Gabble Ratchet retweeted
I paid a large chunk of my income to Medicare and Social Security over the last 45 years. The funny thing is that I could probably be convinced to not take as much as I was promised as a part of a larger reform that would permanently fix Social Security.
I have to tell you that when you get mad at me for being successful and then expect me to give up what I was promised just because you’re sad, that’s when I become absolutely unwilling to part with a single cent. You’re going to pay me everything you owe me, whether I need it or not – and I don’t need it.
Try not being a jerk. You might get some of what you want. But you come at me jealous because I’m successful and want to take what’s mine? Are you high? Here’s my counteroffer.
Nothing
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
I'm sure it's just a coincidence that this doesn't happen in Poland.
🔴🇫🇷🔥 ALERTE INFO | Le clocher de la mairie de Limoges s’est effondré. xitter.cf/Xirthe_v1/status/21115…
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
Democrats discovered billionaires in politics were a threat to democracy the exact day one stopped writing them checks.
When Michael Bloomberg spent around $1 billion of his own money in the 2020 primary, then another $100M to help Biden in Florida, nobody called it an attack on democracy.
When George Soros put $125M into a single Democratic super PAC and became the largest political donor of the 2022 cycle, it was "civic engagement."
When Reid Hoffman, Dustin Moskovitz, JB Pritzker and Tom Steyer wrote eight- and nine-figure checks cycle after cycle, it was "saving democracy." When Bill Gates reportedly gave around $50M to a pro-Harris group in 2024, silence.
In 2020, dark money groups spent over $500M backing Democrats, more than double what went to Republicans. In 2024, Kamala Harris raised more than $1 billion in under three months. Democrats outspent Republicans and lost.
So the problem was never billionaires in politics. The problem is a billionaire who doesn't fund your side.
And here's what nobody in DC wants to say out loud: old billionaire money is quiet money. It funds the foundations, NGOs, think tanks and consultants that make up the permanent establishment. It doesn't challenge the system. It is the system. It freezes the picture: same insiders, same incumbents, same experts, every single cycle.
You can like or hate Musk's spending, but at least it's out in the open. If you really want money out of politics, start with your own party's donor list.
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
A lot of uneducated people fall into this capitalism vs public trap. So let me explain why the "public" side of this debate comes down to one thing: it doesn't work.
And it's not because the State is evil. It's because the State is made of people. Same people as everywhere else. Same incentives, same laziness, same temptations. The only difference is whose money they're spending.
Milton Friedman nailed it. There are four ways to spend money. Your money on yourself: you watch the price and the quality. Your money on someone else: you watch the price, less the quality. Someone else's money on yourself: you stop caring about the price. Someone else's money on someone else: you care about neither. Every public budget on earth lives in that fourth box.
Now let me explain it like you're 8. Picture a schoolyard. 100 kids, Pokémon cards handed out at random. Nobody plans anything. Kids trade, collectors sort, good players accumulate. Very quickly every card ends up with the kid who values it most. Then the teacher walks in, decides it's unfair, confiscates everything and redistributes it herself. Problem: she has no idea who wants what. She can't. Nobody can. Trades stop, good players quit, and somehow the kids sitting closest to her desk end up with all the rare cards.
That last part is the one everyone forgets. When money flows from a central desk instead of voluntary trade, the winners are the people who know the desk best. Lobbyists, connected contractors, consultants billing 10x. California high-speed rail: budget tripled, still no train. That's not a bug, it's what happens every single time someone spends money that isn't theirs, on people they'll never meet, with zero consequences if they fail.
And here's the irony in your take. The capitalists who love public infrastructure the most are the cronies who win the contracts. That's not the free market. That's the exact opposite of it.
The free market is the only system where bad allocators lose their money and good allocators get more to allocate. Profit is the signal. Losses are the correction. The State has neither. A failing company goes bankrupt. A failing ministry gets a bigger budget next year.
So if you actually care about the common good, you should want more free market, not less. Freedom means the freedom to build, to trade, to keep what you create. It does not mean the freedom to hand other people's money to people who've proven they don't know how to invest it.
The question was never capitalism vs public. It's who allocates the next dollar best. 200 years of data, same answer every time.
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
War at the Journal
I’ve never seen a greater disconnect from reality in covering the news.
Front page WSJ: the caption calls the stabbing co-pilot “a rogue pilot.” Rogue? No use of the words “high jacking” or “terrorist.” Quite a cad this rogue.
Article says no clear motive but there are “troubling possibilities”
Then comes this doozy of a paragraph:
“Negotiations to end the war that Israel and the U.S. launched against Iran appear stalled, and anger runs high over Israel’s conduct in the war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip.”
No mention here of Oct. 7th, Hamas or Hezbollah or Iran’s link to terrorism in the UK yesterday — clearly the US or Israel must be to blame for this incident.
Contrast the editorial inside at the same moment with the headline about how brave passengers averted a “highjacking” and calling the stabber a “terrorist” and putting it in the context of the Iranian actions, threats and history of terrorism.
It seems if you want the news straight you need to read the Ed page and I’m at a loss as to the game being played on the front page, but there are “troubling possibilities.”
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
Dario has written that we need to “pace the frontier,” and Sam has agreed. People may be surprised by my response: go ahead.
You guys are the frontier. By any reasonable metric — market share, revenue growth, model capability — the two of you have a duopoly on frontier intelligence. You’ve also claimed the lead is widening because of recursive self-improvement.
I don’t see what you see in the lab. If the unreleased models are scary enough that you think you should slow down, I support your decision to be responsible.
But stop pretending you need anyone else’s permission. Stop pretending antitrust law has to be suspended so you can form a cartel. Stop pretending you need a regulatory approval process that supersedes product liability. Stop pretending METR is independent when it is intertwined with Anthropic’s investors and staff. Stop pretending you need those same evaluators to police competitors who aren’t even at the frontier.
Most of all, stop pretending the motivation to slow down is purely altruistic. You face massive product-liability exposure if your products enable a truly damaging cyberattack. The market already punishes models that behave in unpredictable or unauthorized ways. After the Hugging Face episode, it is simply good business for OpenAI and Anthropic to trade some raw power for reliability and predictability. Call it alignment if you want. It is also just giving customers what they want.
Pacing the frontier would also create breathing room for a more intelligent conversation about regulation than Bernie Sanders’ “shut it all down.” China is very unlikely to join a global agreement, as you know, and that has to be taken into account as well.
So go ahead and pace the frontier. You are the ones setting it. The easiest way not to build superintelligence is for you to agree not to build it. Demanding your preferred regulatory framework as the price of that will look like blackmail of the public and the political system. So just do it.
If you do, you’ll buy goodwill for the next conversation. If you don’t, we’ll know this was just another bid for regulatory capture — or an election-season psyop.
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
what if I told you these cartoons *were* made for children, it's just that children weren't such pussies back then
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
Social media is a sewer because dishonest people dig out the worst example from their political opposition and pretend its representative of everyone else.
Then everyone else gets sucked into the dumb debate.
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
California has spent ALL of your money.
They spent it on bloated programs. They lost it to fraud. They handed it to political insiders. They poured it into benefits for illegal immigrants while California families were told to pay more, wait longer, and expect less.
And every chance they get, Sacramento asks for more.
The taxpayers of California are not an endless ATM for politicians who cannot—or will not—account for where our money went.
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
In case you’re wondering why the nation had a record-high $432 billion budget deficit last month.
Neither party will touch SocSec & Medicare.
Both parties want to cut taxes for bottom 95% of earners.
Republicans want a 40% defense hike.
Democrats want aggressive social spending hikes.
Debt interest costs will exceed $1 trillion.
Huge deficits are a deliberate policy choice.
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
Go to my site
WHY I’M RUNNING FOR CALIFORNIA STATE SENATE
MY VISION FOR CALIFORNIA
I have no intention of being a legislator that does nothing. I welcome everyone UP THERE to join me and be a part of a broad coalition that is willing to work hard, call out EVERYONE that is a part of the problem and design a plan that gets ACTUAL RESULTS. That’s how I did business in the private sector beginning in sales, that in time built up a business as a visionary entrepreneur and conquered an industry at an executive level. Now I get the opportunity to do this, make California better than it’s been – one win at a time.
California is too expensive for a decent family or a young couple with a meager salary to live. It’s becoming increasingly difficult to find a job. Once you do find a job, there’s no guarantee that it will last. Every other day our favorite venues realize they can’t afford to stay in business. They close-up shopand cut jobs that never come back.
Crime has run rampant in California. We’ve all watched the “Smash and Grab” operations, COMMITTED IN BROAD DAYLIGHT. Our current Governor-in-Thief, Newsom has done nothing. In fact, he literally fought AGAINST the effort to increase penalties, catch these thieves and hold them accountable.
The Democrats in charge are a Den of Thieves - these criminals stick together
Trans-Drug “THERAPY” for our kids paid for by our tax-dollars?!
By order of Newsom and School Administrators teachers were told not to share information with parents, that's crazy.
(It’s not therapy). I call it what it is, it’s CHILD ABUSE and pure evil.
Gavin Newsom AND School Administrators STOLE the authority to hide all this information from parents – responsible parents are the only people that should have the authority and right to make these decisions and raise their children, NOT the State! If there are exceptions to the rule they shouldn’t dictate public policy. Newsom has placed our children in direct, irreparable harm FOR LIFE.
This isn’t just the first time I’ve waded into this conversation.
I have a history of calling these abusive acts of criminal enterprise by administrators, bureaucrats and politicians out on Radio. I hope to get the chance to call them out to their faces.
Sincerely,
Mike Netter
Businessman, Taxpayer Advocate, Californian
(I will not give up on California and restoring the California Dream that we deserve.)
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
The truth is that a lot of towns can benefit significantly from the economic activity that comes with data centers.
It’s not the right call for every town, but the general opposition and fear-mongering around this is meant to ensure America falls behind in the innovation race.
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
Reminder: if you end the filibuster & pass the SAVE America Act, it is sure to be repealed the instant Dems take power & replaced with a national ban on voter ID, leaving Rs worse off than they are now.
Gabble Ratchet retweeted
Astronomers have obtained the clearest evidence so far for an atmosphere surrounding a rocky exoplanet inside its star’s habitable zone.
The planet is LHS 1140 b, a temperate super-Earth located about 49 light-years away in the constellation Cetus. It orbits an old, relatively quiet red dwarf every 24.7 days, has approximately 5.6 times Earth’s mass and 1.73 times its radius, and receives about 42 percent as much stellar energy as Earth. Its estimated equilibrium temperature is around 226 kelvin, although the actual surface temperature would depend strongly on the atmosphere, cloud cover, reflectivity and heat redistribution. Being in the habitable zone therefore means that liquid water could be physically possible under suitable atmospheric conditions, not that the planet has been shown to be inhabited or even genuinely habitable.
The researchers did not directly image the atmosphere or identify gases near the surface. Instead, they detected helium escaping from the planet’s extended upper atmosphere. During a transit in September 2024, when LHS 1140 b crossed in front of its star, some of the starlight passed through the tenuous gas surrounding the planet. Using the high-resolution WINERED spectrograph on the 6.5-metre Magellan Clay Telescope in Chile, the team found additional absorption near 10,833 angstroms, the wavelength of a triplet produced by metastable helium. The strongest component absorbed about 1.24 percent of the stellar light, corresponding to an opaque atmospheric region extending to roughly 1.5 times the planet’s visible radius. Absorption also appeared before the optical transit began, suggesting that escaping helium may form an extended stream ahead of the planet, with tentative evidence for a trailing tail as well.
The most likely interpretation is that high-energy X-ray and extreme-ultraviolet radiation from the red dwarf heats the upper atmosphere and drives a hydrodynamic outflow into space. Models fitted to the observations imply a mass-loss rate of roughly 200 to 400 million grams per second. Despite sounding enormous, this rate is low enough for the planet to have retained a substantial atmosphere over billions of years, particularly because LHS 1140 is now comparatively inactive. The models also indicate that the escaping gas contains very little hydrogen relative to helium, with an inferred hydrogen-to-helium ratio of about one part in a thousand. This supports atmospheric-fractionation scenarios in which lighter hydrogen escapes more efficiently over time, gradually leaving the upper atmosphere enriched in helium.
An important complication is that the helium signal was detected in the 2024 transit but not when the planet was observed again in 2025. The team independently reprocessed both datasets and investigated possible contamination from Earth’s atmosphere, instrumental effects and stellar activity, but concluded that these alternatives could not satisfactorily explain the 2024 feature. The difference between the two years is therefore interpreted as variable atmospheric escape, possibly caused by changes in the star’s high-energy emission or interactions between the stellar wind and the planet. The absence of helium in 2025 does not mean that the atmosphere disappeared; it means that the population of metastable helium producing this particular spectral line may vary considerably with time. Additional transits will be necessary to determine how frequently the signal appears and how strongly it changes.
The same observing run also covered LHS 1140 c, a smaller planet orbiting much closer to the star and receiving about five times Earth’s irradiation. No corresponding helium absorption was detected around this inner world. That contrast is consistent with the expectation that the more strongly irradiated planet has lost most or all of its atmosphere, while the cooler and more massive LHS 1140 b has been able to retain one. More generally, the result provides observational evidence that at least some rocky or predominantly rocky planets around red dwarfs can preserve atmospheres despite prolonged exposure to stellar X-ray and ultraviolet radiation. This has been a major unresolved issue because many small planets examined around active M dwarfs appear to be airless or possess atmospheres too thin to detect.
The detection does not yet reveal what the lower atmosphere is made of. The escaping upper layers appear helium-rich and hydrogen-poor, but heavier gases such as nitrogen, carbon dioxide and water vapour could remain trapped deeper down. Earlier JWST observations had already ruled out a large, clear hydrogen-dominated envelope and found tentative, low-significance evidence consistent with Rayleigh scattering from a nitrogen-rich atmosphere. Those data could not distinguish conclusively between a dense high-molecular-weight atmosphere and an almost airless planet. The new helium detection now makes the airless interpretation much less likely, although it still does not determine the surface pressure, climate or chemical composition of the lower atmosphere.
LHS 1140 b’s mass and radius also indicate that it is less dense than a completely dry, Earth-composition planet. One possibility is a mostly rocky world surrounded by a substantial atmosphere; another is a water-rich planet containing perhaps 9 to 19 percent water by mass, far more than Earth. Because the planet is cool, atmospheric models predict that a strong cold trap could condense water in the lower atmosphere before it reaches altitudes where ultraviolet radiation could break it apart and allow the hydrogen to escape. If LHS 1140 b formed with a large water reservoir, it may therefore have preserved much of it. However, oceans have not been detected, and descriptions of the planet as an ocean world remain model-dependent rather than observationally established.
The planet is also probably tidally locked, with one hemisphere permanently facing its star. Whether it could maintain liquid water would depend on the atmospheric pressure and circulation being sufficient to transport heat from the illuminated side to the nightside. Future JWST observations will attempt to search for lower-atmosphere molecules, particularly carbon dioxide, and to constrain the temperature structure and bulk composition more precisely. Even a detection of chemically unusual gases would require considerable caution: no atmospheric molecule by itself would demonstrate the presence of life without a detailed understanding of the planet’s geology, stellar environment and possible abiotic chemistry.
In my view, the central result is not that astronomers have found a second Earth or a living world, because neither claim is supported. The real advance is methodological and physical: helium escaping at high altitude can reveal an atmosphere that is extremely difficult to detect through molecules closer to the surface. LHS 1140 b now appears to be the first clear example of a temperate, predominantly rocky exoplanet that has retained an atmosphere for billions of years. That turns it from an interesting habitable-zone candidate into one of the most valuable nearby laboratories for studying how atmospheres survive, evolve and possibly maintain liquid water around red dwarf stars.
👉 arxiv.org/html/2607.14326v1






































