Irrelevance of money that will be brought upon by AI means you should buy land soon. Your robot will be able to build a hyperdrive spaceship in one afternoon and take you to another galaxy but the Earth will always be the first.
Earth has the first mover advantage.
Buy land.
Jan Kučera retweeted
Fading ethereum:0xca14007eff0db1f8135f4c25b34de49ab0d42766 is like fading ethereum:native but 1000x worse because you had years to prepare and the technological+first mover advantage was FAR MORE OBVIOUS
Jan Kučera retweeted
$STRK CUMBERLAND FLOWS, A $BTW -LINKED WALLET & A MAJOR UNLOCK AHEAD
Over the past month, wallet 0x040D… received 29.6M $STRK (~$1.4M) from a Cumberland-labeled address, starting with a 100 STRK test before larger transfers.
Most of the tokens didn't stay there:
• 20.2M STRK (~$1.04M) → a wallet that appears linked to the $BTW whale I’ve been tracking
• 3.5M STRK (~$160K) → Robinhood hot wallet
$STRK climbed from around $0.027 to $0.07 during the same period.
The latest 3.6M $STRK (~$254K) arrived 10 hours ago and was still sitting there in my screenshot.
With a reported 127M $STRK unlock on Oct. 15, watching where that remaining balance goes next.
That's one of the reasons why I plan to make @nadochain fully agent-driven before 2035
LLMs are neutral. If you ask them which crypto tech is the best, they will not say Bitcoin. They will give you a few questions and hand you the best fitting pick. The barrier of entry for truth is decreasing significantly. But this is just a theory.
Crypto combined with AI will be the final rearrangement of assets. There are a lot of people who got rich on Bitcoin, who make a living holding the narratives. This will be gone thanks to AI. With their entire wealth.
I don't think people realize just how much AI's latest breakthroughs in math have shocked mathematicians, myself included.
The main thing that leaves me and many mathematicians shocked is what AI is solving:
Early on – till about 4 months ago – AI was good at:
(i) solving problems that humans already solved, like Math Olympiad problems
(ii) finding out that a problem in field A was already solved by an obscure work in field B, using a different terminology (or language).
But starting with the shocking work on the Erdos Unit Distance Problem, and up till the recent advance on Navier–Stokes, a totally different AI is seen.
It is innovating.
It's bringing a new set of tools to the problem, and then proceeding to using those tools very delicately and accurately to achieve the result.
It's a bit like how a brain surgeon delicately operates on the exact region that needs fixing.
This is absolutely shocking and unexpected. It raises the question of what exactly constitutes mathematical intuition and brilliance. Many a mathematician have written about it (I love Henri Poincare's treatise "Mathematical Creation"). But we don't understand how mathematicians reach their breakthroughs.
Now, it's the same with AI, we don't understand how it goes about reaching these proofs but the end result is objectively new, and powerful.
This creativity, insight, ingenuity, is what's shocking to me.
The lightning network hack is bad because it is an official part of $BTC today due to how greedy and isolated their ecosystem is.
