🎮 MA Indie Game Design 💄 FdA SFX Makeup 🎨 Disabled creator 🖊 Wordsmith 🦄 Kinetically chaotic & polymathic 🌈 Hoarding weird coloured lipsticks

Joined February 2022
The government is quietly engineering a lethal trap for disabled people, and they are disguising it as "welfare reform." ​Abolishing the Work Capability Assessment (WCA) to make PIP the single, exclusive gateway for health-related Universal Credit by 2028/29 is not a policy tweak. It is a calculated, malicious act of state cruelty designed to eradicate the safety net entirely. ​Look at the sheer scale of the cliff-edge being manufactured: There are currently over 1.1 million people receiving LCW, LCWRA, or ESA who do not have the Daily Living component of PIP. Crucially, nearly half a million (469,920) of those exact claimants have already been dragged through a humiliating PIP assessment and failed it. ​PIP and the WCA measure two entirely different realities. PIP assesses if you need financial help to wash, dress, or navigate your home etc. The WCA assesses if your health legally prevents you from holding down a job. ​By aggressively insisting PIP serves as the solitary threshold for both benefits, the DWP is maliciously deciding that over a million profoundly sick, neurodivergent, and disabled citizens are suddenly "fit for work" by default. ​Let us be absolutely clear about what this actually means: ​1. Total Financial Blackout: People enduring severe, fluctuating chronic illnesses, neurodivergence, or disabling mental health crises who fail the notoriously rigged, adversarial PIP process will have their health-related uplifts instantly severed. ​2. Punitive Harassment: Stripped of their protected status, hundreds of thousands of sick people will be violently shoved into standard Universal Credit conditionality. Imagine being in a rolling, debilitating physical crash, and being legally mandated to spend 35 hours a week job hunting and attending arbitrary Jobcentre interrogations. ​3. Weaponised Starvation: When our bodies inevitably give out, and we fail to meet their impossible, ableist demands, the DWP will sanction us. They will freeze our basic subsistence allowance and starve us out. ​4. State-Sanctioned Deaths: Let’s stop sugarcoating the reality of these policies. We already know the devastating, blood-stained correlation between aggressive DWP conditionality, financial starvation, and suicides. Forcing deeply vulnerable people through this punitive meat grinder will directly cause severe psychological collapse and a catastrophic, preventable loss of life. ​Advocacy groups are already warning that over 900,000 people will be hit by this exact "double whammy" of losing both benefits simultaneously. And this is those who are currently in power. ​This is not about "getting Britain working." This is about wiping disabled people off the ledger by starving us into submission or into the grave. ​We are not your scapegoats, and we are not expendable. ​#ChangingTheNarrative #PunchDownMedia #TakingThePip
I know the Work Capability Assessment is horrendous But what Labour plan to do is *much worse* Their plan is to "decouple financial support from capability to work" Their plan will mean 100,000s who would qualify now as too ill or disabled to work will be deemed "fit for work"
14
211
9
369
12,438
And there are also those providing 24/7 care. ​There are 168 hours in a week. At £86.45, that works out to 51p an hour. ​Because the system refuses to pay for more than one person regardless of caring responsibilities, my husband cares for 3 of us, two needing round-the-clock, 24/7 care, all on that exact same single £86.45 payment. ​That works out to £28.82 a week per person, or a sickening 17p an hour. ​Carers aren't just denied the right to rest; the state relies on our families providing relentless, 24/7 unpaid specialised labour under the guise of an "allowance" that wouldn't cover a single decent meal. ​#ChangingTheNarrative #PunchDownMedia #TakingThePip
More than 1 in 3 carers in the latest survey provide over 100 hours of care a week. Carer’s Allowance: £86.45. That’s 86p an hour. A paid worker doing 100 hours at min wage would earn £1,271 & employment law actually gives workers rights to rest. Where are carers’ rights to rest?
6
10
464
Helen Whatley MP spends every day bashing disabled people online and calling them scroungers. She has claimed for almost £2,000,000 on expenses since 2015. £300,000 of this are for her own travel and accommodation etc, yet she lives 50 miles from London.
235
3,008
110
6,234
182,763
The Government's Find-a-job website currently has 110,505 jobs available across GB. Of those 12,361 are Disability confident jobs. Stephen Timms has regularly told disabled people they can work from home. Currently there are 36 remote jobs available that are disability confident. Of those only 9 are part-time. 20-25% of the working age population are disabled.
13
233
5
555
11,125
When politicians and the press deliberately weaponise disability statistics to manufacture a cultural divide, the inevitable result is callers like Nick on @LBC demanding the return of Victorian poorhouses. Nick proudly stated he wants to strip PIP from every single disabled person so they cannot live "comfortably," before bizarrely claiming that PIP is "completely different from a disability benefit." ​This staggering ignorance does not happen in a vacuum. It is the direct consequence of MPs and the media lying, embellishing, and inflating statistics to scapegoat the vulnerable. When you relentlessly frame disabled citizens as an economic drain, you actively incite hostility. The pipeline from inflammatory political rhetoric to angry radio calls directly feeds the very real surge in disability hate crimes, transitioning rapidly from vitriolic words to physical violence. ​​Yet, @LBC is entirely complicit in this pipeline. Nick is a known "frequent flyer": a caller who treats demanding the systemic starvation of disabled people as a dedicated hobby. He has been permitted to broadcast this exact brand of performative cruelty across the station. By continually platforming repeat offenders to generate cheap outrage and social media engagement, LBC is actively emboldening ableist hate. You are trading the safety and dignity of disabled people for ratings, and the real-world ramifications for our community are devastating. ​So, let us educate the Nicks of this country: ​PIP is not an unemployment benefit. It is a non-means-tested, statutory safeguard designed to help cover the exorbitant extra costs of living with severe illnesses and profound disabilities. You are legally entitled to it whether you are working full-time or permanently unable to work. ​Furthermore, Nick's arrogant challenge that he will simply "apply for PIP" to see how quickly he gets it is laughable. It exposes a profound lack of comprehension regarding a gruelling, humiliating, and heavily scrutinised assessment process that demands extensive medical evidence of severe functional impairment. You do not just ask for it. You are subjected to rigorous interrogation to prove your daily suffering. ​We will not sit quietly while our lifelines are threatened and our existence is debated for entertainment. ​#ChangingTheNarrative #PunchDownMedia #TakingThePip
‘To say that no disabled person should get any kind of benefit…’ Iain Dale thinks caller Nick is the ‘most uncaring person’ he has ever spoken to after hearing his stance on PIP.
2
4
121
The sheer audacity of dictating who has "paid enough into the system" to deserve basic survival. How exactly do you quantify the unpaid, round-the-clock labour of carers raising disabled children, or those sacrificing their own incomes to nurse dying relatives? Where exactly is the line drawn? What about citizens who work for decades until a sudden health crisis temporarily floors them? What about those of us whose fluctuating conditions force a debilitating crash? Are we suddenly unworthy of the safety net we funded? You demand people "go back to work", but to what jobs? As of September 2026, UK vacancies have plummeted for the eighth consecutive quarter to 702,000 - the lowest level since early 2021. You completely broke the job market, and now you are punishing the public for your failure. You conveniently ignore the people desperately applying but who simply cannot secure a role. The graduates trapped in a shrinking economy whose degrees mean little. The neurodivergent individuals passed over because their communication styles do not fit the rigid expectations of standard interviews. Then there is the "fraud" myth weaponised to justify these degrading prepaid cards. The DWP's own 2023/24 statistics reveal that overpayments strictly due to fraud account for a mere 2.8% of total welfare expenditure. ​You are threatening financial control and sweeping 30% cuts against the 97.2% of completely legitimate claimants, across all walks of life, just to mask your own catastrophic economic mismanagement. The British public is not your scapegoat. I'm so glad the Tories aren't in power right now. #ChangingTheNarrative #PunchDownMedia #TakingThePip
Those who can work, should work. That’s why the next Conservative Government will cut benefits for those who refuse to get back to work and introduce a “Back to Work” card restricting what they can spend benefits on, saving taxpayers £538 million a year.
1
3
4
119
Ash Sarkar, "Every time we've had these squeezes on welfare recipients, what we've actually seen, rather than dealing with issues like long-term unemployment, is an increase in child poverty, and in-work poverty as well" "Half of all NEETs are not receiving welfare of any kind.. There's a crisis of opportunity and a crisis of purpose" "There are 140 applicants for the average graduate job opportunity.. That's the worse it has been since 1991" "It's up to successive governments that have failed to create opportunities for young people in this country" My view: It's been around 10% for decades Britain cannot punish its way into prosperity. If work is meant to be the route out of poverty, it must be available, secure, accessible and pay enough to live on. For too long, governments have responded to economic failure by blaming those locked out of opportunity. The real solution is investment in decent jobs, skills, healthcare, mental-health support and affordable homes, not cutting support and pretending hardship is an employment policy.
28
394
10
1,269
26,918
Brianne retweeted
It is very clear that Naomi Fisher has some awful views. Her ableism shines through here and it is unacceptable. She paints poor parents as being thick, middle class families as being undeserving of benefits. Also she does not understand how PIP assessments work.
This article reflects something I’ve been talking about for a while. When a diagnosis is used as a way to decide who gets access to resources or not, then this is going to result in inequality. That’s because those who can afford to pay for a diagnosis and those who understand the system will get their diagnoses more quickly. This will then enable them to access public services more quickly. Those who cannot afford to pay or who do not understand the system will be left behind on a long waiting list, or maybe won’t even get that far. There is no blame attached to this observation. It’s not an attack. Of course parents will do whatever they can to help their children, and if they have the resources to pay privately many of them will do that. But if we have a system where public services are dependent on a diagnosis, and that diagnosis can be obtained more quickly if you pay, then we are going to end up with the most affluent people receiving most services. This is a side effect of the burgeoning market in private diagnostic assessments which has sprung up over the last fifteen years. As a society, we need to look clearly at what is happening and decide whether this is the best way to allocate public resources. theguardian.com/society/2026…
1
3
208
Fabricating a false binary between "hard working taxpayers" and disabled people reliant on "handouts" is as divisive as it is economically illiterate. Disabled people are taxpayers. PIP is not an unemployment handout. It's non means-tested assistance to help absorb the daily costs of chronic illness and disability so that people can live independently and stay in work. ​A medical system that finally diagnoses invisible, neurodevelopmental, and chronic conditions is not disability "losing all meaning". It's clinical advancement. Taking away the equipment, transport, and therapies that keep disabled citizens functional will not cure them. It will just push them out of employment and into total dependency. Targeting disabled people navigating chronic barriers to balance sovereign debt is not having the "backbone to make tough decisions". It's lazy scapegoating masquerading as fiscal prudence. Also, the OBR has *estimated* (the key word). It isn't set in stone. #ChangingTheNarrative #PunchDownMedia ​#TakingThePIP
The term ‘disability’ is in danger of losing all meaning. Spending £45 billion a year on sickness benefits is more than the entire Home Office budget, at a time when we are borrowing just to pay the interest on our debt. That is totally unsustainable. Labour is creating a two-tier economy: one where hard-working taxpayers get up early and go to work, only to pay for another that relies on handouts. Do not doubt that Kemi and I have the backbone to make the tough decisions needed to restore our nation’s finances.
5
12
349
What has "utterly and unforgivably failed" our country is the fractured NHS your party left behind. A catastrophic waiting list for a single, simple procedure destroyed my health and almost cost me my life. I went from running a thriving, highly profitable business alongside my lifelong disabilities to being permanently unable to work. ​What is unforgivable is MPs and the media deliberately distorting PIP projections to manufacture a cultural divide. You are portraying disabled taxpayers as an economic burden to justify stripping the most vulnerable of their vital lifelines. ​What has utterly and unforgivably failed is the systemic attempt to manufacture this divide. You are portraying disabled citizens as a drain, as an inconvenience, and as people "looking for handouts," whilst recklessly inciting hostility and potential hate crimes against us just to push an ideological agenda. ​What should have been allowed to happen is the protection of a system that supports all of us, whether we were born disabled, or acquired our conditions through the very systemic failures your party oversaw. Instead of preserving the healthcare and financial scaffolding that allows us to survive, you broke the infrastructure and are now weaponising statistics to scapegoat us for your own economic mismanagement. We are not an inconvenience; we are collateral damage. #ChangingTheNarrative #PunchDownMedia #TakingThePip
We will have utterly and unforgivably failed our countrymen and women if we allow this to happen.
11
22
1,010
PIP goes by level of need, not by dx. When I made my claim I was told by the assessor "do not tell me your dxs, I want to know how they affect you". I did not just say "oh I have ADHD, hEDS, ME/CFS [insert other dxs]" and they gave me benefits. I had to provide letters from consultants and talk and write about my days/nights and what my husband does for me. I run a group for women in the UK with ADHD and thousands give similar stories, but most of them are told they don't qualify for PIP. The ones with ADHD who do qualify usually have other medical dxs, like me. It's very rare that someone will get it for ADHD alone unless they're severely impacted. There is also no such thing as an "ADHD claim". Don't be silly. "Thou doth protest too much, methinks". Probably has ADHD and doesn't even know it, given her hyperfixation on it. #ChallengeTheNarrative #PunchDownMedia
More ADHD benefit claims than soldiers ⬇️ We cannot go on like this. Andy Burnham says social security comes before national security. He’s wrong.
6
21
933
1. ADHD is not a MH condition - it's the way the brain works and you're born with it. 2. All of my psychs have said the same thing: if you have a MH condition you cannot heal without the ADHD being under control: ie medicated 3. You aren't taken seriously without a dx (been there, done that and I know many others who are still in the same boat or were). 4. If "Hollistic" means "CBT" then it's absolutely useless for people with ADHD. Ableist BS #ChallengeTheNarrative #PunchDownMedia
Exclusive from @benclatworthy People with ADHD symptoms should not automatically be offered a formal diagnosis, a government review of mental health conditions will say The review will recommend that patients are “triaged” under a “needs based” system that emphasises support over diagnostic labels. It means NHS resources will be prioritised for those with the highest level of impairment from ADHD symptoms, such as those at risk of self-harm or unable to work. Those with milder symptoms may not get referred to NHS clinics but should still be able to get “holistic” help if they don’t have a formal diagnosis, the report will say. Children displaying restlessness at school, for example, could get extra one-on-one support regardless of whether they have any formal diagnoses of ADHD, autism or mental health problems The review has been led by Professor Peter Fonagy, a leading psychoanalyst at University College London, and will warn that children and adults are currently “incentivised” to seek a diagnosis as it is the gateway to unlocking support - a finding of an interim review published in March This means too many people spend years waiting for an ADHD assessment, with 800,000 currently on NHS waiting lists thetimes.com/uk/healthcare/a…
6
1
11
492