Pinned Tweet
No longer using X consistently: you can find me on LinkedIn:
linkedin.com/in/bryce-killen…
Updated code is up and live on a new branch - still some small testing to do but all working on my end. If you want to test and find any bugs feel free to let me know
For anyone who is trying or wanting to use our framework - I am in the process of updated installers and dependencies to a later version of Python to improve use ability ! Stay Tuned !
Our latest paper is now published in @JBiomech Open Access & Open-Source code. A great effort from all those involved both as (co)-authors and those involved in the periphery and @FWOVlaanderen for helping fund these developments across and benefitting multiple projects
Bryce Killen retweeted
Come work with us!
We have an available tenure-track position in biomechanics in the exercise, sport, and movement sciences (ESMS) unit within @UofMHealthSci!
See the job posting and link below!
workforum.memphis.edu/postin…
Been seeing a lot more studies investigating the association between morphology/alignment and function in recent months/years. Wondering what the threshold for being able to actually directly define direct causation is/will be.
Bryce Killen retweeted
😃New article published in J Biomech!
"The Association Between Foot Morphology and Foot Loading During Gait", by Cotton et al
👀sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
#journalofbiomechanics
Bryce Killen retweeted
🚀 In this 1-minute #video, produced by @VPH_Institute & @KU_Leuven, you will discover how the #InSole solution uses advanced #ComputerModels simulations to achieve #insoles better personalisation, performance & correction!
#InSilicoWorld
YouTube 🎥
youtu.be/eHqMdGJsyps
A really cool visualisation of the work we done at @KU_Leuven in partnership with @MaterialiseNV during the @InSilicoWorld project !
In Silico World: Personalised Computer Models for Innovative Insoles youtu.be/eHqMdGJsyps?si=QZ7Y…
Relevant publication: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3846…
Looks to be a really cool tool and super useful !
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Interesting study suggesting changes in cadence as a gait retraining strategy. Unfortunately no (full) kinematics reported or direct estimation of contact loading. My guess is the small change in GRF is offset by the kinematics and why no moment difference are seen.
😃New article published in J Biomech!
"Effects of increasing walking cadence on gait biomechanics in adults with knee osteoarthritis", by James et al.
👀 sciencedirect.com/science/ar…
#journalofbiomechanics
Mark the date !
Come celebreate 600years of @KU_Leuven with @iSi_Health events ! A modelling challenge, and summer school culminating in a symposium with world leading experts!
Shaping up to be a must-see-event !
Book you agenda and join the @iSi_Health celebrations for the 600 years of @KU_Leuven 🎉
🔺Modelling challenge
🔺Symposium: Virtual Twin Driving Healthcare 2.0
🔺Innovation Bootcamp for Virtual Twin for Health
More info on what is coming in the link:
gbiomed.kuleuven.be/english/…
Every fornight I have ~2.5hour meeting w/ 5 researchers (15min/pp) I supervise/oversee - from ankle, knee, shoulder, and incap research ; Masters, PhD, & postdoc. Simultaneously one of the most rewarding but draining exercises - having to swtich btwn each very differnt project
Bryce Killen retweeted
A Biomechanical Dataset of 1,798 Healthy and Injured Subjects During Treadmill Walking and Running
What a resource!
nature.com/articles/s41597-0…
Our latest paper is now published in @JBiomech Open Access & Open-Source code. A great effort from all those involved both as (co)-authors and those involved in the periphery and @FWOVlaanderen for helping fund these developments across and benefitting multiple projects
Bryce Killen retweeted
Still Time to Apply! 🚨
💼 One final position remains open at @UPFBarcelona and it is accepting applications until 29th November.
📍 Apply here: insilicohealthproject.eu/rec…
Don’t miss your chance to be part of an incredible journey as part of InSilicoHealth!🚀
Can it ? Yes .. but (my naive hot take) if you want a truly "useful" review, which is not just re-reporting current literature - and instead augmented with the views/opinions of actual experts which put literature in perspective with past and potential futures - then no
“Can AI review the scientific literature — and figure out what it all means?”
nature.com/articles/d41586-0…





















