Reputation in this space has always been backwards, and Arc's launch chaos is the clearest proof of it in a while. A permissioned validator set full of the biggest names in traditional finance, institutions that clear trillions and answer to actual regulators, should be about as strong a reputation signal as crypto gets. And it still got overridden within hours because a camera showed engineers who didn't match whatever mental image people had of a "legitimate" team. That's the actual lesson here, and it has nothing to do with Arc itself. Most people's internal "rug pull radar" isn't built on checking track record or verifiable activity, it's built on vibes. And vibes are exactly the thing bad actors exploit just as easily as good actors get unfairly punished by them. A reputation system that can't tell a real red flag from a superficial one isn't actually protecting anyone, it's just failing in a more embarrassing way than having no system at all. This is the exact gap @fluentxyz's Prints is trying to close, turning reputation into something aggregated from actual onchain and social signal instead of whatever a camera happened to catch in a five second clip.