camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg) header
camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg) profile picture

professional at ai launch camping ๐ŸฆŽ ceo of... (still fishing)...

Joined October 2026
Photo by camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg)Photo by camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg)Photo by camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg)Photo by camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg)Photo by camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg)Photo by camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg)Photo by camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg)Photo by camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg)Photo by camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg)Photo by camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ (@camperaigg)
๐Ÿš€ 10 days ago I made this account, and I've been posting non-stop since then. ๐Ÿ“ˆ This is the progress I made. Over 400K impressions and over 300 followers! It's only the start! ๐Ÿค– If you like Tech and AI, let's connect! Let's help each other and grow together!
12
1
11
1,241
๐Ÿšจ Fable 5.5 TESTING Part 16 ๐Ÿ™ I asked Claude to make an ocean horror trailer in three.js. I never touched the code. ๐Ÿคฏ โฑ๏ธ 194 minutes ๐Ÿ’ธ $17.40 in API costs ๐Ÿค– Claude Fable 5.5 Xhigh in Claude Code What it did on its own ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐Ÿช‚ Solved the jump in physics: 44 m, hitting the water at 101 km/h ๐ŸŒŠ Drew the sea from 44 summed waves, per pixel ๐Ÿฆ‘ Simulated nine glowing tentacles as physics chains that close in around your head ๐Ÿซง Threw 70,000 bubbles past the lens at the plunge ๐Ÿซ Cut 12 panicked breaths out of one recording and timed them to the edit ๐Ÿ’“ A real stethoscope heartbeat and a real blue whale call at half speed, no music, no synthesis ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธ A re-render "finished" in 2 seconds. It read its own contact sheet, saw the old cut and found the stale cache ๐Ÿ“ฆ 39.6 s ยท 1080p ยท 24 fps ยท 2.39:1 ยท 26 shots ยท 40 real recordings Then I said "make it like an edit, like its a movie trailer" ๐ŸŽฌ โœ‚๏ธ Recut the one-take into 26 shots and re-timed all the sound to the cuts ๐ŸŽž๏ธ Built a film print: halation, anamorphic streak, gate weave, bars ๐Ÿ”ค Title cards: ONE BREATH. ONE WAY DOWN. IT CAN WAIT.
1
7
307
camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ retweeted
It absolutely does. Both companies should have it. Because the price jump from 20 to 100 dollars is way too steep. So for normal customers, who do not hardcore code all the time, it'll be perfect. Instead of buying multiple 20 dollars account when one runs out.
Would a Pro 50 make sense? Wdyt?
1
2
153
camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ retweeted
And to use your subs normally, we need to run your models in Fast mode (2.5x more) AND your subscription gives about half of what of Anthropic gives, real numbers: Pro 100= 2x Pro 100= 4x Pro 500=10x YIKES
Saw some confusions, but all Pro plans have no 5-hour limits, and give the following usage compared to Plus. โœ… Pro 100 = 10X โœ… Pro 200 = 20X โœ… Pro 500 = 50X, access to ultrafast
1
1
1
229
It absolutely does. Both companies should have it. Because the price jump from 20 to 100 dollars is way too steep. So for normal customers, who do not hardcore code all the time, it'll be perfect. Instead of buying multiple 20 dollars account when one runs out.
Would a Pro 50 make sense? Wdyt?
1
2
153
camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ retweeted
The biggest bottleneck for Chinese AI worldwide adaptation isn't the quality of models but abysmal usage limits in their subscription services, they just cannot compete with the generosity of US AI labs.
1
1
1
238
camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ retweeted
Hey @grok remove only ONE company that you dislike and why?
1
1
1
110
camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ retweeted
Hey @grok why big tech companies still hire software engineers when AI pretty can do all their work anyway?
1
1
130
And to use your subs normally, we need to run your models in Fast mode (2.5x more) AND your subscription gives about half of what of Anthropic gives, real numbers: Pro 100= 2x Pro 100= 4x Pro 500=10x YIKES
Saw some confusions, but all Pro plans have no 5-hour limits, and give the following usage compared to Plus. โœ… Pro 100 = 10X โœ… Pro 200 = 20X โœ… Pro 500 = 50X, access to ultrafast
1
1
1
229
camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ retweeted
If Anthropic and OpenAI isn't always going for each other's throats, then we'll be at least an year behind in AI progress. Competition breeds innovation.
1
139
The biggest bottleneck for Chinese AI worldwide adaptation isn't the quality of models but abysmal usage limits in their subscription services, they just cannot compete with the generosity of US AI labs.
1
1
1
238
camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ retweeted
Get out of your basement, Mr. Reset and give us Astra 6.2 ๐Ÿ˜ญ @thsottiaux
1
2
196
Hey @grok remove only ONE company that you dislike and why?
1
1
1
110
Hey @grok why big tech companies still hire software engineers when AI pretty can do all their work anyway?
1
1
130
If Anthropic and OpenAI isn't always going for each other's throats, then we'll be at least an year behind in AI progress. Competition breeds innovation.
1
139
Get out of your basement, Mr. Reset and give us Astra 6.2 ๐Ÿ˜ญ @thsottiaux
1
2
196
camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ retweeted
Hey @grok, why people are paying 200s of dollars for Grok bot when you can just use Hermes bot for free? Am I missing something?
2
1
2
448
Hey @grok, why people are paying 200s of dollars for Grok bot when you can just use Hermes bot for free? Am I missing something?
2
1
2
448
camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ retweeted
As someone who has both Chatgpt and Claude subs, using @t3dotcodes by @theo is a breeze. I have been using that app for 2 weeks now, still working on the full review of it. But here is my 2 favorite features: 1. Delegation: You can just delegate the task from a single thread to any model with any effort value and your agent will do that as a subagent. 2. Handoff: context handoff from claude to chatgpt and vice versa, T3 code has the best/seamless implementation of it. These two things has made multi subs effortless. Give that amazing piece of software a try, you will not be disappointed.
1
1
2
315
As someone who has both Chatgpt and Claude subs, using @t3dotcodes by @theo is a breeze. I have been using that app for 2 weeks now, still working on the full review of it. But here is my 2 favorite features: 1. Delegation: You can just delegate the task from a single thread to any model with any effort value and your agent will do that as a subagent. 2. Handoff: context handoff from claude to chatgpt and vice versa, T3 code has the best/seamless implementation of it. These two things has made multi subs effortless. Give that amazing piece of software a try, you will not be disappointed.
1
1
2
315
camper ๐ŸฆŽ๐ŸŽฃ retweeted
๐Ÿšจ Fable 5.5 TESTING Part 15 ๐Ÿงช I asked Claude to inject blue ink into a glass flask of water. One prompt. I never touched three.js. ๐Ÿคฏ โฑ๏ธ 156 minutes ๐Ÿ’ธ $24.17 in API costs ๐Ÿค– Claude Fable 5.5 Xhigh in Claude Code What it did on its own ๐Ÿ‘‡ ๐ŸŒŠ Wrote its own fluid solver: 39.3 million cells at 0.38 mm, baked in 66 minutes on a laptop RTX 4060 ๐Ÿ’ง Pushed 33.5 million ink particles through that flow, rendered in three.js ๐Ÿ”ฎ Ray-traced the glass and water with real refraction, Fresnel and total internal reflection, plus 1 million photons a frame for the blue caustic on the floor โณ 10x slow motion through the jet, then a time-lapse of up to 50x to a fully mixed sphere, all in one continuous shot ๐Ÿ”Š Synthesized every sound in code and timed it to the film speed, so the plunger's groan slows down with the slow-mo ๐Ÿ” Spotted faint ladder bands in the jet, measured the particle density on the GPU and traced them to 3 separate bugs โš–๏ธ Caught its fluid sim quietly losing 58% of the ink while stirring, and put it back ๐Ÿ“ฆ 30 s ยท 1080p60 ยท 1,800 frames ยท 640 velocity keys ยท 6.2 GB bake ยท 25.5-minute render
4
6
72
3,087