Shut up and sit down. You have no clue what you are talking about. Both U.S. heatwave frequency (number of events) and the number of heatwave days (number of days per year meeting heatwave criteria) have decreased since the late 19th century (see Christy, 2026). It does not matter which of the two metrics you choose, the long-term declines are the same. Heatwaves in the U.S. have not become either more frequent, extreme, or longer over the last 130+ years. To state otherwise would be an outright fabrication. And that makes you a boldfaced LIAR. 🔗link.springer.com/article/10… You also arrogantly demonstrate your ignorance about the 1930s “Dust Bowl.” The “Dust Bowl” was not the cause of either the 1930s North American droughts or the widespread, intense heatwaves that scorched the U.S. and Canada during the decade. The term “Dust Bowl” actually refers to the relatively small geographical area covering the Texas and Oklahoma panhandles, southwestern Kansas, and southeastern Colorado that were primarily affected by the dust storms during the decade. The “Dust Bowl” was a mostly localized phenomenon in the southern Great Plains. It was a byproduct of drought and loose soil from farming practices in the region; it was not a cause of the continental-scale, decade-long drought that exacerbated the heatwaves. 🔗sciencedirect.com/science/ar… On days with dust storms in the areas affected, dust aerosol loading actually reflected incoming sunlight back to outer space, which reduced the daytime high temperatures (Tmax) significantly. Again, the dust loading did not exacerbate the heat. Physics do not at all support that claim. The 1930s North American drought was most likely caused by a combination of (1) warm North Atlantic (+AMO) and (2) cool tropical Pacific (persistent La Niña conditions) sea surface temperature anomalies (SSTAs), much like what we have seen over the last five years). Only ~30% of the Great Plains land area had been plowed for agriculture by the 1930s (Cunfer, 2005). That is to say farmers generally adapted to the landscape, they did not completely alter it like has been commonly claimed. 🔗tamupress.com/book/978158544… Paleoclimate records (e.g., tree ring analysis) further indicate that 1930s-like droughts have occurred in the Great Plains region at least once or twice per century, on average, for at least the last 10,000 years. Many of these severe droughts, including the two in the 19th century (~1818–25 and 1854–65 “Civil War Drought”), exceeded that of the 1930s in terms of geographical spatial extent and intensity, and were comparable in duration. Settlers described the Great Plains as a de-facto desert with blowing sand. 🔗sciencedirect.com/science/ar… 🔗journals.ametsoc.org/view/jo… There's also evidence that heat extremes comparable to those of the 1930s were recorded during both 19th century droughts. I attached the temperature readings in Manhattan, Kansas from July 1860 to convey this. The high temperature of 115°F on July 9, 1860, is only eclipsed by 116°F logged on August 13, 1936. Drought conditions in the 1930s were amplified by positive land surface feedbacks, but that was primarily caused by natural devegetation from rainfall deficits, not mechanized agriculture. The latter was only responsible for producing the anomalous Great Plains dust storms. Finally, I am not trying to “refute” global warming here. I said nothing about that topic in this thread. Do not choose my words for me and argue against something I didn't explicitly state because at that point you are only arguing with yourself and making yourself look like a complete moron.

Here are a few fun facts! 🧩 The east coast of the United States has only been hit by one major hurricane (Category 3–5) in the past 30 years (Jeanne, 2004). So, there have been none in the last two decades. No state north of Florida have been struck by a major hurricane in more than 30 years (Fran, 1996). New England has not been hit by a major since Carol (1954). The most recent overall was Bob (1991). A major hurricane has not made direct landfall in the state of Georgia since 1898. By this metric, it's the quietest 30-year period for the east coast in over a century. There were six MHs from 1907–36, eleven from 1937–66, and three from 1967–96. However, the 1967–96 period had the fewest overall hurricane landfalls in the mix with fourteen. The most was 1937–66 with 32 total hurricane strikes.

“Fair and accurate reporting” lol!