
PhD Student in Psychological Methods | Time series, networks, simulation studies & open science | @bsiepe.bsky.social
Marburg, Germany
Joined July 2020
- Tweets104
- Following265
- Followers328
- Likes804
Pinned Tweet
We reviewed 100 psych. simulation studies & find room for improvement in planning/reporting. As a remedy, we (@BartosFra, @tmorris_mrc, @BoulesteixLaure, @Daniel_W_Heck & Samuel Pawel) present ADEMP-PreReg, a sim study preregistration & reporting template
osf.io/ufgy6/
Björn Siepe retweeted
Have you run #simulation studies and encountered issues with missing results, failure, or non-convergence? In a new preprint by Samuel Pawel, @b_siepe & @annloh, we overview different approaches to address missingness and review current practices.
arxiv.org/abs/2409.18527 #Stats
Björn Siepe retweeted
New preprint by @b_siepe & WARN-D team.
We collected information on sleep, tiredness & stress with both EMA and sensor data, and try to find out to which degree these are associated contemporaneously in a large dataset (n~800) with many timepoints (t~360).
Brief 🧵
Just in time for conference season: Our paper on simulation studies in psychology was accepted at Psychological Methods! 🥳See the thread below for a summary, the updated preprint is available at doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ufgy…
We reviewed 100 psych. simulation studies & find room for improvement in planning/reporting. As a remedy, we (@BartosFra, @tmorris_mrc, @BoulesteixLaure, @Daniel_W_Heck & Samuel Pawel) present ADEMP-PreReg, a sim study preregistration & reporting template
osf.io/ufgy6/
Björn Siepe retweeted
The 1st talk in Measurement & Reasoning is “Simulation Studies for Methodological Research in Psychology” by Björn Siepe @b_siepe
mathpsych.org/presentation/1…
#iccmpsyched
Björn Siepe retweeted
Should you use Likert or VAS for EMA research?
In a new paper led by @jonashaslbeck & @AlbertoJover (last author @EatingLab), we assigned n~160 in a 2 week study to either
📏1-7 Likert or
🎚️1-100 Visual Analogue Scale
and compared results using Bayesian multilevel models.
Brief thread with results.
Comparing Likert and Visual Analogue Scales in Ecological Momentary Assessment osf.io/yt8xw/
Björn Siepe retweeted
For those of you who are into prediction, considering joining this fascinating challenge run by my colleague @Gert_Stulp_or_G !
You will be asked to predict who will have a child in the next three years based on both panel survey data and administrative data.
Björn Siepe retweeted
1/8 New tutorial preprint led by @b_siepe in which we present different descriptive statistics & data visualization techniques with the goal to better understand EMA item functioning.
Preprint: osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/dv…
Brief overview thread 🧵:
Björn Siepe retweeted
1/4 FRED is online, our free open source software to provide feedback to participants in EMA studies.
We (led by @AljoschaRimpler) programmed the software to provide feedback at scale to our ~2000 WARN-D participants. Hope it will be useful to researchers & clinicians alike!
Maybe someday I will have the courage to actually go for the pun in the title... Until then, check out our new preprint on multiverse for dynamic network/GIMME models, featuring ~750k individual networks and a shiny app to explore results
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
Björn Siepe retweeted
Thanks to @b_siepe @BartosFra and S. Pawel for involving me in this exciting project together with @tmorris_mrc and @Daniel_W_Heck on planning and reporting of simulation studies (using ADEMP) in psychological methods research!
We reviewed 100 psych. simulation studies & find room for improvement in planning/reporting. As a remedy, we (@BartosFra, @tmorris_mrc, @BoulesteixLaure, @Daniel_W_Heck & Samuel Pawel) present ADEMP-PreReg, a sim study preregistration & reporting template
osf.io/ufgy6/
We provide Monte Carlo standard error calculations and sample size planning formulas for the most common performance measures and showcase the ADEMP methodology in an example simulation study.
Björn Siepe retweeted
👇 REGISTRATION OPEN! 👇
tinyurl.com/OpenScienceDays2…
📢 #OpenScience Days Marburg, part of #BrainhackGlobal 2023!
🗓️ Dec 4-5 in 🏰 Marburg, Schulstrasse 12
🏫 mornings: short intensive talks
💻 afternoons: hands-on sessions & project work
💬 tuesday 4pm: Open Science discussion
Preprint on Bayesian estimation and testing for idiographic networks (psyarxiv.com/uwfjc/)🎉
Networks on n=1 data are popular, but they often contain a lot of noise. How can we test if networks that look different reflect more than sampling variability?
🧵below
💻Test & additional plotting functions (see below for an example on posterior uncertainty coefficient matrix) implemented in the R package 'tsnet' on GitHub (github.com/bsiepe/tsnet); all code available on OSF. Joint work with @Daniel_W_Heck.
We 1) evaluate an existing Bayesian method to estimate idiographic networks & 2) propose a novel test that evaluates the evidence that differences in edges between two models are not just due to sampling variability. We then apply estimation & test methods to empirical data.
















