cryptocurious retweeted
Replying to @friendtech
Choose carefully.
xitter.cf/SharesFinance/status/1…
While @friendtech expects clones and copies to emerge, it's important for users to weigh their options carefully:
By staying with friend.tech, you support the original team, VCs, and influencers. Alternatively, if you move to the upcoming $SHARES platform launching on 8/31, you not only support influencers but also have an opportunity to earn $ETH revenue.
Choose wisely.
cryptocurious retweeted
Replying to @WenPonyRacing @friendtech
$SHARES has been building for some time now - incredibly organized and well structured team. Market cap lower than SharesGram
cryptocurious retweeted
The stark contrast of Bitcoin’s pre-programmed monetary policy induced supply halving being just a year out against rate-hike induced bank failures after ZIRP/QE/UBI induced high inflation is almost comical to Bitcoiners.
The case for Bitcoin has never been so clear.
cryptocurious retweeted
FOMC DECISION:
• Fed raises rates by 25 bps as expected
• Policy statement softens the rate guidance in a way consistent with past pauses
• Deletes reference to “some additional policy firming may be appropriate”
• Unanimous decision
cryptocurious retweeted
The Fed raised rates 25 bps
The decision was unanimous
The terminal rate projection is unchanged at 5.1%
FOMC statement modifies guidance: “The committee anticipates that some additional policy firming may be appropriate.”
cryptocurious retweeted
5. Sam and Gary Own 100% of Alameda
Anytime someone says “Alameda,” just substitute “Sam.”
Sam owns 90% of Alameda and Gary 10%. Alameda has no clients - all that money is Sam and Gary’s, stolen fair and square.
cryptocurious retweeted
Replying to @Shaughnessy119
Why would they need to - they own over 50% of tokens. That’s how DAOs work.
cryptocurious retweeted
$GMX rallies off of bad CEX news. Noted.
cryptocurious retweeted
Cc: @WSJ @nytimes @ftfinancenews
This one is real easy to confirm, rather than softball pieces about Sam.
You’re being fed a media game after someone stoke money and ditched the company.
Please do better in standing for the millions of users who were wronged here.
cryptocurious retweeted
Twitter has broken just about every piece of this FTX story using blockchain analytics, while NYT is writing puff pieces on a criminal.
Feels like a turning point for citizen journalism and loss of trust in MSM.
cryptocurious retweeted
But more generally, I think we need to stop respecting big-money hotshots and start respecting builders. The ZK-EVM space has been *truly* amazing this year.
@Scroll_ZKP @0xPolygon @StarkWareLtd @PrivacyScaling @ConsenSys @the_matter_labs ... I'm sure I missed a bunch!
cryptocurious retweeted
This afternoon, FTX asked for our help. There is a significant liquidity crunch. To protect users, we signed a non-binding LOI, intending to fully acquire FTX.com and help cover the liquidity crunch. We will be conducting a full DD in the coming days.
cryptocurious retweeted
I don’t like what CZ did at all, he pretty much caused an attempted bank run (still in progress) . Even when having a personal feud it’s the retailer in the end that gets hit
People from 2017 class know how ruthless CZ is tho, not sure why everyone things he is a holy saint now
cryptocurious retweeted
20/ The current crisis FTX and Alameda are dealing with is not FTT's price or Alameda's FTT-backed loans.
It is the loss of customer confidence in FTX and the very short-term liquidity crunch as a result of the bank run on FTX.
cryptocurious retweeted
13/ Because the FTT-loans owed by Alameda are a nothing-burger to him. FTT price can go to zero and Sam can probably still re-finance the loans by pledging FTX equity as collateral or something.
What CZ wants as a competitor of FTX (and is getting) is a bank run on FTX. Why?

























