ritchie89 retweeted
I'm really sorry but if you dress your wife up like this, I don't think you're "as English as a Yorkshire cup of tea."
ritchie89 retweeted
Labour has introduced an Islamic blasphemy law via the back door — and it is already having a chilling effect on free speech.
The “anti-Muslim hostility” definition, formerly known as Islamophobia, is being adopted by police forces, prosecutors, courts and the NHS, as well as private-sector organisations and charities.
It will make it even harder to discuss the fundamental challenges we face, like Islamist extremism, and national scandals such as the grooming gangs, with those who speak out fearful of being branded “Islamophobic”.
As Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy says: “It’s a get-out-of-jail-free card for extremists.”
Not only did the Government appoint a working group whose five members had troubling links to Islamist organisations; it also deleted every response to the Working Group’s consultation. It is now almost certain that extremists were able to influence the drafting of the definition.
This is a major cover-up at the heart of government. Government departments are required to retain historical records of those who contributed to key consultations such as this for 20 years.
Angela Rayner has serious questions to answer. The British public deserves to know who drafted Labour’s Islamic blasphemy law.
A fantastic video from @NJ_Timothy 👇
ritchie89 retweeted
Thoughts on this story from last week.
Churches in pre-modern times were the gathering places of communities, serving as hostels, markets, breweries and - yes - venues for feasting and celebration and no doubt lots of music and dancing. They could be so again, especially if we could persuade them to get rid of the pews (unnecessary Victorian innovations, usually). But that's PARISH CHURCHES - the gathering places of local communities, where informality is quite appropriate when it’s not Sunday. This story is about ST PAUL’S CATHEDRAL, where it should be 100% solemnity 24/7.
St Paul’s is the pre-eminent monument of Britain’s greatness and its Christianity. Built after the apocalyptic Great Fire and on the eve of our extraordinary success in the 18th and 19th centuries - the resting place of our quintessential national heroes Nelson and Wellington - it represents the rededication of the country to the religion it was founded on.
Like Trafalgar Square - scene of the notorious Ifthar - St Paul’s isn’t an empty space. These places aren’t neutral. They’re not village halls to be borrowed by any community group or business that wants to hold an event. They stand for something meaningful; ‘august and royal’. A country that can’t see this is in deep trouble.
What next? The nightclub Heaven doing a deal with Westminster Abbey - ‘the sacring place of the Kings of England’ as Evelyn Waugh described it - to license dancing on the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier? ‘Of course not’, you scoff. But why not, if you see nothing sacred (that is, unviolable) about such places?
It’s instructive that the people praising the St Paul’s Fabric deal are two of the most prominent liberals of the day. Sadiq Khan and David Aaronavitch have celebrated every brick dismantled from the walls and foundations of our national life and called it progress. The result of their work is the cultural desert we’re in, and all our divisions and despair.
Fabric. St Paul’s Cathedral. Name a more iconic duo.
Bringing together these two institutions will create a one-of-a-kind experience, pairing world-class music with one of our most special landmarks.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy8z…
ritchie89 retweeted
I guess a church that compromises a sense of itself as a sacred space does indeed risk diminishing itself to the status of a landmark. nitter.cf/MayorofLondon/status/2…
Fabric. St Paul’s Cathedral. Name a more iconic duo.
Bringing together these two institutions will create a one-of-a-kind experience, pairing world-class music with one of our most special landmarks.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy8z…
ritchie89 retweeted
As an Anglican, I don’t think there is anything more offensive or humiliating than a Muslim celebrating the desecration of one of my churches.
Perhaps that’s the point.
Fabric. St Paul’s Cathedral. Name a more iconic duo.
Bringing together these two institutions will create a one-of-a-kind experience, pairing world-class music with one of our most special landmarks.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy8z…
ritchie89 retweeted
London Central Mosque is also an iconic venue. When’s the rave?
Fabric. St Paul’s Cathedral. Name a more iconic duo.
Bringing together these two institutions will create a one-of-a-kind experience, pairing world-class music with one of our most special landmarks.
bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cy8z…
ritchie89 retweeted
Angela Rayner and her department have some serious questions to answer.
It has been revealed through FOI requests submitted by Shadow Justice Secretary Nick Timothy that the Communities Department deleted all responses submitted to the Working Group tasked by Rayner with drafting the official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility”.
Nick has accused the department of a “cover-up” and wants to establish whether extremist groups influenced the process.
Since its publication, the definition has been used to silence legitimate criticism and debate about Islam. It has revived Britain’s blasphemy laws for Islam alone.
Public, private and charitable bodies have been encouraged to adopt the new non-statutory definition — with some, such as South Wales Police, going even further.
The Free Speech Union exposed at the start of the year that all five members of the Working Group had troubling links to Islamist organisations, including the Muslim Council of Britain and MEND — both of which successive governments have adopted a policy of non-engagement with since 2009 due to concerns about extremism.
Nick Timothy has said: “Labour must come clean on whether extremist groups helped to draft their ‘Islamophobia’ definition.
“Ministers have refused to answer whether these groups influenced the definition despite a no-contact policy, and we now know that the Government deleted every single response that the working group received.
“This is clearly a cover-up under way, and the public have a right to know whether a definition the Government is asking the entire public and private sector to adopt was influenced by the views of extremists.”
This is a truly astonishing admission. The Government introduced what amounts to a de facto Islamic blasphemy law in Britain, it could have been influenced by Islamist extremists, and it then deleted all the evidence submitted to the Working Group.
Questions must be answered.
Read more below 👇
ritchie89 retweeted
This is terrible news. Jason Arday has been found dead. I did tweet last week that he needed a compassionate intervention from family, friends, professionals and not more abuse. That he was clearly a troubled person who needed help. Too late. So sad.
ritchie89 retweeted
Is actually a good thing that MoD isn't only ever represented by servicemen/women. We have a civilian led military and rightly so. Many of the great Defence Secs did not have direct military experience.
Senior military officers think the appointment of Wes Streeting as defence secretary can only be a good thing based on his record as health secretary. With a big political voice, he will fight for defence and speed up recruitment. "It is nonsense that MoD needs leaders with military experience", says one source
ritchie89 retweeted
Putting aside everything else, it is a disgrace that Farage as a significant political leader who might become PM, does not have publicly-funded protection. It is not in any way in the interests of British democracy that he is attacked or hurt. Quite the opposite
ritchie89 retweeted
To be fair to Al Carns - look at the man's career to date... commanded the SBS, Colonel in the Royal Marines, straight to Minister do not pass go.
Then look at his peers in the PLP... vast majority of whom are career councilors, charity sector, or trade unionists.
The cream will always rise to top, even in such a stale vassal.
ritchie89 retweeted
Hilariously unlikely cheerleader for the rules based order and the rectitude of football governing bodies. Pure shithousery
Red cards are not overturned by political phone calls. They are overturned by rules, evidence and independent bodies. If a U.S. President intervenes with the FIFA President — and a player is suddenly cleared before a World Cup knockout match — the question is unavoidable: Quo vadis, FIFA?
Football must never become a playground for political power. #FIFA #WorldCup #GianniInfantino #DonaldTrump
ritchie89 retweeted
This worrying development takes place in a wider context of debanking for political reasons, against both the right & the left.
Banks have no right to interfere with legitimate journalistic activity. Lloyds must either disclose their rationale, or reinstate the account immediately.
BREAKING: Canary debanked by Lloyds
Lloyds have debanked the Canary with no warning or explanation, putting the outlet in severe financial crisis
thecanary.co/uk/analysis/202…
thecanary.co/uk/analysis/202…
ritchie89 retweeted
Me on #PoliticsLive: fuss re Kemi's toxic language is SO irritating from party that gave us Lucy Powell's dog whistle attack on mentioning grooming gangs, Lammy labelling Brexiteers as Nazis & nasty, ugly demonising of dissenters as far right/racist/ignorant gammon. Grrr
wa.me/447976628584?source=ex…
ritchie89 retweeted
Replying to @LauraTrottMP
Did you support safeguarding children when you voted to decriminalise abortion up to birth?
ritchie89 retweeted
Replying to @DAaronovitch
I imagine the decline must be hard to spot from Hampstead, David.
ritchie89 retweeted
What terrifies me about this attempted beheading is the potential backlash against peaceful beheaders.
ritchie89 retweeted
When I was a Belfast correspondent at the height of the Troubles or went to the frontline in the first Gulf War none of these compliance requirements existed.
ritchie89 retweeted
It's quite difficult to say two-tier justice doesn't exist when @ShabanaMahmood last year had to intervene to prevent the Sentencing Council publishing new guidelines that said ethnic minorities and trans convicts should receive more lenient sentences than everyone else.



























