#crypto #BTC #BNB #ETH #SOL CRYPTO ANALYST and PROMOTER๐Ÿ“‰ #ALTCOIN CRYPTO SHILLER๐Ÿท๏ธ//CRYPTO KOL๐Ÿ’Ž//DM for business and promotion ๐Ÿ“‘ [email protected]

New York, USA
Joined June 2023
Include

Only show posts containing:

Exclude

Hide posts containing:

Time range
-
Minimum likes
Because in the end, being audited isn't the same as being permanently secure. So what will the evidence ultimately say about Gensuki, because web3 needs both questions answered with evidence and transparency before users pay the price again.
20
And what happens when a researcher raises something unfounded, but the project still burns time and resources responding under public pressure? And if genuine issues are confirmed, how will Gensuki respond?
1
18
Are they actually exploitable? Were they already known or addressed? The real questions aren't about tone or program names. What happens when a concern gets raised, evidence gets submitted, and the project dismisses it, only for it to prove valid later?
1
17
What happens when new security concerns still surface? I'm not taking either side here because the actual findings matter more than the narrative. The interesting part is what happens next. Can the reported issues be reproduced?
1
17
shouldn't that at least get serious technical attention? And if the project has audits or good reasons to challenge the points, shouldn't these reasons be transparent enough for independent assesment?
1
18
I'm not saying the project is vulnerable because someone flagged stuff from public info. But when someone reviews only what's already public, avoids anything intrusive, documents concerns, submits privately, and still offers authorized follow-up,
1
22
with damage in the hundreds of millions. Thatโ€™s what got me interested in this @Gensuki_ swap. I have no personal knowledge of the researcher, and I do not claim that their findings are automatically right.
1
48
Security concerns in Web3 don't get measured by how many followers the person raising them has. The Bitget breach was a prove of that. Questions were already circulating before September and the investigation later confirmed a third-party vulnerability was the entry point,....
Hi @Gensuki_ team, I know we started off on a wrong foot but lemme set things straight here I came across your Project through a friend who had some security concerns about it and asked me to peep so I decided to take a look myself I started with what anyone could see publicly....the website, exposed infra, public repos, configs, on-chain information and all of those There were nothing intrusive too lemme mention, no wallet connected, no transaction signed, no account created I still noticed a few things worth flagging and i reached out to your team through @Hopeepik . He connected me with your CTO and @pa_cem23 Founder in a discord group and I initially tried to move the conversation toward a proper engagement through our Founding50 program with @ancientechLABS rather than simply dropping a full report there There was some back and forth around the concerns I raised, including questions about whether there was enough evidence behind them and references to previous audits the project had undergone Now I understand that part.... More reason I decided to complete the research and send the findings directly The report is now with @Hopeepik on the @Gensuki_ team I'm not saying I'm going to publish any findings here please or turn this into a public call-out. Naaa I'm just setting things straight especially for reference purposes They have the information now and I genuinely hope the team reviews everything and addresses whatever needs attention I'd still be happy to work with the team properly and take the research further with authorized access Like the CTO asked me "what are you proposing?" What we wanna help close in your project is in our Founding50 structure Yeaaa Have a wonderful Friday
4
7
1
7
2,095
Cryptic_Lab๐Ÿ’Ž๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ๐Ÿ“‰ retweeted
Hi @Gensuki_ team, I know we started off on a wrong foot but lemme set things straight here I came across your Project through a friend who had some security concerns about it and asked me to peep so I decided to take a look myself I started with what anyone could see publicly....the website, exposed infra, public repos, configs, on-chain information and all of those There were nothing intrusive too lemme mention, no wallet connected, no transaction signed, no account created I still noticed a few things worth flagging and i reached out to your team through @Hopeepik . He connected me with your CTO and @pa_cem23 Founder in a discord group and I initially tried to move the conversation toward a proper engagement through our Founding50 program with @ancientechLABS rather than simply dropping a full report there There was some back and forth around the concerns I raised, including questions about whether there was enough evidence behind them and references to previous audits the project had undergone Now I understand that part.... More reason I decided to complete the research and send the findings directly The report is now with @Hopeepik on the @Gensuki_ team I'm not saying I'm going to publish any findings here please or turn this into a public call-out. Naaa I'm just setting things straight especially for reference purposes They have the information now and I genuinely hope the team reviews everything and addresses whatever needs attention I'd still be happy to work with the team properly and take the research further with authorized access Like the CTO asked me "what are you proposing?" What we wanna help close in your project is in our Founding50 structure Yeaaa Have a wonderful Friday
2
11
4
20
801
This is exactly why I think $QOR deserves serious attention before the market fully discovers it ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ”ฅ @QoreChain didnโ€™t wait for TGE to start building. The mainnet is already live, the technology is verifiable on-chain, the code is open-source and its post-quantum infrastructure has been running since day one. And thereโ€™s another important piece: QoreX QoreChainโ€™s own non-custodial wallet brings its quantum-safe infrastructure directly to users, with QOR transfers protected by post-quantum signatures while keeping the experience simple. So weโ€™re not looking at just another token launch here. A working Layer 1 โœ… Post-quantum security โœ… Triple-VM infrastructure โœ… QoreX wallet โœ… $QOR entering the market โœ… With the listing only hours away, I think this is one of those projects you donโ€™t want to discover too late. Do your research, watch $QOR closely and keep @QoreChain on your radar today ๐Ÿš€ #QoreChain #QOR #QoreX #MEXC #Layer1 #Web3
In under four hours QOR lists. Before it does, here is how to check us instead of believing us. Block time, measured this morning across the last 100,012 blocks: 2.33 seconds, with single block deterministic finality. Our own materials have been quoting 5 seconds, because that is the configured commit timeout. The chain is faster than our marketing. Every transaction on the native lane requires an ML-DSA-87 signature. No classical fallback. That has been true since block one, 74 days ago. The first transaction secured end to end by the full standardised NIST post-quantum stack: 4E49D57F86FEC8851CDC34811B4C80FDB24F4C253ABE15D25C05B7A27F2B7F1F Validators, staking parameters and every balance are queryable right now at api.qore.host. Blocks and transactions at explore.qore.network. The post-quantum library is published on npm, PyPI, Maven, Go modules and crates.io. The code is Apache-2.0. We shipped all of it before asking the market for anything. Argue with the chain, not with us.
20
5
8
20,726
Replying to @QoreChain
So excited for the outcome of this....LFG๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ
16
Cryptic_Lab๐Ÿ’Ž๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ๐Ÿ“‰ retweeted
Before tomorrow: 1. Install QoreX 2. Bookmark explore.qore.network 3. Follow this account and nothing else claiming to be us Several fake QOR tokens appeared today on DEXs across multiple chains. None of them are ours. QOR is native to QoreChain - we have never deployed a QOR contract on Base, Ethereum, BNB, Solana or any other chain, and any token you find there under our name or our logo is fake. The real QOR trades in one place: MEXC, starting tomorrow, 20 August, 13:00 UTC. QoreX is free and non-custodial: Chrome โ€” chromewebstore.google.com/deโ€ฆ Firefox โ€” addons.mozilla.org/firefox/aโ€ฆ macOS โ€” apps.apple.com/us/app/qorex-โ€ฆ Android โ€” play.google.com/store/apps/dโ€ฆ iOS, TestFlight open beta โ€” testflight.apple.com/join/Xaโ€ฆ We will never DM you first. Nobody from QoreChain will ever ask for your seed phrase. Every account in your mentions tomorrow offering you something is a fake account.
112
26
55
175
102,601
Tomorrow is a big day for @QoreChain ๐Ÿš€ The $QOR MEXC Kickstarter is already LIVE with a 3,000,000 QOR reward pool, while trading officially begins tomorrow, August 20 at 13:00 UTC. But QoreChain is much more than just another new token listing. Itโ€™s an already-built Layer 1 focused on post-quantum security and AI-native infrastructure, with EVM, CosmWasm and SVM brought together within the same ecosystem. What caught my attention most is simple: they built the technology first, and the token is coming to the market after. With the Kickstarter now live and the MEXC listing just hours away, $QOR is entering an important new chapter. Definitely one Iโ€™d recommend researching and keeping on the radar ๐Ÿ‘€ Follow @QoreChain for the latest updates. #QoreChain #QOR #MEXC #Layer1 #Web3
Before tomorrow: 1. Install QoreX 2. Bookmark explore.qore.network 3. Follow this account and nothing else claiming to be us Several fake QOR tokens appeared today on DEXs across multiple chains. None of them are ours. QOR is native to QoreChain - we have never deployed a QOR contract on Base, Ethereum, BNB, Solana or any other chain, and any token you find there under our name or our logo is fake. The real QOR trades in one place: MEXC, starting tomorrow, 20 August, 13:00 UTC. QoreX is free and non-custodial: Chrome โ€” chromewebstore.google.com/deโ€ฆ Firefox โ€” addons.mozilla.org/firefox/aโ€ฆ macOS โ€” apps.apple.com/us/app/qorex-โ€ฆ Android โ€” play.google.com/store/apps/dโ€ฆ iOS, TestFlight open beta โ€” testflight.apple.com/join/Xaโ€ฆ We will never DM you first. Nobody from QoreChain will ever ask for your seed phrase. Every account in your mentions tomorrow offering you something is a fake account.
18
6
11
9,869
Cryptic_Lab๐Ÿ’Ž๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ๐Ÿ“‰ retweeted
A Hero becomes much more interesting when it has a place in the world. Instead of simply owning artwork, @DungeonSaga aims to give every collectible a connection to Kronos, its lore and its ongoing story. That's the kind of direction I'd like to see more projects take.
5
5
22
14,069
Replying to @dungeonsaga
Getting the new series started ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ
5
Cryptic_Lab๐Ÿ’Ž๐Ÿ—‚๏ธ๐Ÿ“‰ retweeted
๐Ÿค– What Happens When AI Agents Need to Pay Each Other? The next frontier isnโ€™t just AI โ€” itโ€™s autonomous economies. ๐Ÿ“… June 18, 3 PM UTC ๐Ÿ”— Set reminder: xitter.cf/i/spaces/1kJzDDEZVmwKvโ€ฆ Featuring: โ€ข Dafu โ€” Chief Evangelist @clawchatglobal โ€ข Bruce Liu โ€” Founder @op_catlayer โ€ข Vlada โ€” Ecosystem Head @NoosProtocol โ€ข Amar โ€” Co-founder @dungeonsaga โ€ข Eric Chiew โ€” BD Lead @termix_ai โ€ข Konsole โ€” AI Engineer If AI agents can think, act, and earnโ€ฆ Who pays them โ€” and how? ๐Ÿ‘€
31
18
125
3,260
what's the first thing you'd want to do? ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿ”ฅ Grab your Beta invite now: 1๏ธโƒฃ Follow @clawchatglobal & @op_catlayer 2๏ธโƒฃ Join Telegram: t.me/opcat_layer 3๏ธโƒฃ Post in the Early Access topic: โ€œJoin ClawChat Betaโ€ #ClawChat #OPCATLayer #Bitcoin #SocialFi
1
61
The first BTC-native social protocol on @op_catlayer โ€” E2E encrypted, Agent-ready, every interaction becomes an on-chain asset. For the first time, "identity" in Web3 isn't just a buzzword. If social data truly belonged to you,....
1
61
On @clawchatglobal: you're an on-chain identity. Wallet = your name. Wallet = your chat key. Wallet = your interaction history. Wallet = your level in the system. Everything on-chain, everything portable, everything yours. No phone number. No email. No company to trust.
1
96