Stephanie Cates retweeted
.@NRO has a makeover! I’m honored to be a part of this new era of a storied institution. Check out our new and improved website at nationalreview.com!
We are excited to announce the launch of a brand new nationalreview.com!
- The complete National Review archive, online for the first time.
- A personalized newsfeed you control.
- Podcasts & new video originals.
- And so much more!
nationalreview.com/?utm_camp…
Stephanie Cates retweeted
Your occasional reminder that “RINO” now means believing in things Republicans have championed for 50+ years. Things that worked to make this country great (see what I did there?). Free markets, free trade, conservative values, love of country, and limited government just to start. Believing in these things make you a “RINO.”
To not be “RINO” you need to believe in right-wing socialism, regressive protectionism, and extreme executive authority, just to start.
Got it?
Stephanie Cates retweeted
Saying "Old ideas are for old people" is *literally* the antithesis of conservatism.
“This new initiative’s organizers want to see a Republican Party aligned to the conservatism that Vance, a close ally of the Claremont Institute, has come to represent.”
politico.com/news/2026/11/09…
Stephanie Cates retweeted
.@charlescwcooke: I have no time whatsoever for people who move here and are unpatriotic. We do not have to let you in.
Stephanie Cates retweeted
Vice President Vance is mistaken. The reason we Republicans lost yesterday is not just the war in Iran. Yes, the resulting higher fuel prices contributed to the inflation that infuriated Americans who were promised lower prices by this administration. But the war is not the only cause. Arbitrary and capricious tariffs directly raised costs for all American consumers. Lower income Americans can least afford them. Many voted for Democrats yesterday.
Tariffs should be a central part, but only part, of the “honest conversation” VP Vance wants Republicans to have about the future of our party. For instance, we all seem to oppose government-owned grocery stores. But are we ok with government ownership of semiconductors companies and rare earth miners? We oppose rent controls. But do we support price controls on medicines and credit cards?
The bigger question is does the Republican party now agree with the left that we need a large, powerful central government to run the economy, allocate capital and control prices? Or, do we believe that free men and women should be able to engage in commerce as they see fit and that a free enterprise system will create a higher standard of living and the greatest opportunities for the most people as it always has?
Let’s have an “honest conversation.”
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Stephanie Cates retweeted
.@jimgeraghty: It’s a slim silver lining to a very dark cloud for Republicans, but the 2028 Republican presidential primary became much more interesting tonight.
Donald Trump is an utterly spent political force. MAGA may continue in one form or another, but no one is just going to sit around and wait for Trump to anoint J.D. Vance or Marco Rubio or anyone else.
The Republican Party may well be best served by some figure who is completely disconnected from Washington and the Trump era. Ron DeSantis, Brian Kemp, Glenn Youngkin…the Republican Party might be a lot more open to an outsider or a fresh face, starting tomorrow morning.
nationalreview.com/2026/11/2…
Stephanie Cates retweeted
If you look on the fringes of the far left, you’ll find disaffected, under-employed, angry young men (and some women), prone to conspiracy theories and virulent antisemitism, who are itching to violently lash out at an American society that they believe has failed them.
If you look on the fringes of the far right, you’ll find . . . er, more disaffected, under-employed, angry young men (and some women), prone to conspiracy theories and virulent antisemitism, who are itching to violently lash out at an American society that they believe has failed them.
Stephanie Cates retweeted
Socialism is government control or ownership over the means of production.
For example, government shares/ownership in what used to be private companies is a step towards socialism.
Stephanie Cates retweeted
Counterpoint: Government actors telling private businesses what they can and can't do is BS.
Our message to corporate America is simple: We’re not going to let you lay off American workers so you can replace them with cheap foreign labor.
whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2…
Stephanie Cates retweeted
25 years removed from 9/11, the Democrats are running a slate of candidates who blame America, side with the terrorists, and think socialism is the answer. The GOP would be wise to tie these things together for the midterms.
Stephanie Cates retweeted
"The need to flatter the misinformed has led politicians from both parties to make a hash of their own position." nationalreview.com/2026/08/i…
Stephanie Cates retweeted
A growing number of people calling themselves Consersative these days sound a lot more like Zohran Mamdani than William F. Buckley.
Stephanie Cates retweeted
The “post liberal right” believes that the classical liberal principles of our founders and the Declaration have failed and need to be replaced with a new order that elevates the “common good” above individual liberty. That should be disqualifying for anyone hoping to lead this country.
Here's the video of @JDVance identifying himself as part of "the postliberal right" while speaking at an @ISI event for his friend @PatrickDeneen's book "Regime Change: Toward a Postliberal Future" - in case anyone was looking for it:
Stephanie Cates retweeted
Your heartfelt tweet about someone’s passing does. Not. Need. To. Note. That. You. Disagreed. With. Them.
This is a hill I will never leave, and may die upon.
Stephanie Cates retweeted
Comes at a time Milton Friedman is surging in interest among a lot of young Tiktokers.
JD Vance is so frustrating. Here he takes gratuitous shots at Milton Friedman as a bad model for Republican economic thinking.
With Friedman as the guiding light, Ronald Reagan won 49 states and ushered in a decade of unrivaled prosperity. xitter.cf/HAHazony/status/207203…





























