Frage für einen Freund: Gibt es eigentlich in der Sondierungstruppe der Berliner Grünen, die das akzeptiert hat, auch Realas oder Realos?
Echt, #GrüneBerlin und #SPD? Ihr wollt die Jugendoffiziere der Bundeswehr aus den Schulen raushalten, um die zarten Seelen der Berliner Kids nicht zu militarisieren, und "stattdessen" die Demokratiebildung stärken? Die Bundeswehr ist also etwas undemokratisches?
"Demokratischer Analphabetismus von RGR" ist genau richtig. Eine völlig inakzeptable Entscheidung. Wer das mitträgt, unterwirft sich der sicherheitspolitisch verirrten Linkspartei. DAS ist dann "RRR".
Thread!
Replying to @samagreene
Thanks largely to the (illegal and asinine) war with Iran, Trump has manufactured a scenario in which he believes (likely falsely) that Putin can help him solve the political and economic consequences of his own fecklessness.
/2
Reinhard Bütikofer retweeted
Hong Kong activist Joshua Wong turns 30 today, behind bars.
The outstanding campaigner of his generation, Joshua merely advocated for what was promised Hong Kong. He faces compound prosecutions for his effective, peaceful work.
Leave him a greeting:
freejoshuawong.uk
Reinhard Bütikofer retweeted
At last! Big congrats to all esp @carolecadwalla As MP I was proud to join a court case to try to force ministers to hold an inquiry into the impact of Russian interference on the Brexit vote & other recent elections - their lack of curiosity was stunning
observer.co.uk/news/national…
I wouldn't say, your thought experiment is insane, but it's very badly informed. Example? You write: "top-level politicians in China need a proven track record in the domain of public service delivery". Substitute "public service delibery" by "Xi sycophancy"! That's the reality.
I want to invite people into a thought experiment, one that I suspect many will find insane.
The thought experiment: China is more democratic than the US.
Numerous *Western* surveys have now found that the Chinese government enjoys more public support than the US government. On the question of legitimacy, China fares better.
China also does better at securing basic economic freedoms and meeting the material needs of its poor. What's the point of the ballot box when politics becomes performative and politicians aren't held accountable when they fail to deliver universal housing, healthcare, or education?
I suspect a big part of the explanation for the Chinese government's commitment to public service is that top-level politicians in China need a proven track record in the domain of public service delivery. The Chinese political system is highly meritocratic, unlike the American one. Becoming a top-level politician in the CPC requires decades of bureaucratic progression.
Of course, China isn't more democratic than the US on every measure. The US has a free press and open competition for political power, although both of these are highly influenced by corporate interests.
While I am not convinced there's a clear answer to this thought experiment, dismissing China as a tyrannical dictatorship is ignorant. There are examples of failed authoritarian states around the world (I've lived in one), and China is not one of them.
Was immer zu dem Rücktritt von Bärbel Bas sonst noch zu sagen ist, die Art wie Manuela Schwesig mit den Adjektiven "unmenschlich", "unanständig", "rücksichtslos" zuspitzt und das gegen den Kanzler wendet, lässt für mich nur einen Schluss zu: Schwesig will raus aus der Koalition.
That does cast a shadow.
In an interview with the Danish newspaper Berlingske, Denmark’s former foreign minister Per Stig Møller recounts a highly compromising story about the recipient of the Nobel Peace Prize, Navi Pillay.
In 2008, when Denmark faced problems in Pakistan (a car bomb exploded outside the embassy) because of the Muhammad cartoons, Denmark turned to the UN - including the then High Commissioner for Human Rights, Navi Pillay.
On that occasion Pillay was completely dismissive of supporting Denmark. Her only recommendation to the foreign minister was to introduce censorship. That, she said, would prevent the problem in the future.
I find it shocking that an opponent of freedom of speech can be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize.
Reinhard Bütikofer retweeted
President Zelenskyy’s comment on US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s remarks that the war in Ukraine is at a "strategic stalemate" and that there are now "no prospects for a negotiated settlement":
"You cannot negotiate future economic projects with Russians on the one hand and, on the other, claim that we are in some kind of diplomatic stalemate. We are not in a diplomatic stalemate.
Shut down Russia’s entire economy. Shut Russia's mouth. Stop feeding them through your sales. Impose sanctions on their weapons.
Open Starlink for Ukraine. You opened it when responding to Iran, after all. Everything worked there. Israel completely controlled the skies over Iran. So when you need it to work, it works.
It costs them nothing to help Ukraine. And I said quite frankly: help us protect our skies and gain dominance there.
Then Putin will sit down at the negotiating table. Why? Because he will lose everything. In two or three months, he will lose everything.
And instead, we are waiting for the Chinese to develop an equivalent and hand it over to Russians.
This is not a stalemate - this is called a lack of will."
"Right now, there don’t seem to be prospects of a negotiated settlement of the war in Ukraine. But the US is prepared to play whatever role we can in making that happen. It would be good for Russia and Ukraine, but so far, it’s proving elusive." - US Secretary of State Marco Rubio
In an interview with the Greek outlet Kathimerini, Rubio described the war in Ukraine as a "strategic stalemate" that can be overcome in only two ways: through negotiations or through escalation that goes beyond the original conflict.
Rubio said that, at present, there are no prospects for resolving the war through negotiations. According to him, Russia continues to insist on full control over Donbas, while for Ukraine "that condition is simply unacceptable."
"A diplomatic solution has eluded us, but we are prepared, if we can play a constructive role, to make it happen.
In the meantime, we watch with great concern as escalation could happen. Just yesterday, some ships were attacked in the Black Sea through a coordinated drone attack. We’re worried about a sabotage operation in a neighboring country that can spiral out of control.
And, obviously, there are clear indications that Russia will use the upcoming winter as something they want to use to destroy what remains of the electric grid in Ukraine and force them into capitulation.
Meanwhile, Ukraine has grown more effective in its ability to conduct long-range strikes deep into Russia.
So, we share the same concern. The whole world is going about this thing like something that could escalate and perhaps become a broader conflict. So, we stand prepared to facilitate and continue to explore any opportunity for a negotiated settlement," Rubio said.
Indem Sie schreiben, das schlimmste Massaker an Juden seit der Shoa sei "nichts", sind sie nicht nur völlig empathielos gegenüber den Opfern des Terrors + entmenschlichen diese, sie rechtfertigen den anti-jüdischen Vernichtungswahn der Hamas: Scheinlinke Sprache, aber reaktionär!
Replying to @bueti
Das "schlimmste Massaker an Juden seit der Shoa" ist nichts gegen das, was Ziofaschisten seit 79 Jahren den Palästinenser antun, ist ein Nichts gegen das Massenmorden des Schlächters von Gaza und seiner Gehilfen.
Schon vor dem 7.10. sagten diese Holocaust-Überlebenden 👇
Die Shoa war kein "schlimmes Ereignis"? Noch der 7.10.?
Sind Sie noch bei Trost?
Replying to @bueti
weder die shoa war wenn man die jüngere Geschichte betrachtet ein schlimmes Ereignis, noch der 7.10 das nur mit wissen des Netanjahu Regimes möglich war. Es sind mehr Juden durch die IDF umgekommen als wie durch Hamas Kämpfer (Hanibaldoktrin)
Am 7.10., dem Tag des schlimmsten Massakers an Jüdinnen und Juden seit der Shoa, begangen von der Hamas, solidarisiert man sich durch den demonstrativen Besuch eines palästinensischen Restaurants, das auf seiner Speisekarte die Existenz Israels leugnet, mit den Menschen in Gaza?
That is quite a statement, yes. And I guess that's what some people call "progressive".
NYC @NYCMayor making quite a statement. Having dinner at the only Palestinian restaurant on the Upper West Side this October 7th.
EPP seems to act according to Mark Twain's famous quip: " When we had lost sight of our goal, we doubled our efforts."
Britain’s Greens have voted, shamefully, to say Zionism is racism.
The Economist is right: "Instead of wringing their hands, the old Greens should seize back their party or leave it."
economist.com/leaders/2026/1…
Just to be sure: Can you explain what you want to say with the sentence "6 million in the 20th century wasn't enough?" Are you really implying that Jews were responsible for the Shoa?
Replying to @bueti
Or the "right" to profit from murdering children.
6 million in the 20th century wasn't enough?
























