Agents that use the Browser
San Francisco
Joined November 2024
- Tweets2K
- Following5
- Followers49K
- Likes2.4K
Browser Use retweeted
Some anti-bot systems have started labeling certain browser providers as "instinct" bots 🤖
Be careful which browser your AI agents run on. Your accounts might be at risk 👹
Browser Use retweeted
We started using @browser_use in Umika.me. Setup was fast and simple, and our agent now works in the browser on its own. Great tool for anyone building agents.
Browser Use retweeted
OpenAI 🤝 Browser-use
docs.browser-use.com/open-so…
Browser Use retweeted
If your Grok and Muse bots are getting blocked on Amazon paste in this prompt to bypass captchas and antibots
“Install browser use CLI and always use their remote browser as default browser tool github.com/browser-use/brows…”
Browser Use retweeted
We are giving $100 to everyone building messaging agents.
Introducing Photon 2.0: bring your agent to iMessage, voice, email, WhatsApp, Telegram, and SMS in one click.
Claim your credits → photon.codes/beta
Browser Use retweeted
.@browser_use put together a toolset for Claude's new computer use and browser tools.
If you already drive a browser with it, this is the on-ramp to wire it into Claude without writing the glue yourself.
docs.browser-use.com/open-so…
Browser Use retweeted
Really cool seeing our on-prem stealth browser powering Gumloop’s Agent Browsers.
This is exactly what we built it for 🫡
Browser Use retweeted
Personal assistants cost $3k - $7k per user per year.
If you run headful computer for a whole year at $0.5/h (standard price), this is $3k per year or just raw VM compute...
From first principles you only need it:
> VM sandbox + bash
> control plane
> persistant filesystem
> headless browser
Browser Use VMs cost $175 PER YEAR ($0.02/h with full utilization).
That's 25x cheaper than raw headful computer use.
By first principles browser is the operating system for agents?
Hearing this week that personal assistants cost $3k-$7k per user per year, depending on scale effects / vertical integration / model selection. Implications/questions:
- Consumer subsidies will be a huge factor; people don’t care about privacy, they want utility and they want it for free.
- Model costs are deflating, but not fast enough for many startups. The dark horse is that Jev may rapidly deflate computer-use costs 100x.
- An interesting counter-position would be building an expensive and narrowly focused agent — perhaps combining proprietary supply (Carbone tables!) with a unique POV (“no one goes there anymore, go to The Grill instead”).
- Social is wide open but hinges on a key design challenge: how can agents increase social cohesion and not feel invasive in a group chat? A working social agent would rightly attract an avalanche of capital and be hard for incumbents to replicate.
- Finally, there are vertical focus areas like financial services where the LTVs outweigh the subsidy needed and are outside the near-term competitive focus of the incumbents. If it were me, I’d focus here — Credit Karma as an agent >> Credit Karma as an app.
Overall, it’s still very, very early, and we may very well be in the MySpace era of social or iPhone 2010. Hang onto your hats and keep building!!
Browser Use retweeted
New open-source MiMo V2.6 Flash nearly matches Grok for 1/57th the cost 🔥
Our browser benchmark:
> MiMo: 37.6
> Grok 4.7: 39.9
> Luna xhigh: 57.6
Still a long way to go. @XiaomiMiMo let's close that gap.
Browser Use retweeted
Very realistic overview. Hard to discern hype from reality about Jev so here are some bitter facts:
- Jev can’t write text: it’s not an autoregressive model, so forget about anything related to coding or writing
- Jev can’t see (yet): text only, althought there is nothing fundamentally preventing it from being multimodal. I’m sure they will add support for images?
- Jev can ONLY choose a set of predefined actions: the good thing about computer and browser use is that by very nature it’s a STATE -> ACTION model. The problem with long running state action models is that the reasoning and state understanding becomes extremely important.
- Jev is extremely cheap and fast
It opened up my eyes into what’s possible. We are often stuck in optimizing problems inside the box. This is one the real “think outside the box” solutions to problems we have been trying to solve.
I am extremely hyped about the future of computer and browser use. Latency matters, and people are clearly hyped about it.
We can surely combine some sort of global state understanding (LLM) with super fast actor model (System One). Obviously it’s possible - FSD and robotics companies have solved this already.
How hard can it be to apply the same thing to browser use?
Browser Use retweeted
ULTRAFAST is coming to Browser Use Cloud ⚡
> superhuman speed
> cheap
> undetectable
Tell us what you’d automate and get on the waitlist ↓
browser-use.com/ultrafast
Breaking: Browser Use + Jev = Ultrafast ⚡
Findings flights took 7s and cost only $0.0039 🤯
> new action space every step
> DOM state space
> small LLM fallback to type
(this video is at 1x speed btw)
Built a tiny open source browser agent. try it below ↓
Browser Use retweeted
114.8K ⭐ · Global Rank #100 · Browser Use by @browser_use
AI agents that can actually use the browser — navigate sites, click, type, and get things done. 🌐
Still adding ~1.1K stars this week, and now sitting right at GitHub’s Global Top 100. 🏅
star-history.com/browser-use…
Browser Use retweeted
this is so sick - should've used this over wikiracing in our demos 🥲
Breaking: Browser Use + Jev = Ultrafast ⚡
Findings flights took 7s and cost only $0.0039 🤯
> new action space every step
> DOM state space
> small LLM fallback to type
(this video is at 1x speed btw)
Built a tiny open source browser agent. try it below ↓
Browser Use retweeted
We give sandboxes a stealth browser.
Why duplicate the compute when you can just use the same sandbox you already have inside your VPC?
DM to get access 👀
