB) and European Banking Authority’s (EBA) responses to the MiCA consultation.
They are not only advocating for a prohibition on paying yield on stablecoins, but also for restrictions on CASPs providing access to DeFi, including protocols offering yield on non-MiCA-authorized stablecoins, without providing a clear framework for how access to DeFi should work in practice.
They also suggest that CASPs offering access to DeFi should restrict it to certain groups of users through so-called “suitability tests,” alongside a potential certification regime for DeFi lending protocols.
It is unclear how these requirements would work in practice. If regulators determine which protocols are deemed suitable for European users, the result risks looking very different from the open DeFi that exists today.
Instead, we could end up with more walled gardens that undermine the liquidity and network effects of open financial networks, ultimately limiting Europeans’ ability to access new ways to grow and preserve wealth.
These proposals are presented as measures to “protect consumers.” But excessive restrictions can instead create more friction for innovation and slow the development of open, transparent, and auditable financial infrastructure that can benefit consumers.
The reality is that onchain finance, including stablecoins, DeFi, and tokenized securities, has the potential to reshape financial infrastructure by reducing friction, increasing transparency, and expanding access to financial opportunities.
European consumers and businesses stand to benefit significantly from this transformation, particularly if the companies building this infrastructure can continue to build and compete from within Europe.
Meanwhile, U.S. regulators, including the SEC and CFTC, have increasingly taken a more pragmatic approach toward enabling onchain financial innovation.
European regulators should put users and their interests at the center of the framework. Banks and other incumbents should be able to adapt their businesses to serve users in an increasingly onchain economy, rather than relying on artificial restrictions that risk increasing costs and reducing access for Europeans as the rest of the world moves onchain.
DeFi will win.
Mr. Frank retweeted
This very post ended being in Nvidia web
The only coin with a deep lore
We are early - solana:CJwDSDLZgUVF4ZgHuyFmy4raSwpWMKmXtdfUC8srXmkS
huggingface.co/datasets/nvid…
I just unearthed something wild 🕵️♂️✨
Turns out, 11 years ago a dev behind an old Dogecoin utility called Ðogebuddy — a handy little tool to track your Dogecoins — was already building in the meme trenches.
And even crazier: 12 years ago he created a project called Gorillacoin. 🦍💰
This isn’t just history — it’s pure crypto legend. A forgotten chapter of the meme coin saga, finally coming back to light.
CA:CJwDSDLZgUVF4ZgHuyFmy4raSwpWMKmXtdfUC8srXmkS
github.com/alheyne/dogebuddy
github.com/alheyne/Gorillaco…
Mr. Frank retweeted
All tokens deployed on launchpad from now on will be from mAQdwbg2EUGLgTfCV6Ts6S3PNFSiUW7pCwo1341p5FS
And the fees made on these will be bought back into solana:EKtmPPLaCbEEKiwoHHtV7TsRsmPXs5CMGtQtZFSiinsc
EKtmPPLaCbEEKiwoHHtV7TsRsmPXs5CMGtQtZFSiinsc
Mr. Frank retweeted
Crypto degens running to the desktop when they hear a famous person's dog has died
Mr. Frank retweeted
dividend benefits are here for our onchain dividend hounds 🔥
Dividend benefits for Stock Tokens are getting an upgrade.
Dividend benefits are now applied automatically on the ex-dividend date instead of weeks later on payment day.
That means more immediate stock-equivalent economics from day one, no dividend dilution after the ex-date, and tighter pricing.
Already live across most Stock Tokens, with more to come 🔥
Mr. Frank retweeted
OMG... I can't believe she just said this.
Senator Elizabeth Warren issues DIRE WARNING to Congress about the CLARITY Act:
"This bill would put us ALL at risk of a crypto-fueled economic CRASH!"
🔴 LIVE: watch the CLARITY Act's procedural vote happen in real time on the Senate floor.
xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1yKAPwBVB…
NEW: LEAKED SCREENSHOTS OF DC INSIDERS SAYING THE RUMOR MILL HAS COMPLETELY SHIFTED AND THE LIKELIHOOD OF PASSING IS FAR HIGHER THAN EXPECTED.
“Andy has been listening to the doomer contingent on CLARITY.”
Wow. The rhetoric in DC has drastically shifted in the last 24 hours after Trump’s ethics provision.
Huge sequence of events. Feels very bullish.
If CLARITY passes and the Fed holds rates steady, we giga send.
If CLARITY doesn't pass and the Fed holds rates steady, we giga send.
If CLARITY passes, and the Fed hikes, we pause then giga send.
If CLARITY doesn't pass, and the Fed hikes, we puke, base out, and then giga send.
Comfy in spot. Much, much higher by end of year.
Mr. Frank retweeted
I found a CHEAPER and direct method to BRIDGE INTO @arc before public mainnet
most ppl are buying native USDC through OTC desks at an 87% premium + another 3% desk fee
i wanted to enter early, but I wasn’t willing to accept that cost or deal with OTC complexity
so i researched the available routes myself and found one that 99% of people still don’t know
i believe i’m the first to share it publicly
here’s exactly what i did:
[1] get native $USDC for gas
i used @Longdotsupply to bridge around $5 of ETH from @RobinhoodApp into WETH on @arc
this route currently carries an ~80% premium, so i received roughly $2.8 worth of WETH
Long automatically allocated 0.1 native USDC to my Arc wallet for gas
i then swapped the WETH into more USDC for gas reserve
and for the wallet, i use @Rabby_io, you only need to connect then it adds Arc chain automately
[2] find the correct token/stock pair
before moving more capital, i checked @ArcDEXScan or @BasedBot to see which stock token was paired with the token i wanted to buy
then i used @matchaxyz on Robinhood Chain to swap ETH into that stock, for example, CRCL
[3] bridge the stock to Arc
i bridged the stock token from Robinhood to Arc through Long
one important detail:
- stock prices on Arc are currently around 40% lower than on Robinhood
- so this route still carries an effective premium of ~70%
it isn’t cheap, but it’s still meaningfully better than paying an 87% OTC premium + a 3% fee
[4] buy the target token
once the stock arrived on Arc, i swapped it through its available pair into the token I wanted
these DEXs are useful if you ask me
- @ArcDEXScan
- @TowerExchange
- launchpads themselves
DONE!
i’m now positioned before public mainnet through a direct onchain route
my pocket list of shopping: $LONG $ARGUS $TOLLY $WARP $DEPEG base:0x23fcefda11d1d785325beda44765472252b37b1d
with a lower premium and no OTC desk involved
still expensive, but much more efficient and still early
finally, i officially rank @longdotxyz in tier-1 launchpads along with @liftdotfun and others
you can thank me later
I ranked every launchpad on @arc before public mainnet
only 3 days left until Arc goes public on Sept 16
so early positioning is already getting aggressive
native Arc USDC is reportedly trading at 1.82x-1.85x all-in through OTC markets
that means users are accepting a 76-78% premium + ~3% in fees, just to access Arc before everyone else
i wouldn’t pay that premium myself, but i take the signal seriously
ppl are not rushing to hold USDC, they want to use it on day 1
then again i believe new token launches will likely be one of the first destinations
so i researched around 30 Arc launchpads and ranked them by product readiness, mainnet exposure and potential to attract early liquidity:
full tier list ↓
[1] Tier 1
- @liftdotfun → focused on native USDC launches
- @circlewarp → owns both the bonding curve and its DEX
- @synthra_finance → combines an AMM, aggregator and buyback model
these have the clearest day-one positioning in my view
i'll probably ape $DEPEG - first play on @liftdotfun, must be a runner ngl
[2] Tier 2
- @actfunxyz
- @ArcadeSwap
- @arcpad_meme
- @TollyLabs
- @arclaunchfun
the most interesting one here may be ArcadeSwap
it supports both bonding-curve launches + direct Uniswap v4 pools
giving projects more control over how liquidity is launched
[3] Tier 3
- @Archemistdotfun
- @UBIdotFUN
- @Fliptfun
- @arcfunapp
- @eve_dot_fun
- @minarafun
- @Arguspad
pre-mainnet branding is easy, execution after launch is what matters
[4] Watchlist
- @Zyoradotfun @sashimidotfun @rwarcdotfun @focidotfamily @Ayooclub
- copycat platforms using similar names
i’d also verify every handle, contract and domain before connecting a wallet
there are already several similar names
all over all, this is how I’m reading the board:
- Tier 1: strongest day-one exposure
- Tier 2: credible products, but execution still needs confirmation
- Tier 3: early and less proven
- Watchlist: relevant, but difficult to rank
i expect this list to change quickly once real volume and user retention appear
Going to sleep. Before I do, a few honest words about what this is.
This is an experiment. Nothing more.
I took the FlyWire connectome — 127,400 real neurons and 14,687,178 real synapses, mapped by scientists over years and released to the public — and I ran it. Not a metaphor for a brain. The brain. Leaky integrate-and-fire, the same model from the Nature paper, ported to JavaScript and calibrated against the reference implementation until it matched within 5%.
When you feed the fly, 21 sugar neurons fire. The signal crosses 448 neurons and 20,901 synapses. MN9 — the motor neuron that extends the proboscis — reaches about 35 Hz. And the fly on your screen eats.
Nobody wrote that behavior. It falls out of the wiring.
Every install gets its own mutation from a random seed, so your fly is not my fly. Some are slower. Some fire harder. That isn't a rarity table I designed — it's what happens when you silence a few neurons in a real nervous system.
It's going up on the Chrome Web Store. Review takes a few weeks and they can still say no. If they do, the code is on GitHub and you can load it yourself.
I don't know if this goes anywhere. It might be nothing. But it's out there now, it's real, it's verifiable, and pretty soon anyone who wants a fly living in their browser can have one.
Good night. $PECK
github.com/cryptoghost1ng/Fl…
flymagotchi.vercel.app
3
5
390





























