#energytwitter enthusiast. personal views etc etc.

Washington, DC
Joined May 2008
We are excited to announce our 2026-2027 Policy Fellows: Former White House Special Assistant @azevin and former Heritage Foundation Deputy Director Nick Loris 🎊 Learn more: epic.uchicago.edu/news/epic-…
3
4
392
I think it probably does strike a chord for clean energy advocates to see long time ally @JesseJenkins attacked for taking a risk to do the exact thing we have to do to solve climate: figure out how energy users can buy clean rather than fossil.
It apparently strikes a chord--and a coordinated response--when you point out that people who are paid by BigTech to shill for data centers are not reliably neutral on questions central to the AI data center build out.
6
491
this is just too on point. these guys think that being naughty is enviable. They aren't trying to make your life better, they're valorizing the opposite.
1
352
I just gotta say, the amount of freakout about a random NYT op-ed AND the reaction to said op-ed versus the amount of Discourse on cancelling 5 existing energy projects that will raise consumer costs in this "affordability" moment seems... Miscalibrated
4
174
Highly recommend taking a run through Travis's thread and thinking hard about the proposal! (I will be)
We at @nrgenergy are big fans of the @ENERGY proposal that could create a more standardized, efficient process to connect large loads to the grid. Today we propose some concrete ideas to make sure it works as intended. 🧵
3
340
Generally agree with this from @AlecStapp. But framing only as misguided risk aversion understates how real oversight risk is. We must increase (smart) risk tolerance by government. But also by public/media! Need as much effort recalibrating political consequences of failure.
This is the paradox of "accountability" in government: Policymakers become so obsessed with mitigating oversight/litigation risk, they ignore the ultimate risk of not actually getting anything done.
1
231
Also, highly commend the underlying article from former CHIPS team. It mirrors much of my experience on clean energy implementation at DOE and White House.
79
.@Energy’s ANOPR could change the way large energy users (e.g. data centers) connect to the grid. This Policy Brief, by Roselle LLP and @ClementsFERC, working with @NichInstitute, unpacks a promising principle in the ANOPR: interconnection for flexible loads should be expedited.
2
9
18
4,504
Recently the Trump Admin kicked off an important new FERC rulemaking process, positing that interconnection of e.g. AI data centers should be regulated at the federal level, and that regulation should encourage flexibility of operation.
1
1
2
271
If done right, there's potential to drive new supply, enable speed-to-market, and limit ratepayer impacts. But it's complex! FERC launched a lightning-fast comment process. Today @NichInstitute released a brief on what FERC must do to get those benefits.
1
154
🚨 NEW REPORT: A major @FERC rulemaking on large load interconnection is likely imminent, and anyone who wants to understand its potential should read @NichInstitute's new brief by @MilesFarmer @ClementsFERC @azevin @Smaczni et al. nicholasinstitute.duke.edu/p…
3
24
3
105
16,624
Roselle partner @MilesFarmer outlines thoughts on DOE's start of a rulemaking process at FERC on large load interconnection. This is MUCH better than the last time the Trump Admin kicked off a rule making process at FERC (in 2017 aimed at keeping piles of coal around)
Major development🚨🚨 @ENERGY directs @FERC to consider an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on large load interconnection. THREAD highlighting noteworthy paragraphs:
1
2
6
1,556
BUT: An ANOPR is a regulatory tool to put ideas out and ask questions. DOE hasn't directed FERC to do anything, expanded FERC's jurisdiction, even proposed anything specific. It's clear where DOE wants things to go. But it will be up to FERC where to go. xitter.cf/bert_gilfoyle/status/1…
This notice from DOE directs the FERC to create standardized, fast, and non-discriminatory interconnection procedures for large loads exceeding 20 MW, particularly data centers and AI facilities. It expands FERC’s jurisdiction to large loads (not just generation), and proposes requiring the same kind of deposits, standards, and readiness to curtail or dispatch for flexible loads. It emphasizes studying “hybrid facilities” where large loads share interconnections with generation to minimize grid upgrades and expedite approvals. BESS co-located with data centers would appear to qualify as hybrid, dispatchable facilities, eligible for accelerated interconnection (possibly <= 60 days with streamlined studies) and reduced upgrade costs. The caveat is that hybrid operators must accept curtailment controls, and fund necessary network upgrades.
312
Remain extremely proud of the work the BIDEN Admin did to bring back this plant. Energy abundance.
🇺🇸HISTORY MADE: America is bringing nuclear power plants BACK TO LIFE. The Palisades will unleash 837 MW of 24/7, around the clock power—enough to fuel nearly 1 MILLION homes. Call it what it is: ENERGY DOMINANCE.
1
4
41
4,875
The Pee Wee Herman theory of politics
NEW — I interviewed DOE Sec Chris Wright at Des Moines airport in Iowa about Trump’s efforts to stifle renewables. He told me, “We’re going to get blamed” for rising power prices, which has become a midterms sleeper issue. But he says it’s Dems’ fault subscriber.politicopro.com/a…
1
274