need editor

monster🧟- @emoAimers

does anyone know why my group D pickems are incorrect ?

. @mrmtcFN tech, idk how you was in this game tho

am I schizo but how was this a pen 😅

if you are under 20k with 700 hours you are just untalented ngl, cs is easy as shit

is cs2 anticheat even on... ?

how do I escape playing cs like val, its like a curse

🤩🤩🤩🤩

4k master 🥲

calm lil ace @emoAimers

#VCTAmericas #techpaws

FULL HIGHGUARD REVIEW AFTER PLAYING Highguard is getting way more backlash than it deserves, and honestly a lot of it feels like cope. The game is hard. It demands mechanical skill, awareness, and good decision-making, and that alone is enough to turn a lot of people off. A lot of the negative comparisons come from players expecting another Overwatch or Marvel Rivals-style hero shooter, but Highguard clearly isn’t trying to be that. Judging it by those standards completely misses the point. The 3v3 siege mode gets criticized a lot, but it actually works really well with the current time-to-kill. Smaller teams mean individual skill matters more, and clutching a 1v3 is genuinely possible if you play well. Sure, I think there’s room to experiment with larger formats like 5v5 or 6v6 down the line, but for this mode, 3v3 feels intentional and balanced rather than limiting. If you enjoy fast-paced movement shooters that reward raw aim, positioning, and quick reactions, there’s a lot to like here. That said, I can’t ignore the performance issues. The game is badly optimized right now, and there’s a strange blur that constantly affects visual clarity. These feel like fixable problems, but they do hurt the experience in its current state. Overall, most of the outrage and bad reviews don’t come from bad design — they come from players who can’t keep up and don’t want to adapt. Highguard knows what kind of game it wants to be, and for the right audience, it delivers.