
Research Fellow @LowyInstitute. Former diplomat @dfat and international adviser @pmc_gov_au. Watching strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific. Views are mine.
Sydney, New South Wales
Joined July 2013
- Tweets6.7K
- Following1.2K
- Followers2.7K
- Likes35.5K
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
AUKUS is usually framed as just a submarine-building project. But I went down to HMAS Stirling recently to get a good look at one of the most consequential force posture shifts in decades.
Stirling will be the first American submarine base to be established abroad in half a century, transforming it into a port that will project American power deep into Asia economist.com/asia/2026/11/1…
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
The U.S. will deploy four Virginia-class boats to Stirling under the command of the new Submarine Squadron 3. That’s as many as the U.S. has home-ported in Guam. Unlike Guam, it’s out of range of all Chinese conventional missiles except maybe the DF-27. And it’s closer to the fight than every other base.
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
Despite Jensen Huang’s resignation, Congress must demand answers from Mr. Huang and others at Nvidia about how they may have put U.S. national security at risk.
The Trump administration must also answer for what it did once it learned about Mr. Huang’s relationship with a suspected Chinese intelligence asset. Were government officials told not to investigate because of Trump’s relationship with Mr. Huang? What did Trump know when he personally invited Mr. Huang aboard Air Force One?
Americans deserve to know that those at the highest levels of power are putting America first, not their bottom line or their personal friendships.
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
This will get missed in the news of Jensen resigning, but it's super important.
Singapore says it was holding Alice Huang's passport thru Feb 2026, but got little help from the U.S. in its investigation. Trump was briefed on Alice in fall 2025.
That means the U.S. did nothing for months as Singapore held a Chinese spy who the U.S. knew was in a relationship with the most important person in A.I. Hard to understand. nytimes.com/2026/11/12/busin…
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
The Scandal Is Bigger Than Jensen Huang
I argue the most alarming revelation in this mess may not be that America’s most influential AI executive was involved with a suspected Chinese spy—but that senior administration officials were warned about the danger and nevertheless continued relying on him.
American strategy has come to depend, to an extraordinary degree, on powerful private-sector actors whose incentives the government cannot simply assume will align with the national interest.
The power of these individuals is fast escaping the reach of the institutions responsible for guarding against technological and geopolitical risks.
The lesson of this scandal is not simply that these people are fallible. It is that we need institutions capable of checking their influence and managing the consequences of their mistakes before these individuals become too powerful to be held accountable.
Read it in @TheAtlantic here: theatlantic.com/internationa…
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
Mr. Trump’s approach could embolden China to take bigger risks, said Dennis Wilder, a former U.S. intelligence analyst on China and a senior fellow at Georgetown University. “The president’s whole laissez-faire attitude toward spying reassures Beijing that the political blowback from espionage operations will be very manageable...The president has over and over dismissed Chinese spying by saying that everyone does it...the problem is that no one else does it to the very damaging effect that the Chinese can and do.”
Behind the Trump-Xi Bonhomie, a Fierce Spy War Rages nytimes.com/2026/11/11/world…
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
WSJ: "As recently as the summer of last year, Singapore was officially one of Nvidia’s biggest markets, generating 22% of the chip maker’s revenue. Then, practically overnight, it disappeared from the company’s financial disclosures. Investors deserve to know why, and Nvidia needs to start explaining, with or without Jensen Huang at the helm. The timeline indicates that Nvidia altered its methodology for reporting the geographic breakdown of its revenue shortly after placing Megaspeed International on an internal block list. It isn’t clear if the two are related, but the shift had the effect of removing visibility into Nvidia’s sales tied to Singapore. That is the home to Megaspeed, the cloud-computing company embroiled in a sex-and-espionage scandal that has engulfed Nvidia and its chief executive."
wsj.com/business/earnings/nv…
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
Stunning report. At this point it seems like Howard Lutnick and Jeff Kessler are just outright defying the President's orders on export controls. The President apparently ordered Secretary Lutnick to crack down on China's access to controlled AI chips in Southeast Asia--and reportedly has ordered this three separate times--and they're just...not doing it.
Why is Lutnick refusing to act? Why is he allowing China to continue to get AI chips via Southeast Asia? At this point, Lutnick isn't just protecting Nvidia, he's straight up protecting Chinese companies--reportedly against the wishes of the President and the entire rest of the Cabinet. Is Lutnick personally benefitting from China getting access to AI chips?
This is a total breakdown inside the administration on a major national security issue. There has to be accountability for this. Congress obviously will investigate, but how is it that the President's own appointees are just refusing to execute the President's orders? I've never seen anything like this.
SCOOP: President Trump authorized a crackdown on companies suspected of diverting Nvidia's advanced AI chips to China on Thursday, but one administration official repeatedly stood in the way: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. axios.com/2026/11/11/trump-l…
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
Watch this story very closely. China’s Megaspeed received between 5 and 7 billion dollars worth of Nvidia chips, or in reality, China did, which they should not have. Jensen and Alice may only be part of the story which eventually emerges. The race for the narrative, blame, and hearings has begun. Eyes wide open.
SCOOP: President Trump authorized a crackdown on companies suspected of diverting Nvidia's advanced AI chips to China on Thursday, but one administration official repeatedly stood in the way: Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. axios.com/2026/11/11/trump-l…
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
“Sources told Axios that Lutnick has spent the last year "undoing" efforts by other administration officials to hold Megaspeed — a company accused of illegally diverting U.S. chips to China — accountable because of concerns it would escalate the trade war with China.”
Scoop: Inside Bessent's Situation Room confrontation with Lutnick over China chip security axios.com/2026/11/11/bessent…
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
For six months, no one really noticed Culper Research’s report outlining the short-selling firm's case against Nvidia. All that changed this week. 🔗 on.wsj.com/3XlgmJN
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
And his should not be the only head to roll economist.com/leaders/2026/1…
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
Jensen Huang must go
We argue in @TheEconomist that his position is untenable
"Like many powerful leaders, he came to believe that he was too important for the normal rules to apply to him."
But he is not the only one. Howard Lutnick has failed to stem the flow of chips to China. More heads should roll
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
Secretary Lutnick literally couldn't even explain why Megaspeed isn't on the Entity List when confronted about it at an NSC meeting by Secretary Bessent. Not only does the rest of the administration not support Commerce's refusal to implement or enforce export controls, but Commerce can't even explain their lack of action when asked about it. This is beyond absurd, and needs to be investigated.
And to be clear, placing Megaspeed on the Entity List today would be way too little too late. Chinese AI chip smuggling via Southeast Asia is rampant. China would just get chips via Speedmatrix, or any of the dozens of other cutouts in Malaysia/Singapore/Thailand that already exist.
Commerce needs to enforce the existing regulations (which it has refused to enforce since May 2025) that would require a license for all AI chip shipments to Southeast Asia, and also require a license for all large-scale AI chip orders to non-trusted companies in most countries. If a sketchy company is ordering $5 billion worth of AI chips, the US government must know about it and at least have the ability to block the sale.
This is the only way to cut down on Chinese smuggling, otherwise we're just playing a game of whack-a-mole that is difficult in the best of times, and that this Commerce department has shown it is uniquely inept at.
SCOOP: Inside Bessent's Situation Room confrontation with Lutnick over China chip security axios.com/2026/11/11/bessent…
This is getting really, really bad.
Exclusive: A Chinese university with deep ties to the People's Liberation Army bought Nvidia's powerful H200 AI chips last month despite being on a US export blacklist, procurement records show, highlighting gaps in Washington's efforts to curb China's access to advanced technology reut.rs/3XiUfni
Exclusive: A Chinese university with deep ties to the People's Liberation Army bought Nvidia's powerful H200 AI chips last month despite being on a US export blacklist, procurement records show, highlighting gaps in Washington's efforts to curb China's access to advanced technology reut.rs/3XiUfni
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
While Alice Huang was having an extramarital affair with Nvidia CEO, her husband Kang Wei was behind the scenes supporting her fundraise and secure chips. This was a family project, which also involved her sister.
He was her former boss at a private equity firm that she joined after a meteoric rise in finance, having first started as an assistant to a senior executive following a journalism career.
Lots more details, including on Kang Wei’s stock market violations and fall from grace at the @FT
ft.com/content/3238d92b-4074…
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
Jensen Huang should resign.
As I told @BusinessInsider's @saraheneedleman, I don't see how he can stay on as CEO of Nvidia.
I understand to most shareholders this will seem unimaginable. The man personally built the American semiconductor industry. He created Nvidia, conceived of the GPU, and scaled it into the backbone of the modern intelligence economy. He has personally run the company for 30+ years, commanding an incredible number of direct reports and directly overseeing every aspect of the company's operations.
But this is a truly extraordinary case—an immense misjudgment that opened the company up to unimaginable reputational and legal liability, which will continue to haunt it in the eyes of Republicans and Democrats alike.
And so, for the first time in its history, the board really does need to distinguish between the interests of Jensen Huang the man, and the $4 trillion company he's created.
It's not just that the CEO of the world's largest company engaged in an extramarital affair. He did so with a customer—posing a massive conflict of interest.
It's also clear this was more than a "potential" conflict of interest. The New York Times is reporting that, in addition to shipping Megaspeed huge quantities of its AI chips, Nvidia—under Mr. Huang's supervision—actually did attempt to intervene in the U.S. government's criminal investigation of that customer, Mr. Huang's girlfriend. This was a massive betrayal of President Trump's trust.
And it wasn't just any customer. It was a woman allegedly operating as a spy for China's intelligence service—running a company that served as a middle-man for one of China's largest AI labs (Alibaba). And both the Commerce Department and the Department of Justice seem to believe this may have been happening in violation of U.S. law.
We don't know what information might have been shared in the course of Mr. Huang's personal relationship—be it about Nvidia, its products, its customers, or senior officials across the Trump administration. If I were a major Nvidia partner today, I would be asking questions about what kind of information about my company might have been inadvertently shared with Ms. Huang.
We can't trust Nvidia to conduct or abide a truly independent investigation. Under Mr. Huang's supervision, representatives from the company have made statements about this case that we now know to be false.
It really doesn't matter what you think of the merits of American export control policy, or whether you agree with Jensen about open-source. This was a betrayal of Nvidia's shareholders, its customers, American security interests, and potentially U.S. law.
The company deserves better. The semiconductor industry deserves better. And so I believe, for the first time in its history, Nvidia needs to seriously consider new leadership and a post-Jensen governance plan.
businessinsider.com/jensen-h…
Charles Lyons-Jones retweeted
I've been teaching anti-corruption law for two decades, so I have a lot of experience analyzing corporate scandals. Two things stand out to me here:
1. The number of people who are willing to ignore a national security scandal because "people make mistakes."
2. A board that has called for an "independent" investigation while simultaneously prejudging its outcome. Even if the investigation is truly independent and credible, I have serious concerns about what this board will do with it.

























