@captsinghi
iAccount based inSingapore!
About this account
- Account based in
- Singapore
- Connected via
- Singapore Android App
! X says this location may be affected by a proxy or VPN.
Account-level information from X, not a live location or the device used for a specific post.
Pinned Tweet
Flags donβt collide. Decisions do.
Chinese fishing vessel vs Panama-flagged bulk carrier is the headline
β relative motion is the story.
The above collision between a China-registered fishing vessel and a Panama-flagged bulk carrier in Singapore waters is being investigated by the Maritime and Port Authority of Singapore (MPA).
The tanker boom is structural, not cyclical.
Trafigura's shipping head confirms a "paradigm shift": Middle Eastern producers are buying their own VLCCs to control exports, putting a structural floor under earnings & asset values .
VLCC spot rates >$1M/day on Gulf-Asia routes and $20bn in new orders signal this isn't a bubble β it's a new world led by VLCCs .
#Shipping #Tankers #VLCC #Maritime
$30 a barrel to move oil from the Gulf to China. That is almost a third of the price of the oil itself. π’οΈπ’
According to reporting from AGBI, the physical cost of navigating the Strait of Hormuz has fundamentally reshaped the tanker market. The financial premium isn't just about the cargoβit's about the logistics of avoiding the chokepoint.
Here is the operational reality breaking down the cost structure, per Arsenio Longo of maritime intelligence firm Huax:
πΉ The STS Shift: Ship-to-ship (STS) transfers off the coast of Oman are becoming the new normal. Large vessels bound for Asia are staying outside the Strait. Shuttle tankers run the gauntlet through Hormuz, transfer their crude offshore, and return to the Gulf for another load.
πΉ The Cost Breakdown: Longo notes that the STS operation itself is not the expensive part. The real drivers are the shuttle leg, the Hormuz risk premium, and the waiting time. With about 413 vessels holding off-berth, waiting time is now a massive financial drain.
πΉ The Daylight Shift: TankerTrackers reports Saudi Arabia is now crossing Hormuz during daylight hours, supported by US CENTCOM. This is a major operational shift from the night-only transits we saw earlier in the crisis.
The supply chain is physically fracturing into a complex shuttle system. Every barrel is being taxed by the geography of the Strait.
How long before the cost of the shuttle system becomes unsustainably high for global refiners?
The Southern Ocean is not here to play. π³π Watch as massive waves toss this vessel around while crossing the Drake Passage. It takes a true sense of adventure to make it to Antarctica! Who else is mesmerized by the power of the sea? πβοΈ #SouthernOcean #Antarctica #OceanWaves
Nuclear power. Ice as thick as a quay wall.
This is polar seamanship β not a postcard.
Itβs the price of keeping a Northern Sea Route open
Cloud is marketing.
ππππππ π’π¬ π«πππ₯π’ππ².
We donβt usually break the internet with missiles.
We break it with anchors.
The internet is ~*1.5 million km* of garden-hose cable on the ocean floor β over 95% of global data, $10 trillion+ a day in finance riding on it.
Most βattacksβ? Accidents: *150β200* faults a year.
70β80% from fishing gear and anchors.
Repair is slow: mobilise 3β5 days, transit 2β5 days , then grapnel the mud. Time to *start* repairs: under 20 days (2012) β over 50 days (2024).
By 2040, ~ two-third of cable ships age out β needs ~$3bn and 15+ new vessels.
How long before the next drag becomes a global outage?
Merriam-Webster just reminded the internet how a "knot" got its name. A wooden log, a line, and a 28-second sandglass.
Today, the chip log is gone. We measure speed with Doppler logs and GPS, and we navigate with ECDIS. But the "log book" remains. It is not just a record of speed and course; it is a legal document, a timeline of decisions, and the memory of the voyage.
The tools change. The responsibility never does. βοΈπ
Another verified attack in the southern Hormuz corridor. The physical threat has not receded. π’π¨
On 21 September at ~0730 UTC, a Isle of Man (UK) flag, Greek-operated tanker was struck by an unknown projectile while inbound through the southern Hormuz corridor. UKMTO Warning 140-26 did not name the vessel. Security sources (Vanguard Tech) identify her as the LR STEPHANIE (72,825 dwt, Isle of Man flag).
Two crew sustained minor injuries. The ship continued under her own power. No pollution reported.
From the bridge, this is the modern threat landscape in a nutshell:
πΉ The "Unknown Projectile" Factor: Whether it is a drone, a missile, or a new tactic, the lack of attribution creates a permanent state of uncertainty for every Master transiting the corridor.
πΉ The Crew Toll: "Minor injuries" are still casualties. They are the physical price paid by seafarers for a geopolitical conflict they have no part in.
πΉ The Resilience: The fact that the vessel continued under her own power is a testament to the training and damage control of the crew.
This comes on a day with reports of a second incident in the same region. The market is pricing the risk premium. Insurers are pricing the hull. But the mariners on the water are facing an invisible, unpredictable threat with no clear end in sight.
How long can this corridor function under these conditions?
This is the physical reality of a throttled chokepoint, landing directly on the American consumer. πβ½οΈ
Diesel isn't just for trucks. It powers the global supply chainβrail, freight, and the vessels that move the cargo. With Strait of Hormuz transits down to single digits and hundreds of vessels holding off-berth, the physical cost of moving oil is being passed straight to the pump.
The market isn't just pricing a geopolitical crisis. It is pricing a physical logistics bottleneck. You cannot print your way out of a chokepoint. The math is unforgiving.
The physical bottleneck in the Gulf is about to hit the refining hubs of Asia. The market is pricing the crude. It hasn't priced the logistics yet. π’οΈπ’
Reports indicate Indian refiners are currently eyeing deliveries for November and may cut back crude purchases. This isn't just a demand-side decision. It is a direct symptom of the physical crisis unfolding on the water.
Here is the operational reality driving this:
πΉ Tonnage Crunch: With the Strait of Hormuz averaging under 10 transits a day and 413 vessels holding off-berth, the availability of Aframax and VLCC tonnage is artificially constrained. Even if you want the barrels, finding a ship to move them is becoming a gamble.
πΉ War-Risk Premiums: Insurers are pricing the risk of every voyage into the Gulf. Those premiums are being passed from shipowners to charterers to refiners. When the cost of insurance rivals the cost of the cargo, refiners step back.
πΉ The Lag Effect: Financial markets react instantly to headlines. But the physical supply chain moves at the speed of a shipβ20 knots at best. The inflation and supply shock hitting Asian refineries in November was set in motion by the attacks in September.
The market sees a price. The mariner sees a wait list. Until the physical corridor stabilizes, the global energy supply chain will continue to fracture.
This is a "Hobson's choice"βa seemingly free choice where all options carry significant costs. India's best play is a hybrid strategy: negotiate hard while quietly accelerating diversification. The era of discounted Russian oil is ending, and the long-term priority must be energy security through a diverse supplier base.
The game is afoot, and New Delhi must play its hand with a steady nerve.
Indiaβs Oil Buyers May Weigh Cutting Russian Cargoes Amid New US Sanctions
Indian refiners are considering reducing their purchases of Russian crude for November delivery following a sweeping US sanctions law signed last week. The legislation grants the administration authority to levy up to 100% tariffs on major buyers of Russian energy, prompting top processors to explore alternative sources despite Russia currently supplying over a third of India's imports.
While replacing such massive volumes will be difficult and costlyβespecially with Middle Eastern supplies squeezed and domestic demand heading toward a record 5.4 million barrels a dayβrefiners face a tight window of uncertainty as November buying cycles approach. New Delhi must balance the looming threat of punitive tariffs against its priority of securing affordable energy for its population, while watching whether Washington applies the measures equally to other major buyers like China.
Hormuz pinches oil.
The Black Sea is pinching **food**.
~A third of world grain trade normally moves that sea. This summer both Russia and Ukraine hit ships and terminals hard enough that Greater Odesa calls collapsed and southern Russian grain berths went quiet β at peak harvest. CSIS: Ukrainian Black Sea traffic largely halted after late July; early-August grain exports ~**75%** below 2025. July killed more seafarers there than the whole war before it (Guardian).
Masters feel it first: no safe berth, no lift, silos fill, crews wait. Stack that on a throttled Hormuz (oil + fertilizer) and the shock hits the plate, not just the pump.
Two chokepoints. Same lesson: open water is a public good β until it isnβt.
How long can harvest season run with the Black Sea this hostile?
Navigational Warning : The Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) warns conditions could "deteriorate rapidly" as Typhoon Dujuan passes near Tokyo later today
8 ships a day where 85 used to pass. The Strait of Hormuz is not just pinchedβit is functionally throttled. π’βοΈ
The latest data from IMF PortWatch paints a picture that headlines miss. On 13 September, just 8 transits were recorded through Hormuz, compared to a pre-crisis average of ~85 per day.
The physical consequence is visible on the water. As of 20 September, ~413 AIS-visible vessels were holding off-berth in the Hormuz/Gulf watch box. They are not moving. They are waiting.
The commercial fallout is being absorbed globally. Brent is holding near $103.87. The longer-term trend from TCBS citing PortWatch is stark: Hormuz is averaging ~6.8 transits/day since March 2026, versus ~85.5/day in 2025.
Meanwhile, the Cape of Good Hope is soaking up the diversionsβaveraging ~92.1 transits/day as ships reroute around Africa.
For the Master on the bridge, this isn't a geopolitical debate. It is a voyage planning crisis. Waiting off-berth burns fuel, costs charter hire, and stretches crews. When the primary artery functions at less than 10% of capacity, the global supply chain doesn't bendβit chokes.
How long can the market sustain this level of physical friction?
**ππ‘ππ§ π¬ππππ₯ π π¨ππ¬ ππ¨ π«ππ¬π β ππ§π ππ‘π π¬ππ πππ€ππ¬ ππ‘π π°ππππ‘**
Not every wreck is a tragedy. Some are put down on purpose.
Scuttling, done right, is not dumping. Strip the hull of fuel, asbestos, paint and wiring. Cut the holes so she floods even and sits where the chart says. Then leave her.
At first sheβs only bare plates in open water. Then the pioneers arrive β film, algae, the small stuff that turns metal into a living skin. Sponges soften the edges. Fish take the voids for shelter. In time you hardly see the ship. You see a reef that happens to have frames and decks.
Thatβs the point Masters understand without a lecture: hard structure where the seabed offered none. Habitat. Fisheries. Dive tourism. Same steel that once carried cargo now carries life.
The rule is simple. A cleaned, permitted reef is seamanship of a different kind. An uncleaned hulk is still pollution β with a pretty photo.
We spend our careers keeping ships afloat. Occasionally, the honest end of a vessel is to serve the sea from below.
The weekend's escalation changed the risk calculus for global energy. Here is what the US market needs to watch this week. π’π’οΈ
On Sunday, the Houthis announced a strike on a Saudi Aramco facility. Saudi Arabia intercepted ballistic missiles aimed at Riyadh. The US issued caution warnings to citizens across eight countries. This is no longer a Red Sea shipping crisis. This is a direct threat to the source of the cargo.
Combine that with the East-West pipeline still offline, and the picture is grim:
πΉ Hormuz: Commercial crossings remain in the single digits to low teens, far below the pre-war flow of roughly 20 million barrels per day. The primary artery is pinched.
πΉ Bab el-Mandeb: Kpler-tracked commodity crossings halved on 11 September β 15 vessels versus 30 the day before. The secondary artery is strained.
πΉ The Source: With Aramco infrastructure under direct threat, the question is no longer whether ships can transit. It is whether the terminals that load them can operate.
For the US, this is not an abstract geopolitical crisis. It feeds directly into gasoline prices, diesel costs, and the inflation battle the Fed is still fighting. The market has been pricing a chokepoint shock. It may need to start pricing a supply-source shock.
The week ahead will tell us whether this is a temporary spike or the beginning of a sustained energy crisis. The mariners on the water already know which way the wind is blowing.
A green label on a press release does not suspend the law of the sea. βοΈ
Marine "geoengineering" is arriving on the bridge dressed as climate virtue. Alkalinity dosing. Biomass sinking. Cloud brightening. Different chemistry, but the same question for the Master on watch: What am I putting overside, under whose authority, and who owns the risk if it fails?
A climate compliance certificate does not automatically clear your ocean duties. The legal reality is stark:
πΉ UNCLOS still binds. Article 192 requires you to protect and preserve the marine environment. Article 195 prohibits transferring damage or transforming one pollution into another. Article 196 requires control of pollution from technologies under your jurisdiction. The recent ITLOS climate advisory opinion confirms that if geoengineering turns one pollution into another, Article 195 bites. Paris Agreement targets and UNCLOS obligations are separate ledgers.
πΉ The London Convention/Protocol still applies. Parties have flagged priority techniquesβalkalinity enhancement, biomass interventions, marine cloud brighteningβas carrying potential for widespread, long-lasting, or severe effects, with high uncertainty. The precautionary principle applies: where harm is likely, act even without conclusive proof. Not "trial first, litigate later."
πΉ Due diligence is not a duty to experiment on the ocean. Speculative technology is not "readily available" climate kit. Proponents carry the burden of proof: feasibility, monitoring, and a clean stop if harm appears. On the high seas, BBNJ logic demands proper Environmental Impact Assessment. A carbon claim does not cancel that assessment.
The Master's Checklist Before You Sign the Log:
β’ Licensed trialβor a CSR charter?
β’ Written authorization from flag state, coastal state, and LC/LP authority: limits, monitoring, stop criteria.
β’ Exact substance, quantity, position. Who signs the log?
β’ P&I and pollution cover for this specific job, not assumed under normal trading.
β’ Cannot reverse or halt it? You are committing, not piloting.
Hormuz dominates the feed. Quietly, another risk is being sold as virtue: the ocean as a carbon workshop. Masters are not climate negotiators. We are the last line between a green press release and a pollution incident.
UNCLOS 192/195/196 Β· LC/LP Β· ITLOS/ICJ climate AOs Β· BBNJ EIA