Pinned Tweet
So excited to share what I've been working on with @k_aviny !!
Regulation is good actually! Excited to share what i've been building with @christopherbann, announcing Particularity (YC F26) @particularity_ !
Christopher Bannon retweeted
A frontier lab will claim that its incumbent on them as a "responsible" entity to develop the "safest" AGI first as the rationale behind increasingly rapid development timelines, but this sentiment, quite frankly, seems disingenuous now.
OpenAI will fire three of their safety researchers for sharing information with METR and Anthropic will draft a concerningly light-touch AI safety bill that effectively has less teeth than the FRONTIER Act while simultaneously advocating for regulatory oversight. As an aside, it's not entirely clear to me that the Hugging Face incident itself would even warrant penalties (unless it separately violates some reporting / safety framework requirements) under this bill draft.
Reading the writing on the wall right now, the professed commitment to AI safety as the motivating factor for development seems like a guise for underlying commercial incentives, especially with the prospect of impending IPO's. I just find it funny how these labs reconcile their conviction in the possibility of human extinction with the fact that shareholder value still matters in such a future.
Christopher Bannon retweeted
Regulation is good actually! Excited to share what i've been building with @christopherbann, announcing Particularity (YC F26) @particularity_ !
Fantastic. The next step is agencies using tools to proactively uncover such violations - even before consumers report them!
Terrific to see @NYCMayor's "click to cancel" rule go into effect today.
Trapping customers in subscriptions is against the law.
Businesses must make it as easy to cancel as it is to sign up.
New Yorkers can report subscription traps here: nyc.gov/main/click-to-cancel
Christopher Bannon retweeted
Outsourcing AI regulation to a voluntary "pledge" conceived by Mark Zuckerberg and endorsed by tech CEOs over a private White House lunch is a recipe for disaster.
"Self-regulation" by tech giants is a proven failure. The last time Meta promised to police itself, turned out it was hiding evidence that its platforms actively harm kids. Repeating this mistake with AI leaves the public dangerously exposed.
AI companies are already bound by existing laws, but the White House has generally stopped enforcing laws against the wealthy and powerful. State AGs should step up, halt lawbreaking, and promote real deterrence, including through holding individual executives accountable.
Congress also needs to legislate. We have a long history of regulating risky, transformative industries like banking, pharmaceuticals, and nuclear power. These tools include mandatory testing, truly independent supervision, and break-ups that end conflicts of interest.
Ultimately, reckoning with AI will also require reckoning with our broader crisis of governance. All three branches have become severely deformed. Against this backdrop it might be tempting to outsource regulation to these private actors, but it would be a serious mistake.
Our public institutions must decide the trajectory of these powerful technologies, not the firms whose breakneck pace and financial conflicts brought us here.
My piece in @nytopinion: nytimes.com/2026/09/30/opini…
xitter.cf/semaforben/status/2105…
Big @ashleyrgold scoop: Zuckerberg shaped the Trump AI pledge semafor.com/article/09/30/20…
Christopher Bannon retweeted
i guess kalshi saw this and thought they should steal my video, turn me into a white dude, and run it as an ad
Christopher Bannon retweeted
Have ideas about which deceptive business practices California's new Business & Consumer Services Agency should crack down on?
The agency, established just this month, wants to hear from you.
"Our goal is to ensure that companies are upfront and honest about prices and product features."
"And you can help us. If you have ideas about areas the new Business & Consumer Services Agency should focus on, we want to hear from you."
bcsa.ca.gov/newsroom/2026/07…
Christopher Bannon retweeted
A huge win for anti-slop
Today, Substack is launching an AI detection feature, via an integration with @pangram. Going forward, you’ll be able to scan posts, replies, and comments on the Substack app to see an estimate of how much of it was written by a human, or with AI assistance.
Competition is good! I hope this gets more people looking at M&A.
For example, most deals never get reviewed by the FTC if they're small enough (under the ~$134 million HSR threshold) & dodge antitrust reporting entirely.
ftc.gov/enforcement/competit…
We are on the road to #blockthemerger check out where we are and what happens next. Follow along.
blockthemerger.com/what-happ…
Our government needs tooling to proactively monitor this
Christopher Bannon retweeted
Every confusing city website and dead-end government portal makes New Yorkers trust their leaders less and less. It's time for City government to enter the 21st century.
We’re investing in five @NYCOfficeofTech PIT crews dedicated to modernizing New York City’s web tools and creating new, easy-to-use online resources.
If you’re a software engineer, designer, or technologist who wants to help make City government work better and faster, apply to join our PIT crews at nyc.gov/pitcrew.
Christopher Bannon retweeted
Wrote an article about the epidemic of undisclosed advertising on social media! It’s almost frightening to see how openly people celebrate deceptive practices as “smart marketing” on here
particularity.substack.com/p…
Christopher Bannon retweeted
EXCLUSIVE | Mayor Mamdani is hiring a tech crew for City Hall to help his affordability agenda. The teams will "design, build, and launch digital solutions on accelerated timelines.” This includes DCWP's "Click to Cancel" button. inc.com/moses-jeanfrancois/n…




























