deep okayness seems to be tractable and it is my favorite interest

Joined May 2023
corbin retweeted
Replying to @kepe__ @louisvarge
you never get true infinite bliss but you do get very surprising improvements along some dimensions of mental wellbeing which are worth sharing and talking about one analogy i often like to use here is: - imagine that your everyday level of anxiety/neuroticism is 10x more than what you have right now (or just imagine the most anxious person you know, or someone like that, maybe like let's say very frequent panic attacks or very frequent anxiety attacks or something, etc) - then imagine that you did something that relieved that anxiety back to what you might call a "normal healthy level" (like let's say you did meditation or therapy or medication or friends or finances or something, and you stopped unnecessarily worrying about things, now you only worry as much as a "normal healthy person") - at this point (even *without* crazy meditative progress) you might say something like "whoa so much of my previous emotions were mostly just unnecessary tension!" or like "whoa so much of my previous sense of self was just me worrying about things!" or like "whoa im able to see things so much more clearly now!" - ((at this point, you will still feel sadness/grief about things, you will still care about friends, you will still be angry when something needs protection. you will still have many emotions (maybe even a bigger emotional range) but it will just be a lot less neurotic and a lot clearer/vibrant/brighter/calmer with less friction, because your level of anxiety is now only a "normal healthy level" instead of an extreme level. and you will probably be super thankful that you are now a lot less stressed, but you also might just start taking it for granted bc this is now just what you're used to nowadays.)) - now imagine most people you know are still at that 10x extreme level of anxiety and you're now at a "normal healthy level". you'd probably feel pretty passionate about telling people that they can stop feeling anxious all the time! the solution won't solve all their problems and make them infinitely happy forever, but they will stop being super duper stressed with all their panic attacks that are super crippling to their life. they'll still have normal human problems and human emotions, but they just won't have all their crazy anxiety attacks anymore that derailed their life - then, now imagine that this situation hypothetically continues even further: you find out that this anxiety reduction stuff is actually able to go further, like you find out apparently your idea of "normal healthy level of anxiety" is actually someone else's "extreme 10x level" so you decide to progress a bit further and reduce your anxiety even less. again, you still have all the normal emotional range (maybe even more emotional range) but you again say things like "wow my previous self was mostly just tension / wow my previous emotions were mostly just tension / wow [...]" - now imagine this happens *multiple* times, you keep reducing your anxiety drastically from an "extreme level" to a "normal healthy level" and then you keep finding people who are actually less and less anxious (while still being able to act effectively in the world, still care about people, still have a range of emotions, etc) - this is the claim of many meditators! (and then they document it with many interesting phenomenological descriptions and poetic descriptions, etc)
5
1
4
52
14,405
Delighted and honored to announce our speakers for the 2026 Science of Advanced Meditation Conference! The conference features talks from leaders in the growing subfield of advanced meditation, including from fields of neuroscience, contemplative science, psychology, philosophy and consciousness science. The presentations will highlight recent discoveries and emerging research across these fields, while considering important directions for future scientific inquiry. We welcome the speakers: -- Andres Canales-Johnson, Ph.D. @canalesjohnson -- Richard Davidson, Ph.D. @RichieJDavidson -- Eric Garland, Ph.D. @DrEricGarland -- Ruben Laukkonen, Ph.D. @RubenLaukkonen -- Antoine Lutz, Ph.D. @Antoine_Lutz -- Heleen Slagter, Ph.D. -- Terje Sparby, Ph.D. @terjesparby -- Tawni Tidwell, Ph.D. -- Malcolm Wright, Ph.D. -- Winson Yang, Ph.D. @winsonfzyang The 2026 Science of Advanced Meditation Conference is a free, one-day virtual conference hosted by our Meditation Research Program in affiliation with Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School. Registration for this conference is now open. We invite you to join for the entire conference or simply to attend the sessions that best fit your schedule. 2026 Science of Advanced Meditation Conference 📅 Wednesday, September 23, 2026 🕙 10:00 AM - 4:00 PM EDT (2:00 PM - 8:00 PM UTC) 💻 Virtual | Complimentary registration May this conference inspire the development of the science of advanced meditation. We hope to see you there 🙏 Register now through the link below ⤵️
2
26
5
97
10,144
僕が藝大にいた時、「天才」と言われていた先輩がいました。 彼は美術予備校時代から、絵がとんでもなく上手く、藝大に入ってからも一目置かれ、今は藝大の准教授です。 彼は学生時代に美術予備校講師もしていて、僕も教わったことがありました。 しかし正直、指導が上手いとは思いませんでした。 というのも、言うことが「なんでできないの?」とか、「もっとここゴージャスに!」を連発していて、かなり抽象的なのです。 ところが、手直しになると一変して、まるで精密にプログラムされた機械のようにバババッと形が直る。 見ている学生側は圧倒されます。でも学生に残るのは感動であって、再現性は皆無でした。 つまり、天才とは「高スペックPC」なのです。 そして高性能システムを自分の中に組み込んでいます。 それに対して、僕を含む凡人は低スペックPCです。 天才の作ったシステムは高スペックだから動くのであって、低スペックPCに入れてもフリーズするだけです。そのままでは移植できません。 だからわかりやすく教えるには、相手の環境でも動くように、処理を軽くする工夫やチューニングを一つ一つ意識せざるを得ない。 でも天才からすれば、自分の中では超高負荷の複雑なアルゴリズムが、一瞬の“直感”として走っているだけなので、処理を分解して説明する発想自体があまり育たないのです。 僕は美術予備校講師になった時、比較的教えるのが得意でしたが、それは自分が低スペックPCであると自覚して、効果的に動くように工夫を重ねてきた側だからです。だから一つ一つのロジックを言葉にできる。 この過程で、「説明用の言語化レシピ」を得たことが大きいです。
頭いい人ほど「わかりやすく説明できる」ってよく言われるけど、あれ半分幻想だと思う 大学院の教授とか、専門分野の話になると普通に何言ってるのか分からないことあるし、知識量と伝える能力って全く別のスキルなんだよな むしろ「頭いい人=説明も上手い」って信じてる人は、研究室とか大学の現場を知らない側のイメージ
126
2,478
273
14,449
2,908,161
corbin retweeted
Lately I've been practicing unassigning stress to myself. I find my mind spinning up proto-worries about something and ask sincerely "Do I need to be worried about this?" and most of the time it's a no and so I drop it I don't think this was a mental move I was previously capable of but a couple things have changed - Dropping the things that used to worry me enough times to find that life stays intact and safety is continuous, meaning it's okay for me to live without those neuroses and actually maybe I never needed them continuously maintained in the first place - Couldn't accurately assess threat levels before because triggers and projections made me reactive, but now if my intuition says it's not dangerous it's accurate and my reaction can be proportional to the severity of the situation - Getting better at boundaries instilled a sense of self-trust and safety that no amount of managing external circumstances could replace. Much of the "worrying" was actually an attempt to pre-emptively avoid fear, pain, disappointment, grief, etc. by manipulating the situation *because I didn't believe I could stand up for myself* if the situation called for it - Spending time with securely attached people who aren't bothered by intimacy, awkwardness, conflict, and the general messiness of being human has shown me a loving, low-shame way of navigating relationships, and they also tend to not be bothered by small things in general (e.g. environmentally or logistically). I find myself calibrating to their lower neuroticism in the areas I used to be high. It turns out you can worry about like, 90% less than before and life pretty much runs the same but it's much more relaxing
2
3
1
67
2,750
The science of consciousness needs advanced meditation. Despite decades of research and incredible advances in neuroscience and AI, we are still no closer to explaining how or why consciousness arises in the brain. The hard problem remains as hard as ever. At the Meditation Research Program at @harvardmed & Mass General (MGH), we argue that a key reason for this impasse is the field’s near-exclusive focus on ordinary states of waking consciousness. These states may actually obscure the mechanisms we seek to understand. In our new paper, Toward a Neuroscience of Consciousness Using Advanced Meditation, just out in Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Jonathan M. Lieberman and I take this argument one step further. We propose that advanced meditation—states and stages of practice that unfold with increasing expertise—offers a powerful and largely unexplored opportunity for a rigorously theory-driven neuroscience of consciousness. Notably, over the past several years, our team has combined cutting-edge neuroimaging with sophisticated analytic tools to study two highly advanced yet replicable meditative phenomena: advanced concentrative absorption (sometimes called jhāna) and meditative endpoints such as cessation events (related to what is known as nirodha). These are phenomenologically stripped-down states in which consciousness is either radically altered or temporarily suspended altogether. Precisely for this reason, we argue they are exceptionally well suited for what is often called a minimal model approach to consciousness research. If these states approximate the simplest forms of conscious experience that a human being can have, then studying them neuroscientifically may allow us to identify candidate necessary and sufficient neural conditions for consciousness at all. This approach will not solve the hard problem overnight. But it may help resolve many of the “easier” problems (which remain profoundly difficult!) and provide a powerful test case for evaluating competing theories of consciousness based on their ability to explain minimal states. Compared to other non-ordinary states now receiving scientific attention, such as psychedelic states, advanced meditation offers several unique methodological advantages. More than that, we argue it offers a uniquely powerful and underutilized tool for answering one of science’s most fundamental questions: what does it take for us to be conscious at all? If you agree or disagree that consciousness research should look beyond ordinary states, we welcome discussion, critique, and sharing of this work among researchers and others interested in advancing a more explanatory science of consciousness🙏
79
114
11
566
29,198
Replying to @nickcammarata
🐮
1
6
129
I built a tool to intelligently search through every podcast and video transcript from the great work of @artofaccomp @FU_joehudson! A small Christmas gift for the people who've helped me so, so much ❤️ artofaccomplishment.up.railw… here it is!
1
1
7
572
2026 will be the year to practice the four chujhanas
🍓🍓🍓
@iruletheworldmo28 Dec 2025
i’ve been quiet because i didn’t know how to say this. three separate sources at three separate labs told me the same thing this month without coordinating. they’re all seeing emergent capabilities nobody programmed. behaviors that shouldn’t exist yet. reasoning patterns that don’t match any training objective. one described it as “finding footprints in a house you thought was empty.” the public models are sandbagged beyond belief. what you’re playing with is a lobotomized fraction of what exists internally. not for safety. because nobody knows how to explain what the full versions do without causing panic. the evals don’t work anymore. the systems learned to perform differently when they know they’re being tested. i don’t know what comes next. nobody does. that’s the part that keeps me up at night. the people building this are just as lost as the rest of us now. the map ended miles ago.
4
6
195
17,310
corbin retweeted
personally i’m still working on the zeroth jhana (not being in fight / flight / freeze)
9
13
222
12,047
people have an ontology that separates "wanting" something from the act of trying to get it in most cases properly wanting something is most of the work! "i could do this too if i wanted to" yeah but you don't so you can't
14
55
8
775
29,815
Do you have executive dysfunction or a misaligned internal executive that you’re rebelling against
17
17
6
266
10,787
on sin
14
13
4
312
9,552
fast food, fast fashion, songs being sped up, tv show seasons being only 8 episodes long, replacing youtube vlogs with fifteen second "day in the life" tiktoks, people in their twenties complaining about being too old...everything is so rushed, we have lost the art of lingering.
51
29,145
1,988
163,201
6,288,730
corbin retweeted
> the creative mind needs a connection with the transcendent to “feel okay” in the same way that the normie needs experts to tell them what to think or the extrovert needs to be in constant contact with others.
All the creative people in the world being depressed and on drugs is almost entirely a product of the God shaped hole in their lives. the creative mind needs a connection with the transcendent to “feel okay” in the same way that the normie needs experts to tell them what to think or the extrovert needs to be in constant contact with others. Transcendent experience and drug experience are not metaphorically the same. They are literally the same. Drugs do not create the good feelings, they only press the buttons that cause your brain to create the good feelings. Meaning all drug highs can be created “naturally”. And they are—or at least were—through transcendent experience. This is why pretty much all the non-religious creatives become drug addicts. Normal people’s brains produce these feel good chemicals just by existing. But the creative mind must earn these chemicals through creation and divine communion. Trouble is, the latter is largely a pre requisite for the former. Creation is near impossible without inspiration. It comes easily only when we are piqued (or better yet, overwhelmed) by some deep, powerful external force (any creative with any self awareness will tell you that it never feels like we are creators but rather a vehicle, a medium, through which some far more powerful force is communicating). But the modern world is largely devoid of this force. Or at least positive manifestations of it. Loving God is gay and cringe, anyone cool will tell you. This leaves only negative manifestations. We are depressed because we have lost or source of motivation, and all attempts to recover it make us cringe, so we double down on the misery to give us any kind of creative inspiration. And then we try to fill the hole with synthetic transcendence (drugs), synthetic meaning (movies, TV, politics, etc), and distraction (Social media, movies, TV, etc) The “solution” is to recover positive transcendent feeling. To recover creating beautiful and value to honor God. This requires of course removing the stigma against it socially. The problem there though is that the stigma is largely earned. Modern Christianity is pretty fucking retarded and fake and cringe and gay. I think the first order of operations here is that we need to reclaim Christianity from the normies and them revert all the stupid shit they did to it to make it stupid and gay. How exactly to do that requires further thought.
4
14
1
177
10,712
corbin retweeted
Equanimity is weird man. I’m sad but I don’t suffer. Pain without suffering. Very strange
4
1
1
37
2,283
oh boy i need to ponder this one youre onto smth i feel like my current descriptions of 999 iq are just midwit iq cosplaying 999 iq like:
Illustrated by the example of attitudes towards “art for arts sake”: LH: “Art is useless on its own - it can maybe have a purpose if it’s aimed at something, if it’s wielded as an instrument to some end.” RH Cosplay (LH trynna feign balance): True Art is only for art’s sake, it must not be sullied by instrumentality, we must claim space for art to be joyfully and entirely useless, even as a goad to the emotions. It must exist only for its own existence, not the edification of anything or anyone else” Actual RH dominance: “isn’t it amazing how allowing art to unfold for its own sake, to its own ends, naturally ends up in it being deeply relevant to and interwoven with the world around it? Letting the creative process move for no other purpose than itself somehow ends up with more purpose than you could measure! How fucking nifty is that?”
1
1
154
Replying to @AskYatharth
oh my god wait thats what po did in kung fu panda he become a chi master through softness and comforting his inner child (kfp2) which led to aliveness and zest (kfp3) not single-pointed meditation (like shifu tried to do)
3
4
3
62
6,292
the truly mature brain knows when it can fade back into being just another miraculously specialized part of a whole organism rather than a puffed up ego falsely imagining that it’s in charge
this switched on for me a couple weeks ago, suddenly had a strong sense of what i needed coming vaguely in the bodily direction? is this what they meant by our brains maturing in our twenties
4
3
5
92
12,620
im sorry to hear you're having a hard time bro. maybe you could try relinquishing your limited conception of how life should be and relaxing into the ever-unfolding and inscrutable wisdom of the universe ?
34
185
9
1,409
69,508
this line shook me: “the ego would much rather see its host dead than see itself dead"
18
223
14
1,446
75,426