
Market Makers Friend. Timing tops. Capturing trends. Managing risk. Shorted the $BTC cycle top months in advance. Track record in Highlights.
Joined March 2021
- Tweets5.8K
- Following57
- Followers736
- Likes7.9K
Replying to @spectatorindex
Stomach drops every single time one of these notifications hits the feed. Hoping everyone inside is safe and police clear this fast.
Replying to @astronomer_zero
Yup same thought process. Although I’m long from 81.2k. Targeting 94k but have taken some profits.
Anything left to say? 🎯
$BTC - preparing shorts in area of 84.2-84.8k expecting a reversal towards at least 82.1k.
Replying to @AlfMi114
Yes please share the chart and your thinking
$BTC - preparing shorts in area of 84.2-84.8k expecting a reversal towards at least 82.1k.
Replying to @AlfMi114
What do you mean? Send me the chart.
Should I expose the blueprint?
What if this entire move is just one phase of a much bigger HTF accumulation model - a structure that may not fully play out until next year?
Most are positioned for a higher low → higher high.
I’m looking for the opposite.
The next major high will be lower. Mark this.
If my model is correct, the path should look something like this:
$92,955. A rejection somewhere around $93k–$94k. Not a coincidence, a key level in the model.
Controlled distribution of price. Choppy price action, continued downside, occasional violent flushes. But the broader structure remains intact. Liquidity has to build before the next phase can unfold.
The cycle low: $46k–$48k. The zone where this entire structure could come full circle.
The real move isn't necessarily what happens next.
It's what this move is setting up.
Most will only understand the structure once it's already played out.
#BTC
Swept all of the liquidity. $BTC will be aiming for 93k next.
Replying to @astronomer_zero
Wouldnt that be the perfect time to clean up the highs when everybody is scared
Replying to @astronomer_zero
Nice analysis, trading it exactly like that, planning my long around 84.8-9k.
Replying to @AlfMi114
The probability has been decreased.
Replying to @AlfMi114
Would be great If I would be, but yeah it's just analysis...I dont need to be right. 52.8k





