NYC
Joined June 2009
The @united pre-board line EWR-SFO is longer than the regular board line.
192
Market open as a junior quant on the Lehman trading floor. Entire floor watches stock price crater - no phones ring, no orders placed. Silence when there should have been cacophony
For those who were adults during the 2008 financial crisis, what was your holy crap, the economy is actually crashing moment?
6
406
Not on my bingo card. Ben Affleck is actually the character that Matt Damon played in Good Will Hunting
Ben Affleck reveals he writes Python, understands convolutional neural networks, worked extensively with GPUs, and used his celebrity status to get private looks at Google and OpenAI’s video models “I’ve always been kind of into computers since I was young. Then, when film started to move from analog film to digital, I became more interested in that aspect of it. The visual-effects workflow for many years has included machine learning, so I can write pretty shitty Python scripts and stuff like that. “With convolutional neural networks, which were the precursors to what the transformer can do, which is much more computation simultaneously, you would do things like look at what’s called a tensor. That’s the numerical translation of a visual image in numbers, like the batch number, the frame number and the red, green and blue values of each pixel in each frame. It’s just that simple. That numeric is called a tensor. “You’d use a convolutional neural network to identify patterns that reveal what’s called edge detection or feature extraction, which is identifying patterns well enough to know, this is where the window ledge is, so we can more easily take the green-screen image out and replace it with something. “That was familiar to me early on because, prior to Artists Equity, I had a small visual-effects company. I’ve worked with GPUs a lot too. The visual-effects guys said, ‘Hey, you should see. There are a couple: Google and this other company, OpenAI, are doing really interesting stuff with transformers in video.’ “I’ve learned that I can actually just call up and go, ‘Hey, it’s Ben Affleck. Can I come see what you’re doing?’ Sometimes people say yes, to my astonishment.”
2
228
Lowkey ai data center ad
The future belongs to those who hydrate.
66
This was a real challenge building Noble. The right answer is a meaningful personal knowledge base. But that’s a big lift to ask consumers to build - at the minimum sources you trust but ideal data points about what you liked and didn’t like.
Instinct Selections We’re bringing human taste to the core of our product. We’re partnering with local chefs, designers, architects, travel guides, and more to create curated recommendations in the areas they know best. The next time you're looking for a restaurant, Instinct can pull from a list handpicked by chefs who know the hidden gems in your area. If you want to find a new trail to explore, Instinct can draw on recommendations from local guides and suggest a few routes that fit your preferences. And if you're looking to add some color to your home, Instinct will find pieces from independent designers that match your style, space, and budget. Our goal is to deliver world-class recommendations that are differentiated in quality from what you might find on the internet, and from what other chatbots produce. We’re rolling out access to Instinct Selections to our early access program, and plan to make it generally available soon. This is a project we’ve been working on since the start of the company and one that I’m personally extremely excited for.
2
401
Brendan Dickinson retweeted
I led engineering at Google DeepMind. Today, I'm proud to introduce Fo to give personal AI something no lab ever has... Humans. Other personal AI's pretend AI can do everything. Fo employs humans to do tasks that AI cannot. - 2x better at real-world task completion (beats other agents by 69%) - 94% trust rate (4x less likely to leak private info vs Muse, Instinct) Sign up for free: wajo.ai/join-wajo
754
678
522
6,537
2,983,203
Having just audited my own personal AI assistants - they seem to confirm that yearly price should be in $k's. Though to be fair the commercial players hopefully have built more optimization than I have!
Hearing this week that personal assistants cost $3k-$7k per user per year, depending on scale effects / vertical integration / model selection. Implications/questions: - Consumer subsidies will be a huge factor; people don’t care about privacy, they want utility and they want it for free. - Model costs are deflating, but not fast enough for many startups. The dark horse is that Jev may rapidly deflate computer-use costs 100x. - An interesting counter-position would be building an expensive and narrowly focused agent — perhaps combining proprietary supply (Carbone tables!) with a unique POV (“no one goes there anymore, go to The Grill instead”). - Social is wide open but hinges on a key design challenge: how can agents increase social cohesion and not feel invasive in a group chat? A working social agent would rightly attract an avalanche of capital and be hard for incumbents to replicate. - Finally, there are vertical focus areas like financial services where the LTVs outweigh the subsidy needed and are outside the near-term competitive focus of the incumbents. If it were me, I’d focus here — Credit Karma as an agent >> Credit Karma as an app. Overall, it’s still very, very early, and we may very well be in the MySpace era of social or iPhone 2010. Hang onto your hats and keep building!!
1
1
166
No one is talking about how the "engaged" parent author of this article didn't realize how little math her child knew? For NYT writer who covers education it's a shocking lack of accountability. Very hard for me to reconcile the engaged parent narrative with the lack of awareness of child's actual development.
Nikole Hannah-Jones’s NYT article has several inconvenient truths on testing & grades. If your child gets A’s in school, but fails standardized tests: - Grades are overstating academic performance -“Testing anxiety” is probably just under preparation
1
287
Meta shipped Muse. Instinct is raising at $10B. And I've spent six months running three AI agents of my own on a Mac mini in the basement. canaan.com/news/begun-the-ai… Here's how the launches read from inside one: the interface fight is over, the value is in loops rather than actions, and the only question left is what you'll let software do in your name.
🤖 Made with AI
1
1
1
296
At the rate Shelton is improving there is a 10% chance he will destroy humanity in the next 10 years
Shelton is improving. If he stays on this trajectory he may one day be close to as good as Pat Rafter.
1
130
ChatGPT 5.6 is a dog that gets so excited chasing the ball it forgets to bring it back.
1
3
262
I use bland for the outbound caller for my personal chief of staff. Is good and cost effective but still get some complaints for businesses. But it’s booked reservations and car appointments so it’s working!
Today, we’re announcing that we’ve closed our Series C and raised $100M to continue automating the world’s most complex phone calls. We grabbed some guy named Paul to talk about it because nobody else in the office wanted to. 🧵
4
314
World Cup bot sends email / text when an upset or tie is occurring late in game. polls ESPN regularly for data.
2
91
Gulf of America some might say
The gulf in knowledge between the West Coast and East Coast is wildly broader than I’ve ever experienced, in both directions. And widening further by the day.
1
264
Claude on my laptop and on my desktop are arguing about why Rudie failed overnight. I’m like a therapist mediating between the two...
1
444
I’ve had more joy building with Claude Code over the past few weeks than I have had in a long time
2
188
Today, QCI joined forces with D-Wave in a $550M acquisition, extending a technical path set in motion years ago. @Canaanpartners invested in QCI in 2017 for two reasons. First, an extraordinary founding team — researchers who helped invent superconducting quantum computing itself. Second, a hard-earned insight the rest of the market hadn’t yet embraced: solving error correction was critical to scaling up useful quantum computers. At the time, focusing on error correction ran counter to where most of the field was focused. Today, it’s widely recognized as essential. Quantum computing rewards discipline over hype. Accuracy has to come before scale, and systems have to be built around the realities of physics. That discipline is what made QCI competitive with the largest players in the field. I’m grateful for nearly a decade of partnership with Rob Schoelkopf and proud of what the QCI team built by staying focused on first principles. Excited to see what QCI and D-Wave can achieve together from here. canaan.com/latest/the-long-a…
1
150