Catholic Evangelizer

So a “total Groyper victory” is putting people in power who support open borders, abortion up to birth, overregulation, attacks on the First and Second Amendments, huge taxes, leftist judges, an anti-Christian cultural agenda, persecution of conservatives (which will only become more aggressive), socialism, a massive bureaucratic machine full of cronyism and endless fraud, sellout to China and Ukraine, crackdown on American energy independence, and more. You people are satanic fools and in mortal sin. (By the way, the liar Fuentes also declared a "total Groyper victory" when Trump and the Republicans won in 2024.)

CMRI Supporter Blatantly Denies Defined Dogma In this clip a CMRI supporter blatantly denies the Catholic Church’s defined dogma on salvation. He explicitly states that they’re not saying that all Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus are damned and that “we don’t know” if such people are saved. Well, the Church has already settled this issue. It has dogmatically defined that all who die as Buddhists, Muslims and Hindus (i.e. as pagans) are lost (Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino”) and that the Catholic faith is required for salvation. People like him are simply not Catholic, even though they purport to be staunch traditionalists when they aren’t. This is also why such heretical groups (and the heretical rogue priests who lead them into heresy) have such an animosity toward true Catholics who actually believe in the Church’s teaching on salvation and baptism. “The Holy Roman Church firmly believes, professes and preaches that all those who are outside the Catholic Church, not only pagans but also Jews or heretics and schismatics, cannot share in eternal life and will go into the everlasting fire which was prepared for the devil and his angels, unless they are joined to the Church before the end of their lives and that nobody can be saved, no matter how much he has given away in alms and even if he has shed blood in the name of Christ, unless he has persevered in the bosom and unity of the Catholic Church.” (Pope Eugene IV, Council of Florence, “Cantate Domino”, 1441)

16th Century Theologian: Pope St. Siricius & St. Gregory Nazianzen Rejected “Baptism Of Desire” Fr. Juan de Maldonado was a Spanish Jesuit theologian who died in 1583.  He admitted that Pope St. Siricius and important Church father St. Gregory Nazianzen (who is named the Theologian) rejected “baptism of desire”.  The fact that they rejected “baptism of desire” is obvious to any honest person who reads what Pope St. Siricius and St. Gregory actually wrote on the matter.  However, many John 3:5 mockers are so dishonest that they won’t even admit that Pope St. Siricius and St. Gregory the Theologian denied “baptism of desire”.  Hence, a statement from a theologian who acknowledged this is noteworthy.  Note that Maldonado presumes that the aforementioned individuals believed that martyrdom could replace baptism, but there’s no proof for his assertion and his statement on this point can be disregarded.  The Church’s teaching demonstrates that all the martyrs in Heaven received the Sacrament of  Baptism (see Pope Benedict XII, Benedictus Deus) and that no one is saved without rebirth of water and the Spirit.  See our video: 2,000 Years Of Infallible Papal Teaching On Baptism’s Absolute Necessity. Fr. Juan Maldonado, Opera varia theologica, Vol. 1, 1677 (De Baptismo, Q. 4), p. 59: “Among the ancients there were some who insisted on baptism itself so strictly that they thought everyone perished who died either unbaptized or not by a martyr’s death.  Of this opinion was the author of the book On Ecclesiastical Doctrines, chapter 74: ‘We do not believe that a catechumen has life, even if he died in good works.’  So also Pope [Siricius] in his letter to the bishop of Tarragona, and Gregory of Nazianzus in the oration on holy baptism [Oration 40].” Also, it wasn’t just Pope St. Siricius (in his decree to Himerius) and St. Gregory the Theologian who rejected “baptism of desire”.  The early Church itself did, as we showed in the aforementioned video by citing Pope St. Leo the Great, Pope St. Zosimus, and more.

Why Our Lady Appeared On Aug. 19th, Not Aug. 13th On August 13, 1917, Artur de Oliveira Santos (the anti-Catholic administrator of the district) seized the Fatima children (Lucia, Francisco, and Jacinta) under false pretenses.  He said that he wanted to escort them to the Cova da Iria for the apparition of Our Lady. But he actually kidnapped them and took them to Ourém, where they were held.  They were first detained in his house and then in a jail cell.  He repeatedly asked them about the “secret” they said Our Lady had mentioned, and he threatened to boil them in oil if they did not reveal it to him.  The children refused to reveal the secret. Since the children had been kidnapped and did not make it to the apparition site, Our Lady did not appear to them on that day. They were released on approximately August 15 (the Feast of the Assumption). Our Lady then unexpectedly appeared to the children on August 19.  During the apparition she told them: “If you had not been taken away [by the Administrator on Aug. 13] to the City, the miracle [of Oct. 13th] would have been greater”. She also said: “Pray, pray a great deal, and make sacrifices for sinners, for many souls go to Hell because they have no one to pray and make sacrifices for them.” (William Thomas Walsh, Our Lady of Fatima, p. 120)

Joe Heschmeyer (“Shameless Popery”) Confronted By Bro. Peter Dimond About Vatican II - New Video youtube.com/watch?v=PVeCJ9Q2…

You really have no idea what you are talking about. This video covers in detail the shocking things that John Paul II said about Assisi and the (false) religions that were represented there. By defending the abomination of Assisi, you implicate yourself in mortal sin and idolatry. John Paul II blasphemously taught that all the pagans and idol worshippers at Assisi actually worshipped God and that their prayer was necessary and inspired by the Holy Spirit. You are heretical and totally deceived. xitter.cf/mhfmvc/status/21053612…

Are you actually calling him a saint? If so, that's a mortal sin and a denial of the Catholic faith. See our recent video on Assisi for many other shocking things Antipope John Paul II said about it and about the false religions represented there. xitter.cf/mhfmvc/status/21053612…