My adjectives are "handsome" and "right", even subtly implying I'm not right and/or handsome is a hate crime.

Mexico
Joined December 2016
Es la UNICA "presidentA" que ha habido en México. Teniendo cero competencia en su categoría, bien podría decir que es la "presidentA" más guapa, con más carisma, menos vínculos con el narcotráfico, más inteligente y con menos cara de Alex Lora de toda la historia de México.
Carlos Bonavides asegura que Claudia Sheimbaum, es la presidenta mejor preparada desde la Conquista. Lo preocupante no es su declaración sino que muy probablemente cree que está haciendo un análisis histórico y no una audición para conseguir trabajo. Cuando un ignorante de su tamaño afirma que nuestra presidenta es la persona más preparada en más de 500 años de historia, no la está defendiendo, nos está confesando que jamás en su vida ha abierto un libro. La diferencia entre un elogio y una reverencia es que el elogio conserva la dignidad y la reverencia, siempre termina buscando patrocinador. ¡Jamás me imaginé ver a Huicho Domínguez interpretar el personaje de arrastrado y lamehuevos con tanto nivel de compromiso!
1
1
183
Olo m3rol retweeted
LOS PISTONS SE LLEVAN EL PRIMER PARTIDO DE LA TEMPORADA 🏀🔥 Derrotaron a los Celtics 121-113.
1
2
1,008
Olo m3rol retweeted
Los motoristas de esta ciudad deberían ver este video.
72
999
44
2,438
74,572
Nunca fue tan fácil elegir un bando
581
5,975
423
93,529
4,869,151
Change the punishment for filicide to death penalty and your corpse being paraded naked after the execution. That's the only thing that can override the hive mind command and deter any further copycats.
Since Lindsay Clancy: 82 mothers have killed 123 of their own children.
 37 MORE mothers tried. 52 children survived.
 These are just the ones that made the local news. 
Every time, the same excuse: Postpartum. Hormones. Psychosis.
 NO. Hormones are not a defense and the mothers are not the victims. The children are. 
 The moment we call the killer a victim, the children never get justice.
 Someone has to speak for them. So I will. 
 America, we have a problem.
8
I don't produce "content." I make art. AI posers can't compete with a real artist any more than a master Street Fighter player can compete against an MMA black belt.
Perhaps But good luck competing against 50,000 posers producing content 10 times faster than you
160
92
13
1,932
34,021
Replying to @Pirat_Nation
We need to start shaming people who are still using nexus mods
1
8
92
Good Nexus Mods is compromised by political activists. They censored so many creators
So nexus mods finally has some true competition and is losing games to another mod platforms The Witcher 3 Remastered got around 820K downloads on mod .io vs 171K on Nexus from August 30 to September 30, despite Nexus having roughly 9,100 mods compared to just 110 on mod. io. The difference is that modio is integrated directly into the game, making it much easier for players to discover and install mods.
49
280
2
4,085
55,520
IDK about you, but I've had enough. #CancelNexusMods Stop what you're doing and uninstall right now.
Nexus banned a mod that replaces the Pride flags in the game. The mod replaces the artwork for all 20 included Pride profile entries with the game's existing Dad's Home poster artwork. It covers small and large emblems, banners, and banner previews (84 texture assets in total). The creator says it was banned for “discriminatory content” and argues that all they did was replace the textures with something “a little more wholesome”. You gotta admit the double standards in Nexus Mods, it’s so funny that they selectively ban and censor what they want. If it were the reverse with Pride flags, they would allow it.
14
Not being able to draw is not a disability. Nobody is "born" with it. I don't have extra organs or magic graphite fingernails. It's just something you do over and over for years, like every skill that exists on this planet. If you can't draw yet, it only means haven't practiced enough. That can be fixed, right now, by picking up a pencil and a stack of cheap paper like I did in middle school. If you claim to have practiced for years and aren't improving, you are either the only person in the world who doesn't get better at something with practice, or you're a liar.
Imagine getting humbled by a 13 year old
55
32
5
622
18,717
I am anti-woke & proud. Here’s a manifesto of what this means & why I fight woke ideology. I’m not alone in this. If you believe these too, you’re one of us. (See the end for a definition of woke.) ——— 𝟭. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗺𝗲𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝗰𝘆 We believe individuals should be hired based on their skills and experience, not based on their race or gender. If you think that will disadvantage a race or gender, you’re actually being racist or sexist. ——— 𝟮. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝘂𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗲𝘀𝘀, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝗮𝘂𝗹𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝘆𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆 𝘄𝗵𝗼 𝗰𝗹𝗮𝗶𝗺𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝗲 𝗮 𝘃𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗺 Back in the day, people default believed the man in rape allegations. That was bad. Woke nowadays tries to make it so people default believe the woman in rape allegations. That is 𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘰 bad. We believe in due process. Hear both sides. Decide on each case based on the evidence. ——— 𝟯. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘁𝘆, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝘂𝘁𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘀 Make sure everybody can apply. Sometimes this will lead to group differences, and that’s OK. Women used to be barred from most professions. When we removed the barriers, they flocked to medicine and law and now it’s close to 50-50 among students there. They didn’t flock to STEM - and that’s 𝘧𝘪𝘯𝘦. The reason doesn’t matter. They can join STEM if they want, and plenty of women do. But we shouldn’t aim for 50-50 women in STEM. We shouldn’t aim for “proportional representation” in any field. We should just make sure everybody’s allowed to try, and some will take up the opportunity and others won’t. Let people be adults. ——— 𝟰. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱𝗻’𝘁 𝗽𝘂𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗱𝘂𝗮𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆 𝗲𝗹𝘀𝗲 𝗱𝗶𝗱 Did you descend from slave-owners? Or are you white, with no ancestors who owned slaves, but the same race as those who did? So what? 𝘠𝘰𝘶 never owned slaves. You’re against slavery. You shouldn’t be made to feel guilty for something outside of your control. ——— 𝟱. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗯𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗹𝗱 𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗿𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀, 𝗿𝗲𝗴𝗮𝗿𝗱𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗼𝗳 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 Did a black person commit a crime? Did a woman kill her husband? Did a non-white person loot a store during a riot? Then they should be held accountable for their crimes. They should not have a mob of people saying that they only did it because of racism/sexism/what-have-you. Maybe a white criminal did it because they had a hard childhood. Maybe a man raped a woman because he’s mentally ill. Nobody ever says we should let them off the hook because of that. We should apply the same standards to everybody, regardless of irrelevant group membership. Including black people and women. ——— 𝟲. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗲𝗻𝗴𝗮𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗮𝗿𝗴𝘂𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗸𝗲𝗿’𝘀 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 It used to be that people by default believed white people instead of black people. That was bad. Nowadays they’re trying to make it so that, by default, you believe black people instead of white people. That is 𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘰 bad. We should believe people based on their arguments and evidence, not based on race. The same goes for gender and all other possible group identities. ——— 𝟳. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗰𝗶𝘃𝗶𝗹𝗹𝘆, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗹𝘆𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝘂𝗯𝗺𝗶𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗼𝗿 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 We believe if we disagree on an ethical question, we should try to persuade the person with reasons. We don’t believe we should bully them into submission and exile them if they don’t sufficiently bend the knee to a mob. ——— 𝟴. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗺, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗱𝗲𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 We believe police officers are there to protect people. And usually they do. Sometimes they make mistakes or there are ways to improve the institution. But we shouldn’t eliminate an institution because it could be better. ——— 𝟵. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲 𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗱𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗿𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘂𝗽 𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗻𝗶𝗰 𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 The ideal is to not see race. To make being black or any form of non-white a complete non-issue, much like how nobody cares if you’re descended from the Irish or Italians nowadays. Talking about race all the time and encouraging non-white people to be afraid of white people and constantly bringing up old grievances is stirring up ethnic tensions. ——— 𝟭𝟬. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗿𝘂𝗶𝗻 𝗮 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻’𝘀 𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝗺𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗼𝗿 𝗻𝗼𝗻-𝗲𝘅𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁 Did you feel unsupported at work? Did you feel offended by something a colleague said? Did you feel it was unfair that somebody had more power or status than you? Fine. Welcome to the real world. Deal with it. Your every discomfort is not meant to be catered to. Life is uncomfortable. Get a helmet. ——— 𝟭𝟭. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆 𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘁𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗮𝘂𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗺𝗮 Life is hard. Lots of minor to major things will happen to you and you can handle it. In fact, you can grow from it. Believing things will cause trauma creates a self-fulfilling prophecy. We believe the solution to dealing with life’s slings and arrows is to develop a thick skin. Not to create a bubble environment where the smallest thing causes you to freak out and seek a “safe space”. ——— 𝟭𝟮. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱𝗻’𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲 𝗮 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗯𝘆 𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝘀𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 Yes, men commit far more violence than women. Yes, some white men commit domestic abuse or hate women. Yes, some white police officers harm black people. But we should not judge a group by its worst members. Most white men never harm women. Most white police officers do not harm black people. In fact, both groups are far more likely to protect those groups than to harm them. The vast majority of men are ethical. The vast majority of men will 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘵𝘦𝘤𝘵 a woman in danger. That’s why judging men by their worst members is misandry. ——— 𝟭𝟯. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗮𝗻 𝗼𝗽𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝗱 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗯𝗹𝗲 Did a mentally ill sex worker say she was a victim? Did an indigenous disabled woman comment on the Indian Act? Who cares? That doesn’t make them more credible. What makes people more credible is knowledge. Being a member of a group doesn’t magically make you an expert. Depending on the mental illness, it should 𝘳𝘦𝘥𝘶𝘤𝘦 your credibility. It might mean you’re experiencing paranoid delusions or interpreting ambiguous events as dangerous. ——— 𝟭𝟰. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗰𝗼𝗺𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝗮 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗮 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿 𝗼𝗳 Everybody is entitled to their own opinion. Even if you don’t have much knowledge about a group or situation, you’re allowed to comment on it. Nobody should be silenced based on race or gender. ——— 𝟭𝟱. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗽𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗶𝗹𝗲 We believe if somebody makes a genuine mistake, the solution isn’t to exile them or get them fired. We believe in a path to redemption. We believe in trying to change their minds with reason and moral persuasion. We believe that if they see the error of their ways, we should forgive them. ——— 𝟭𝟲. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝘁’𝘀 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 𝘁𝗼 𝗳𝗲𝗲𝗹 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗱 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆, 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝗱𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲, 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝘄𝗵𝗶𝘁𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗼𝗽𝗹𝗲 Woke will do everything it can to preserve the culture and traditions of non-white people. Then they’ll turn and say any feelings of pride for white people are “white supremacy”. People are allowed to feel proud of their history without hating other groups. ——— 𝟭𝟳. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝗿𝗮𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗯𝗮𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱𝗻’𝘁 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗱𝘄𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗶𝘁 The indigenous people of the Pacific Northwest were warlike slave societies. The Iroquois ethnically cleansed the Wendat in the 1600s. Should they spend their days feeling guilty about their ancestors’ sins? Or should we all acknowledge that, yes, those bad things were bad, learn from them, and move on? Some white people did bad things in the past. They also did good things. Like, for example, ending slavery. That doesn’t mean we should feel endlessly guilty. We didn’t do anything bad. We should feel responsible for our own actions and those we can influence, not things beyond our control. ——— 𝟭𝟴. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗺𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿, 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗷𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗾𝘂𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 Sometimes you will have the best of intentions and still hurt somebody’s feelings. That should be taken into account when thinking about what to do about the situation. We need to respond differently to somebody who was trying to hurt you vs somebody who made an honest mistake. ——— 𝟭𝟵. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗳𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂’𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗱𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗴𝗲𝗿 𝗱𝗼𝗲𝘀𝗻’𝘁 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗮 𝘄𝗿𝗼𝗻𝗴 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗲 Woke’s rallying cry for why people should come and defend the victim-heroes is that they “felt unsafe”. We say: so what? Feelings sometimes point to something real, sometimes not. You have to check. Just because you felt unsafe around a man, just because you’re afraid he’ll retaliate, doesn’t mean he’s actually dangerous. Check. If there’s real evidence, act on it. If there’s no reason to actually be afraid, get over it. The problem is 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘦𝘮𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴. Fix them. Don’t make your feelings other people’s problem. ——— 𝟮𝟬. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗼𝗸𝗲 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝘅𝗶𝗲𝘁𝘆, 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗿𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗼𝗶𝗮 Playing the game of spot the racism/sexism/transphobia/____ism makes you fear large swathes of society. Believing most men are predators out to hurt you or sexually assault you makes you fear and dislike half of the whole population. Focusing on every single bad thing a police officer has ever done leads to distrusting the institutions designed to protect you. All of this leads to a general paranoia, believing anybody could be out to get you and distrusting every person’s intentions. Believing your skin color means you’re guilty for every single bad thing a white person has ever done makes you depressed. Same goes for feeling guilty for being a man, straight, or cis. ——— 𝟮𝟭. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗳𝗮𝗺𝗶𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗳𝗿𝗶𝗲𝗻𝗱𝘀 𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗱𝗶𝘀𝗮𝗴𝗿𝗲𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁-𝗹𝗶𝗸𝗲 The biggest warning sign you’re in a cult is that it encourages cutting off people who are not part of the cult. If they say you should cut off family members or friends because they disagree with you, that’s bad. They are isolating you and this leads down a road of echo chambers, loneliness, and escalating abuse. ——— 𝟮𝟮. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗲𝘅𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗼𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 ____𝗶𝘀𝗺 𝗶𝘀 𝗴𝗼𝗼𝗱 Not every group difference is because of racism/sexism/transphobia, etc. It’s important to explore other possibilities. If somebody proposes another hypothesis, they should not be fired or exiled. Their arguments should be engaged with. ——— 𝟮𝟯. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝗯𝘂𝗹𝗹𝘀𝗵𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗳𝗲𝗹𝘁 𝗳𝗶𝗻𝗲 𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲 𝘄𝗮𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘂𝗺𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘇𝗶𝗻𝗴 If you enjoyed or didn’t mind something at the time, it’s terrible emotional intelligence to later re-interpret it as traumatizing. It’s downright unethical to then turn that reframing into ruining the life of the person who you “were traumatized by”. You can reframe hard things into something good or neutral. You can also reframe good or neutral things into bad. One is healthy and good. The other is unhealthy and bad for the person doing it and their target. ——— 𝟮𝟰. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝗱𝘂𝗹𝘁 𝘄𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗲 𝗰𝗵𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲𝘀, 𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗹𝘂𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗯𝗮𝗱 𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘀 A woman can choose to have sex while drunk and regret it the next day. We believe a woman can sleep with a powerful man to advance her career. We believe a woman can get a job where she thinks the work is beneath her or doesn’t like the boss. We believe a woman can get jealous or mad at a man and do serious damage and even kill him. They’re adults, and they will be treated the same as men. This is what equality means. If they did something they regret, that’s on them. They made that decision. If they committed something unethical, they will be held accountable by society. No special treatment. ——— 𝟮𝟱. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝘄𝗲’𝗿𝗲 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗹𝗲𝗻 𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗿𝗶𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆. 𝗧𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗮 𝗶𝘀 𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗻𝗼𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗺, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗶𝘁’𝘀 𝗯𝗮𝗱, 𝗮𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 The indigenous people aren’t the “original” people of an area. Every single area was conquered back and forth for millennia prior. Thinking that a land belongs to a certain race and the others should all leave is racist ethnonationalism. We should not do it. ——— 𝟮𝟲. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝘀𝗼𝗺𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗺𝗲𝘀 𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗯𝘂𝘁𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗽 𝗱𝗶𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗲𝗻𝗰𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁’𝘀 𝗢𝗞 Nobody calls the Olympics black supremacist because athletes of West African descent dominate in sprinting. They’re just better at sprinting for some reason. It’s probably genetic. And that’s OK. There might be genetic differences between races and genders, and that’s OK. Judge each person as an individual, not their group averages. ——— 𝟮𝟳. 𝗪𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘃𝗲 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘆𝗯𝗼𝗱𝘆 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗸 It used to be that black people and women were silenced. That was bad. Nowadays, they’re trying to silence white people and men. That is 𝘢𝘭𝘴𝘰 bad. Everybody should be allowed to speak, regardless of race, gender, or group membership. ——— 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗱𝗼 𝗜 𝗺𝗲𝗮𝗻 𝗯𝘆 “𝘄𝗼𝗸𝗲”? Woke is a cluster of beliefs and behaviors that makes a point of hating any label, because the name inevitably becomes stigmatized. That’s because a large percentage of society hates everything they stand for. It is not stigma. It is earned dislike. But to define them: • Some other words for the cluster: social justice warriors, the far left, critical theorists, critical social justice, left identitarianism, identity politics, the Great Awokening, the regressive left • It’s the ideology that everything is about oppression, race/gender/trans, power imbalances, believing all alleged victims, cancel culture, playing spot the racism/sexism/transphobia/etc. • Its central cases are White Fragility, Black Lives Matter, #MeToo, DEI
Everybody loves a good conversion story, where somebody in the out-group sees the light and leaves. I know I certainly enjoyed two excellent articles by people explaining their own exit from the left (see links in comment). So here’s mine: I was born in the most progressive region of Canada, one of the most progressive countries, into one of the most progressive families, filled with artists, feminists, environmentalists, and nudists. The first time I was ever featured in a newspaper it had a photo of me literally hugging a tree, running an environmentalist campaign at my high school. In uni I was a polyamorous anarcho-communist vegan who attended Occupy Wall Street. I *proudly* identified as the far left. Nowadays, whenever I write about politics, it’s almost always criticizing the left. It’s not because I’ve become a rightist or far right. Mostly I criticize the left because they’re who I’m *around*. I think I might be *acquaintances* with maybe 2 people who’d identify as on the right, and zero friends. I work in the overlap of the academic sector and the charity sector in big cities, where finding a MAGA supporter would be as surprising as finding Trump at a library. I’m sure if I was around people on the right, they’d drive me even more nuts, and I’d have to write about it. But I certainly no longer identify with the left. Here’s my story of how I left the ideology. The first crack in my beliefs came when I realized men were people too. My childhood had taught me that women were the best and men were at best cute love interests, but usually just kind of dumb brutes to be tolerated or overcome. My first Disney films were Pocahontas and then Mulan. I read fantasy novels voraciously where the main character was a woman who disguised herself as a man to become a badass knight and save the prince. That was the context I brought to my second-ever boyfriend, at 19. Shortly before meeting him, I'd gone on a date with another guy. After my first date with my future boyfriend, I told the other guy: “sorry, I met somebody way better. I don’t want to go on another date with you.” I told this to my boyfriend, thinking he’d find it funny and complimentary. Instead, he said “Ouch. You know, men have feelings too.” This. Blew. My. Mind. Wait what? Men had *feelings*? They were moral agents, worthy of compassion and consideration? The moment he said it, I knew this was obviously true and I was totally being prejudiced. I was treating 50% of the world as violent idiots to be managed. If I’d thought the same thing of, say, Black people or Muslims, I’d immediately see this as hate and prejudice. The next crack in the armor came when my anarchist boyfriend converted to libertarianism. It’s embarrassing to think about how much of your politics is influenced by your romantic partner, but it’s obviously true and it’s better to admit it than live in denial. Aren’t anarchism and libertarianism the same thing? Yes and no. They both want the same result (eliminate the government), but they come at it from totally different reasoning. Anarchism is mostly “fuck the establishment!” vibes-based. Libertarianism is more “let me tell you about the Austrian school of economics.” Also, anarchism is leftist in aesthetics, with mohawks, poor hygiene, and ragged clothing. Libertarianism is rightist aesthetics, with suits and clean-shaven faces. His obsession with economics led to me taking economics at uni. This convinced me, not that capitalism wasn't the root of all evil, but that it was nowhere near as *obviously* evil as I'd thought. What followed was years of slowly evolving a much more nuanced take on economics. Finally, the nail in the coffin came with woke mobs. My first experience with this was in 2014. One morning a woman I didn’t know messaged me over Facebook. Paraphrased: “Did you know that your friend, Simon [made up name] is a rapist? He drugged me then raped me. Just thought you should know so you can avoid him.” For context, Simon was a feminist activist and animal rights activist who I’d probably talked to 10 times or so. He seemed like a deeply compassionate person, with the most soft-spoken demeanor you could imagine. I was surprised, but I knew very well that appearances weren’t everything. Pol Pot came across as a sweet-mannered man while he was a high school teacher. I asked her for more details, and she gave me inconsistent and evasive responses. I then reached out to Simon and asked him “hey, this woman just told me that you drugged and raped her. I wanted to check in with you and ask you for your side.” He then told me something that has stuck with me ever since: “Thank you, Kat. She’s told hundreds of people this, and I’ve had basically my whole community unfriend me and exile me. You’re the *only* person who asked me my side.” I still tear up with sympathy for him and anger at all of his supposed “friends”. Even if he *was* guilty, you owe it to your friends to hear their side before condemning them to social exile. And I was barely even his friend! And it turns out he *wasn’t* guilty. Apparently they’d been romantic partners for a year. A few months earlier she’d said she’d been having trouble sleeping and he’d offered to give her some of his sleeping pills. She was taking them regularly, and she took them on a night they had perfectly regular normal consensual sex. She even left the room and came back with a condom, hardly something a rape victim would do. Later, she broke up with him and then started spreading this rumor. It’s hard to tell if it was just normal ex-partner vindictiveness or the woke belief that sex under the influence of any drug whatsoever counts as rape. (Of course, it’s just rape for the woman. If a man is similarly inebriated, it’s not rape. He’s just a predator.) He had collected a large amount of evidence, and even some of *her* friends vouched that it wasn't true. Either way, it didn’t matter. Believe All Women became famous in 2017, but it started earlier in the activist communities. And as a male feminist activist dating a feminist, he got to be one of the first victims. Now, at first I thought this was just the Vancouver feminist community. I didn’t think it was the left broadly. And maybe it wasn’t! I don't know exactly how and when wokeness spread. However, it did keep growing. And I could no longer deny that this wasn't a weird one-off, but the far left's default. When I’d been far left, it meant being color-blind, not making everything about race. It meant free speech, not silencing dissenters or even just questioning the orthodoxy. It meant appreciating and integrating other cultures’ best offerings to humanity, not cultural appropriation. It meant questioning the establishment, not thinking doing your own research means you’re an idiotic bigot. It meant sex positivity, not thinking that merely being asked out by a powerful man somehow damaged a woman. It meant thinking women were strong and agentic, not weak easily damaged flowers in need of protection from powerful men. But “left” and “right” aren’t coherent stable ideologies. They are a conglomeration of beliefs and tribal alliances that are dependent on time and place. Being “far left” in 2006 is far different from being “far left” in 2026, let alone 1926. Being “far left” in California means something different than being “far left” in China. So part of why I stopped being far left was that the ideology changed and I didn't agree with the changes. The other part was that I changed my mind about beliefs I already held. Capitalism wasn’t pure evil. Men were people too, and not idiotic thugs. I could go on. But the underlying thing was realizing that the left was wrong about some things, which eventually led me to stress-test all of my major political beliefs. I played steelman solitaire on my views (see links in comment). I looked for disconfirming evidence. I binged a whole bunch of right-wing material to better understand their views. And again - I disagree with most of the right too. I’m a sex positive, cosmopolitan, atheist, anti-traditionalist intellectual. I love myself a good soy latte and foreign film. I think welfare states are awesome, abortion should be a right, and we should invest way more in international aid and fighting climate change. Guns should be super regulated and what you do with your own body shouldn’t be. I think it’s the government’s job to help pull up those who are worst off. I am still a tree-hugger. I'm just a centrist now, one who evaluates each policy on its merits rather than loving or hating it based on which side my tribe is on.
7
2
4
65
5,547
Olo m3rol retweeted
🚨WHAT ON EARTH?!!! An Ohio dad who HUNTED DOWN his 11-year-old daughter's r*pist... ...is sitting in jail on a HIGHER bond than the man who r*ped his 11-year-old daughter AND AN INFANT. Yes, you read that right... the FATHER has a higher bond than the man who r*ped his daughter. It began when a mother in Grove City Ohio picked up her daughter's phone and found a video. A grown man s*xually assaulting her 11-year-old little girl, inside their OWN HOME. His name is Diego Montoya Gonzalez, he is 20 years old. The next day, that little girl's father lured the man back to the apartment by posing as his daughter on TikTok. He got Gonzalez to come back to the apartment. He told police the plan was to hold him there, beat him up and then call the cops. When Gonzalez walked in, he reached for his pocket. The father (who had already watched this man flash a gun in a TikTok video) then sh0t him. Gonzalez lived. He ran. Police found him slumped in a chair with two gunshot wounds. Police found multiple videos on his phone of children being abused... one of them was an INFANT. Now here is the part that should make every parent in America sick. The alleged child r*pist's bond? $70,000. The FATHER who tried to protect his baby girl $100,000. The dad is being held on a HIGHER bond than the monster who hurt his child. Let that sink in. A man films himself abusing babies… and a judge hands him a CHEAPER ticket out of jail than the father who snapped trying to defend his own daughter. WE DO NOT HAVE TO LIVE LIKE THIS!!!!!!!
845
6,050
334
12,120
129,025
Technically that was a kidnap, the sex crime is only implied in your head. As obvious as it may seem to an adult, a child wouldn't have the needed context to imply a sex crime in this cartoon. The message is just "bad guys do bad things, and because of that, they get punished"
Çizgifilmlerde cinsel suçları çok rahat bir şekilde yansıtmaları saçmalığı??? yetişkin olarak izlerken içim daraldı çocuk bunu neden izlesin
1
40
Jajajaja, la pendeja se burló de los trabajadores del IMSS en su cara y se la tragaron entera. Esta sociedad está condenada. ¿En serio no se preguntan qué le da valor para comportarse así? Se los digo YO: sabe que esta patética sociedad no se inmuta por nada que, según ella, no le afecta. Toda la mierda que ves que le está afectando a alguien más, más temprano que tarde te va a afectar a ti. No es si va a suceder, es solo cuestión de cuándo. Léanme bien: la pendeja ya dejó al país en la orilla de perder el grado de inversión. Cuando eso suceda, el dinero invertido aquí va a salir a carretadas. No habrá poder humano que frene la salida de capitales y con ello vendrá una abrupta devaluación e inflación. La pendeja tendrá que subir impuestos sí o sí. ¿Te vas a esperar a que tengas que suprimir la ingesta de carne para sentirte agraviado? ¿Qué pedo con esta sociedad? Wey, no lo puedo creer. No se van a ir a otro país; México llegó tarde a la fiesta, Europa está a nada de empezar a escupir migrantes. ¿A dónde chingados crees que te vas a ir? ¿A colonizar la luna? Wey, ¿qué pedo? ¿Cómo te explico que solo tienes un país? Si no lo defiendes tú, nadie más lo va a hacer por ti.
133
924
18
2,860
43,086
Now THAT's a deterrent.
All female firing squad (no hijabs) and bullets dipped in bacon fat Everyone cool with that idea?
2
Olo m3rol retweeted
For the women wondering how men treat fellow men convicted of child murder 👇👇. They don't wear blue, carry placards in protest and blame mental health.
🚨BREAKING: Convicted child killer Kyle Bevan was brutally stabbed more than 30 times by fellow inmates in a savage 5-minute prison attack at HMP Wakefield — and was left for dead. Bevan was serving a life sentence for the horrific 2020 murder of two-year-old Lola James, whom he subjected to a savage assault causing catastrophic brain injuries and over 100 wounds. The brutal prison attack is being seen by many as raw "prison justice" for his crimes against an innocent toddler.
136
7,019
56
38,035
720,662
If you think a tiger should die just because some asshole wants to commit suicide, you're out of your mind. Tigers are endangered. Depressed/insane/stupid humans are not.
If you think a Tigers life is more important than a human life, you have something deeply wrong with you. The tiger should have been shot on the spot while the man was still alive, they had plenty of time to do so and everyone knows it. It’s easy to make fun of the guy but if it were your family member you’d want the tiger killed to save them. Don’t @ me I don’t care.
21
Si entras a la jaula de un tigre estás cometiendo suicidio, el tigre no tiene que morir por tus pendjadas.
43
If you migrate to another country with a different culture, and you plan to stay there, you should INTEGRATE to the local culture. If you try to enforce the rules of your culture in your new country of residence, you should be considered as an invader, and treated as such.
8
OMG! Jajaja
🚨 Escandalo mundial. Gracias al kirchnerismo se cayo la mentira, NO EXISTE LA NUBE, los datos de la web no van a una nube en el cielo, sino que van a servidores. Esto es una escándalo, nos mintieron por decadas.
7
158
1,021
19
11,745
102,103