You don't have to be "technical" to be against increasing OP_RETURN. Creative people who make a living out of The Bitcoin Community can be firmly against increasing OP_RETURN because there are two aspects of the debacle, one of which should be enough to persuade. The first part of the OP_RETURN debacle is technical and the other part is ethical. People who are technical can argue both the technical and ethical sides. The Ethical side however is a sufficient stand alone argument to reject increasing OP_RETURN. The ethical argument goes like this... * Bitcoin is a financial information network only * Large OP_RETURN sizes are not required to operate it * Making other users store pornography is unethical * Using other user's gear to store files is unethical * Putting users at risk of prosecution for storing porn * Change was forced on network by unethical actors These arguments alone are sufficient to cause any ethical person to understand that the OP_RETURN fiasco is completely wrong. They don't have to regurgitate Core Logic, cite the holy White Paper or do any of the other fallacious things to argue the position. Anyone who has a wife and children also should have no trouble at all making the argument against increasing OP_RETURN; all they have to do is imagine their loved ones "inscribed" forever by some bad actor or troll. The financial incentives to be on the Core side are great. if the Ordinals and Inscribers and OP_RETURN people are also running the conferences that pay you, you are more than likely to side with them even if they are wrong and against Bitcoin. Bitcoiners are not goin to rally together to pay your mortgage or feed your family; you alone are responsible for that. So the choices are simple, but difficult. Should you side with the conference organizers that glom on to every fad, even if those fads are destructive to Bitcoin, or should you risk your livelihood to side with the plebs who have no money and will not support you even if they did? It's a tough one!