Pinned Tweet
thread of things I made to make it easier to share w ppl I meet instead of having to dig thru my tweets 👇
thought i was a sucker for burning hours and tokens into building a “software factory” but it’s … actually working? It just keeps the code fast and maintainable ?? It fixes its own process failures (mostly)??? i can just walk away finally????
Learning that clarity of thought and good technical writing are the most important skills for working w AI presently and in the future
Clarity of thought will never be superseded.
xitter.cf/liminal_warmth/status/…
learning linguistics and making viz to understand what makes claudish sentences difficult, eg:
An ops claim whose inputs a co-chosen decision pins to stored data computes a function of Consts.
its actually rly impressive how claude manages to compress so much info into a sentence, and how english affords that compression. writing the meaning in code would take quite a few lines
How do yall get away with not reading the code? I tried it and it was a ton of slop that was super slow and buggy and had to burn a lot of tokens refactoring it and I’m just waiting around for hours and hours
…
Is that what you all do? Omg.
Esp rn. Claude confused itself twice with its bizarrely bad writing 🤦♂️ don’t ever let it freely write instructions or notes for itself!
In the strange position of having been one of those ppl rly deep into meticulously crafting code , but feeling no reservations about ai taking over and in fact welcoming it
Wait a minute. That’s bc I am now meticulously crafting instructions for ai 🤦♂️
seeing lots of discussion lately on the impact of AI in graphics programming and interactive/coding communities.
what used to require technical expertise, years of study, arcane knowledge has now been reduced to a quick prompt. it’s a hard pill to swallow; there’s a joy and intellectual stimulation in solving complex exercises with hand-written code, but I suspect developing in that way will very soon be obsolete & automated (or already is). 😓
for what it’s worth, I still believe that “think bigger” is a good way to stay sane and a step ahead. not just working on something more technical, that a future model might beat, but working on something you find ambitious, that you might never have even considered previously.
also, it’s worth remembering:
AI is a jagged intelligence: it still sucks at making art, coming up with original ideas, writing good prose, having good aesthetics/taste, doing any kind of graphic design.
AI knowledge needs to be extracted: even if a future model can solve a hard problem, for now we still need humans to “mine” and surface these answers.
AI models today are large and inefficient: there’s a lot of value in developing smaller representations, and bringing them into constrained environments (interaction, games, web, embedded systems).
The next big problem in SWE is human-ai communication . “Good writing” will supersede “clean code”. And agents are incredibly bad at this
Yep. you can just ask for clean-enough code. Might take some iterations but it can be done today xitter.cf/dhh/status/21036134367…
The opus 5.5 generated vids are v impressive and I’m looking forward to experimenting, but something about them is rly cringe and I can’t stand watching them. And I suppose it’s not rly that novel to me, having practiced generative art, like the techniques aren’t mysterious to me
Jev is a dev classifier: based on how the dev reacted to Jev, you can tell a lot about the dev’s experience, sensibilities, and priorities









