Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
Les graphistes qui se plaignent de l'IA, faut leur rappeler d'oĂč vient leur mĂ©tier.
Pour sortir une affiche il y a 40 ans il fallait un maquettiste, un dessinateur-lettreur, un typographe, un correcteur, un photograveur, un chromiste, un monteur film, un copiste pour les plaques, un conducteur offset, un margeur. Dix mecs, des semaines, un atelier entier pour une affiche.
Aujourd'hui c'est un type avec un MacBook et Photoshop. Deux heures dans son salon. Il a bouffé dix métiers tout seul et je n'ai jamais vu personne écrire une tribune sur la mort du chromiste.
Le graphiste d'aujourd'hui n'est pas un artisan face à la machine. Il est déjà la machine. Chacun de ses outils est le fossile d'un métier qui a disparu pour qu'il puisse bosser seul.
Donc venir dire que l'IA c'est le mal quand ton mĂ©tier est nĂ© exactement de la mĂȘme vague, c'est pas de l'Ă©thique. C'est juste que cette fois c'est ton tour.
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
Une hydrobase aurait pu permettre Ă la Belgique dâaffronter plus efficacement lâincendie dans les Fagnes⊠mais le projet a Ă©tĂ© bloquĂ© par lâex-ministre CĂ©line Tellier : « Elle sâest opposĂ©e Ă lâavis de sa propre administration » sudinfo.be/id1182274/articleâŠ
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
Randomness Is the Foundation
Cryptography is hard. Implementing it securely is harder. And the part almost nobody thinks about, generating high quality randomness, is where the whole thing lives or dies.
This week's Coldcard incident made that visible in the most expensive way possible.
What broke. Every private key you own derives from one number: the seed. If that number is predictable, everything derived from it is too. Coldcard's firmware was supposed to draw that seed from a dedicated hardware RNG. It didn't. A guard checked whether a config macro was defined, not whether it was enabled, so the build silently fell back to a software generator seeded from the chip's serial number and timer, values an attacker can reconstruct. Older devices were effectively deterministic; current ones were capped near 32 bits, about four billion possibilities. A seed space advertised as 128 bits collapsed to something you can enumerate. Researchers estimate more than 1,000 BTC drained from roughly 1,200 wallets, from a flaw sitting in public code since March 2021. The device never had to be touched.
A bad RNG is silent. The output still looks random and passes casual inspection. You discover the problem when someone else does, on-chain, at 21:56 on a Thursday. That is why randomness cannot be a software convenience with a fallback path. It has to be engineered, measured, and certified as a first-class security function.
How we do it at Ledger. We build on certified Secure Elements specifically to access the best cryptographic primitives, including a True hardware RNG. The TRNG is physics, not a formula: it leverages chaotic physical phenomena on silicon to produce genuine entropy, so there is no seed to guess. The Secure Element embeds hardware detectors that watch for malfunctions and manipulation, environmental sensors, active shielding, glitch and voltage detection. Extreme temperature, for instance, can degrade a noise source, so the hardware is built to catch that rather than quietly ship weak entropy. And raw entropy is never used directly: this low-throughput source is fed into cryptographic post-processing inside Ledger OS. Physics for the entropy, cryptography to condition it.
The certifications, and what they mean. Claims are cheap. Certifications are third parties trying to break your claims. Our TRNG is evaluated under AIS-31 and certified PTG.2. AIS-31 is the German BSI methodology, used inside the Common Criteria scheme, that defines how to evaluate a true physical RNG, including a stochastic model of the noise source, not just tests on the output. The Secure Element carries Common Criteria certification at EAL5+ / EAL6+. And Ledger devices are certified under CSPN, ANSSI's first-level scheme, with random number generation quality explicitly in scope. The exact failure that hit Coldcard, "generating a biased or deterministic random number," is written down as Threat #1 in our published security targets, and the TRNG is the security function that answers it.
On closed source, honestly. This part of Ledger OS is closed source. Access to this Secure Element technology comes with a hard vendor requirement that the low-level implementation stays closed. We love open source, but between the highest level of certified security and open source philosophy for this specific layer, we chose security, and I still think that was the right call.
Closed source does not mean unaudited: our code goes through regular evaluation by multiple independent vendors and earns certification on a recurring basis. Security shall not rely on obscurity, that principle stands.
But it is also true that closed source raises the cost of vulnerability research for an attacker. Both are true at once. A flaw sitting in public code for five years until an adversary reportedly used AI to find it is a reminder that "open" and "reviewed" are not the same word.
That AI angle is not a footnote. Internally we make heavy use of LLMs to hunt for vulnerabilities in our own products, and it is genuinely effective (Read the excellent blogpost on the matter: donjon.ledger.com/blog/ai-seâŠ). The adversary is already doing this at machine speed. So do we, before they do. More on our approach soon.
None of this makes us immune. It makes us measurable, monitored, and certified against exactly the class of failure that just played out. Cryptographic guarantees beat social trust, always. A seed you cannot predict beats a promise that it was random.
Stay safe.
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
Free Supercharging for France & Spain wildfire relief. Midnight July 29 to midnight August 5 at
ArĂšs, France tesla.com/findus?location=30âŠ
Biganos, France tesla.com/findus?location=baâŠ
MĂ©rignac, France tesla.com/findus?location=boâŠ
Bordeaux Lac, France tesla.com/findus?location=BoâŠ
BĂšgles, France tesla.com/findus?location=BoâŠ
CastellĂłn, Spain tesla.com/findus?location=29âŠ
Sagunto, Spain tesla.com/findus?location=CaâŠ
Fuenlabrada, Spain - Service Center tesla.com/findus?location=fuâŠ
Majadahonda, Spain tesla.com/findus?location=29âŠ
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
En direct de Ponteves, oĂč lâincendie repart violemment, aprĂšs Cotignac, en soutien aux maires, habitants, pompiers, protection civile et tous les bĂ©nĂ©voles mobilisĂ©s.
Le diagnostic est posĂ© depuis lâĂ©tĂ© 2022 : commissions, rapport du SĂ©nat, propositions des forestiers; les solutions sont connues. Il faut agir sur les trois temps du feu : avant, pendant, aprĂšs.
La prévention bute sur cinq verrous.
Premier verrou : la contradiction de lâĂtat avec lui-mĂȘme. Le code forestier impose le dĂ©broussaillement, le code de lâenvironnement le limite au nom des espĂšces protĂ©gĂ©es. LâarrĂȘtĂ© du 29 mars 2024 prĂ©sumait les dĂ©broussaillements conformes non attentatoires Ă ces espĂšces, mais le Conseil dâĂtat, le 6 fĂ©vrier 2026, a jugĂ© quâune dĂ©rogation reste nĂ©cessaire en cas de risque caractĂ©risĂ©. Il faut sĂ©curiser juridiquement les propriĂ©taires et consolider par la loi la prĂ©somption de conformitĂ©.
DeuxiĂšme verrou : les moyens des maires, qui assument la police du dĂ©broussaillement et la dĂ©fense incendie parfois sans ingĂ©nierie technique, et pour qui crĂ©er une rĂ©serve dâeau coĂ»te souvent plus en Ă©tudes quâen travaux. Le modĂšle des Alpes-Maritimes (ingĂ©nierie mutualisĂ©e Ă lâĂ©chelle dĂ©partementale) doit se gĂ©nĂ©raliser, tout comme lâarrĂȘt de lâurbanisation diffuse aux interfaces habitat-forĂȘt.
TroisiĂšme verrou : le financement. Les SDIS (services dĂ©partementaux dâincendie et de secours, financĂ©s par les dĂ©partements et les intercommunalitĂ©s) manquent de ressources propres, alors quâune part de la taxe sur les conventions dâassurance (environ 1,1 milliard dâeuros) va Ă la CNAF plutĂŽt quâaux dĂ©partements. Le Parlement a prĂ©fĂ©rĂ© crĂ©er une taxe nouvelle sur lâassurance auto plutĂŽt que flĂ©cher autrement lâexistant. Il faut lâinverse : aucun impĂŽt supplĂ©mentaire, mais la rĂ©affectation de ce qui est dĂ©jĂ collectĂ©.
QuatriĂšme verrou : une sanction inappliquĂ©e. 90 % des maisons dĂ©truites Ă©taient sur des terrains mal dĂ©broussaillĂ©s, mais lâamende de 50 âŹ/mÂČ reste thĂ©orique. Ă dĂ©faut, lâassurance peut faire ce que la loi nâa pas fait, en conditionnant primes et franchises Ă la conformitĂ©.
CinquiĂšme verrou : les incendiaires. 90 % des feux sont dâorigine humaine. Fauchage des bords de route, extincteurs obligatoires, interdiction rĂ©elle dâaccĂšs aux massifs Ă risque extrĂȘme : lâadministration contrĂŽle plus les travailleurs lĂ©gaux que les imprudents. En Gironde, le parquet de Bordeaux a requalifiĂ© des infractions en mise en danger de la vie dâautrui. Cette fermetĂ© doit devenir la norme.
La lutte se joue dans les premiĂšres minutes, avec lâeau au bon endroit. Or, on puise encore dans lâeau potable de communes rurales sous-dimensionnĂ©es. Il faut un plan de stockage pluriannuel et la rĂ©duction du recours Ă lâeau potable. Les moyens aĂ©riens (du ressort de lâEtat) resteront insuffisants avant 2028, la flotte ne passant de douze Ă seize appareils quâen 2033 : lâeffort des prochaines saisons se joue donc au sol.
La reconstitution est le grand oubliĂ© : une forĂȘt brĂ»lĂ©e devient source de carbone plutĂŽt que puits, et pĂ©naliser le renouvellement forestier en pleine sĂ©cheresse, câest prĂ©parer les incendies suivants.
Les forestiers ne demandent pas des milliards, mais du bon sens : une piste DFCI nâest pas une blessure Ă la nature, un dĂ©broussaillement raisonnĂ© nâest pas un recul Ă©cologique. La vraie menace pour la biodiversitĂ© et le carbone, câest le feu. Le feu, lui, ignore les dĂ©lais de recours et les Ă©tudes dâimpact. Ă chaque niveau, les moyens de ses obligations ; et Ă lâĂtat, sa mission premiĂšre : sanctionner ceux qui dĂ©truisent, non entraver ceux qui protĂšgent.
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
Des «écologistes» se fĂ©licitaient il y a un an dâavoir empĂȘchĂ© les amĂ©nagements souhaitĂ©s par les pompiers đ pour protĂ©ger la forĂȘt de la Teste de Buch du đ„. Aujourdâhui il nây a plus de đłđ„đ„đ„đą
#écologisme
Victoire ! GrĂące Ă l'intervention de @moniquedemarco au sĂ©nat, le gouvernement suspend le plan simple de gestion de la forĂȘt usagĂšre de la Teste de Buch #addufu ! Il sâengage Ă©galement Ă mener une mission dâinspection pour protĂ©ger le patrimoine forestier et culturel.
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
đšđš REFEREE GIVES A YELLOW CARD TO AN ARGENTINA PLAYER!!
I REPEAT!!
REFEREE GIVES A YELLOW CARD TO AN ARGENTINA PLAYER!!
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
Whether it is or isnât a red to Balogun is now irrelevant. Government interference is a violation of FIFA Article 2 & 15, and the punishment is disqualification and suspension. #FIFAWorldCup
'I asked for a review.'
Donald Trump spoke about FIFA's decision to reverse Folarin Balogun's one-game ban after the USA forward received a red card.
Live updates: trib.al/XmqQNA8
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
Replying to @Acyn
Political interference is explicitly against FIFA regulations and usually results in expulsion from all FIFA competitions.
A number of national associations are currently banned for far less obvious interventions.
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
The US menâs team wins football matches with help from their president. Every other team wins by being better than their opponent.
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
Whether the appeal is successful or not, the outcome should be a bye for Belgium with the USA disqualified for political interference.
đš đđ„đđđđđĄđ: Belgium have appealed FIFA's decision to overturn Folarin Balogun's suspension.
Balogun could still miss the USA's World Cup clash with Belgium if the appeal is successful before kick-off.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Belgium did not appeal. The RBFA submitted a letter requesting an explanation and clarification about the suspension of the one match ban. Fifa unilaterally treated this request as an appeal and dismissed it. The Belgian FA's statement is very clear on this.
rbfa.be/en/news/updateâŠ
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
If you're so concerned about the letter of the rules, what do you think about Articles 14&19 - the ones stating that political pressure on behalf of a team results in automatic disqualification?
No, the Belgians are not astonished. They are afraid of losing to a better team. There is precedent for reversing red cards and this was clearly an injustice. I guarantee they will continue to complain after they lose to the US tomorrow. They are already acting like losersâŠ
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
The Red Card has NOT been reversed as claimed. It has been suspended to allow the player to play. The Red card was suspended for 1 year. This is NOT the usual process.
Source: ESPN share.google/wfyKWi00X9tuRMâŠ
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
Fun fact: If FIFA took its own statutes seriously, it would now have to take action against the U.S. Soccer Federation (USSF), since the statutes prohibit a national government from interfering with the application of FIFA rules; see digitalhub.fifa.com/m/16d1f7âŠ, Article 14. #MaFIFA
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
If FIFA want to stay consistent with their statutes, suspension of the United States Federation and team from the World Cup for political interference should follow! #FIFAWorldCup
It was a red card foul. Just because another referee didnât give it against someone else doesnât change that. No one else has been able to appeal or change their red cards because FIFA doesnât allow it. And again theyâre not overturning the card, theyâre simply suspending it.
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
Les US đșđž dĂ©marreront Ă©galement le match avec 1 but dâavance â
(@fifamafia)
đšđš FOLARIN BALOGUN đșđž SERA DISPONIBLE POUR LE HUITIĂME DE FINALE CONTRE LA BELGIQUE !
Sa suspension d'un match aprĂšs avoir Ă©tĂ© expulsĂ© contre la Bosnie a Ă©tĂ© LEVĂE. â
đïž @AdamCrafton_
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
I guess you can almost break someones leg and be good guys. This is crazy stuff!!!
BREAKING @TheAthleticFC
Folarin Balogun will be available to play the USMNTâs round of 16 match against Belgium with his one-game red-card ban suspended. Extraordinary development.
Story with @Dan_Sheldon_
nytimes.com/athletic/7423410âŠ
Cedric Claus @127.0.0.1 retweeted
"This is where it becomes dangerous... If you make this call, I'm curious to what other calls FIFA is willing to make."
@MikeLahoud on FIFA's decision to suspend Folarin Balogun's red card match ban đ„










































