with an affinity for toast, clouds, and slow moments staff engineer @morpho, prev @uniswap

Joined October 2012
Replying to @danielkauppi
It's this: toast, butter substance (vegan or dairy), peanut butter, sriracha, and brown sugar. Optional side pickle.
4
2
1
26
the hyperion cantos is still one of my very favorite book series. highly rec all four books! then read accelerando by charles stross
Finished Hyperion & I cannot recommend it enough. A jewel of American sci fi. Dan Simmons was a giant & I regret discovering him on the year of his passing. Even in a year where I have read Dune, Starship Troopers, Canticle for Leibowitz & Shadow of the Torturer-it stands tall!
1
1
5
473
aulneau retweeted
Just found out about recency bias. Maybe the most important bias ever
340
13,585
348
212,413
3,169,985
Decision models could damage Anthropic's business. You don't need Opus 5.5 when you can instantaneously run hundreds of natural language assertions on agent output... ... at a fraction of the cost. This approach is being streamlined via Traits. traits.sh/
2
3
2
26
2,229
it's written in @EffectTS_ btw
6
3
3
130
15,038
Hey @simonsarris, I love nocta, works great on my pixel. Have you thought about making it so we can create custom presets? I want to try and make a ricoh preset 👼 people could also share presets
1
2
6,227
Hi, I'm Felix. I'm an eng lead working on Claude. I love watching people take flight and do things they never thought possible. We often describe that as "being more ambitious" when using AI, which is tricky advice to follow. I wrote a tutorial: felixrieseberg.com/how-to-be…
395
2,473
551
23,810
5,232,427
Benefits of the CAFE stack (@Cloudflare + @alchemy_run + @foldkit + @EffectTS_) for building software with coding agents: 1. Agents invent less architecture. They focus on product-level execution within a well-defined architecture. You build faster, with more confidence. You focus on what makes your product unique. 2. Your codebase becomes semantically rich. Intent and meaning are explicit rather than left for future agents to infer. Each new agent spends fewer tokens reconstructing intent. 3. Tests read like executable behavioral specs. Expected behavior is easy to inspect, and both humans and agents can verify implementations against it. 4. Strong conventions result in remarkably legible AI-generated code. Agents do what you expect more often, with less steering. The codebase feels consistent and predictable. 5. Explicitness makes behavior clear. Unexpected magic has fewer places to hide. Diffs are easier to review. Yes, it’s more LoC, but who cares when you’re not writing it by hand?
19
20
6
227
29,902
This is amazing
I built "foldkit for the backend" on top of Alchemy. I absolutely love this style of testing.
5
12
277
aulneau retweeted
we specifically avoided using quickjs as our codemode implementation it brings in webasm complexity + forces worker threads + serialization of values back and forth if you're involved in implementing something like this check out our codemode package it is way simpler
44
14
14
756
93,226
aulneau retweeted
you should be more ambitious way more ambitious
457
1,768
142
15,369
396,747
aulneau retweeted
[email protected] brings a ton of new stuff, including broad GCP coverage, Neon becomes more than a Database, pluggable secret providers, Prisma ORM, better scheduling primitives for Durable Objects and much more. alchemy.run/blog/2026-09-29-…
1
6
1
55
9,948
aulneau retweeted
everyone is an efficient market believer until they taste the difference between the average us and japanese grape
19
7
353
18,390
My hot take from chatting to @poteto is that we should use MORE abstractions in the AI age You can use them (combined with harsh lint rules) to reduce the design space available to the agent and constrain them only to good decisions. Combined with the fact that high-leverage abstractions let you do more with less code - so, more token efficient. Plus, unwinding the damage from a bad abstraction is much cheaper with agents. This runs counter to a lot of folks thinking that agents just want to read the raw code. They can, but they're not maximally efficient that way. Be braver! Design abstractions.
263
213
108
3,917
448,373
I absolutely think machines can be conscious, and it’s not a dramatic thing to believe.
72
13
15
201
21,617
i think i'm gonna frame this one :)
Mods are absolutely insane. You can now customize Claude to work and look the way you want by just prompting it. Each person works differently, so there's no reason why everyone should have an identical Claude experience. Make Claude your own, and share mods as plugins so others can try your mods too.
36
23
1
831
53,180
@dillon_mulroy witness me, for i have become durable
1
1
40
7,088