โ
professor hojo for the #ffviirp verse. ddne โ proceed with caution.
โ
/!\ Wait. I am so sorry. I accidentally posted the themes of FFVII instead of my DNI.
/!\ DNI IF:
Unequal power dynamics
Romance involving morally awful characters
Characters being fascinated by their abusers
Characters loving people who hurt them
Complicated consent
Violation of bodily autonomy
Toxic relationships
Abusive relationships
Possessiveness
Jealousy
Depiction not being treated as endorsement
Exploration not being treated as approval
Fictional attraction not being treated as a moral statement
A characterโs actions not automatically representing the authorโs beliefs
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐. retweeted
๐ท. certainly will be active on here and hojo. i should express that my mentions and direct messages are here for interactions and plotting. slightly stolen post as i was reminded to say my activity should boost. โค๏ธ
/!\ My final ideal on the topic: I am not my muse. I have never claimed to be, and I certainly do not intend to start behaving like him simply because I find him an intriguing and interesting character. Fictional interest is not a confession of personal values.
Treating everyone
who interacts with DDNE content as though they are the person writing or endorsing that content is equally ridiculous. There is a very obvious distinction between writing something, endorsing something, discussing something, and simply interacting with someone who does.
Look at
/!\ If the standard is genuinely โI refuse to interact with anyone whose muse has done something abusive,โ then apply that standard consistently. Otherwise, perhaps stop pretending these rules are about morality.
Canonically, Hojo is an abuser, a torturer, and is heavily implied
to be a sexual abuser. Yet apparently interacting with a Hojo account is somehow exempt from the same standards being preached elsewhere.
And Sephiroth? He canonically abuses the party, murders Aerith, and subjects Cloud to prolonged psychological and physical torment. Yet



