Web3 dev • NFT collector • Vibe coder • Cm: @DECIPH3R_ Founder : @SovereignD40. building: https://xitter.cf/t.co/L7hNHVbLkf Dc: https://xitter.cf/t.co/8HKDkbNV75

Joined October 2024
It’s been 1 year since I joined the space, and honestly, there’s so much to be thankful for. 🙏 Funny how I didn’t even know what Web3 was until @daniennix onboarded me into the space and introduced me to some real chads to follow: 1. @Tma_420 2. @0itsali0 3. @yourbros 4. @CryptoGorilla 5. @BR4ted 6. @wh7nft and many more I can’t fit into this post. If I should advise any newbie on who to follow, I’d strongly recommend the accounts above. Turn on notis and study their consistency. They’ve stayed active through both bull and bear markets, always showing up and doing their best. Shoutout to my first community, @IncentiveDAO & @DECIPH3R. Through them, I’ve met a lot of goal-oriented people who have helped me one way or another. Lastly, thank you to my amazing 900 followers for always supporting, engaging, and growing with me on this journey ❤️ It can only get better from here
19
6
105
14,842
Another week to try again
5
1
12
388
biltechie retweeted
When someone jeets or sells for a few bucks, it can hurt a collection, especially when the project has a lot more to offer. But who's really responsible for a collection's failure? The team or the minters? Let's start with the minters. You can't stop people from selling. No matter how gated your WL distribution is, some people will always sell early. If you want people to hold and believe in your project, you need to build that connection with them. If a team wants accountability, there are steps it can take. Launch a Discord server, interact with the community, host AMAs and X Spaces, and get to know the people who are genuinely interested in what you're building. You can even select members based on their contributions and on-chain activity, just like Icon did with their WL approach. Of course, this doesn't guarantee success, but it gives you a better chance of building a genuine community around people who actually contribute. We rarely have these discussions when collections are running hard. We start talking about them when the market gets dry. I've seen hundreds of collections mint for free, with people selling for pennies while the FP sits at $1–2. Yet some of those same collections later pump to $100–200 or even higher. How does that happen? Because those collections gave people reasons to sweep the floor. If someone has to take the most responsibility for a collection's failure, I'd say it's the team. Look at BAYC, CryptoPunks, or other successful collections. Holders sold at low prices too, but their teams kept building instead of blaming holders for selling. They gave people reasons to hold, sweep the floor, and buy more. Of course, it hurts when people sell your art or product for much less than you expected. But instead of chasing sellers or blaming jeets, focus on building what you promised. And please, don't complain when people talk about their funds, whether it's $10, $20, or $50. For you, it might be your only collection, but minters participate in dozens or even hundreds of mints. When you add up all those small amounts, it becomes serious money for them. You can't control when people sell. You can control what you build. Give people a reason to believe in your project, and let your work speak for itself.
22
14
6
99
5,052
It’s weekend, what should we build?
2
10
416
One day
CONGRATULATIONS TO ME. 🖤🥂 A Mercedes-Benz GLE 53 AMG 2025. First in the industry. 👑 If you told me a few years ago that I’d be here today, I probably wouldn’t have believed you. I’m just grateful that I didn’t give up on myself. Thank you, God. 🙏❤️
5
13
644