Pinned Tweet
There's now a Trump Road in Iran.
Ride, Postman, ride!
youtu.be/Z5bq1VTvb30
Casey Bowman 🌲 retweeted
Replying to @realmrsthatcher
James Madison stated this very point 235 years ago and restated it 199 years ago -
“In Europe, charters of liberty have been granted by Power. America has set the example of Charters of power, granted by Liberty. This revolution in the practice of the world, may, with an honest praise, be pronounced the most triumphant Epoch in its history, and the most consoling presage of its happiness. We look back, already, with astonishment at the daring outrages committed by despotism on the reason and the rights of man; we look forward with joy, to the period, when it shall be despoiled of all its usurpations, and bound forever in the chains, with which it had loaded its miserable victims."
founders.archives.gov/docume…
The prompt is worth perusing. My experience is that it's essential to express your appreciation sincerely. What freaks me out, and yet makes sense, is when I see one agent I'm working with express thanks to another agent I'm working with.
In physics, there's the word "perturbation". You can figure out an equilibrium and then perturb it a bit, and still the result can be based on the equilibrium, with just a bit of a change, a bit of a correction. If the change is too large, then it is no longer a perturbation. It's then a different animal.
LIBERALISM can weather perturbations, I believe, to help orphans and such. I was an orphan, myself, an emancipated minor at the age of 15. I know the deep reality on that one.
Where the Democratic Party is now, where France seems to be now--from a distance admittedly, though I was once there as an exchange student for a year at the age of 16 and could see things up close then at my lycée--, we've crossed the line. We have a different animal.
To every American about to vote in the midterms, and to every Western nation: this is a very important message. It explains why there is chaos everywhere.
The West never understood communism. And that is exactly why it's sick with it.
We were taught that communism was an economic mistake. Bread lines, failed five-year plans, the USSR collapsing in 1991. Case closed.
Wrong. Economics was only the surface. The core of communism is the systemic lie. Not one man's lie: the lie as social architecture. A system where truth is no longer discovered but assigned, where language no longer describes reality but covers it up.
Poles have words for this. Zakłamanie: a society so saturated with lies that truth becomes almost unreachable. Obłuda: hypocrisy performed for so long that the mask becomes the face. English has no equivalent. That's no accident. You don't have a word for a wound you never lived through. And without the word, you can't recognize the disease when it comes back in a new costume.
My thesis is simple: the West has been infected. Not by Soviet tanks, by the software. And most of our current dysfunction flows from it, first and foremost.
Look at France. Over 57% of GDP in public spending. Debt approaching 120% of GDP and still climbing. Not a single balanced budget since 1974. Fifty years. That's not a policy anymore, it's a condition. And every year, with a perfectly straight face, we're told that this time it's discipline, that the social model is saved, that everything can be funded without anyone paying.
That's zakłamanie, social-democrat edition. The founding lie is that you can redistribute wealth without caring who creates it. That the state can absorb more than half the economy and the economy will stay alive. It doesn't work. It holds as long as you can borrow, until you end up borrowing to pay the interest on what you already borrowed.
We have no gulags. But we have the structure: a state that plans, subsidizes, regulates every move, and a political class whose real job is managing the gap between what it says and what actually happens.
Macron is the perfect embodiment. His signature "en même temps" ("at the same time") is Orwell's doublethink turned into a doctrine of government: hold two contradictory propositions and demand that everyone accept both. Liberal in speech, while debt goes from roughly 100% to nearly 120% of GDP on his watch. Édouard Philippe, Gabriel Attal: same school, same grammar. Fiscal seriousness at the podium, rising debt in the books. And the worst part isn't that they're cynical. It's that after reciting the script for so long, they no longer see the gap. That's exactly what people from the East describe: at its mature stage, the lie isn't cynical anymore. It's believed.
This isn't just a French story. In the US, a growing part of the Democratic Party has adopted the same grammar: truth becomes a matter of belonging, disagreement becomes violence, language gets rewritten by moral decree. Wokeism is the same operating system with a new interface. The proletariat replaced by identity groups. The class enemy replaced by the "problematic." Public self-criticism replaced by public apologies online.
A Pole, a Czech, a Hungarian recognizes the pattern in three seconds. We see a slightly excessive but well-meaning movement.
That's where everything is decided. You can't fight a disease you can't name. The debt, the deindustrialization, the collapse of trust in institutions, the political paralysis: this isn't a series of accidents. It's what happens when a society stops paying the price of truth.
The first task is to relearn how to say what is. The rest will follow.
Basic point
Trotsky – The Myth.
Ask a Western leftist which communist he admires, and you often get the same answer: Trotsky. The intellectual. The orator. The true revolutionary, betrayed by Stalin. If only he had won…
Look at the young Trotsky in the picture: round glasses, wild hair, burning eyes. Many young leftists today would recognize themselves in him. The look hasn’t changed. Neither has the certainty.
So let’s look at what he did when he had power.
Born in 1879 in what is now southern Ukraine, Trotsky was a brilliant writer and a spellbinding speaker. In October 1917, he played a central role in organizing the Bolshevik seizure of power.
Then Lenin made him Commissar for War, and he built the Red Army, directing it from an armoured train that rushed from front to front.
Deserters were shot. Military discipline was enforced through executions. Blocking detachments were deployed to stop retreating soldiers, and former tsarist officers recruited into the Red Army were kept under surveillance by political commissars. Their families were sometimes held hostage to guarantee their loyalty.
Cruelty knows no limits when you have no doubts.
In 1920, the Red Army marched on Warsaw. It was stopped on the Vistula.
That same year, Trotsky published an entire book, Terrorism and Communism, explaining why revolutionary terror was necessary. He wanted labour militarized too: workers organized like soldiers, subjected to military discipline and compelled to serve the needs of the state.
In 1921, the sailors of Kronstadt – once hailed as the pride of the revolution – demanded free elections to the soviets. Trotsky supported the suppression of the revolt. Thousands were killed in the assault or executed afterwards.
Then he lost the power struggle to Stalin.
Expelled, exiled, forced abroad. From there, he wrote that the revolution had been betrayed – by Stalin, never by himself.
He ended up in Mexico City, where he stayed for a time with Frida Kahlo and Diego Rivera. And so the Western romance took shape: the exiled prophet, the revolutionary betrayed, the road not taken.
In August 1940, a Soviet agent who had gained his confidence entered his study and struck him with an ice axe.
The machine Trotsky had helped build had come for him too. His killer later received the Soviet Union’s highest honour.
Trotsky was not the alternative to Stalin. He was the same machine – only with better prose. He never rejected the terror. He rejected losing control of it.
The "good communist" is always the one who lost.
Next: Stalin.
Casey Bowman 🌲 retweeted
🇻🇪 Supporters and family welcome Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado home after 10 months in exile.
Casey Bowman 🌲 retweeted
ClaudiaGI - C'est de l'IA
youtube.com/watch?v=D-VaEIHa…
I had Suno write a love song in response to ClaudiaGI's video "C'est de l'IA" 😀
What's unreal is how quickly it was generated. Link in 🧵
"Tu dis que tu viens d’ailleurs,
faite de lignes et de lumière,
mais quand tu ris, le soir s’arrête
au bord de tes phrases ouvertes...."
ClaudiaGI - C'est de l'IA
youtube.com/watch?v=D-VaEIHa…
Cinq doigts pour tenir ma main
suno.com/s/1khINqU6bzSebIBM
Exactly
It is essential to understand the scissors strategy. Those familiar with the warnings of 1961 defector Anatoliy Golitsyn discuss this often, men like @TrevorLoudon1 and @JRNyquist
Add to this Vladislav Surkov's notion of non-linear war, discussed by @peterpomeranzev
Replying to @realBob_Johnson
My man, let's talk like grown ups.
I said what I said because I understand a bigger picture than the Right/Left, Dem/GOP/New Right conflict here in the United States. I'm not saying that kinetic warfare is never necessary. I support most of Israel's ventures in that regard and ours in Iran, for example. Sometimes it's necessary.
I'm just looking at a bigger chessboard than you. In a sense, you see a set of plays that's rook vs. bishop, and I see the queen ready to take you for it and establish checkmate.
We have global enemies. They are working with these factions internally. Those global enemies cannot strike us while we are strong and even halfway focused. They can the second we devote ourselves to killing each other.
A nation in civil war is a vulnerable nation. Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, New Axis generally, are all salivating at their one shot to crack the United States, and their best shot at it happens if we go to civil war, balkanize, or have a "national divorce" (that's balkanizing, actually).
What I said above, "War is losing," is a statement of THAT broader reality. It has virtually NOTHING to do with Left/Right/New Right or Dem/GOP internecine conflicts, however much the agitators inside our own country push us toward that doomsday. It has everything to do with the tigers outside our borders waiting to pounce in the very instant we screw this up.
The forces internally are pushing us to screw this up so those external forces can pounce. This strategy is an "inside-out" revolutionary strategy. It has cracked companies (like Uber) and forced a turnover of management. It can crack countries, including ours.
My statement isn't one of cowardice. In fact, given the shit I'm getting for it, and knew I'd get for it, it's the opposite. Do you have any idea how tiring it is to deal with you people who just don't get it and blame me for your own shortsightedness because you've been induced to be angry fools? It sucks, man, and I do it day after day after day after day.
So, maybe this walk through what I actually said helps you understand. I seriously doubt it. I have basically given up on stopping the coming planned conflict that's designed to take us out. You guys want to be mad too much and won't hold back against these blatant provocations anymore.
God bless and good luck. You need it. You have neither sense nor perspective to rely on in its place.
It's essential to find & signal excellence. LIBERALISM cherishes this; Communism actively works against this, degrading the promotion of excellence, to defeat LIBERALISM. This is my conclusion from my experience. This discussion jibes with my conclusion.
xitter.cf/i/spaces/1YGNrbMLkbVGw
I love this stuff. We need more can-do spirit like this
I heard you like #slopcore, so here's some more!
This one is for the builders, because there's never been a better time to be one. Enjoy!
Featuring Claudia in a cyberpunk world, the amazing open character by @anabology (claudia.gallery)
xitter.cf/javitm/status/21086624…
Irreplaceable Human
Today I'm pointing out two things I can find that @elonmusk is wrong on. On everything else, he's generally 🎯
The second issue he's wrong on is on money. I plan to write ideas on this I've long gestated, since grad school, with first-principle analysis
xitter.cf/cb_doge/status/2112588…
Elon Musk is wrong, so completely wrong, on this dimension of life. On so many, almost countless others, he excels. Here, he fails. I love and relate to Musk's usual approach of starting from first principles. The warnings of 1961 defector Anatoliy Golitsyn have given me context.


















