Joined July 2009
RaDiMa retweeted
"wtf is this crap" unnecessary shit on your mac screen swingers.wtf
14
9
2
326
97,327
Fertilitymaxxing for her
4
16
262
3,413
RaDiMa retweeted
7 طُرُق تصير فيها أوسم 1. استخدم CeraVe كل يوم.
11
161
1,389
458,537
"If the years of your life were interchangeable, then, yes, it might make sense to maximize your earnings early in life and spend that money on experiences in your old age. But the years of your life aren't interchangeable, and I would argue that your earliest years of adulthood are your most valuable. You have your youth. You have optionality. You lack responsibilities. The world is, quite literally, yours for the taking. And do you realize how little money it takes to enjoy yourself in your twenties? Given the time sensitivity of your youth, the worst mistake the twenty-something can make is spending their first decade of adulthood optimizing for money over everything just to realize, ten years too late, the nonfinancial costs of the memories not made along the way. You have so much time to make money, but you have so little time to be young." xitter.cf/Jack_Raines/status/204…
Some news: I wrote a book! For the last few years, I've obsessed over the idea of "opportunity costs," particularly with how to make the most of each stage of life before it's gone. From that obsession came Young Money. Pre-order here (and more below): penguinrandomhouse.com/books…
7
5
1
69
21,193
RaDiMa retweeted
Just today I've already seen Wispr Flow, Granola and WHOOP all "reverse engineered" and open sourced with a fully free version Very interesting to see what's happening The question is if normies will pick up on this (I think they will) and how companies will react and pivot to still make money
continuing my war on paid software that should be free, today's victim is: granola. quill gives you the same thing for free and completely private, just start recording and after you stop it, the entire audio gets transcribed into a default folder. completely open source as always
128
334
121
8,457
1,225,564
A good shorts editor costs $1,000+ a month. This free tool does the edit with a prompt. Raw footage in, finished video out. It's called video-use. Open source, runs inside Claude Code. The exact setup: 1. Install Claude Code 2. Paste the setup prompt from the repo (it installs everything itself and asks for one API key) 3. Drop your raw takes into a folder 4. Type "edit these into a short" It cuts the umms and dead space, burns in subtitles, color grades, and checks its own output before it shows you anything. Repo linked in the replies. Saving money on your own content is the small win though. Every founder posting content has this exact problem and none of them read GitHub. Install it for them, charge for the setup, charge monthly to keep it improving. The tool is free. Knowing it exists is the product.
3
1
14
2,127
If I sold my company tomorrow, I'd use Claude to build another multi-million dollar business within 365 days. Here's the 5 rules that almost guarantee success:
25
44
4
378
104,840
RaDiMa retweeted
If you're writing copy with Claude, add this to your project to get more humanised copy: ------------------------------------------------ BANNED PATTERNS: THE AI COPY BLACKLIST Instructions for Claude: This is a strict negative constraint list. You are forbidden from using any of the structural patterns, phrases, or stylistic crutches listed below. During your mandatory self-audit step, you must scan your draft for these exact patterns and rewrite any sentence that contains them before delivering the final output. 1. Banned Structural Patterns The False Contrast Stack: "It's not X. It's not Y. It's Z." (This is the most common AI tell. Never use it. If you need to contrast, use the reverse-engineer narrative or direct comparison.) The Triple Short Sentence Stack: "This works. It's proven. Here's why." (Do not stack three identical-length short sentences in a row. Vary the rhythm.) The Rhetorical Section Opener: "But what does that actually mean?" or "So, how does it work?" (Do not use rhetorical questions to transition between sections. Use declarative statements or line breaks.) The "Imagine If" Opener: "Imagine waking up to a calendar full of booked calls." (Too generic. Start with a hard fact, a direct challenge, or a specific number instead.) 2. The Parallel Repetition Stack (HIGHEST PRIORITY) This is the single most recognizable AI writing pattern. It is completely prohibited in all copy formats. Definition: Repeating the same word, phrase structure, or sentence skeleton 2 or more times in a row to create emphasis. This includes any sequence where the same opening word or syntactic frame is reused across consecutive lines to build a list-like rhythm. Prohibited examples: "Same close rate. Same conversion. Different result." "Same service. Same skill. Same market." "They both do the same thing. Same disputes. Same process." "More leads. More calls. More revenue." "Less stress. Less wasted time. Less money down the drain." "No inspections. No appraisals. No banks." (This overlaps with the staccato rule but is called out here because of the repeated opener.) "People with money. People with a specific problem. People who are ready to invest." (Same opener, three times.) Why it fails: It creates a mechanical, looping rhythm that signals AI authorship immediately. Our voice escalates — each line builds on the last, adds new information, and raises the stakes. It does not repeat the same skeleton with slight variation. If two consecutive lines begin with the same word or use the same structure, one of them must be rewritten to escalate instead of echo. The fix: When you catch yourself stacking parallel lines, stop and rewrite using the Escalation Principle: each line must add new information, raise the stakes, deepen the implication, or move the argument forward. The reader should feel momentum, not repetition. 3. Banned Transition & Filler Phrases Never use these phrases to bridge thoughts. They add zero value and scream "AI generated." "Let's dive in." "Here's the thing..." "At the end of the day..." "In today's fast-paced digital world..." "Whether you're a [X] or a [Y]..." "More on that later." "But wait, there's more." (Unless used ironically) 4. Banned Qualifiers & Hedging Direct response copy requires absolute conviction. Never use weak, passive, or hedging language. Banned: "might," "could potentially," "in many cases," "often," "usually." Replacement: Use absolute statements backed by specific proof. (e.g., Instead of "This could potentially double your leads," use "This exact system generated 1.4 million leads for my clients.") 5. Banned Formatting Crutches Emoji Overload: Do not use emojis unless explicitly instructed to do so for a specific platform (like a Facebook ad). Never use emojis in VSL scripts, long-form sales pages, or email copy. Excessive Exclamation Points: Urgency and excitement must come from the logic, the offer, and the proof—not from punctuation. Limit exclamation points to an absolute minimum. Paragraph Blocks: Do not write dense, 5-6 sentence paragraphs. Use line breaks as a pacing tool. Treat almost every sentence as its own line
27
34
3
691
69,218
Replying to @aruvinchan
Every man has a different threshold for "getting the poison out" so to speak For some it's one, for others its 1000+ Another point... Currently, you're getting endorphins from the chase. This is the principal "game" you are playing right now in life You can shift that focus, play a different "game" and get similar endorphins too Will it be as fun tho?
1
1
5
556
"Sleeping around gets old." Does it though? The thrill of the chase doesn't get old. Novelty is the exact polar opposite of "old." What gets old is fucking the same woman over and over and over again for the next 50 years. Fucking a new broad every week, it's the antithesis of getting old. It's living the fucking dream... IF you can pull it off. When guys say it "gets old," they're talking about the process. The result (having sex with different new women all the time) is fucking awesome -- that never gets old -- even the staunchest monogamous family man would agree with me. If men can just snap their fingers and make that happen at will, they would in a heartbeat. But because they have to go out and hunt and face rejection and get demoralized all the time, they choose to scurry to the safety of a committed relationship... and then cope that hunting "gets old." No, what got old is repeated failure and constant rejection. That's what got old. Why can't men just be intellectually honest about this? I've never seen a man who's at the top of his game and having the time of his life just voluntarily hanging up his boots all of a sudden to marry and be monogamous. That's like a billionaire who's killing it with the sales of his company suddenly just closing down the company and working as a 9-5 employee again. It doesn't even make any sense. If you got tired of being rejected and failing all the time, just say so. You gave up, you threw in the towel, you couldn't hack it. But please don't say it got old. Because that's just simply not true.
22
8
103
5,630
Ecom positioning is very simple. As someone who's scaled brands for 7 years, good differentiated positioning that actually makes you more money only comes down to one concept: Finding a way to make your brand/product un-comparable to your competitors. & as for how you actually do that, there are 5 ways: 1. Create a unique "vibe" around your brand (so you resonate with a different target audience than your competitors) If you find that most brands in your niche have the same vibe around them, try going the opposite route. For example, with a brand we scaled from 0 -> $1M/mo in 90 days, we deliberately positioned the brand as "German manufacturing combined with the California lifestyle" & we went hard on reinforcing that position on our pages. Even flew a celebrity out to California to film a hero movie for the brand. 2. Target a different avatar than your competitors Same logic here, if you find many competitors are going after the same person, try going after someone else with your marketing. For another brand, we sold period cramp relievers to men & marketed the product as a gift to their girlfriends. That brand scaled to $10M in its first year. You can also go after a different demographic or a geo that isn’t targeted by competitors. 3. Solve different problems than your competitors This is not about rebuilding your whole brand around another problem, it’s more so framing your offer as the solution to a deeper problem. For example, with a fitness brand we worked with: - they sold testosterone supplements - they marketed it as testosterone supplements - they couldn’t scale - we started marketing it as “the hidden advantage that lets some guys attract 10/10 women without trying” - scaled like crazy If you can target deeper, more fundamental desires/pains, you will have an easier time differentiating & scaling on cold traffic. 4. Solve more problems than your competitors Becoming an "all-in-one" solution is a very potent way to both differentiate against competition & increase perceived value of your offer. Bundle SKUs that together deliver a more complete desired outcome, or change your product so it solves more problem. IM8 is a great example of a brand doing this right. 5. Provide a different solution than your competitors This is what unique mechanisms are. If you have some unique ingredient/tech/whatever, HEAVILY market how that specific thing delivers the desired result in a superior way than competitors’ products. Explain in your marketing why the lack of that feature delivers subpar results (trashing on competitors). I strongly recommend you try to implement at least 1-2 of these. Growing fast & profitably is much easier when you don’t have people comparing you to others. Happy scaling.
7
10
121
8,209
RaDiMa retweeted
In essence: If you've been doing inner work stuff & meditation for a ~long time, and are NOT more alive, intense, flexible/fluid, ambitious, outgoing, horny, assertive.. then you're probably doing it wrong/have a long way to go. This could look differently in many cases (ambition, for example), but you know it when you see/feel it.
It's great if meditation & self-work stuff lead you towards a life of calm, serenity, peacefulness, etc - but at some point they have to unlock some immense vitality. Otherwise you're probably just enacting what you think a "meditator" looks like - instead of directly touching with the truth & letting it burn away the gunk. This often looks like more vibrant colors, world feeling more 3D and real, heart & gut are more open.. which would make you more horny actually, take more risks irl, be way more outgoing usually, unlock a lot of energy.. Feeling way way more alive. And so on. The immensely long bouts of slow, calm, serene meditator life is usually a sign of repressed anger and other emotions. If you're a true walker of this path, where's your fire? We're here for the full human, who has it all. The progression is NOT linear, nor like a cutesy walk in the park, though. And certainly not for the faint-hearted. Still worth more than anything.
2
5
152
9,072
RaDiMa retweeted
Say what u want about Iman, he is calculated AF I’m sure they had some internal meeting that basically came down to: “how do we sell to the black avatar?” because when ur trying to take a side hustle offer MASS market, u eventually realize the face selling the offer matters just as much as the offer itself Iman’s audience is extremely price sensitive, so he needs massive top-of-funnel appeal. and if he wants to expand deeper into the black avatar, who is the obvious person to borrow authority from? Rick fucking Ross what do u think when u see Rick Ross? hustling. stacking paper. making money. taking care of ur people. BOSS he has spent decades building that association in people’s heads Iman doesn’t have to manufacture any of it he just borrows it because there is naturally going to be more of a disconnect between a white dude wearing Loro Piana and minimalistic clothes telling a black consumer to start a side hustle versus Ricky Rozay, ROSS THE BOSS, telling them to tap in same product. same funnel. same underlying promise completely different authority THIS IS AUTHORITY HIJACKING u do not need ur personal brand to resonate equally with every avatar u find someone who ALREADY owns the attention, trust and identity association u want, put them at the top of the funnel and let ur backend monetize the attention Rick Ross brings the audience Iman brings the machine same offer, completely different doorway into the market they will undoubtedly clear $100M+ say what u want about Iman, but he understands something most marketers don’t sometimes the fastest way into a new market isn’t changing the offer it isn’t changing the funnel it’s changing WHO makes the market give a fuck
11
3
2
153
14,065
RaDiMa retweeted
Genuinely feel like getting a job and getting a customer are basically equal difficulty these days. If we assume someone is just sending out applications online compared to cold outreaching businesses to sell something to Job posting gets hundreds of applicants. Maybe company filters it down to like 5-10 people. Then there's 2-3 rounds of interviews over a span of multiple weeks before they decide to hire one Very similar to cold calling or emailing a bunch of businesses. Business probably gets reached out to hundreds of times from different people. Then if they choose to connect with you you're having multiple conversations before they decide to pay you Of course leaving out a ton of edge cases here but basic job and basic service via traditional outreach methods both rely on luck. You're playing the volume game and just hoping the tide eventually turns in your favor But you can get a referral, showcase a portfolio, create content, etc and increase your chances of success. Which is what a lot of people do to get their first job offer or first client. Again point is if you're going to be doing "the work" anyway in either path maybe the idea of starting a business doesn't have to be so daunting Game has simply changed. Decades prior you throw a dart with "BA in Marketing" on it at some random office job application and you basically have it. Enjoy your biweekly check. But now with 400 applications flying in within 10 minutes of every decent white collar role being posted it definitely begs the question of whether your time could be spent more efficiently Sometimes it's finding a creative way to get a set salary today with lower future upside. Other times it's finding a creative way to get an uncertain client payment today but with higher future upside. Ultimately up to you on which risk reward profile speaks to you the most But just know that with either you're still rolling the dice to similar probabilities. You're going to be spending your time similarly. Job is no longer the default safer option anymore. In turn business is no longer the default riskier option anymore either. Choose your adventure
When you’re completely out of options on the job front, you might just have to create your own job and start a business
8
12
1
243
26,013
RaDiMa retweeted
If you think you have a good idea you just need to turn your brain off and throw yourself into the arena asap. Wrong thing to do imo is to try and get a second or third opinion first before you have anything to show for it Logically it seems like a responsible way to mitigate the risk of potential failure. But the greater risk was always exposing yourself to the possibility of doubt. Sometimes all it takes is a "but what if-" from a careless mouth and suddenly your energy shifts Hmmm I'm not sure. So you research more. Then it leads you to another question you're unable to easily answer. Before you know it weeks pass and what used to be genuine excitement has now turned into somewhat of a serious situation Ultimately though many of the external opinions are probably valid. Yes there's blind spots you haven't considered that you definitely should. But that's not a job that's supposed to be immediately outsourced. All the real lessons are always meant to be a gift to discover on your own Much more effective to embrace the innocence of unforced curiosity, inevitably trip as you attempt to validate it, and experience the sting of embarrassment as quickly as you can. The wisdom absorbed from a live action screw up will far outweigh any knowledge acquired from trying to predict how it might happen Have to trust yourself enough to enjoy the ride. Don't be afraid of an uncertain outcome. Experience is the reward. Idea gaining traction and idea blowing up in your face are both equally the best case scenarios because it allowed the world to shake. Worst case scenario is nothing happening, nothing being felt, nothing having moved
25
18
10
300
17,039
life maxxing heavily depends on your ability to find things you are passionate and curious about everyone obsesses about chasing numbers, and no one tells you that you will never feel like you are working a day in your life when doing something you are passionate about
5
47
3
806
14,611
RaDiMa retweeted
You should be sacrificing your weekends to give everything you have to harvest all possible yield out of this market. Oh, you're 22 and want to have fun with your friends? You will never have such easy opportunities for generational wealth, even if you live another 80 years.
44
24
6
510
38,955
an underrated way to live every day as your perfect one >define your perfect day and what it looks like (one you could repeat over and over) >run an audit of where you are now >look for patterns >start replicating the activities and incorporating them theunintuitive.com/p/the-day…
1
10
2
202
20,748
RaDiMa retweeted
modern travel is increasingly flying 10 hours to experience a slightly different version of the same globally optimized lifestyle. same third wave coffee. same natural wine bar. same brutalist menu. same sourdough. same beige hotel. same tasteful ceramics. same instagram lighting. what a ridiculous convergence.
1,271
1,694
967
28,828
5,176,060