공룡¹⁰ retweeted
𝐐𝐮𝐚𝐥𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐌𝐒𝐈 𝟐𝟎𝟐𝟔
한화생명e스포츠가 MSI 1시드 진출을 확정하며, 창단 첫 MSI 진출이라는 새로운 역사를 만들었습니다. 더 큰 무대에서 이어질 선수단의 여정에 많은 관심과 응원 부탁드립니다.
Hanwha Life Esports has secured the 1st seed and made history with the organization’s first-ever qualification for MSI. Please show your support and interest as our team continues its journey on the bigger stage.
공룡¹⁰ retweeted
그니까 지표로 판단하는건 잘못됐다 하지만 내가 들고온 지표보면 이 선수가 1등이니까 더 나은 대우가 필요하다라는 주장이죠?
결국 하고싶은 말이 국대 그 선수로 바꿔라 면서 아닌척은 왤케하는지 모르겠음 애초에 지표만 보고 뽑는다 한 적이 없다니까 그말은 영원히 무시하고 해외여론에 선동함
Now let's talk about MSI, and why I wanted to establish that the criteria themselves are flawed before getting into this.
I still do not know why MSI, the midseason international event, wasn't in the criteria, while KESPA Cup, a preseason event, was.
So I pulled Riot's API and ran their own criteria stats across 2024–2026: EWC 2025, MSI 2024–25, Worlds 2024–25, LCK 2024–26, and First Stand 2025–26.
The result: Kiin ranks #1 in Overall (image 1), and clearly so. Include KESPA Cup (image 2) as well and the margin narrows, but he's still #1.
For a moment, I'm willing to set aside every concern about whether these are even the right metrics, and take their stat list exactly as given. Even then, the moment the event scope is wider, Kiin is the top player.
He only isn't #1 if the window stays narrow, limited to just their chosen list of events.
And you don't even have to agree with my earlier point that the metrics themselves are flawed. Even using their statistical metrics across a wider, fairer set of events, their own numbers put Kiin first. Kiin deserves better.
