@caseciter

Legal Research| Supreme Court Judgement Updates

CaseCiter.in
Joined July 2022
  • Tweets3.1K
  • Following13
  • Followers4.5K
373Media
#SupremeCourt holds that female relatives of husband cannot be ousted from the shared household in domestic violence proceedings for the non-appearance of the husband.
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase3h
Shahjahan & Ors. v. Yasmeen & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

Shahjahan & Ors. vs. Yasmeen & Ors.

Under the proviso to Section 19(1)(b) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, no order can be passed against a woman to remove her from the shared household.

caseciter.in
4
14
871
Shahjahan & Ors. v. Yasmeen & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

Shahjahan & Ors. vs. Yasmeen & Ors.

Under the proviso to Section 19(1)(b) of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, no order can be passed against a woman to remove her from the shared household.

caseciter.in
1
1
3
1,165
#SupremeCourt reiterates that life sentences awarded for multiple offences in a single Trial, cannot be directed to run consecutively. But clarifies one aspect on remission/commutation.
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase4h
Raju Shantaram Koli v. The State of Maharashtra caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

Raju Shantaram Koli vs. The State of Maharashtra

2026 INSC 1161 — Multiple sentences of imprisonment for life awarded to a convict in a single trial cannot be directed to run consecutively because human life is singular and such an order is…

caseciter.in
1
9
862
Raju Shantaram Koli v. The State of Maharashtra caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

Raju Shantaram Koli vs. The State of Maharashtra

2026 INSC 1161 — Multiple sentences of imprisonment for life awarded to a convict in a single trial cannot be directed to run consecutively because human life is singular and such an order is…

caseciter.in
1
1
2
1,198
Village Administrative officer is not a police officer for the purpose of Section 25 Evidence Act, reiterates #SupremeCourt !
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase4h
UNION OF INDIA v. MOHAMED RIFAS @ MOHAMED RIGBAS caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

UNION OF INDIA vs. MOHAMED RIFAS @ MOHAMED RIGBAS

2026 INSC 1160 — The restriction on bail for foreign nationals under Section 43D(7) of the UAP Act is applicable only if the entry into India was unauthorized or illegal at the inception;…

caseciter.in
5
17
1,019
This #SupremeCourt Judgment by Justice Aravind Kumar interpreting UAPA bail restriction provision begins by quoting Justice VR Krishna Iyer:
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase4h
UNION OF INDIA v. MOHAMED RIFAS @ MOHAMED RIGBAS caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

UNION OF INDIA vs. MOHAMED RIFAS @ MOHAMED RIGBAS

2026 INSC 1160 — The restriction on bail for foreign nationals under Section 43D(7) of the UAP Act is applicable only if the entry into India was unauthorized or illegal at the inception;…

caseciter.in
1
7
1
39
2,864
#SupremeCourt clarifies scope of Section 43D(7) UAPA: ✅The statutory bar preventing the grant of bail to a foreign national only applies if the individual's initial entry into India was unauthorized or illegal. ✅A lawful entry (such as via a valid visa) whose stay subsequently becomes unauthorized or illegal does not trigger this specific statutory bar.
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase4h
UNION OF INDIA v. MOHAMED RIFAS @ MOHAMED RIGBAS caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

UNION OF INDIA vs. MOHAMED RIFAS @ MOHAMED RIGBAS

2026 INSC 1160 — The restriction on bail for foreign nationals under Section 43D(7) of the UAP Act is applicable only if the entry into India was unauthorized or illegal at the inception;…

caseciter.in
1
13
1,119
UNION OF INDIA v. MOHAMED RIFAS @ MOHAMED RIGBAS caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

UNION OF INDIA vs. MOHAMED RIFAS @ MOHAMED RIGBAS

2026 INSC 1160 — The restriction on bail for foreign nationals under Section 43D(7) of the UAP Act is applicable only if the entry into India was unauthorized or illegal at the inception;…

caseciter.in
1
1
2
4,872
#SupremeCourt on Section 319 CrPC: if the statement of a witness during cross-examination demolishes the edifice of his statement in chief, the trial court cannot overlook the statement in its entirety.
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase10h
NEELAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. & ANR. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

NEELAM YADAV vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANR.

The power under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to summon an additional accused is not to be exercised mechanically but must be based on a judicious evaluation…

caseciter.in
10
45
1,841
NEELAM YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. & ANR. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

NEELAM YADAV vs. STATE OF U.P. & ANR.

The power under Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 to summon an additional accused is not to be exercised mechanically but must be based on a judicious evaluation…

caseciter.in
1
1
3
2,313
CaseCiter retweeted
Miss Lawdles@Lawdles10h
While considering an appeal against acquittal, the Court should be slow to interfere where two views are possible, and the view in favour of the accused should be given primacy!
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCase11h
TINKARI GHOSH v. ANANDA MANDAL AND OTHERS caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

TINKARI GHOSH vs. ANANDA MANDAL AND OTHERS

In an appeal against acquittal, the Supreme Court will not interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless the appellant demonstrates manifest perversity or gross illegality in…

caseciter.in
2
135
TINKARI GHOSH v. ANANDA MANDAL AND OTHERS caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

TINKARI GHOSH vs. ANANDA MANDAL AND OTHERS

In an appeal against acquittal, the Supreme Court will not interfere with concurrent findings of fact unless the appellant demonstrates manifest perversity or gross illegality in…

caseciter.in
1
1
2
916
A classic case of how an investigation should not be proceeded with:
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCaseOct 26
ARUN @ DEEPAK v. STATE OF U.P. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

ARUN @ DEEPAK vs. STATE OF U.P.

2026 INSC 1150 — Electronic evidence is inadmissible in the absence of a mandatory certificate under Section 65B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.

caseciter.in
1
16
78
2,555
THE ASSESSING OFFICER, TEXTILES COMMITTEE v. M/S. PREMIUM SUITING PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

THE ASSESSING OFFICER, TEXTILES COMMITTEE vs. M/S. PREMIUM SUITING PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER

2026 INSC 1158 — In the absence of a definition of "manufacture" in the Textiles Committee Act, 1963, the definition provided in the Central Excise Act, 1944, cannot be imported as the two…

caseciter.in
1
1
1
1,803
Justice GP Singh universe🔥
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCaseOct 26
THE ASSESSING OFFICER, TEXTILES COMMITTEE v. M/S. PREMIUM SUITING PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

THE ASSESSING OFFICER, TEXTILES COMMITTEE vs. M/S. PREMIUM SUITING PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER

2026 INSC 1158 — In the absence of a definition of "manufacture" in the Textiles Committee Act, 1963, the definition provided in the Central Excise Act, 1944, cannot be imported as the two…

caseciter.in
3
26
1,494
The powers of a Constitutional Court cannot be totally circumscribed by statutory provisions, reiterates #SupremeCourt !
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCaseOct 26
DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. v. VAIBHAV METAL CRUSHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. vs. VAIBHAV METAL CRUSHER

2026 INSC 1157 — In cases of electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the amount required for restoration of supply upon disconnection must be assessed using the procedure…

caseciter.in
3
28
1,316
DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. v. VAIBHAV METAL CRUSHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

DAKSHIN GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LIMITED & ANR. vs. VAIBHAV METAL CRUSHER

2026 INSC 1157 — In cases of electricity theft under Section 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, the amount required for restoration of supply upon disconnection must be assessed using the procedure…

caseciter.in
1
1
2
1,560
Much ado about Hakkupatra 🙂
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCaseOct 26
BALAKRISHNA (DEAD) THR. LRS. v. G.N. KANNIAH NAIDU (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANOTHER caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

BALAKRISHNA (DEAD) THR. LRS. vs. G.N. KANNIAH NAIDU (DEAD) THR. LRS. AND ANOTHER

2026 INSC 1155 — An application filed under Order XXI Rules 97 to 101 CPC is equivalent to a regular suit, and the Executing Court is legally mandated to adjudicate the rights, title, and interest…

caseciter.in
1
8
1,139
Looking for a #SupremeCourt judgment that rejected Res Judicata plea by applying 'Fraud vitiates all solemn acts’ Principle? Here is it:
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCaseOct 26
N. Arasappa v. State of Karnataka & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

N. Arasappa vs. State of Karnataka & Ors.

2026 INSC 1151 — The acquisition of land for a Cooperative Society under Section 3(f)(vi) of the Land Acquisition Act requires the prior approval of a specific housing scheme, including a layout…

caseciter.in
13
66
3,001
When Supreme Court of India began its judgment endorsing an observation from a very old judgment of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania:
CiteCase 🇮🇳
@CiteCaseOct 26
N. Arasappa v. State of Karnataka & Ors. caseciter.in/sci-judgments/d…

N. Arasappa vs. State of Karnataka & Ors.

2026 INSC 1151 — The acquisition of land for a Cooperative Society under Section 3(f)(vi) of the Land Acquisition Act requires the prior approval of a specific housing scheme, including a layout…

caseciter.in
4
31
1,965
Load more