ddefying 🌙⛩️ retweeted
BREAKING: Researchers at Imperial College London propose framework for post-quantum private transfers on Bitcoin without a need for a soft fork 👀
ddefying 🌙⛩️ retweeted
Never fall for the psyop to “prove yourself” to anyone here.
This isn’t directed towards the quote post,
But a lot of niggaz on here care about their imaginary “online aura” so much that they’ll go to stupid depths to verify their net worth/show they “got it.”
Why?
Is the paranoia of knowing you could be a marked target worth the trade-off of some anon retard singing your praises saying, “Mashallah you’re the goat bro!”
Or is it worth flexing / wallet doxxing your entire transaction history [that onchain sleuths can pull mad shit from] just so you “save face” vs irrelevant morons on here?
The answer is ALWAYS NO.
If I told you guys how easy it is to get T1 CEX KYC info, you’d all be fucking horrified.
It takes one wallet doxxed tied to an off-ramp account and it’s gg.
Let niggaz call you a LARP.
You should be damn grateful that people think you’re poor.
The vast majority of niggaz on here are money worshippers,
They don’t care about YOU in the slightest, they only care about your imaginary figures and jerk off to that.
We used to come on here to shitpost and troll with chart updates in between dead volatility moments.
Somewhere, CT became no more than “onchain PnL” pissing contests.
The morons who said, “If you don’t dox, your opinion is irrelevant” are the same people, who, unironically, are clueless about real wealth.
Stay anon and just nod in agreement if niggaz try to clown your bank balance.
Agree and amplify.
~ Dr. Axius.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Why doxx yourself at all? Wasn’t the whole point of nft profile images to have anonymity in crypto?
ddefying 🌙⛩️ retweeted
PSA check your ledger for spywear
This is a device purchased in store from an official reseller in Europe
I opened my device and found a very strange note
If you own a ledger that didn't directly come from the ledger online store make sure to not just rely on the software genuinely check by ledger but to actually open up the ledger yourself to make sure its original, again there are reported cases in Asia, south America and now Europe as well.
@MagicalTux please review
ddefying 🌙⛩️ retweeted
they didn’t hack ledger. they didn’t exploit the code. they BOUGHT the company selling you the device. $86 million gone
a company called CryptoBilis was an authorized ledger reseller in southeast asia. trusted. legit. sold ledgers for years
a random chinese company quietly bought CryptoBilis from its malaysian owner
made the original owner sign a confidentiality agreement. he couldn’t tell anyone the company was sold
same brand name. same website. same “authorized reseller” badge. but different people behind it now
the new owners started opening every ledger device before shipping
soldered a tiny spy chip onto the board inside. repackaged it. sealed the box. shipped it
the device looked normal. felt normal. worked normal
but the spy chip was silently capturing your private keys the moment you set it up
your seed phrase was sent to the attacker before you even finished writing it down
hundreds of wallets across ethereum tron and bitcoin. all drained
the guy who lost $5.3 million said “i did everything right. no leverage. no memecoins. i stored my funds on a hardware wallet like we’re all told to”
he was right. he did everything right
except his device had a parasite inside it that he couldn’t see
ledger has now told CryptoBilis to stop all sales. told recent buyers NOT to set up their devices
mark karpelès posted photos of the implant. normal board on top. spy chip below
the most dangerous attack in crypto this year wasn’t a line of code
it was a business acquisition
ddefying 🌙⛩️ retweeted
oh my god this is worse than we thought
here's @Ledger $86M exploits explained
> cryptobilis was a reputable and authorized Ledger/Trezor/OneKey dealer for over 4 years
> they decided to sell the company to a Chinese guy (most likely patsy for DPRK) from northern China in MARCH 2026
> the "Chinese guy" modded the devices within the supply chain itself (physical), namely Nano X devices, to contain an implant module
> ledger validity/genuineness check CANNOT detect this because hw wasn't actually tampered with, just spied on
> quoting @MagicalTux:
" implant just monitors what's shown on the screen, will take note of the seed as it's shown to you, then transmits it to 3rd party"
> former owner chimes in on X (pic below) to say that "they were under a NDA" to not mention anything to anyone for 6 months
> they obviously didn't alert any of their partners that they were authorized to sell devices of... because NDA, duh!! its in the name!
> conveniently, funds start getting siphoned a few weeks before this magical NDA due date, and being laundered across all blockchains
