đĄïž Men's Rights | Anti-Feminist đ | đïž Exposing double standards with logic.
Joined August 2021
- Tweets627
- Following37
- Followers167
- Likes1.4K
We canât deny it. Pussy privilege is real. đ
If a man commits the same crime, he receives a minimum of 10 years. But sheâs a woman, so she gets only 9 months.
In most countries, male rape isnât even recognized. Imagine how many men never get justice.
Women are fucking rapists.
đšđłđŽ - En NorvĂšge, une femme de 23 ans a Ă©tĂ© CONDAMNĂ Ă la PRISON aprĂšs avoir VIOLĂ un homme.
En 2005, une Norvégienne de 23 ans a été condamnée à 9 mois de prison pour avoir violé un homme de 31 ans endormi sur un canapé. Elle a pratiqué une f*llation sur un homme endormi.
Elle a Ă©galement Ă©tĂ© condamnĂ©e Ă lui verser 40 000 couronnes norvĂ©giennes (â4 200$) de dommages et intĂ©rĂȘts.
Dâabord, elle a niĂ© les faits avant dâadmettre un contact sexuel, affirmant quâil Ă©tait consenti. La victime a dĂ©clarĂ© que cette agression avait profondĂ©ment affectĂ© sa vie.
Plusieurs cas de viols de femmes sur des hommes ont Ă©tĂ© recensĂ©s ces derniĂšres annĂ©es. Par contre, les viols dâhommes sur des femmes se comptent par millions chaque annĂ©e.
(The Guardian)
Lana Rhoades signed the contracts, took the cheques, stayed on set, and delivered the scenes. Years later the story becomes âI felt raped,â âno choice,â and âI didnât want to.â
Do women have no accountability at all?
Victimhood has become the new spotlight. đ
Are women allergic to accountability? đ€Ą
Lana Rhoades says there were scenes where she felt like she was being RAPED, describing how she was feeling things in her body that she didn't want to feel. đ
She says she would gag or cry when the camera couldn't see her face, forcing herself to continue because she wanted to be professional.
Even worse, she claims she had no choice over who she filmed with, despite feeling disgusted by some of her co-stars.
âI did not want to be doing it.â
She says what viewers saw on camera was far from what she was actually experiencing behind the scenes. đ
He killed his rapistđ
She raped him under false promise of marriage.
A 19-year-old woman was shot dead by her boyfriend in UP's #Jhansi after her family opposed their marriage and arranged her wedding elsewhere. The accused wanted to kill himself but fled after the murder. He was arrested after he was injured in a police encounter.
indiatoday.in/cities/other-câŠ
So whether itâs called rape apparently depends on who commits it.
If a woman does it, the same law doesnât even apply. đ€Ą
Isnât that targeting men?
Isnât this judicial misandry?
If the law is supposed to protect everyone, why should gender determine who gets legal protection? đ
Offence Of Sexual Intercourse On False Promise Of Marriage U/S 69 BNS Doesn't Apply To Women: Karnataka High Court
livelaw.in/high-court/karnatâŠ
The real rapist here is Jane Doe; she raped seven men.
Women want equality, so according to that, if an intoxicated woman cannot consent, a man cannot give consent either. By this logic, she is the rapist of seven men.
And now, by playing the woman card and using simp laws that define only intoxicated women as unable to consent, she is shielding her slutting instincts. She is the real rapist, and these seven men are victims of this evil witch hunt.
Now it's high time to believe all men, and fuck this bullshit "believe all women."
Why have women made sex such a taboo? đ
âSilence doesnât mean consent.â
âConsent is necessary.â
âConsent this, consent thatâŠâ đ€Ą
If you donât want to do it, just say, âNo, Iâm not in the mood.â Why create a whole scene? đ
Good sex always starts with a natural flowâyou touch her waist, pull her closer, kiss her, and things go on from there. â€ïžâđ„
Why does social media have endless definitions of a âreal manâ?
Does a âreal womanâ not exist? đ
Indian women : Indian men would stay single forever if the concept of arranged marriage didnât exist. đ
Indian women also:
Drunk men + drunk women = Men grapist.
Men + drunk women = Men grapist.
Drunk men + women = Men grapist.
Different combinations. Same conclusion. đ€Ąđ
A 20-year-old guy and a 20-year-old girl have sex. Both are under the influence of alcohol.
The girl gives consent during the act, and everything that happens is consensual.
However, when the girl wakes up the next morning, she regrets it and realizes that she only gave consent because she was drunk.
1. Does the act become rape now because she revoked her consent the next morning?
2. Both are of the same age, and both are drunk. Why is the girl not held responsible for being drunk, while the guy is? She isn't considered conscious enough to consent, but he is expected to be conscious enough to say no to a drunk girl, even if she gives verbal consent?
So basically, sheâs a whore, and men were simping over a whore like this. She ruined the lives of 7 innocent men, publicly shamed them, got 2 of them expelled, and ended their careers.
What a slut, men.
After enjoying a gangbang, she rewrote the story just to get compensation through a lawsuit.
Thatâs why, never believe all women, men. You need to keep your zip tight. The entire legal burden is on you. Youâll lose your job, youâll get kicked out of college, and youâll be left with nothing.
A whole army of simps and white knights will come after you to lynch you.
And even after this case, weâll learn nothing. Then some other slut will come with her fabricated story, and someone elseâs life will be ruined.
Alleged Cornell gang rape victim told accused frat bro sex wasn't illegal, he apologized.
Read more: tmz.com/2026/09/29/cornell-gâŠ
