Crypto Bro retweeted
Are more than 50 right wing goons threatening with violence right outside the mandir marg police station not a "breach of peace" for the Delhi Police?
This hooliganism is being enabled while peaceful protestors are being framed as disruptors in the imagination of the people.
Crypto Bro retweeted
In a small Greek restaurant in Cambridge my journey of love began.
Rajiv and I created a world filled with love, laughter and memories. On 10th November, I share that world with you.
Crypto Bro retweeted
$ICP is attracting more users, but its price isn’t following.
Over the past month, ICP dropped 8.3%, while network activity tells a different story:
- Daily active addresses: +35%, reaching 3,860.
- New addresses: +45%, reaching 710 per day.
That’s encouraging, but I wouldn’t call it an adoption breakout yet.
Activity is still roughly half its November 2025 peak.
The price structure is also fragile:
$2.50 is the key downside level I’m watching, while reclaiming $2.85 would weaken the bearish setup. A sustained move above $3.30–$3.60 would be more convincing.
Can growing onchain usage eventually support $ICP’s valuation?
Crypto Bro retweeted
$NEAR vs $ICP
Dom may be right about the cryptography, but he's losing the only scoreboard that pays anyone.
> Chain TVL: $244M vs $12M
> Below ATH: -76% vs -99.7%
> Market cap / TVL: ~25x vs ~100x
> Since Feb : 4.3x vs flat
👉 What Dom actually said about NEAR
Dom shared a PhD engineer's review calling Confidential Intents a permissioned instance with trusted operators, no public code and no public operator list.
He later escalated to calling it snake oil and floated legal action over vetKeys, putting his odds at 70% to 85%, though all of that remains allegation.
👉 Where the criticism lands and where not
On the trust model he has a point, since a private shard with a handful of permissioned validators and a TEE bridge is not threshold cryptography.
Disclosure is weaker ground, because NEAR described the permissioned shard and TEE bridge publicly from its February launch.
👉 What the market chose to pay for
Confidential Intents now holds $171M, up 6.4x since June, though part of that growth was incentivized. All of ICP holds about $12M.
👉 My take
You could argue users never asked for the purest design, they asked for private swaps with compliance built in, and NEAR shipped that first.
Dom's engineering points deserve a technical answer, but a founder attacking a rival from 99.7% below ATH will always get read as marketing.
ICP's own docs also say standard subnet state is readable by node operators, so neither side offers privacy by default.
If you had to pick, does cryptographic purity still matter when the market keeps paying for the practical version?
Crypto Bro retweeted
I told you that sooner or later, technology would be copied, and technological capabilities would eventually become commoditized.
NEAR has numerous institutions backing it.
The Bitwise NEAR ETF is already listed in New York, and Grayscale is preparing to convert its NEAR Trust into an ETF in the United States.
Powerful institutional investors and major financial players are lining up behind NEAR.
And what have you accomplished?
In the end, your obsession with technological superiority has left you spending years developing technology, only to watch others replicate it and reap the benefits.
What is your next plan?
Who care if NEAR took ICP tech, proprietary or not. Everyone has stolen Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Uniswap code forever. The ultimate winner is whoever is more battle-tested, capturing the most users, liquidity, and trust.
Crypto Bro retweeted
UN experts urge Indian authorities to cease 'use of excessive force' to curb protests reut.rs/485W2hL reut.rs/485W2hL
Crypto Bro retweeted
#India
“We call on the authorities to immediately cease the use of excessive force, rescind blanket assembly bans, and refrain from the misuse of digital surveillance, including through biometrics, and internet disruptions.”
- @UN_SPExperts
buff.ly/GxuUI2e
Crypto Bro retweeted
We have worked closely with regulators, industry and operators in India for 5+ years, and built a network of dedicated systems, gateways, and other infrastructure all in-country to exclusively serve Indian traffic safely and securely - and all with the requisite government approvals.
Starlink is ready to connect India with high-speed internet.
Statement from Reliance Industries
In light of recent remarks about Reliance and the Indian market, we wish to place the facts on record.
Like every Indian enterprise, Reliance has grown in an India that welcomes investment and innovation, homegrown or international, that improve the lives of the people.
That openness rests on the rule of law. As the Government of India has stated, it applies the same process to every applicant, Indian or foreign. Jio's own satellite services await clearances.
At Reliance, we have never feared competition. We see it as the truest test of who serves the customer best. Jio itself entered India's crowded telecom market in 2016 as the newest player, with not a single customer. In just ten years, Jio has earned the trust of over 530 million customers and given Indians some of the best digital infrastructure and most affordable data in the world.
We welcome competition in satellite communications, including Starlink. Every player, Jio included, must serve the people of India and abide by the laws and policies of the land.
Crypto Bro retweeted
What if an Ethereum account could rotate or revoke its keys without changing its address?
ERC 8403 proposes a shared model for managing account authorities. Instead of treating every key change as a wallet specific operation, it commits to a single cryptographic root representing the account’s authorized keys and rules.
A transaction must prove that its authority belongs to that root and provide the required authorization. Adding, rotating, or revoking an authority updates the root.
The proposal also explores how this model could support post quantum keys.
The bigger idea is standardized account authority management.
A consistent way to change who or what can authorize transactions, across different account abstraction designs.
ERC 8403 is still a draft, not an implemented Ethereum standard.
