Bitcoin is the exit. Fiat is the trap. Cutting through the noise with Aussie finance insights + Bitcoin truth bombs. Not financial advice.

Joined October 2024
The RBA calling bitcoin a poor store of value is like McDonald’s criticizing salads for being unhealthy. You print money for a living. Sit this one out. @GreenTyler27 @AusBTCIndBody
25
10
2
162
6,993
₿its on Finance retweeted
This was collated and fed to journalists after Helen Haines had rightfully called out Albanese’s blatant unprecedented handover of 6 million dollars of taxpayer money to a golf course next to one of his properties. Albanese then told parliament the money was for sewerage work. It wasn’t. He is a serial liar. He used taxpayer money to try to smear and silence Helen Haines. It didn’t work because she isn’t corrupt. After the horrendous attack on her by an unhinged maniac, Albanese did a press conference calling Haines a woman of ‘the highest integrity’, ‘a beacon of light’. Albanese must resign now for the sake of Australia. The electorate is on to his disgusting behaviour and no number of sad fools still defending him will change that.
As someone who was critical of Albo’s golf funding deal (pork barrelling by both sides is a joke), I can tell you this PM briefing about Haines is categorically not any sort of dirt file. Anyone who calls this a dirt file, as Peter Van Onselen did, does not have a single clue about how public sector briefings to Ministers work. Either that or they are a rusted-on bleacher-screeching barrow-pusher for one side of politics. Van Onselen’s pieces read like a cadet who has read an offical document for the first time. All the information is completely legitimately gathered, including an attempt to ascertain a pecuniary interest. There are hundreds of these things written every day at state, federal and local government level for ministers of every colour. Stock. Standard. Briefing.
143
417
27
2,784
53,952
₿its on Finance retweeted
So it turns out that @AnikaWells, the lady who wants to censor her political enemies at home and the entire Internet globally, lied about her misuse of public money for personal travel. And it's not even her first time. No wonder these lying crooks are desperate for censorship.
124
2,141
46
10,076
168,259
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese just indirectly denounced me as an “online sleuth” for finding and publishing the identity of the far-left terrorist 8 hours before the government announcement.
Hello guys, I did some digging. Registration for the car that hit Australian MP Helen Haines: XCK 017. Car appears to be owned by Brendan Nugent, a radical leftist anti-Israel Houthi supporter. His handle is @NotLaoTzu
272
707
21
6,177
164,708
I actually can’t believe the balls of Australian mainstream media. Far-left guy attempts to murder Australian MP, so they put Hannah Ferguson on TV to blame the right and “harmful online rhetoric.” Hannah Ferguson supported the assassination of Charlie Kirk! Within 24 hours of his murder she said violence was sometimes necessary and that she was glad that he would no longer spread his extremist messaging. Guys, they booked Hannah Ferguson for the breakfast TV shows before I released the Twitter of the attacker. They were completely ready and set to blame the right and launch a crackdown against us. We literally just caught them in this.
217
1,249
30
6,508
121,508
₿its on Finance retweeted
A reportedly drunk & possibly insane man attacked a member of parliament in Australia with his car. And so, naturally, a few vile politicians are exploiting the tragedy to demand mass online censorship. Decades of scientific evidence & common sense demolish their lies. THREAD
168
1,121
45
7,888
265,106
₿its on Finance retweeted
BREAKING: Albanese has been plotting against Helen Haines for the last five weeks because she criticised a $6 million grant to Albanese’s Marrickville Golf Club as “pork-barrelling by design” Since then, Albanese has been on the attack. The day after her comments his staff gave a dirt sheet on Haines to journalists with a list of requests including: -A list of Haines’ advocacy for projects in Indi of $1.8 billion then raising questions about the value for money and due diligence of those projects ***Asking journalists to check for personal or professional connections, donations, or undeclared benefits that might create conflicts*** framed as potential avenues to examine, not proven allegations… Specific examples given included: -Whether Haines had received undeclared wine or food from local businesses, held business interests, received political donations, or had personal associations with businesses that could benefit from tourism funding? -For an $8 million Benalla Art Gallery redevelopment request, Albanese asked whether Haines had visited, been a member, donated, or had any personal professional connection with employees or the board? -For a local recreation centre upgrade Albanese asked if Haines had played or trained with local clubs, watched games, or received jerseys/equipment? -Made reference to her, and her spouse’s receipt of Mount Buller ski lift passes, alongside later requests for resort infrastructure funding The document supplied no proof of undisclosed wrongdoing but Haines told the Daily Mail she had not seen it previously, and described the approach as “pretty desperate” See how Albanese and Labor operate? See how the media play their part?
465
1,524
215
4,713
154,008
Media Release: One Nation will reverse Dr Chalmers’ budget experiments One Nation will fix Dr Jim Chalmers’ destructive budget experiments by reversing his capital gains tax and trust changes. One Nation will also protect negative gearing for up to two investment properties and vows to fight any plan by the Treasurer to impose death taxes and taxes on the family home. One Nation leader Senator Pauline Hanson said Australians were paying for a Treasurer who had no idea what he was doing and the Albanese Labor government who just cannot stop spending and driving up inflation. “Dr Jim Chalmers is experimenting on the Australian economy, and everyday Australians are his guinea pigs.” Senator Pauline Hanson said. “He’s playing with your home, your rent, your business and your savings. When his experiments fail, Australians will pay dearly. “He has smashed business confidence, cut off business investment and helped send the property market into free fall. “Already, more than 1,100 households who bought through Labor’s expanded five per cent deposit scheme are now estimated to owe more than their homes are worth. “Labor encouraged them into the market, then pulled the rug out from under them. “They botched the ATO credit card ban and lied about their involvement. They were forced to back down on their widow tax. Now accountants warn Labor’s trust changes could cost Australians billions in unnecessary advice and restructuring. “Labor couldn’t run a corner shop. But they know how to send one broke. “One Nation will restore the 50 per cent capital gains tax discount and scrap Labor’s proposed 30 per cent minimum tax on trusts. “The status quo of allowing unlimited taxpayer concessions for property tycoons was not working for Australians. The Liberal plan to back the broken model protecting property moguls makes no sense. “One Nation would continue to allow Australians to negatively gear up to two investment properties. “Anthony Albanese has pulled the ladder up behind him on young people trying to break into the property market, protecting tax concessions for existing properties. This includes the Prime Minister’s own ocean view clifftop house in Copacabana, the hundreds of properties held by his own cabinet and the thousands of properties held by property tycoons. “The Labor government must answer whether members of cabinet who benefited from grandfathering negative gearing concessions recused themselves from voting on the measures given their conflict of interest. “Australians should be able to work hard, invest and get ahead. For many young Australians, an investment property was one way they could get a foot into the property market. “One Nation will end this disastrous experiment and reverse Chalmers’ destructive budget experiments. “And we will draw a line around the family home and stop any plans for Labor’s death taxes. “It’s not enough that you already work several days a week to pay for Labor’s uncontrolled spending. Because Labor cannot control their own spending, they will keep coming back to shake you down for more. “My warning is that your family home, your super, and what you leave your children will be in the firing line next. “Labor broke its promises on negative gearing and capital gains tax. Why would Australians trust anything they say? “One Nation will never impose a death tax. We will never impose a tax on the family home. “You should not have to spend your life paying for Labor’s spending addiction, then have them send your children the final bill.”
325
992
82
5,618
159,485
Labor’s Digital Duty of Care censorship bill can’t be fixed. Here’s One Nation’s chief of staff explaining why.
79
452
11
2,194
29,631
₿its on Finance retweeted
₿uy the Flying Car.
1,472
2,776
388
34,890
1,767,931
Nothing can fix Labor’s censorship bill. They’re losing the debate so now they want to change the rules.
258
1,016
45
5,040
61,772
₿its on Finance retweeted
Wow, wow, wow. I just left the National Press Club where Minister of Communications @AnikaWells spoke. She repeatedly and brazenly lied about the fake accounts, claiming they were only for enforcement, even though the legislation says in black and white that the eSafety Commissioner can use them in unlimited ways for "educational" and "promotional" purposes. One big moment came when a Politico reporter got up and said something about how mean people like @PaulineHansonOz were to eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant. Seriously. A supposed reporter was white-knighting for a government official during the official Q&A. The same reporter had come up to me before Wells' speech and asked if I had criticized Inman-Grant. Who needs government censors when you have Politico? After he asked his question, Wells showed the most emotion, describing online criticism of Inman-Grant as "abuse." She also talked about her own staff's supposed suffering. I kid you not. The mask dropped, and you could see what really upset her: people — including a sitting Senator — criticizing government officials. After gaslighting the audience about fake accounts, Wells repeatedly insisted the government wasn't trying to censor content. She said this after filling her speech with examples of content she claimed harmed people. You couldn't make it up. This legislation is the culmination of decades of progressives equating words with physical violence. Wells cynically compared her legislation to prevent psychological "harm" to various laws that protect people from physical harm, like seat belt laws. BTW, Wells never said what content it was that she thought caused eating disorders. Pictures of skinny women? Dietary advice? Who knows. Nobody asked. Another important moment came when Wells explicitly said Australia would be pursuing censorship alongside other nations, including the UK, France, and Spain—all countries where governments risk losing power to populists. I spoke with Julie Inman-Grant before the speech began and asked about the fake accounts. She insisted they were there just for enforcement, and when I asked why the law allowed them to be used for government propaganda, she said she might write an "enforcement memo," which, of course, would have no impact on the legislation. After her speech, I went up to Wells and asked if she was seriously saying the legislation didn't allow the government to use fake accounts for government propaganda. She refused to answer. A man who said he was from the National Press Club stepped in front of me and said I could interview her afterward. But that wasn't possible because they rushed her out the back to avoid any difficult questions. So there you have it. The pettiest people in Australia are seeking to silence citizens and their political opponents in the name of protecting children. These deeply intolerant and cynical people want to control what you can see and say online. And they're doing it with most of the media's support. Australia has reached a new low in its rapid descent into dogmatism, intolerance, and censorship.
The government today will introduce sweeping censorship that @AlboMP & @AnikaWells lie about. Below she claims the government wants to create a bot army of fake accounts for “research” when the bill clearly intends for them to be used in partisan warfare against fooled citizens.
605
4,748
374
15,753
363,226
₿its on Finance retweeted
The government today will introduce sweeping censorship that @AlboMP & @AnikaWells lie about. Below she claims the government wants to create a bot army of fake accounts for “research” when the bill clearly intends for them to be used in partisan warfare against fooled citizens.
104
1,272
77
3,915
364,054
₿its on Finance retweeted
Well, that was wild. I'm at the Australian Parliament and just left a meeting with two staffers for the governing party. They told us that the government needed more power to censor things like the upcoming US execution of Nidal Hasan. When I asked why they needed to censor that video, one said it was to prevent copycat killings. Copycat killings by governments? I asked. Er, no, they said. Copycat killings like of a backpacker, several decades ago. So, under that logic, I pointed out, the government should censor things like last year's Bondi massacre, where two Muslims killed 15 people, no? Well, that was news, they said. Didn't they realize their bill would allow the government to censor news? They didn't seem to know, or care. They also admitted that they did not know that the bill would allow the government to create and operate an unlimited number of fake social media accounts to attack its political enemies and spread disinformation. Having presented them with information they had never heard about a bill they had clearly not read, they emphasized to us, strenuously, that they were moving forward with the bill. So there you have it. The government wants the power to arbitrarily censor scenes of violent crime, or violence, for any reason. And it wants the power to use an unlimited number of fake accounts to wage offensive disinformational warfare against the Australian people. Given that the Bondi massacre last year increased public opposition to mass migration, and support for the populist One Nation Party, it seems obvious that the government wants to censor such events in order to protect its political power. It's quite telling how obediently governing party members insist such a law is needed without even knowing what's in it.
1,319
10,069
713
37,292
851,673
₿its on Finance retweeted
I released a special, bonus episode with @bayanimills, CEO of @AusBTCIndBody to discuss advocacy for a sound Bitcoin policy in Australia. We cover: 🟠 What Canberra really thinks of Bitcoin 🟠 The energy angle that gets politicians listening 🟠 Why Australia’s Bitcoin miners keep quiet 🟠 How regulators pushed investment overseas 🟠 Why showing up beats complaining 🟠 AML/KYC and who really controls access to money 🟠 A retail CBDC pitch within five years? 🟠 How you can get involved with ABIB And why the RBA says it has “no position” on Bitcoin, yet keeps writing about it. Listen to the full episode now, share it with someone who should hear it, and get involved with @AusBTCIndBody. Policy changes when people show up. 🧡 YouTube: youtu.be/a-QT5flYhfQ Fountain: fountain.fm/episode/TpXzJR8T… Spotify: open.spotify.com/episode/71u…
6
7
50
1,472
Albanese doesn’t like what Australians are saying about him online. From his cringeworthy social media videos to his government’s lies. Instead of answering his critics, he wants the power to shut them down. It’s censorship, straight from the playbook of China, Russia and Iran. He even wants to create 'sock puppets' to spread government propaganda. No amount of tinkering or deal-making with the Greens can disguise the threat this bill poses to free speech. The government should scrap this bill.
324
960
44
6,750
90,403
₿its on Finance retweeted
The censorship industrial complex is going on the offensive. New legislation being field tested in Australia would give the government the power to run AI bot networks/sock puppets, apparently to secretly influence & manipulate online debates. Creepy af. H/t @NAffects @MikeNayna
The censorship industrial complex suffered major setbacks in recent years. But now the censors are back with a vengeance: successful lawfare that could cost Meta tens of billions for not censoring enough; two major Hollywood movies; and the worst censorship legislation yet.
253
2,061
217
5,792
692,268
At the UN, Anthony Albanese linked social media algorithms, misinformation, political extremism and his social media crackdown to the rise of parties like One Nation. He claimed: "I didn't link the two." What a joke. The transcript exists. The video exists. Australians can see exactly what he said. The problem isn't misinformation. The problem is he got caught saying the censorship plans out loud.
406
1,146
79
5,735
73,857
Whoops! Prime Minister Albanese has accidentally exposed Labor’s real censorship agenda. He has now confirmed that the new social media “Digital Duty of Care” scheme is nothing more than a back-door attempt to resurrect Labor’s rejected Misinformation and Disinformation Bill, while boasting about it overseas to his elite globalist friends. That’s despite his own Minister for Travel Expenses and Grand Final Rorts, Anika Wells, who also doubles as Labor’s Minister for Censorship, assuring Australians just two weeks ago that it “isn’t about misinformation”. Australians are supposed to believe one story at home while Labor tells a completely different story overseas. In his own words, Albanese admits these powers are being sold under the banner of “child safety” today, while laying the groundwork for much broader controls on speech and public debate tomorrow. If there was ever any doubt that this legislation is a Trojan horse, the Prime Minister has just all but removed it. Most revealing of all, Albanese has explicitly linked the need for new censorship powers to the rise of One Nation, declaring that “People are moving away from the centre and more and more to the extremes”. In other words, Australians are abandoning Labor in growing numbers, rejecting the political establishment, and Labor's response is not to listen to them, but to seek new powers to police online debate and suppress criticism. This is what governments do when they are losing the argument. They stop defending their record and start looking for ways to control the conversation. The truth is Labor cannot tolerate Australians questioning its failures on the cost of living, housing, energy prices, migration and government waste. Instead of fixing the problems it created, it wants new powers to manage what Australians can see, hear and say online. There appears to be no limit to how far this desperate Labor Government will go to protect its grip on power. Albanese should scrap this censorship scheme immediately, stop grandstanding overseas, and get back home to deal with the crises Australians are living through every day.
589
2,194
149
8,693
213,486
The attacks from Chalmers and Albanese on One Nation have become increasingly desperate. Yesterday they crossed a line. No matter how worried Jim and Albanese are about losing their jobs, telling Australians that their democratically elected opponents are “dangerous” and a “threat to our country” invites people to treat them as a threat. Words have consequences. That is how political violence is incited. The murder of Ann Widdecombe in Britain should be warning enough about the dangers of poisonous political rhetoric. Anthony Albanese says we need to turn down the heat and violent rhetoric in our political discourse. Meanwhile, he and his Treasurer are pouring petrol all over it. Australians are entitled to vote for One Nation without being told by the Treasurer and the Prime Minister that their democratic choice is a danger to the nation. The real danger is that Jim and Albanese's incompetent economic management will continue to push your rent, your mortgage and your bills even higher. The real danger to Jim and Albanese is that the people of Australia are coming for their government… at the ballot box.
870
2,521
209
15,547
301,029
₿its on Finance retweeted
🚨 NEW: Federal voting intention 🟧 ONP: 30% (+1) 🟥 ALP: 29% (-) 🟦 L/NP: 19% (+1) 🟩 GRN: 13% (-1) ⬛️ OTH: 9% (-1) Newspoll | 24-28 Aug | n=1243 | +/- 3-7 Aug
50
124
27
1,067
121,296