The X user, PowFish @pooopypeepy is an egregiously incompetent flat-earther.
He cannot understand most basic things.
He asked for one of my debunks of flat-earth and I linked to a recent one.
He forgot how dumb he is, so he repeated his dumb claim about the tan() function.
1/
Poor Charlie @Charlie157874
He accidentally left a suggestion from his LLM at the bottom of a scientifically deranged post he doesn't understand.
Another intrepid flat-earth pro-stupidity warrior has given up before he could figure out where he was.
I remember when flat-earthers would defend their insane ideas. Now they just bitch, whine, cry and block.
It's so incredibly impotent.
I think this could be some sort of foundational stupidity; the atomic stupidity that all other stupidity is built from.
Things flat-earth morons say:
"bottom up obstruction [is] a fact of perspective"
Perspective obstructs nothing. It makes distant things too small to see.
Perspective cannot make the lower half of a giant ship too small to see without also affecting the top half.
How do they get to be so stupid?
This pea-brained troll Jordan
@ChiseledTablet
is hiding behind a block, too scared to be honest.
The constant lies from these pseudo-religious flat-earthers is wild!
Replying to @ChiseledTablet
The answer is: lift, weight, thrust, and drag
Now apologize for being an asshole instead of appreciating the obvious and appropriate joke.
If you're going to be the ignorant, badgering dipshit who knows nothing, please go away now.
Now justify flat earth with airplanes.
Flat-earthers love their ignorance. Beneath the arrogant gullibility and pious incuriosity, there lies a complete absence of technical ability, scientific competence and freedom of reasoning.
I'm doing advanced flat earth research!
I zoomed 125x with a P1000 until the horizon was barely a mile wide and not curved!
Science says that the pixelated horizon looks flat, but the shape of the Earth cannot be determined from such a stupid experiment.
I'm doing advanced flat earth research!
I placed calibrated spirit levels on both ends of my very long table. Both ends show level.
According to science, I can say that my table is level and that Earth's shape cannot be determined from such a stupid experiment.
9/11 truther got exposed and ran away behind a block.
At least it admits that flat-earthers are even more stupid.
I don't think most truthers are looking for truths. There might be exceptions, but mostly I see stubborn, dogmatic opinions based on "possibilities" rather than "what the evidence shows."
Every conspiracy is full of shit unless it can die when the evidence contradicts it.
The flat-earther wants to measure Earth to see if it's flat, but he panicked when he realized those measurements will prove that it's not flat.
This is the last gasp of a self-professed 138 IQ genius who blocked me the moment he realized he was the stupidest person in the conversation.
Wrong again, Laura.
Gene duplication adds information by definition. Take that up with Shannon, et. al. if you disagree.
Moreover, copies will mutate differentially over time. Even by creationist standards, that is additional, novel information.
The easiest possible cartographic task is drawing a true-to-scale flat map of a flat surface.
For more than 2000 years, the world's best flat-earth cartographers have failed to produce such a map of their imaginary flat-earth.
Imagine being so clueless 🤔 and stupid 🤪 that you post a flat-earth map with this scale embedded in it.
xitter.cf/PostNASA/status/196084…
unavailable
Hi @BanyamyanGaza
The idiot who posted the unusable flat map above blocked me, so I have to answer you here.
Things obviously fall. How are you confused by the fact that things fall?
Momentum is conserved. How are you confused that chemical reaction engines work without air?

















