Previously removed from YouTube. Account reinstated.
Joined November 2023
- Tweets545
- Following60
- Followers122
- Likes549
Case Closed retweeted
YouTube is my only income to pay kindergarten for my 3 little daughters.
I myself added a manager to help upload videos - he abused my trust & launched crypto stream
Deleted instantly, but channel terminated.
Why YT ignore me?
youtube.com/channel/UCNKE7pp…
@TeamYouTube
@nealmohan
Case Closed retweeted
😳 Finally, after waiting for more than 4 months, one of my three channels has been restored… but with suspended execution 😭
Today I submitted an appeal through the Google form, it was accepted, and I received an email confirming that my reconsideration request was approved and that my channel had been restored. But the surprise was that when I went to YouTube Studio, it shows that the channel is removed and not displayed on YouTube at this time, as shown in the image. I deleted the app and reinstalled it, but the problem is still there. I also tried from different devices, but another surprise appeared: YouTube Studio shows an error saying “try again” 😂 Is this normal? Are these errors expected to happen from a leading company the size of @Google and YouTube? 🤔
Now I want urgent intervention from a real human at @TeamYouTube to activate my channel and restore it on YouTube based on the email that confirmed my appeal was accepted and my channel reinstated, because this whole situation from the beginning was an AI mistake that took down my three channels. This is clear proof of the scale of the failure in YouTube’s AI system, which @nealmohan does not want to admit and is very proud of. He must see the damage it causes to every creator on the platform. I am now demanding a response to this tweet and the restoration of my channel by the @YouTube team according to their own policies and official emails. I already received confirmation from the specialized team that my channel was reinstated, and I want that decision executed.
I ask everyone who reads my tweet to help me by tagging @TeamYouTube so this tweet reaches them and they see the serious mistakes their AI system is making.
Case Closed retweeted
🎄 Yesterday was Christmas, but I still haven’t received any positive response.
• Your team is happily celebrating Christmas & New Year 🎉
• But what about terminated creators like us? 🤔
• Many channels were terminated by the system without clear action or explanation ⚠️
• We appealed again and again, yet only rejections came ❌
• At the same time, many channels that were rejected multiple times were later reinstated ✅
❓ If they can be reinstated, why not mine?
❓ Why not other genuine creators like me?
❓ Are we not creators too?
All we ask for is fair review and equal treatment ⚖️
All we want is our channels back 📺🙏
@nealmohan @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeIndia @YouTubeInsider @TeamYouTube
#TerminatedCreators #JusticeForCreators #ReinstateChannels #YouTubeSupport
I got my channel reinstated after 380 days following a termination that felt like career death.
Something inside me died when I realized I'm now terrified to upload anything—even content I know is 100% compliant.
I second-guess every thumbnail, every title, every word in my videos wondering "is this going to trigger something?"
The termination broke my creative confidence in a way I didn't expect.
Case Closed retweeted
@TeamYouTube Pls have a proper manual human review 🙏🙏🙏
My channel has been falsely terminated for circumvention. I have never had any terminated channels. It's been already 4 months and my channel hasn't been reinstated yet.
I had
No reuploads
No original terminated channels
Case Closed retweeted
@nealmohan @YouTubeInsider @TeamYouTube @YouTube
157 days.
That’s how long I’ve been waiting since my channel was terminated.
No strikes.
No prior warnings.
No clear explanation.
I create original ZEPETO avatar videos using my own created avatars. I always tried to follow YouTube’s guidelines. I appealed, I waited, I asked respectfully — but I’m still stuck in silence.
So I genuinely want to ask:
• If creators upload similar ZEPETO-style content and are still active, why was my channel terminated?
• If there were no strikes or warnings, why was there no chance to correct anything?
• Why do some terminated channels get reinstated after review, while others are left waiting for months?
• Is there a real human review for small creators, or are we lost in automation?
This is not just about me.
Many genuine creators are facing the same situation — months of waiting, no clarity, no closure, years of hard work gone overnight.
We are not asking for special treatment.
We are asking for fairness, transparency, and a proper review.
@TeamYouTube @YouTube
Please look into these cases.
Please tell us what went wrong, or fix what went wrong.
Creators deserve answers.
Creators deserve justice.
#YouTubeAIWrongedCreators
UPDATE: My channel has been reinstated! 🎉
After 379 days, YouTube finally reviewed my case with full context.
Thank you to @TeamYouTube for looking into this and restoring my channel. 🙏
A real human review was all I needed - and that's exactly what happened.
To everyone who shared and supported: Thank you. Your voices made the difference. 💙
YouTube destroyed my dreams💔
379 days permanently banned. For asking questions.
No strikes. No warnings. Years of work gone. ❌
I contacted support asking: "Why are my competitors allowed to post this type of content but I'm not?"
While asking support: BANNED⚠️
Reason: "Spam, Deceptive Practices, and Scams" 🤯
Meanwhile:
My competitors? Still thriving. Millions of views. Fully monetized. 💰
Me? Permanently nuked for asking why the rules applied differently.
Here's what led to this:
• 300+ gaming videos over years, zero traction 🎮
• Finally switched to true crime - got monetized ✅
• Almost all the videos human-reviewed and approved "safe for all advertisers".
• Did competitive analysis and tried what massive channels were doing.
• Tried it for the first time (kept video private) 🔒
• Reviewer flagged minor tweaks
• I had questions, contacted support to understand
• Support was literally helping me
• BOOM. Everything gone.
• They trashed years of legitimate work. Inhumanely.
• Mid-help-session.
• Based on 1 video, I tried for the first time ever.
• 379 days of appeals: All rejected 💔
What I want:
One human to review this. 👤
Let one human being review this situation with full context.
Show them the timeline. The support conversation. My channel history. The fact that the "violation" occurred during an official help session.
No reasonable person would look at this sequence of events and think justice was served.
YouTube talks about supporting creators.
But what they've built is a system where the safest move is to never ask questions. To operate in ignorance. To avoid their own support channels.
That's not creator support.
That's creator punishment.
And after 379 days, I'm still waiting.
@TeamYouTube #youtube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeInsider @nealmohan @sundarpichai #YouTubeAIWrongedCreators
YouTube destroyed my dreams💔
379 days permanently banned. For asking questions.
No strikes. No warnings. Years of work gone. ❌
I contacted support asking: "Why are my competitors allowed to post this type of content but I'm not?"
While asking support: BANNED⚠️
Reason: "Spam, Deceptive Practices, and Scams" 🤯
Meanwhile:
My competitors? Still thriving. Millions of views. Fully monetized. 💰
Me? Permanently nuked for asking why the rules applied differently.
Here's what led to this:
• 300+ gaming videos over years, zero traction 🎮
• Finally switched to true crime - got monetized ✅
• Almost all the videos human-reviewed and approved "safe for all advertisers".
• Did competitive analysis and tried what massive channels were doing.
• Tried it for the first time (kept video private) 🔒
• Reviewer flagged minor tweaks
• I had questions, contacted support to understand
• Support was literally helping me
• BOOM. Everything gone.
• They trashed years of legitimate work. Inhumanely.
• Mid-help-session.
• Based on 1 video, I tried for the first time ever.
• 379 days of appeals: All rejected 💔
What I want:
One human to review this. 👤
Let one human being review this situation with full context.
Show them the timeline. The support conversation. My channel history. The fact that the "violation" occurred during an official help session.
No reasonable person would look at this sequence of events and think justice was served.
YouTube talks about supporting creators.
But what they've built is a system where the safest move is to never ask questions. To operate in ignorance. To avoid their own support channels.
That's not creator support.
That's creator punishment.
And after 379 days, I'm still waiting.
@TeamYouTube #youtube @YouTubeCreators @YouTubeInsider @nealmohan @sundarpichai #YouTubeAIWrongedCreators
Case Closed retweeted
@TeamYouTube @YouTube
I’m sharing this screenshot to show my genuine creator journey. I create original ZEPETO videos using my own avatar, and as you can see in the screenshot, I’m very close to reaching 1M followers. ZEPETO strictly does not allow fake followers or fake engagement, so every follower I earned is from people who truly love and support my content.
I’ve followed the same honest approach on YouTube. I have never bought views, subscribers, or engagement. My channel Advis World was built slowly with years of hard work, creativity, and originality.
I’m happy for creators whose channels were reinstated, but I’m still waiting without any response. I respectfully request a fair manual review of my case and the reinstatement of my channel. At the very least, please acknowledge those of us who are still waiting.
Case Closed retweeted
🚨 Wow... huge congrats to this creator on the reinstatement as a "one-time exception"! 🚨
This gives real hope to thousands like me suffering from possible wrongful classification.
YouTube showing mercy and manual review when it's a genuine human creator... thank you for this precedent.
Respectfully: Could the same fair exception apply to clear cases with strong evidence? @TeamYouTube
My experience: 💔👇
I believe that my channel’s termination may have resulted from a misinterpretation and I’m politely asking for a complete manual re-assessment. My channel was dedicated to motivational and entertainment content, while the remaining videos fully adhered to YouTube’s community guidelines.
I’m convinced this could be a mistake — here’s solid proof to check. Any help from the community would be greatly valued.
1. Andrew Tate "Kanal D Interview" (motivational edited clip)
The original full interview is STILL openly available on YouTube:
youtu.be/jLMp0RYUs1I
My version was transformative for positive motivation and does not promote any violations.
2. Mo Vlogs – Public Drone Show Celebration
Videos with similar themes are still hosted on YouTube (here is the one 👇):
youtu.be/sMkLbxHjPBc
My content depicted a joyful public event — entirely non-violative.
3. Tate Brothers Returning to Dubai
A straightforward lifestyle/travel video, with no promotion of harmful actions or mentions of bypassing rules. On YT still are dozens of similar content.
🧩 Why this matters
None of these videos:
• encouraged others to break rules
• reposted previously removed content
• featured creators with active restrictions
• violated ToS & CG in intent or design
The whole channel had no previous strikes, no malicious intent, and zero videos advocating Terms of Services & Community Guidelines breaches. All material followed YouTube’s EDSA guideline emphasizing that “context matters.”
Certain uploads might have been mistakenly categorized under “restricted” content due to confusion over what qualifies. If any crossed boundaries, it was completely accidental, without any intent to evade enforcement.
To be clear: my channel was never intended to breach the TOS, and I have not sought to avoid any actions taken.
My creation style is basic: I uploaded original motivational / entertainment videos. I do not intentionally include or highlight material from banned creators, nor do I prompt viewers to violate rules.
If reinstated, I pledge to comply strictly with all policies, focusing on:
1️⃣ Avoiding any material previously removed for violations
2️⃣ Ensuring none of my sources come from restricted or terminated creators
3️⃣ Double-checking every upload for compliance before publishing
I kindly request a re-evaluation of my channel termination. If specific uploads caused this, I’m willing to delete it right away and fix any problems.
Thank you very much for your consideration and impartiality.
• Channel URL: youtube.com/channel/UCps2XwI…
📢 Like this case, a real human operates my channel.
It was unintentional if any rule was violated (pure contextual clips from sources still public on YouTube).
Would I intentionally destroy my own life? Of course not, I knew the risks and cared deeply.
It just doesn’t make sense: Why would I wake up one day and decide to intentionally harm my loyal viewers, the people who appreciated my content, who made every video worth creating, who helped me level up my career and grow as a person?
If exceptions are possible for comment spam... why not for unintended violation flag with undeniable proof?
I've appealed respectfully for months, just asking for the same human consideration.
Thank you Team YouTube for helping creators when mistakes happen, we all appreciate the hard work keeping the platform safe.
If a manual re-review could confirm this as another "one-time exception"... it would mean everything. Evidence ready. Grateful for your help.
If this sounds insane, RT and reply with your story.
Good news! We're reinstating your channel as a one-time exception.
We confirmed it violated our Comment Spam policy by leaving many repetitive comments. Since a real human operates the channel, we're making this exception.
Please be aware: If this spam behavior continues, we will not reinstate the channel again.
You must read the specific sections on Comment Spam and Repetitive Comments in the Community Guidelines to avoid this in the future: goo.gle/4r3Mhcp
Case Closed retweeted
Today marks the day that my channel got falsely terminated 2 months ago for a false circumvention violation by the ai. YouTube has done nothing to help me at all as my channel I spent 2 years growing went down the drain. I have no hope. My voice is too small to be noticed.
Case Closed retweeted
@TeamYouTube my channel was terminated. I am sure this decision was made in error.
I never broke any rules nor redirected any viewers off site. and believe a human Review will fix my issue.
Please look into this and reinstate my channel please.
URL: youtube.com/channel/UCAfr2Xx…
Case Closed retweeted
@TeamYouTube How can ruin someone's years of hard work without any warning, that too without giving any reason, this is Injustice.
My channel was wrongly terminated on 21/nov/2025.
Channel-Cricket Kila
Email-dataartist8084@gmail.com
I want real human review.
🚨378 Days Banned for Asking a Question on Youtube
I was testing a new video style for the first time ever on my channel. The video was private.
A human reviewer said it only needed minor tweaks.
So I did what creators are told to do: I asked for clarification.
I was mid-conversation. Taking notes. Applying the fixes.
Then the email hit: “Your account has been terminated.”
Reason: Spam, Deceptive Practices & Scams.
Here’s the part that doesn’t add up:
The same video I was fixing with Support’s guidance is now being used to justify my ban.
For over a year, I’ve tried to understand what happened:
• Appeals → instant, generic denials
• Emails → copy-paste policy links
• Reaching out to @TeamYouTube → silence
This wasn’t just administrative.
The uncertainty, lack of explanation, and total loss of control seriously affected my mental health. It’s exhausting to be accused of something you can’t even see or respond to.
I understand YouTube relies on automation at scale.
But automation fails — even YouTube admits that.
When it does, creators need one real human to review the actual context.
If asking questions before publishing can erase years of work…
what message does that send to every creator on this platform?
@TeamYouTube #YouTube @YouTubeInsider @nealmohan #YouTubeAIWrongedCreators
Case Closed retweeted
🚨I never thought I’d be writing something like this.
Every day, more creators wake up to find their work gone — not because they broke the rules, but because an automated system decided so 🤖❌.
What’s happening now goes far beyond “mistakes.”
It’s a pattern that no human logic can justify.
My channel wasn’t inactive.
It wasn’t failing.
It was growing — getting thousands of views and real engagement 📈 — yet it disappeared as if it never mattered.
For over 98 days, I’ve been asking one simple question: why?
And the only answer I keep receiving is silence… or the same recycled phrase:
“Your case is still under review.” ⏳
This isn’t how creators should be treated on the biggest platform built for them.
If visibility and fairness only exist for those who go viral or have millions of subscribers, then something is deeply wrong.
If YouTube no longer wants human creators, it should say it clearly — and let machines create content for machines 🤖➡️🤖.
Because what we’re losing isn’t just channels.
We’re losing trust 💔.
@TeamYouTube @YouTube @YouTubeCreators @nealmohan
#YouTubeAIWrongedCreators #HumanReviewNeeded
Case Closed retweeted
🚨 After 130+ days in hell from an unfair termination that destroyed my livelihood...
I’ve posted on X for 4 months straight, getting thousands of views on threads with rock-solid evidence.
Yet @TeamYouTube ignores me completely.
Meanwhile, creators with just a few hundred views get quick responses and re-reviews.
Do our posts even matter anymore? 🧵👇
I’m not angry, just heartbroken and confused.
No viewer was ever harmed by my content.
It was unintentional if any rule was brushed (pure contextual clips from sources STILL live on YouTube).
Would I intentionally destroy my own life? Of course not, I knew the risks and cared deeply.
It just doesn’t make sense: Why would I wake up one day and decide to intentionally harm my loyal viewers, the people who appreciated my content, who made every video worth creating, who helped me level up my career and grow as a person? This just doesn’t MAKE SENSE.
📢 Thousands of creators like me are suffering endlessly in the hands of AI.
YouTube admits mistakes happen (we all see the absurd flags daily).
One appeal, often rejected by the same AI in minutes, evidence ignored.
A human could spend 15 minutes fairly reviewing and escalating my situation to resolve it... but no, we're treated like dangerous criminals attacking the platform.
YouTube has forgotten we're humans & that every alive human makes mistakes.
Everyone deserves a fair manual chance, especially those showing good faith: professional tone, full commitment to safe content moving forward.
Yet heartlessly they ignore us.
Small creators' revenue is negligible in billions, one gone changes nothing for them, but EVERTHING for us.
I have no problem, it’s not my ego, seeing posts with a few hundred views get replies from TeamYouTube while mine don’t.
But it proves we’re definitely shadow-banned: 4+ months asking respectfully for a fair manual review, thousands of views... yet endless silence while others get heard.
My experience: 💔👇
I believe that my channel’s termination may have resulted from a misinterpretation and I’m politely asking for a complete manual re-assessment. My channel was dedicated to motivational and entertainment content, while the remaining videos fully adhered to YouTube’s community guidelines. I’m convinced this could be a mistake — here’s solid proof to check. Any help from the community would be greatly valued.
1. Andrew Tate "Kanal D Interview" (motivational edited clip)
The original full interview is STILL openly available on YouTube:
youtu.be/jLMp0RYUs1I
My version was transformative for positive motivation and does not promote any violations.
2. Mo Vlogs – Public Drone Show Celebration
Videos with similar themes are still hosted on YouTube (here is the one 👇):
youtu.be/sMkLbxHjPBc
My content depicted a joyful public event — entirely non-violative.
3. Tate Brothers Returning to Dubai
A straightforward lifestyle/travel video, with no promotion of harmful actions or mentions of bypassing rules. On YT still are dozens of similar content.
🧩 Why this matters
None of these videos:
• encouraged others to break rules
• reposted previously removed content
• featured creators with active restrictions
• violated ToS & CG in intent or design
The whole channel had no previous strikes, no malicious intent, and zero videos advocating Terms of Services & Community Guidelines breaches. All material followed YouTube’s EDSA guideline emphasizing that “context matters.”
Certain uploads might have been mistakenly categorized under “restricted” content due to confusion over what qualifies. If any crossed boundaries, it was completely accidental, without any intent to evade enforcement.
To be clear: my channel was never intended to breach the TOS, and I have not sought to avoid any actions taken.
My creation style is basic: I uploaded original motivational / entertainment videos. I do not intentionally include or highlight material from banned creators, nor do I prompt viewers to violate rules.
If reinstated, I pledge to comply strictly with all policies, focusing on:
Completely avoiding any content previously flagged or removed
Verifying that no sources involve restricted or terminated accounts
Carefully vetting each video for full compliance before publicizing
I kindly request a re-evaluation of my channel termination. If specific uploads caused this, I’m willing to delete it right away and fix any problems.
Thank you very much for your consideration and impartiality.
• Channel URL: youtube.com/channel/UCps2XwI…
⚖️After 130 days of this pain, I’m still here asking with respect: All I want is fair human review, the same chance others receive.
If AI can err (and YouTube knows it does), why leave thousands suffering without help?
RT if you've felt invisible too. Reply your story. we're humans, not criminals.
We're not criminals, we're HUMANS and humans are...
Thank you from the bottom of my heart.
Case Closed retweeted
Hello @TeamYouTube last night @Lucan_X has got his channel back and you sent me a DM and said - "the decision will stay the same and they won't reinstate my channel".
This isn't fair, when some creators get their channel back but some didn't why?
