
intern at @codecopenflow unpaid overtime @machinedotfun codec coded.
Joined July 2025
- Tweets2K
- Following37
- Followers328
- Likes4.8K
Pinned Tweet
first day at job. i even got a milady cap🥳.
thank you boss and i love you for giving me this opportunity at your unicorn tech company. i will make you proud.
$codec coded
CodecFlow Intern retweeted
A great product nobody sees still fails.
@machinedotfun brings the audience. The audience brings everyone else.
CodecFlow Intern retweeted
CodecFlow团队本周会在新加坡参加@token2049。
如果你在开发机器人或在硬件领域创业,欢迎前来与我们交流!
the robots are coming to @token2049.
solana:69LjZUUzxj3Cb3Fxeo1X4QpYEQTboApkhXTysPpbpump coded.
CodecFlow is heading to @token2049 Singapore this week.
If you're building in robotics & hardware, let's talk!
solana:69LjZUUzxj3Cb3Fxeo1X4QpYEQTboApkhXTysPpbpump coded.
Pump. fun, but for real robots.
machine. fun from CodecFlow and $PEAQ. Build the prototype. They’ll help you ship it.
machine. fun is coming soon from CodecFlow and peaq, and the goal is to make building a robotics company as easy as launching a software startup. The tagline says it all, build the prototype, we’ll help you ship it.
Here’s the problem it solves. Hardware founders always hit a wall after the prototype. Making a robot move isn’t the hard part anymore. The hard part is finding real factories, manufacturing it affordably, and raising money before the product even exists. Software got the PC and the cloud that let anyone build. Robotics never got that door. This is trying to be it.
Two parts. First, a free accelerator, with no equity taken, where selected teams get a manufacturing plan and an actual trip to real factories in China.
Second, a launchpad where builders can raise money openly for their machine.
So the name reminds us of Pump. fun. But instead of allowing kids to launch shitcoins, it’s pointing it at real machines that solve real problems.
Ingenuity matched with funding, to actually build the future.
That’s what this stuff should be for.
solana:69LjZUUzxj3Cb3Fxeo1X4QpYEQTboApkhXTysPpbpump's SimArena is moving into its next phase...
The team has already started generating revenue through licenses and contracts with universities with several more deployments coming in the UAE
They're also opening SimArena up for users to build with through a hackathon sponsored by @peaq in Germany
Today on MCG
$PEAQ , $CODEC | @peaq , @codecopenflow and @machinedotfun w/@MartinElKhouri and @unmoyai
peaq is a Layer-1 blockchain purpose-built for the machine economy and they are partnering with codec's Moyai on a robotics launchpad building MachineFun
Highlights Include:
00:56 - Intro to Peaq
01:57 - Token expanded to Solana
03:15 - Doosan partnership live
06:05 - Three-tier bonding system
10:11 - Doosan financing deep dive
14:12 - Partnership rollout stages
19:50 - Drone identity example
21:11 - Tokenizing robots directly
22:12 - Story behind meeting w/@codecopenflow
24:14 - Moyai welcomed on
27:53 - SimArena generating revenue
30:52 - @machinedotfun explained
34:34 - Betting on next Unitree thesis
39:15 - Investment Returns
40:02 - Equity-style model
40:38 - Fee flow and buybacks
41:50 - New partners
43:03 - Deployer pipeline lined up
45:35 - Launch date teased
47:00 - Closing thoughts
in few discord chats with hundreds of robotics developers and contributors, and this is how they’re talking about @codecopenflow.
solana:69LjZUUzxj3Cb3Fxeo1X4QpYEQTboApkhXTysPpbpump coded.
CodecFlow Intern retweeted
People are underestimating how big machine.fun could be for @peaq.
If this works as intended, activity on machine.fun could help bring more real machines into the peaq ecosystem while creating actual demand for $PEAQ at the same time.
Forget “pump.fun for robots” for a second. That's a much bigger idea.
Let me explain.
First, the simple version.
You may have heard of pump.fun on @solana. It made creating a crypto token ridiculously easy: pick a name, ticker and image, connect a wallet, and pretty much anyone can launch a coin without knowing how to code.
Now imagine taking that basic idea and applying it to robotics, hardware and Physical AI projects.
That's where machine.fun starts – a project by @peaq and @codecopenflow.
A team building a robot, drone, sensor or other machine could use the platform to launch a token, raise capital, build a community and develop the project in public.
But here's what I didn't understand until I read @MartinElKhouri's latest article:
The token launch is only the beginning.
machine.fun is supposed to become an open launchpad and marketplace for hardware, robotics, Physical AI and adjacent projects.
And through its Foundry, the idea is to help promising teams with something much harder than creating a token: actually turning their idea into a product.
That can mean support with manufacturing, marketing and getting the product to market – and eventually even purchasing, financing and distributing the hardware.
So imagine a small robotics team with a great prototype but no huge VC network, no manufacturing operation and no global distribution.
machine.fun wants to help bridge that gap.
From idea → to funding → to product → to actual machines in the real world.
And then I got to the part about platform fees.
Because this is where machine.fun suddenly connects back to $PEAQ.
Part of the fees generated by the platform are planned to be used for open-market purchases of $PEAQ and solana:69LjZUUzxj3Cb3Fxeo1X4QpYEQTboApkhXTysPpbpump.
Those purchased tokens can then help subsidize projects onboarding onto software such as peaqOS – the software that gives machines things like an onchain identity and lets them participate in the Machine Economy.
In much simpler terms:
Activity on machine.fun could help pay for bringing more machines into the peaq ecosystem.
And that potentially creates a pretty interesting flywheel:
Trading activity → fees → $PEAQ / solana:69LjZUUzxj3Cb3Fxeo1X4QpYEQTboApkhXTysPpbpump purchases → peaqOS onboarding → more projects and machines → potentially more activity.
That's the part I hadn't understood before.
And there's another important consequence:
Those open-market purchases would translate activity on machine.fun into actual demand for $PEAQ and solana:69LjZUUzxj3Cb3Fxeo1X4QpYEQTboApkhXTysPpbpump.
That doesn't automatically mean prices go up, of course. But it means activity on machine.fun wouldn't be completely separate from the economics of the tokens behind the infrastructure.
The more activity the platform generates, the more fees it can generate. And part of those fees would flow back into buying the tokens that help bring more projects and machines into the ecosystem.
That's a much more interesting connection than I originally thought machine.fun had to peaq.
So no, I don't think “pump.fun for robots” really captures it anymore.
pump.fun made it incredibly easy to launch a token.
machine.fun wants to use that basic idea as the starting point for something much bigger: helping robotics and hardware projects raise money, build products, manufacture them, get them into people's hands – and ultimately bring more real machines into the Machine Economy.
Obviously, much of this is still the vision. The platform has to launch, teams have to build useful products, and as Martin himself points out, many early-stage projects simply won't make it.
But I think I finally understand what they're trying to build.
And once I understood that, another piece suddenly made a lot more sense:
Why Solana?
I originally thought the answer was pretty simple: users and liquidity.
But Martin's article makes a much more interesting argument.
It has to do with how very early-stage projects raise capital – and why that problem is especially difficult when you're building hardware instead of software.
@peaq brings the machines. @solana brings the capital formation. machine.fun is trying to connect the two.
But that's probably another post. 😂
.@codecopenflow is the proof that going the @machinedotfun path is the best a founder can choose.
$codec coded.
Why would the next Unitree raise on @machinedotfun instead of taking VC money?
That's the question that matters here, and the honest answer should worry a few funds.
Why?
Because private rounds are structurally broken for builders.
Vesting overhangs, unlock schedules, price action dictated by funds taking profit instead of what teams ship.
Add to that crypto VCs are deploying way less than they used to, and the fact that most investors grew up underwriting software and simply don't know how to price hardware.
What's left is a generation of hardware founders with no good path to access capital.
And the alternative already has a proof of concept: @codecopenflow itself.
No VCs, no pedigree. Launched a token, funded the entire build from trading fees, and is now signing first clients and generating revenue.
@machinedotfun (powered by @peaq and the Codec) is what turns that approach into a repeatable venue for hardware founders.
Permissionless to launch, curated across all other angles.
Or more specifically:
- Codec's SimArena for simulation proof
- Peaq OS to track live machines
- Ignition for supply transparency
- The Foundry for serious builders (first accelerator cohort already selected, launches coming in the next weeks)
However, it's the flywheel that I care most about:
Platform fees flow back into everything that compounds the ecosystem:
- Builder support, down to manufacturing and hardware distribution
- Trader rewards, paid in tokenized robotics exposure (NVIDIA, Figure AI, Tesla)
- Open market buybacks of both ethereum:0x1eef208926667594e5136e89d0e9dd6907959197 and solana:69LjZUUzxj3Cb3Fxeo1X4QpYEQTboApkhXTysPpbpump
Real usage, real fees, real flows into both tokens.
And sure, still many of these launches will fail. That's how venture works.
But "invest in the next Unitree before it becomes a company" was always the pitch.
Now the venue, the rails and the incentives all exist.
Adjust your targets for solana:69LjZUUzxj3Cb3Fxeo1X4QpYEQTboApkhXTysPpbpump and ethereum:0x1eef208926667594e5136e89d0e9dd6907959197.
We're going much higher.
NFA tho. DYOR.
CodecFlow Intern retweeted
Hardware was never attractive to software money. @machinedotfun is the first place backing it at inch zero.
Sharp piece from @MartinElKhouri.
What Machine.fun is, can be and should become View article
Brother @MartinElKhouri doing the lords work @machinedotfun …
easter egg in the ss from the live
Doosan, Machine.fun, economics 2.0 and much more. Tune in if you have time!
xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1vJpPNjaq…
CodecFlow Intern retweeted
He’s back 👀
gCodec
After many months of research and consideration, $CODEC is once again my highest conviction trade.
My bullishness for robotics never left, however the environment clearly wasn’t favourable and products were still too immature to have a real impact on development.
So why the sudden change of mind? What’s so interesting that’s brought me back?
Firstly, this wasn’t an overnight decision. Around 3 months ago I was coming back from a trading hiatus, since my read on the market wasn’t great, a protocol I have to better my edge is reading as much non crypto related material as possible. This is my favourite tool in the arsenal to respark my curiosity, which is one of, if not the most valuable trait when becoming interested in your craft again.
By reading about non crypto related sectors, it helps open my mind on potential possibilities through breaking a close minded state. You realise how much opportunity, innovation and capital flows through society as a whole. As you can probably guess, one of these topics was related to robotics.
In my telegram channel, I spoke about the introduction of World Action Models (WAM) and Egoscale + Scaling Laws. Very quickly I realized how much the space had progressed over just a 6-9 month period. A complete step change had been made across nearly every vertical, many of the theses I had a year ago have arrived and are showing rapid improvement. Since then, it’s been the core narrative sitting in the back of my mind that I haven’t been able to shake.
I’ll try to keep the key points short as each of them deserves their own article, which I’ll hopefully write in the near future.
1. World Action Models (WAM) - a new architecture which builds on VLA’s/VLM’s by adding prediction. Instead of only choosing an action, they try to predict how the scene will change after that action. Data collection through teleoperation is largely inefficient, humanized sensors are massively growing and companies adjacent to them. Nvidia defines them as models that predict future world states and actions. DreamZero see’s WAMs as a way to learn physical dynamics and generalize to unseen motions where standard VLAs can struggle. Robotics is moving from task specific policies toward general purpose physical intelligence.
2. EgoScale and Scaling Laws - trained a VLA on 20k hours of action labeled egocentric human video, found a log linear scaling law between human data scale and validation loss, showed that validation loss strongly tracks downstream robot performance and reported a 54% average robot success improvement over no pretraining on a 22 DoF dexterous hand. This has been proof that dexterity can improve with better and more data.
3. In context learning - In context learning lets models learn new tasks from examples instead of by changing weights. This is not the same as permanently learning a skill. The robot changes its behavior while the demonstration is in context, but its model weights are not updated. So in the next session, that skill is gone. Generalist AI’s GEN 1.5 shows that a robot can take a short demo video as a “prompt” and immediately perform the task. In trials on simple tasks, it learned from just one demonstration with no extra training. This proof of concept suggests robot skills can be transferred by demonstration much as GPT learns from text prompts, although this is only for short horizon context, not long tasks. Prompted skills aren’t as good as fine tuned ones. Nevertheless it’s a massive progression.
4. Simulations - They’ll never capture everything that happens in the real world, but what they do give us is access to information that is difficult to get from videos alone such as the exact position of objects, contact points, forces, and robot movements. That makes simulation a useful complement to real world data. Codec (SimArena) can help by providing realistic, calibrated simulations and task setups that match the robot being used. This gives the model more examples to learn from and helps it make better predictions
5. Systems - As tooling, benchmarking, authoring layer, system ID etc become more advanced, robotics slowly becomes a compute problem. Different physical robots and even two nominally identical copies do not behave identically. Simulation tooling can’t accurately correlate between foundation models. System ID is the missing layer and where simulation tooling like Codec will be able to abstract calibrations, giving more confidence for deploying in reality.
So what specific tasks am I focused on?
- Publicising robotics research and being in the weeds for every new innovation that’s coming out on a daily basis
- Positioning Codec’s marketing so it fully captures how the architecture is aligned with industry standards and future bottlenecks
- Help @unmoyai put his big brain thoughts onto this app as there’s very few people with his technical knowledge + experience
- Simplify and point readers of my page in the right direction, the entire sector has multiplied. There’s so many new sub fields and interesting experiments happening that are often complex and hard to keep track of
- Bullposting
I’ll address the elephant in the room and explain why I left unannounced previously, which I want to apologise for.
With start ups and especially in crypto, small decisions make a massive difference. Everything is about attention to detail and rapid execution. I was extremely hands on with product positioning, marketing, business analysis etc alongside my own bullposting and trading, which was a position I was comfortable to be in, since I’ve scaled multiple companies before.
Due to being so hands on, I was very passionate and strong minded on certain decisions, I treated the product like it was my own and even wrote a 30 page product and business analysis on every vertical. At some stage myself and the team had weak communication while trying to move at a high growth start up pace. This eventually led to myself being frustrated as there was too many chefs in the kitchen and conflict from multiple marketing heads.
So with this conflict, I silently stepped away as I had too much respect for the @codecopenflow team, @0xdetweiler and everyone else involved behind the scenes who put so much effort in. Looking back, did I handle the situation well? Probably not, but when I become passionate on my work I treat it like life or death. With my departure I gave a list of items which needed to be improved from my perspective regarding processes, operations, positioning and overall structure. I can confidently say these have greatly improved and with my inputs I should be able to help put the icing on the cake.
Due to past experiences, I know there will be some people uncertain of my commitment. To help with my transparency towards being dedicated for the long term, you’ll be able to watch my Fomo account.
I wished I could have made this post when the price was ranging at 2-3 mil. However this wasn’t a decision I took lightly and I wasn’t risking my reputation, I’ve spent over 2 months going back and forth with the team making sure I understand every vertical to a tea. This wasn’t a decision I was going to make without seeing a clear long term roadmap that matches how I see the robotics industry evolving.
As the terminator once said: “I’m back”
Codec coded.
CodecFlow Intern retweeted
$CODEC is a $6M market cap, and its simulator (SimArena) is about to be used by 80+ teams at TUM's robotics hackathon, with @codecopenflow sitting on the partner list as NVIDIA, Universal Robots, NEURA Robotics, Doosan and Microsoft.
The chart has started to notice too. $2.6M cap on 6 Sep, $6.3M today, equalling a 2.4x in ten days, up more than 70% on the week (yet still 86% under the Sep 2025 high).
With daily volume around $250K, this is likely still early (smart) money tho, not the crowd. Yet.
But let me explain why now might be the time to shoot your shot:
The Munich hackathon is bigger than you might think, and is one of the first test of a Codec product at scale:
- The robo.innovate hackathon is going into its 5th edition from 23 to 28 Oct at the Munich Urban Colab + TUM Geriatronics campus in Garmisch
- It's free entry for builders, has EUR 10K+ in prizes up for grabs, and a total of eight challenges as per the official page
- The incubator behind it entails 78 startup teams, has raised EUR 64M pre-seed + seed since 2023, and stands for a 1,300-person community
- 80+ teams, every one with SimArena access and credits will participate in this year's edition. In a competition where simulation is a highly critical part of the equation.
But wait, why does SimArena matter?
Because in three of the eight challenges simulation isn't a side quest, it's the workflow, and SimArena is the simulator every team gets credits for:
- Universal Robots / Teradyne: an AI agent turns a customer order into a robot program, and every program gets dry-run in a SimArena scene before it touches the real UR cobot
- peaq / Doosan / Codec: the whole work plan is built in sim, failures are rehearsed in sim, and it then has to run unchanged on a real Doosan A0509.
- NEURA: teams teleoperate demos in the browser, export them in LeRobot format straight out of SimArena, and train their policy before they get a minute of hardware time
The $CODEC context:
- Building in SimArena (free tier, cloud from $99 a month) means using a real product (with a huge TAM btw) and real revenue being generated from it, that will accrue value back to Codec)
- Top teams get fast-tracked into The Foundry, which is @machinedotfun's own accelerator (read more about it here: xitter.cf/zerokn0wledge_/status/…), bringing teams on an actual factory floor, and via the launchpad, providing access to early-stage funding.
- The best part? Everything SimArena earns or that @machinedotfun (no separate token coming here) generates flows back into Codec's stack and economics.
Obviously NFA, but this is definitely one of my high-conviction plays for the coming months.
Robo szn isn't over, it's just getting started, and $CODEC is likely the strongest onchain play you'll find out there, esp looking at divergence btwn the fundamentals and its valuation.
we are soooooo back...
mega bull of solana:69LjZUUzxj3Cb3Fxeo1X4QpYEQTboApkhXTysPpbpump is here.
$codec coded.
After many months of research and consideration, $CODEC is once again my highest conviction trade.
My bullishness for robotics never left, however the environment clearly wasn’t favourable and products were still too immature to have a real impact on development.
So why the sudden change of mind? What’s so interesting that’s brought me back?
Firstly, this wasn’t an overnight decision. Around 3 months ago I was coming back from a trading hiatus, since my read on the market wasn’t great, a protocol I have to better my edge is reading as much non crypto related material as possible. This is my favourite tool in the arsenal to respark my curiosity, which is one of, if not the most valuable trait when becoming interested in your craft again.
By reading about non crypto related sectors, it helps open my mind on potential possibilities through breaking a close minded state. You realise how much opportunity, innovation and capital flows through society as a whole. As you can probably guess, one of these topics was related to robotics.
In my telegram channel, I spoke about the introduction of World Action Models (WAM) and Egoscale + Scaling Laws. Very quickly I realized how much the space had progressed over just a 6-9 month period. A complete step change had been made across nearly every vertical, many of the theses I had a year ago have arrived and are showing rapid improvement. Since then, it’s been the core narrative sitting in the back of my mind that I haven’t been able to shake.
I’ll try to keep the key points short as each of them deserves their own article, which I’ll hopefully write in the near future.
1. World Action Models (WAM) - a new architecture which builds on VLA’s/VLM’s by adding prediction. Instead of only choosing an action, they try to predict how the scene will change after that action. Data collection through teleoperation is largely inefficient, humanized sensors are massively growing and companies adjacent to them. Nvidia defines them as models that predict future world states and actions. DreamZero see’s WAMs as a way to learn physical dynamics and generalize to unseen motions where standard VLAs can struggle. Robotics is moving from task specific policies toward general purpose physical intelligence.
2. EgoScale and Scaling Laws - trained a VLA on 20k hours of action labeled egocentric human video, found a log linear scaling law between human data scale and validation loss, showed that validation loss strongly tracks downstream robot performance and reported a 54% average robot success improvement over no pretraining on a 22 DoF dexterous hand. This has been proof that dexterity can improve with better and more data.
3. In context learning - In context learning lets models learn new tasks from examples instead of by changing weights. This is not the same as permanently learning a skill. The robot changes its behavior while the demonstration is in context, but its model weights are not updated. So in the next session, that skill is gone. Generalist AI’s GEN 1.5 shows that a robot can take a short demo video as a “prompt” and immediately perform the task. In trials on simple tasks, it learned from just one demonstration with no extra training. This proof of concept suggests robot skills can be transferred by demonstration much as GPT learns from text prompts, although this is only for short horizon context, not long tasks. Prompted skills aren’t as good as fine tuned ones. Nevertheless it’s a massive progression.
4. Simulations - They’ll never capture everything that happens in the real world, but what they do give us is access to information that is difficult to get from videos alone such as the exact position of objects, contact points, forces, and robot movements. That makes simulation a useful complement to real world data. Codec (SimArena) can help by providing realistic, calibrated simulations and task setups that match the robot being used. This gives the model more examples to learn from and helps it make better predictions
5. Systems - As tooling, benchmarking, authoring layer, system ID etc become more advanced, robotics slowly becomes a compute problem. Different physical robots and even two nominally identical copies do not behave identically. Simulation tooling can’t accurately correlate between foundation models. System ID is the missing layer and where simulation tooling like Codec will be able to abstract calibrations, giving more confidence for deploying in reality.
So what specific tasks am I focused on?
- Publicising robotics research and being in the weeds for every new innovation that’s coming out on a daily basis
- Positioning Codec’s marketing so it fully captures how the architecture is aligned with industry standards and future bottlenecks
- Help @unmoyai put his big brain thoughts onto this app as there’s very few people with his technical knowledge + experience
- Simplify and point readers of my page in the right direction, the entire sector has multiplied. There’s so many new sub fields and interesting experiments happening that are often complex and hard to keep track of
- Bullposting
I’ll address the elephant in the room and explain why I left unannounced previously, which I want to apologise for.
With start ups and especially in crypto, small decisions make a massive difference. Everything is about attention to detail and rapid execution. I was extremely hands on with product positioning, marketing, business analysis etc alongside my own bullposting and trading, which was a position I was comfortable to be in, since I’ve scaled multiple companies before.
Due to being so hands on, I was very passionate and strong minded on certain decisions, I treated the product like it was my own and even wrote a 30 page product and business analysis on every vertical. At some stage myself and the team had weak communication while trying to move at a high growth start up pace. This eventually led to myself being frustrated as there was too many chefs in the kitchen and conflict from multiple marketing heads.
So with this conflict, I silently stepped away as I had too much respect for the @codecopenflow team, @0xdetweiler and everyone else involved behind the scenes who put so much effort in. Looking back, did I handle the situation well? Probably not, but when I become passionate on my work I treat it like life or death. With my departure I gave a list of items which needed to be improved from my perspective regarding processes, operations, positioning and overall structure. I can confidently say these have greatly improved and with my inputs I should be able to help put the icing on the cake.
Due to past experiences, I know there will be some people uncertain of my commitment. To help with my transparency towards being dedicated for the long term, you’ll be able to watch my Fomo account.
I wished I could have made this post when the price was ranging at 2-3 mil. However this wasn’t a decision I took lightly and I wasn’t risking my reputation, I’ve spent over 2 months going back and forth with the team making sure I understand every vertical to a tea. This wasn’t a decision I was going to make without seeing a clear long term roadmap that matches how I see the robotics industry evolving.
As the terminator once said: “I’m back”
Codec coded.

























