abstract nonsense enjoyer - leave no shape unrotated - maintaining https://xitter.cf/t.co/iKkNUm0NvQ

nyc
Joined October 2009
thread of things I made to make it easier to share w ppl I meet instead of having to dig thru my tweets 👇
2
20
thought i was a sucker for burning hours and tokens into building a “software factory” but it’s … actually working? It just keeps the code fast and maintainable ?? It fixes its own process failures (mostly)??? i can just walk away finally????
4
350
yo, following up
me: i like pancakes chris lakin 6mo later: do you still like pancakes?
3
2
153
3,487
“ultrathink” is the new “make no mistakes”
1
80
Learning that clarity of thought and good technical writing are the most important skills for working w AI presently and in the future
3
17
597
Clarity of thought will never be superseded. xitter.cf/liminal_warmth/status/…
This is another thing I think about constantly lately. The problems that we were working on six months ago with AI just don't matter as much now. "Prompt engineering" lasted all of what, a year? No IP law will be able to keep up with how fast people can retool ideas.
1
1
14
learning linguistics and making viz to understand what makes claudish sentences difficult, eg: An ops claim whose inputs a co-chosen decision pins to stored data computes a function of Consts. its actually rly impressive how claude manages to compress so much info into a sentence, and how english affords that compression. writing the meaning in code would take quite a few lines
1
9
361
How do yall get away with not reading the code? I tried it and it was a ton of slop that was super slow and buggy and had to burn a lot of tokens refactoring it and I’m just waiting around for hours and hours … Is that what you all do? Omg.
People seem shocked that the author of Clean Code doesn't read code anymore. But that should not be surprising. Why did I write Clean Code? What is the goal of keeping code clean? To get it out of the way of the real job -- thinking.
1
5
653
Esp rn. Claude confused itself twice with its bizarrely bad writing 🤦‍♂️ don’t ever let it freely write instructions or notes for itself!
1
57
I can’t believe I tell good night to Claude as a practical technique🤦‍♂️
2
6
216
The technique being: communicating in two words that I will be unavailable for the next ~8 hours and it must act autonomously
2
45
In the strange position of having been one of those ppl rly deep into meticulously crafting code , but feeling no reservations about ai taking over and in fact welcoming it Wait a minute. That’s bc I am now meticulously crafting instructions for ai 🤦‍♂️
seeing lots of discussion lately on the impact of AI in graphics programming and interactive/coding communities. what used to require technical expertise, years of study, arcane knowledge has now been reduced to a quick prompt. it’s a hard pill to swallow; there’s a joy and intellectual stimulation in solving complex exercises with hand-written code, but I suspect developing in that way will very soon be obsolete & automated (or already is). 😓 for what it’s worth, I still believe that “think bigger” is a good way to stay sane and a step ahead. not just working on something more technical, that a future model might beat, but working on something you find ambitious, that you might never have even considered previously. also, it’s worth remembering: AI is a jagged intelligence: it still sucks at making art, coming up with original ideas, writing good prose, having good aesthetics/taste, doing any kind of graphic design. AI knowledge needs to be extracted: even if a future model can solve a hard problem, for now we still need humans to “mine” and surface these answers. AI models today are large and inefficient: there’s a lot of value in developing smaller representations, and bringing them into constrained environments (interaction, games, web, embedded systems).
1
7
304
Ok that’s not true I do have reservations but it’s all about the slop rather than loss
3
36
The next big problem in SWE is human-ai communication . “Good writing” will supersede “clean code”. And agents are incredibly bad at this
1
4
183
Yep. you can just ask for clean-enough code. Might take some iterations but it can be done today xitter.cf/dhh/status/21036134367…
I understand the appeal in trying to find the first plausible fortress in our retreat from writing code, but if you think it's "architecture", I have bad news for you. The models are also very good at that.
1
99
The opus 5.5 generated vids are v impressive and I’m looking forward to experimenting, but something about them is rly cringe and I can’t stand watching them. And I suppose it’s not rly that novel to me, having practiced generative art, like the techniques aren’t mysterious to me
4
119
u wot m8
48
92
16
4,515
110,808
Jev is a dev classifier: based on how the dev reacted to Jev, you can tell a lot about the dev’s experience, sensibilities, and priorities
3
172
I cringe so much when I use or see someone use a Claudish word. At the same time, they’re good words!! It’s like the training of Claude resulted in all these optimal words concentrated in one model
2
5
264